ICML 2026 论文列表

The scalability of world models is currently bottlenecked by the scarcity of action annotations. While self-supervised latent action learning offers a potential solution, existing single-view paradigms—relying on information bottlenecks or Vector Quantization (VQ)—often conflate superficial 2D pixel displacements with the underlying physical-spatial dynamics of an action. Consequently, these methods remain highly susceptible to view-dependent noise, such as camera shake. We introduce **MuCoLA** (**Mu**lti-view **Co**nsistent **L**atent **A**ction learning), a framework that learns robust, view-invariant action representations by enforcing semantic consistency across synchronized video streams. MuCoLA utilizes a Student-Teacher network with DINO-style self-distillation to align action distributions across viewpoints, effectively filtering high-frequency visual noise while preserving motion semantics. Theoretical analysis reveals that our multi-view objective functions as a spectral filter, isolating agent dynamics from environmental nuisances. Empirically, MuCoLA significantly outperforms baselines in action regression, video reconstruction, and downstream visual control tasks. Furthermore, we demonstrate that MuCoLA exhibits favorable scaling properties with respect to model capacity and data volume, paving the way for large-scale action-free world modeling.

LLM-based multi-agent embodied planning remains impractical due to prohibitively high execution latency. We identify failed actions as the dominant bottleneck, stemming from two core challenges: inaccurate state tracking under partial observability and inefficient coordination that produces redundant or conflicting actions. We introduce Mosaic, a runtime-efficient multi-agent planning framework that addresses both challenges. Mosaic maintains accurate yet lightweight state tracking through agent-centric semantic memory that stores objects in relative coordinates, enabling geometric transformations and coordination. It ensures efficient coordination through Integer Linear Programming that allocates actions at every planning step, enforcing physical feasibility and inter-agent coordination constraints. Across AI2-THOR and search-and-rescue benchmarks, Mosaic achieves 27–32% faster execution, 30–33% fewer LLM calls, 25–31% fewer steps, and 4–10% points higher success rates. These results demonstrate that efficient memory and constraint-guided coordination are critical for scalable, low-latency multi-agent planning.

Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly support culturally sensitive decision making, yet often exhibit misalignment due to skewed pretraining data and the absence of structured value representations. Existing methods can steer outputs, but often lack demographic grounding and treat values as independent, unstructured signals, reducing consistency and interpretability. We propose OG-MAR, an Ontology-Guided Multi-Agent Reasoning framework. OG-MAR summarizes respondent-specific values from the World Values Survey (WVS) and constructs a global cultural ontology by eliciting relations over a fixed taxonomy via competency questions. At inference time, it retrieves ontology-consistent relations and demographically similar profiles to instantiate multiple value-persona agents, whose outputs are synthesized by a judgment agent that enforces ontology consistency and demographic proximity. Experiments on regional social-survey benchmarks across four LLM backbones show that OG-MAR improves cultural alignment and robustness over competitive baselines, while producing more transparent reasoning traces.

While existing text-to-speech (TTS) models exhibit high expressiveness, fine-grained control over composite instructions remains challenging due to the structural mismatch between discrete textual intents and continuous acoustic realizations. Inspired by human cognitive decoupling, we introduce AgentSteerTTS, a multi-agent closed-loop framework designed for intent-faithful expressive control of composite instructions. First, in our framework, an adversarial disentanglement module mitigates speaker-emotion leakage through gradient reversal and cross-covariance regularization. Next, a Dual-Stream Anchoring Controller grounds abstract intents using a large-scale acoustic prototype library: a Retrieval Agent selects expressive anchors, while a Synthesis Agent fuses them into continuous control vectors via gated attention. Finally, a Fast–Slow Feedback Agent refines output intensity through latent gradient correction and resolves semantic–acoustic mismatches using high-level perceptual critique. Experiments on a composite-instruction benchmark and public test sets show that AgentSteerTTS yields consistent and significant improvements to the baselines, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed method. Our code and models will be released.

In many multi-agent systems, agents interact repeatedly and are expected to settle into stable, rational behavior over time. Yet in practice, behavior often drifts, and detecting such deviations in real time remains an open challenge. We introduce a sequential testing framework that monitors whether observed play is consistent with a benchmark of strategic behavior, without assuming a fixed sample size. Our approach builds on the e-value framework for safe anytime-valid inference: by "betting" against the benchmark, we construct a test supermartingale that accumulates evidence whenever observed payoffs systematically violate the expected conditions. For repeated normal-form games, we take equilibrium as the benchmark, yielding a statistically sound, interpretable measure of departure from equilibrium that can be monitored online; our framework unifies the treatment of Nash, correlated, and coarse correlated equilibria, offering finite-time guarantees and a detailed analysis of detection times. We also leverage Benjamini-Hochberg-type procedures to increase detection power in large games while rigorously controlling the false discovery rate. Finally, we extend our method to stochastic games, verifying online whether observed trajectories adhere to a specified target policy, such as a computed equilibrium, broadening the framework's applicability to dynamic, state-dependent settings.

