NeurIPS 2025 论文列表

Generalized Category Discovery (GCD) aims to leverage labeled samples from known categories to cluster unlabeled data that may include both known and unknown categories. While existing methods have achieved impressive results under standard conditions, their performance often deteriorates in the presence of distribution shifts. In this paper, we explore a more realistic task: Domain-Shifted Generalized Category Discovery (DS\_GCD), where the unlabeled data includes not only unknown categories but also samples from unknown domains. To tackle this challenge, we propose a \textbf{\underline{F}}requency-guided Gene\textbf{\underline{r}}alized Cat\textbf{\underline{e}}gory Discov\textbf{\underline{e}}ry framework (FREE) that enhances the model's ability to discover categories under distributional shift by leveraging frequency-domain information. Specifically, we first propose a frequency-based domain separation strategy that partitions samples into known and unknown domains by measuring their amplitude differences. We then propose two types of frequency-domain perturbation strategies: a cross-domain strategy, which adapts to new distributions by exchanging amplitude components across domains, and an intra-domain strategy, which enhances robustness to intra-domain variations within the unknown domain. Furthermore, we extend the self-supervised contrastive objective and semantic clustering loss to better guide the training process. Finally, we introduce a clustering-difficulty-aware resampling technique to adaptively focus on harder-to-cluster categories, further enhancing model performance. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method effectively mitigates the impact of distributional shifts across various benchmark datasets and achieves superior performance in discovering both known and unknown categories.

Generative models for materials, especially inorganic crystals, hold potential to transform the theoretical prediction of novel compounds and structures. Advancement in this field depends critically on robust benchmarks and minimal, information-rich datasets that enable meaningful model evaluation. This paper critically examines common datasets and reported metrics for a crystal structure prediction task—generating the most likely structures given the chemical composition of a material. We focus on three key issues: First, materials datasets should contain unique crystal structures; for example, we show that the widely-utilized carbon-24 dataset only contains $\approx 40$% unique structures. Second, materials datasets should not be split randomly if polymorphs of many different compositions are numerous—which we find to be the case for the perov-5 and MP-20 datasets. Third, benchmarks can mislead if used uncritically, e.g., reporting a match rate metric without considering the structural variety exhibited by identical building blocks. To address these oft-overlooked issues, we introduce several fixes. We provide revised versions of the carbon-24 dataset: one with duplicates removed, one deduplicated and split by number of atoms $N$, one with enantiomorphs, and two containing only identical structures but with different unit cells. We also propose new splits for datasets with polymorphs, ensuring that polymorphs are grouped within each split subset, setting a more sensible standard for benchmarking model performance. Finally, we present METRe and cRMSE, new model evaluation metrics that can correct existing issues with the match rate metric.

Graph classification has long assumed a closed-world setting, limiting its applicability to real-world scenarios where new categories often emerge. To address this limitation, we introduce Graph-Level Novel Category Discovery (GLNCD), a new task aimed at identifying unseen graph categories without supervision from novel classes. We first adapt classical Novel Category Discovery (NCD) methods for images to the graph domain and evaluate these baseline methods on four diverse graph datasets curated for the GLNCD task. Our analysis reveals that these methods suffer a notable performance degradation compared to their image-based counterparts, due to two key challenges: (1) insufficient utilization of structural information in graph self-supervised learning (SSL), and (2) ineffective pseudo-labeling strategies based on ranking statistics (RS) that neglect graph structure. To alleviate these issues, we propose ProtoFGW-NCD, a framework consisting of two core components: ProtoFGW-CL, a novel graph SSL framework, and FGW-RS, a structure-aware pseudo-labeling method. Both components employ a differentiable Fused Gromov-Wasserstein (FGW) distance to effectively compare graphs by incorporating structural information. These components are built upon learnable prototype graphs, which enable efficient, parallel FGW-based graph comparisons and capture representative patterns within graph datasets. Experiments on four GLNCD benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of ProtoFGW-NCD.

