ICML 2026 论文列表

Communication is a key component in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) for mitigating partial observability, yet prior approaches often rely on inefficient information exchange or fail to transmit sufficient state information. To address this, we propose LLM-driven Multi-Agent Communication (LMAC), which leverages an LLM's reasoning capability to design a communication protocol that enables all agents to reconstruct the underlying state as accurately and uniformly as possible. LMAC iteratively refines the protocol using an explicit state-awareness criterion, improving state recovery while narrowing differences in agents' knowledge. Experiments on diverse MARL benchmarks show that LMAC improves state reconstruction across agents and yields substantial performance gains over prior communication baselines.

Multi-person human mesh recovery (HMR) from a single image is inherently ill-posed, as multiple 3D poses can produce identical 2D projections due to depth ambiguity. Most existing methods implicitly regress 3D translation from image features, which often leads to unreliable depth estimation. To address this issue, we propose a depth-guided multi-person HMR framework that explicitly models instance-level depth cues and integrates them into mesh recovery. Specifically, we first introduce an instance-aware depth estimator to predict per-person pelvis depths that serve as explicit 3D anchors, thereby decoupling depth estimation from mesh regression. Then, we design a geometry-anchored refinement decoder that uses these anchors to initialize each instance within a plausible 3D neighborhood, stabilizing mesh refinement under joint 2D-3D supervision. Finally, we adopt a single-stage joint training strategy to coordinate depth estimation and mesh recovery in a unified framework. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in both mesh reconstruction accuracy and depth ordering.

E-commerce platforms have begun recruiting crowdsourced jurors to adjudicate massive volumes of transaction disputes. Unlike formal legal judgment, E-commerce dispute verdicts require grounding pivotal clues from redundant, multi-round, multimodal evidence and making decisions under flexible platform-specific conventions. These characteristics render existing methods insufficient for this scenario. To bridge this gap, we introduce a pioneering task, *E-commerce Dispute Verdicts* (EDV), and present *VerdictBench*, a multimodal benchmark comprising 6,000 real-world cases designed to reflect crowdsourced jury decisions. Building upon this, we propose *CyberJurors*, a multi-agent framework to clarify the dispute logic and regulate the verdict process. At the individual level, *Individual Verdict Chain-of-Thought* decomposes the EDV task into four structured reasoning stages, enabling fine-grained clue perception and clarifying causal logic between pivotal clues and the dispute focus. At the collective level, *Jury Consensus Verdict* simulates multi-round discussion and voting among jurors, while incorporating verdict precedents to mitigate cognitive biases toward either disputant. Experiments on *VerdictBench* show that *CyberJurors* outperforms state-of-the-art LLMs, MLLMs, and court simulators, while achieving stronger alignment with real-world jury voting patterns. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/YanhuiS/CyberJurors and https://huggingface.co/datasets/piggi/VerdictBench.

Follow the regularized leader (FTRL) is the premier algorithm for online optimization. However, despite decades of research on its convergence in constrained optimization---and potential games in particular---its behavior remained hitherto poorly understood. In this paper, we establish that FTRL can take exponential time to converge to a Nash equilibrium in two-player potential games for any (permutation-invariant) regularizer and potentially vanishing learning rate. By known equivalences, this translates to an exponential lower bound for certain mirror descent counterparts, most notably multiplicative weights update. On the positive side, we establish the potential property for FTRL and obtain an exponential upper bound $\exp(O_{\epsilon}(1/\epsilon^2))$ for any no-regret dynamics executed in a lazy, alternating fashion, matching our lower bound up to factors in the exponent. Finally, in multi-player potential games, we show that fictitious play---the extreme version of FTRL---can take doubly exponential time to reach a Nash equilibrium. This constitutes an exponentially stronger lower bound for the foundational learning algorithm in games.

LLM-based multi-agent simulations are increasingly adopted across application domains, but remain difficult to scale due to GPU memory pressure. Each agent maintains private GPU-resident states, including models, prefix caches, and adapters, which quickly exhaust device memory as the agent count grows. We identify two key properties of these workloads: sparse agent activation and an estimable agent invocation order. Based on an analysis of representative workload classes, we introduce invocation distance, a unified abstraction that estimates the relative order in which agents will issue future LLM requests. Leveraging this abstraction, we present ScaleSim, a memory-efficient LLM serving system for large-scale multi-agent simulations. ScaleSim enables proactive prefetching and priority-based eviction, supports diverse agent-specific memory through a modular interface, and achieves up to 1.74$\times$ speedup over SGLang on simulation benchmarks. ScaleSim's source code is available at https://github.com/PanZaifeng/KVFlow.