We present a differentiable optimization framework for multi-agent coordination. An input is decomposed into overlapping local views, each processed by an agent that solves a convex subproblem parameterized by a neural encoder. Agents coordinate through the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) with inter-agent constraints specified by a cellular sheaf. The sheaf specifies which aspects of neighboring solutions must agree, allowing for heterogeneous notions of global consensus. Backpropagating through the unrolled optimization jointly trains all components of the multi-agent system. We evaluate on maze pathfinding, image classification, and Sudoku, where agents with individually insufficient local views learn to coordinate to produce correct global outputs. On MNIST, the local-view decomposition yields improved robustness to distribution shifts relative to a standard CNN. On Sudoku, the optimization-derived structure yields markedly higher solve rates than parameter-matched MPNN baselines. Finally, the ADMM structure exposes distinct primal, consensus, and dual state variables, opening the coordination dynamics to direct analysis and intervention—a property unavailable in standard message-passing architectures.

The Platonic Representation Hypothesis suggests that independently trained neural networks converge to increasingly similar latent spaces. However, current strategies for mapping these representations are inherently pairwise, scaling quadratically with the number of models and failing to yield a consistent global reference. In this paper, we study the alignment of $M \ge 3$ models. We first adapt Generalized Procrustes Analysis (GPA) to construct a shared orthogonal universe that preserves the internal geometry essential for tasks like model stitching. We then show that strict isometric alignment is suboptimal for retrieval, where agreement-maximizing methods like Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) typically prevail. To bridge this gap, we finally propose Geometry-Corrected Procrustes Alignment (GCPA), which establishes a robust GPA-based universe followed by a post-hoc correction for directional mismatch. Extensive experiments demonstrate that GCPA consistently improves any-to-any retrieval while retaining a practical shared reference space.

Dynamic graphs are pervasive in real-world systems, but their tightly entangled spatiotemporal evolution causes significant modeling challenges. Existing Dynamic Graph Neural Networks (DGNNs) lack a principled framework for systematically decoupling this multi-domain entanglement, raising two key problems: (i) representation drift caused by structural incompleteness, and (ii) signal distortion amplified by noise perturbation. These problems can accumulate over time, forming temporal redundancy that weakens robustness of DGNNs. In view of these, we propose DeR-Mamba(Decoupling for Robust Mamba), a multi-domain decoupling framework for robust DGNNs. To address (i), we develop the Multi-Particle Kernel Kalman observation field (MP-K$^2$alman), which achieves spatial decoupling by sampling latent evolution paths in kernel subspaces and performing Kalman-style updates to estimate structural states. To address (ii), we design the Adversarial-aware Frequency Decoupling Module (AFDM), which performs frequency-domain decoupling and dynamic cross-frequency modulation to purify spectral signals. Finally, a self-consistent dynamic graph state-space system performs temporal decoupling to control redundancy, suppressing residual disturbances through discretized cross-time modeling and selective snapshot scanning. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets with adversarial attacks validate its superior robustness.

Credit assignment is a core challenge in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), especially in large-scale systems with structured, local interactions. Graph-based Markov decision processes (GMDPs) capture such settings via an influence graph, but standard critics are poorly aligned with this structure: global value functions provide weak per-agent learning signals, while existing local constructions can be difficult to estimate and ill-behaved in infinite-horizon settings. We introduce the Diffusion Value Function (DVF), a factored value function for GMDPs that assigns to each agent a value component by diffusing rewards over the influence graph with temporal discounting and spatial attenuation. We show that DVF is well-defined, admits a Bellman fixed point, and decomposes the global discounted value via an averaging property. DVF can be used as a drop-in critic in standard RL algorithms and estimated scalably with graph neural networks. Building on DVF, we propose Diffusion A2C (DA2C) and a sparse message-passing actor, Learned DropEdge GNN (LD-GNN), for learning decentralised algorithms under communication costs. Across the firefighting benchmark and three distributed computation tasks (vector graph colouring and two transmit power optimisation problems), DA2C consistently outperforms local and global critic baselines, improving average reward by up to 11%.

In this work, we extend distributional reinforcement learning (RL) to develop a risk-sensitive multi-objective RL framework, with applications to domains such as finance and robotics. We achieve this by adopting vector-risk measures and approximating them via Knothe-Rosenblatt (KR) quantile regression. This approach directly extends the IQN framework to the multi-objective setting, aligns with the axiomatic definition of vector-risk measures, and guarantees that critics converge under the distributional Bellman operator. To mitigate the artificial ordering imposed by the KR map, we employ a transformer architecture without positional encoding, and introduce MO-TQC for training stability. We demonstrate improved performance on MO-Gymnasium benchmarks and use our framework to study risk-sensitive policies in multi-objective tasks.