Causal discovery for dynamical systems poses a major challenge in fields where active interventions are infeasible. Most methods used to investigate these systems and their associated benchmarks are tailored to deterministic, low-dimensional and weakly nonlinear time-series data. To address these limitations, we present *CausalDynamics*, a large-scale benchmark and extensible data generation framework to advance the structural discovery of dynamical causal models. Our benchmark consists of true causal graphs derived from thousands of both linearly and nonlinearly coupled ordinary and stochastic differential equations as well as two idealized climate models. We perform a comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art causal discovery algorithms for graph reconstruction on systems with noisy, confounded, and lagged dynamics. *CausalDynamics* consists of a plug-and-play, build-your-own coupling workflow that enables the construction of a hierarchy of physical systems. We anticipate that our framework will facilitate the development of robust causal discovery algorithms that are broadly applicable across domains while addressing their unique challenges. We provide a user-friendly implementation and documentation on https://kausable.github.io/CausalDynamics.

When language model (LM) users aim to improve the quality of its generations, it is crucial to specify concrete behavioral attributes that the model should strive to reflect. However, curating such principles across many domains, even non-exhaustively, requires a labor-intensive annotation process. To automate this process, we propose eliciting these latent attributes that guide model reasoning toward human-preferred responses by explicitly modeling them in a self-correction setting. Our approach mines new principles from the LM itself and compresses the discovered elements to an interpretable set via clustering. Specifically, we employ a form of posterior-regularized Monte Carlo Expectation-Maximization to both identify a condensed set of the most effective latent principles and teach the LM to strategically invoke them in order to intrinsically refine its responses. We demonstrate that bootstrapping our algorithm over multiple iterations enables smaller language models (7-8B parameters) to self-improve, achieving +8-10\% in AlpacaEval win-rate, an average of +0.3 on MT-Bench, and +19-23\% in principle-following win-rate on IFEval. We also show that clustering the principles yields interpretable and diverse model-generated constitutions while retaining model performance. The gains that our method achieves highlight the potential of automated, principle-driven post-training recipes toward continual self-improvement.

The ability to quickly and accurately compute properties from atomic simulations is critical for advancing a large number of applications in chemistry and materials science including drug discovery, energy storage, and semiconductor manufacturing. To address this need, we present a family of Universal Models for Atoms (UMA), designed to push the frontier of speed, accuracy, and generalization. UMA models are trained on half a billion unique 3D atomic structures (the largest training runs to date) by compiling data across multiple chemical domains, e.g. molecules, materials, and catalysts. We develop empirical scaling laws to help understand how to increase model capacity alongside dataset size to achieve the best accuracy. The UMA small and medium models utilize a novel architectural design we refer to as mixture of linear experts that enables increasing model capacity without sacrificing speed. For example, UMA-medium has 1.4B parameters but only $\sim$50M active parameters per atomic structure. We evaluate UMA models on a diverse set of applications across multiple domains and find that, remarkably, a single model without any fine-tuning can perform similarly or better than specialized models. We are releasing the UMA code, weights, and associated data to accelerate computational workflows and enable the community to build increasingly capable AI models.