Spiking neural networks (SNNs) promise energy-efficient inference, yet on static vision benchmarks, they often trail matched ANNs under short simulation horizons. Under a matched-backbone and matched-budget protocol without extra tricks, we find that this ANN-SNN accuracy gap is consistently smaller on representative continuous 1D temporal signal classification benchmarks than on image benchmarks. We attribute this to a mechanism-level mismatch: leaky integration naturally implements causal evidence accumulation over time for native temporal signals, while static images typically require amplitude-to-spike encoding, whose finite-window estimation error becomes non-negligible at short horizons. Guided by this view, we propose a plug-and-play framework that combines Multi-Scale Temporal Encoding (MTE) and Sparsity-Regularized Transform Encoding (STE). MTE replaces naive repetition with multi-scale streams and allocates scale-aligned multi-bit integer spikes to increase per-step information density, and STE replaces a controllable fraction of LIF units with a transform-encoding neuron trained using auxiliary reconstruction and sparsity regularization, with a synthesis branch used only during training. Across diverse 1D datasets and backbone families, MTE$\times$STE consistently improves the accuracy-efficiency trade-off over standard SNN baselines and matches or occasionally surpasses ANN counterparts.

Transformers pretrained via next token prediction learn to factor their world into parts, representing these factors in orthogonal subspaces of the residual stream. We formalize two representational hypotheses: (1) a representation in the product space of all factors, whose dimension grows exponentially with the number of parts, or (2) a factored representation in orthogonal subspaces, whose dimension grows linearly. Both track context-induced uncertainty over the latent parts, but the factored representation sacrifices fidelity when factors are not conditionally independent. We derive precise predictions about the geometric structure of activations for each, including the number of subspaces, their dimensionality, and the arrangement of context embeddings within them. We test between these hypotheses on transformers trained on synthetic processes with known latent structure. When factors are conditionally independent, models learn factored representations; when noise or dependencies break this structure, models gradually expand their effective dimensionality over training to recover fidelity. This provides a principled explanation for why transformers decompose the world into parts, and suggests that interpretable low dimensional structure may persist even in models trained on complex data.

Lagrangian-based methodologies are one of the fundamental paradigms of safe reinforcement learning (RL) for constrained Markov decision processes, particularly when dealing with multi-constraint cases. While the specific details of the methodologies may differ, with some using a single estimator for the overall mixed penalty term of the constraints and others using separate estimators for the constraints, the fundamental question of the theoretical validity of the methodologies has remained largely unexplored. The present paper performs the first theoretical analysis of the methodologies and proves that the use of the mixed critic structure leads to the presence of a bias due to the target drift of the Lagrange multipliers. On the other hand, the use of the dedicated critic structure, where separate critics are used for the reward function and the constraint functions, does not suffer from this bias. The theoretical analysis is supported with experiments on a realistic power system environment with multiple constraints, where the dedicated critic structure succeeds in satisfying the constraints, whereas the mixed critic structure fails.

Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning (MORL) extends standard RL by optimizing policies with respect to multiple, often conflicting, objectives. While max-min MORL has emerged as an effective approach for promoting fairness, its applicability remains limited, particularly when constraints must be incorporated. In this paper, we propose a MORL framework that integrates the max-min criterion with explicit constraint satisfaction. We establish a theoretical foundation for the proposed framework and validate the resulting algorithm through convergence analysis and experiments in tabular settings. We further demonstrate the practical relevance of our approach in simulated building thermal control, multi-objective locomotion control, and greenhouse-gas-emission-aware traffic management. Across these domains, our method effectively balances fairness and constraint satisfaction in multi-objective decision-making.

Dynamic Data selection aims to accelerate training by prioritizing informative samples during online training. However, existing methods typically rely on task-specific handcrafted metrics or static/snapshot-based criteria to estimate sample importance, limiting scalability across learning paradigms and making it difficult to capture the evolving utility of data throughout training. To address this challenge, we propose Data Agent, an end-to-end dynamic data selection framework that formulates data selection as a training-aware sequential decision-making problem. The agent learns a sample-wise selection policy that co-evolves with model optimization, guided by a composite reward that integrates loss-based difficulty and confidence-based uncertainty signals. The reward signals capture complementary objectives of optimization impact and information gain, together with a tuning-free adaptive weighting mechanism that balances these signals over training. Extensive experiments across a wide range of datasets and architectures demonstrate that Data Agent consistently accelerates training while preserving or improving performance, e.g., reducing costs by over 50\% on ImageNet-1k and MMLU with lossless performance. Moreover, its dataset-agnostic formulation and modular reward make it plug-and-play across tasks and scenarios, e.g., robustness to noisy datasets, highlighting its potential in real-world scenarios. Code is available at https://github.com/Jackbrocp/Data-Agent.