Federated Generalized Category Discovery (Fed-GCD) requires a global model to classify seen classes and discover novel classes when data are siloed across heterogeneous clients. Existing GCD work often makes unrealistic assumptions, such as the need for prior knowledge of the number of novel classes or the assumption of uniform class distribution. We present Federated Local Prior Alignment (FedLPA), which eliminates these unrealistic assumptions by grounding learning in client-local structure and aligning predictions to client-local priors. Each client builds a similarity graph refined with reliable seen-class signals and discovers client-specific concepts and prototypes via Infomap. Leveraging the discovered concept structures, we introduce Local Prior Alignment (LPA): a self-distillation loss that matches the batch-mean prediction to an empirical prior computed from current concept assignments. The iterative process of local structure discovery and dynamic prior adaptation enables robust generalized category discovery under severe data heterogeneity. Our framework significantly outperforms existing federated generalized category discovery approaches on fine-grained and standard benchmarks, as demonstrated by extensive experimental results.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in automating scientific hypothesis generation, yet existing approaches primarily yield coarse-grained hypotheses lacking critical methodological and experimental details. We introduce and formally define the new task of fine-grained scientific hypothesis discovery, which entails generating detailed, experimentally actionable hypotheses from coarse initial research directions. We frame this as a combinatorial optimization problem and investigate the upper limits of LLMs' capacity to solve it when maximally leveraged. Specifically, we explore four foundational questions: (1) how to best harness an LLM's internal heuristics to formulate the fine-grained hypothesis it itself would judge as the most promising among all the possible hypotheses it might generate, based on its own internal scoring-thus defining a latent reward landscape over the hypothesis space; (2) whether such LLM-judged better hypotheses exhibit stronger alignment with ground-truth hypotheses; (3) whether shaping the reward landscape using an ensemble of diverse LLMs of similar capacity yields better outcomes than defining it with repeated instances of the strongest LLM among them; and (4) whether an ensemble of identical LLMs provides a more reliable reward landscape than a single LLM. To address these questions, we propose a hierarchical search method that incrementally proposes and integrates details into the hypothesis, progressing from general concepts to specific experimental configurations. We show that this hierarchical process smooths the reward landscape and enables more effective optimization. Empirical evaluations on a new benchmark of expert-annotated fine-grained hypotheses from recent literature show that our method consistently outperforms strong baselines.

Foundation models (FMs), such as GPT-4 and AlphaFold, are reshaping the landscape of scientific research. Beyond accelerating tasks such as hypothesis generation, experimental design, and result interpretation, they prompt a more fundamental question: Are FMs merely enhancing existing scientific methodologies, or are they redefining the way science is conducted? In this paper, we argue that FMs are catalyzing a transition toward a new scientific paradigm. We introduce a three-stage framework to describe this evolution: (1) Meta-Scientific Integration, where FMs enhance workflows within traditional paradigms; (2) Hybrid Human-AI Co-Creation, where FMs become active collaborators in problem formulation, reasoning, and discovery; and (3) Autonomous Scientific Discovery, where FMs operate as independent agents capable of generating new scientific knowledge with minimal human intervention. Through this lens, we review current applications and emerging capabilities of FMs across existing scientific paradigms. We further identify risks and future directions for FM-enabled scientific discovery. This position paper aims to support the scientific community in understanding the transformative role of FMs and to foster reflection on the future of scientific discovery.

Large language model-assisted Evolutionary Search (LES) has emerged as a promising approach for Automated Algorithm Discovery (AAD). While many evolutionary search strategies have been developed for classic optimization problems, LES operates in abstract language spaces, presenting unique challenges for applying these strategies effectively. To address this, we propose a general LES framework that incorporates feature-assisted niche construction within abstract search spaces, enabling the seamless integration of niche-based search strategies from evolutionary computation. Building on this framework, we introduce PartEvo, an LES method that combines niche collaborative search and advanced prompting strategies to improve algorithm discovery efficiency. Experiments on both synthetic and real-world optimization problems show that PartEvo outperforms human-designed baselines and surpasses prior LES methods, such as Eoh and Funsearch. In particular, on resource scheduling tasks, PartEvo generates meta-heuristics with low design costs, achieving up to 90.1\% performance improvement over widely-used baseline algorithms, highlighting its potential for real-world applications.

Scientific discovery across diverse fields increasingly grapples with datasets exhibiting pathological long-tailed distributions: a few common phenomena overshadow a multitude of rare yet scientifically critical instances. Unlike standard benchmarks, these scientific datasets often feature extreme imbalance coupled with a modest number of classes and limited overall sample volume, rendering existing long-tailed recognition (LTR) techniques ineffective. Such methods, biased by majority classes or prone to overfitting on scarce tail data, frequently fail to identify the very instances—novel materials, rare disease biomarkers, faint astronomical signals—that drive scientific breakthroughs. This paper introduces a novel, end-to-end framework explicitly designed to address pathological long-tailed recognition in scientific contexts. Our approach synergizes a Balanced Supervised Contrastive Learning (B-SCL) mechanism, which enhances the representation of tail classes by dynamically re-weighting their contributions, with a Smooth Objective Regularization (SOR) strategy that manages the inherent tension between tail-class focus and overall classification performance. We introduce and analyze the real-world ZincFluor chemical dataset ($\mathcal{T}=137.54$) and synthetic benchmarks with controllable extreme imbalances (CIFAR-LT variants). Extensive evaluations demonstrate our method's superior ability to decipher these extremes. Notably, on ZincFluor, our approach achieves a Tail Top-2 accuracy of $66.84\%$, significantly outperforming existing techniques. On CIFAR-10-LT with an imbalance ratio of $1000$ ($\mathcal{T}=100$), our method achieves a tail-class accuracy of $38.99\%$, substantially leading the next best. These results underscore our framework's potential to unlock novel insights from complex, imbalanced scientific datasets, thereby accelerating discovery.

Unsupervised skill discovery in reinforcement learning (RL) aims to learn diverse behaviors without relying on external rewards. However, current methods often overlook the periodic nature of learned skills, focusing instead on increasing the mutual dependency between states and skills or maximizing the distance traveled in latent space. Considering that many robotic tasks—particularly those involving locomotion—require periodic behaviors across varying timescales, the ability to discover diverse periodic skills is essential. Motivated by this, we propose Periodic Skill Discovery (PSD), a framework that discovers periodic behaviors in an unsupervised manner. The key idea of PSD is to train an encoder that maps states to a circular latent space, thereby naturally encoding periodicity in the latent representation. By capturing temporal distance, PSD can effectively learn skills with diverse periods in complex robotic tasks, even with pixel-based observations. We further show that these learned skills achieve high performance on downstream tasks such as hurdling. Moreover, integrating PSD with an existing skill discovery method offers more diverse behaviors, thus broadening the agent’s repertoire. Our code and demos are available at https://jonghaepark.github.io/psd

The success of computer vision tasks is mainly attributed to the architectural design of neural networks. This highlights the need to automatically design high-performance architectures via Neural Architecture Search (NAS). To accelerate the search process, training-free NAS is proposed, which aims to search high-performance architectures at initialization via zero-cost proxies (ZCPs). However, existing zero-cost proxies heavily rely on manual design, which is often labor-intensive and requires extensive expert knowledge. In addition, these crafted proxies often suffer from poor correlation with final model performance and high computational complexity, severely limiting NAS efficiency in real-world applications. To address those issues, this paper proposes a novel Large Language Models (LLMs)-driven $\underline{A}$utomatic $\underline{P}$roxy $\underline{D}$iscovery ($\textbf{APD}$) framework, which revolutionizes the design paradigm of ZCPs by leveraging LLMs to automatically discover optimal ZCPs for Training-Free NAS. Moreover, we utilize actor-critic based reinforcement learning to optimize prompts, enabling to generate better ZCPs in the next generation. We conduct extensive experiments on mainstream NAS benchmarks, demonstrating APD excels in both performance and efficiency. Besides, we firmly believe that our APD will dramatically benefit the deep learning community through providing novel paradigm of design algorithms via LLMs.

Signed networks, where edges are labeled as positive or negative to represent friendly or antagonistic interactions, offer a natural framework for analyzing polarization, trust, and conflict in social systems. Detecting meaningful group structures in such networks is crucial for understanding online discourse, political divisions, and trust dynamics. A key challenge is to identify communities that are internally cohesive and externally antagonistic, while allowing for neutral or unaligned vertices. In this paper, we propose a method for identifying $k$ polarized communities that addresses a major limitation of prior methods: their tendency to produce highly size-imbalanced solutions. We introduce a novel optimization objective that avoids such imbalance. In addition, it is well known that approximation algorithms based on *local search* are highly effective for clustering signed networks when neutral vertices are not allowed. We build on this idea and design the first local search algorithm that extends to the setting with neutral vertices while scaling to large networks. By connecting our approach to block-coordinate Frank-Wolfe optimization, we prove a linear convergence rate, enabled by the structure of our objective. Experiments on real-world and synthetic datasets demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in solution quality, while remaining competitive in computational efficiency.