*Debate*, where AI agents argue opposing positions, has emerged as a key approach to scalable oversight. However, debate faces a fundamental tension: models are incentivized to be persuasive to the judge, which may not always align with epistemic honesty. In this work, we propose an alternative paradigm: *disagreement resolution*, which reframes the interaction mechanism from adversarial debate to collaborative truth seeking. Drawing on principles from human mediation and conflict resolution, where mediators facilitate dialogue to help disputing parties reach consensus rather than adjudicating between them, we design an automated pipeline that adapts these strategies to AI oversight. Unlike standard debate where models argue for fixed positions, our pipeline directs models to collaboratively identify points of disagreement, examine the evidence for conflicting claims, and converge toward consensus or isolate the specific ''crux'' of their disagreement. We find that Disagreement Resolution consistently helps non-expert models identify the truth, achieving 62.1\% judging accuracy compared to 49.2\% for standard debate. Our results provide encouraging empirical evidence for rethinking the scalable oversight protocol from adversarial persuasion to collaborative truth-seeking.

Small language models are viewed as a promising, cost-effective approach to agentic AI, yet how their performance scales with task complexity remains unclear. While smaller agents match larger ones on simple tasks, it is unknown when large models become necessary and how to better leverage small agents. In this work, we show that small agents fail to scale with task complexity on deep search and coding tasks, and introduce *Strategy Auctions for Workload Efficiency* (*SALE*), a framework inspired by freelancer marketplaces. In SALE, agents bid with strategic plans scored by a cost–value mechanism and refined via shared auction memory, enabling per-task routing and continual self-improvement without training a router. On average, SALE reduces reliance on the largest agent by 52%, lowers overall cost by 35%, and consistently improves pass@1 with only a negligible token overhead. In contrast, established routers either underperform the largest agent or fail to reduce cost. These results suggest that small agents can be effectively “scaled up” through coordinated allocation and test-time self-improvement. More broadly, they motivate a systems-level view of agentic AI in which gains come less from ever-larger individual models and more from market-inspired coordination mechanisms that organize heterogeneous agents into efficient, adaptive ecosystems.

Explainability for graph neural networks (GNNs) aims to unveil the complex decision logic of learned models by identifying the most influential structures in the input graph, thereby improving transparency and trustworthiness. Existing post-hoc explainers typically extract a sparse key subgraph at a single scale as the explanation. However, a single-scale view often fails to capture multi-level semantics, and the optimization procedure may degenerate into a local search that is sensitive to initialization and noise, leading to unstable explanations and compromising their reliability. To address these issues, we propose MSExplainer, a multi-scale explainer for GNNs. MSExplainer couples multi-scale subgraph consistency guidance with single-scale adaptive subgraph learning under a parameter-sharing design. It simultaneously extracts multi-scale key subgraphs and complementary subgraphs, yielding a hierarchical decomposition of the original graph that covers semantics at different granularities and improves the stability of subgraph extraction. Experiments on six benchmark datasets show that MSExplainer generally outperforms prior methods in explanation accuracy and fidelity. Moreover, we theoretically prove the upper bound advantage of the multi-scale strategy in representation consistency, and derive that it achieves the same-order computational complexity as single-scale methods under the parameter-sharing mechanism, thus ensuring the high fidelity of key subgraphs while maintaining computational efficiency.

Multi-instance partial-label learning (MIPL) is a recently proposed dual weakly supervised learning framework where each training bag is annotated with a candidate label set containing one true label and several false positives. The key challange of MIPL problem is that the relations between the key instances and the ground-truth labels are much more covered due to the false positive labels. Existing methods usually rely on the model's own predictions and roughly aggregate instance features according to the learned attention weights, which is easily misled by false positives and lets key instances be overlooked. Here, we propose Average Gradient Outer Product based Multi-instance Partial-Label Learning~(AGOPMIPL) method, where the average gradient outer product (AGOP) is directly calculated from the bag-level features and the model prediction, then it is integrated in an attention module to amplify discriminative feature directions and thereby helps key-instance identification. Moreover, the feature prototypes and a progressive disambiguation strategy are introduced to further suppress noisy candidates. The experimental studies on four MIPL benchmarks and the real-world \textsf{CRC-MIPL} dataset are performed and AGOPMIPL consistently outperforms five state-of-the-art baselines, with up to $25.9\%$ relative gain on \textsf{CRC-MIPL-KMeansSeg}.