The emergence of large language model (LLM)-based agents has significantly advanced the development of autonomous machine learning (ML) engineering. However, the dominant prompt-based paradigm exhibits limitations: smaller models lack the capacity to learn from execution trajectories for generalization, while large proprietary models incur high computational overhead, restricting accessibility and scalability. Focusing on this, for the first time, we explore the paradigm of learning-based agentic ML, where an LLM agent learns through interactive experimentation on ML tasks using online reinforcement learning (RL). To realize this, we propose a novel agentic ML training framework with three key components: (1) exploration-enriched fine-tuning, which enables LLM agents to generate diverse actions for enhanced RL exploration; (2) step-wise RL, which enables training on a single action step, accelerating experience collection and improving training efficiency; (3) an agentic ML-specific reward module, which unifies varied ML feedback signals into consistent rewards for RL optimization. Leveraging this framework, we train ML-Agent, driven by a 7B-sized Qwen-2.5 LLM for autonomous ML. Despite training on only 9 ML tasks, our 7B-sized ML-Agent achieves comparable performance to agents using much larger proprietary LLMs (e.g., GPT-5) but at significantly lower computational cost, demonstrating strong performance and cross-task generalization.

Automating end-to-end GPU kernel generation with Large Language Models (LLMs) faces a critical tension between global performance and exploration efficiency. We present LEGO, a hierarchical framework that resolves this trade-off via a parallel multi-agent search over a recursive AND-OR FusionTree. LEGO synergizes two complementary flows: Top-Down Construction decomposes complex graphs into valid, context-isolated sub-problems to guarantee correctness and enable parallel exploration, while Bottom-Up Mutation speculatively fuses verified sub-plans to recover global locality for peak performance. This bi-directional mechanism effectively prunes the search space to avoid repetitive unguided sampling, while naturally parallelizing exploration and enabling the discovery of sophisticated fusion strategies. Evaluations demonstrate that LEGO achieves 2.18×–13.48× speedups over PyTorch Eager and, compared to monolithic baselines, reduces end-to-end exploration time by up to 2.47× and token consumption by up to 7×, across diverse end-to-end models.

Self-evolving large language model (LLM) agents continually improve by accumulating and reusing past experience, yet it remains unclear whether they faithfully rely on that experience to guide their behavior. We present the first systematic investigation of \emph{experience faithfulness}—the causal dependence of an agent's decisions on the experience it is given—in self-evolving LLM agents. Using controlled causal interventions on both raw and condensed forms of experience, we comprehensively evaluate four representative frameworks across 13 LLM backbones and 9 environments. Our analysis uncovers a striking asymmetry: while agents consistently depend on raw experience, they often disregard or misinterpret condensed experience, even when it is the only experience provided. This gap persists across single- and multi-agent configurations and across backbone scales. We trace its underlying causes to three factors: the semantic limitations of condensed content, internal processing biases that suppress experience, and task regimes where pretrained priors already suffice. These findings challenge prevailing assumptions about self-evolving methods and underscore the need for more faithful and reliable approaches to experience integration.

The design of environments plays a critical role in shaping the development and evaluation of cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) algorithms. While existing benchmarks highlight critical challenges, they often lack the modularity required to design custom evaluation scenarios. We introduce the Totally Accelerated Battle Simulator in JAX (TABX), a high-throughput sandbox designed for reconfigurable multi-agent tasks. TABX provides granular control over environmental parameters, permitting a systematic investigation into emergent agent behaviors and algorithmic trade-offs across a diverse spectrum of task complexities. Leveraging JAX for hardware-accelerated execution on GPUs, TABX enables massive parallelization and significantly reduces computational overhead. By providing a fast, extensible, and easily customized framework, TABX facilitates the study of MARL agents in complex structured domains and serves as a scalable foundation for future research. Our code is available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/TABX-00CA.

The rapid expansion of remote sensing technology has generated massive amounts of unlabeled multi-view data distributed across different institutions. Analyzing this data presents significant challenges, as centralized processing incurs prohibitive communication costs and raises data privacy concerns. To address these issues, this paper proposes a novel deep federated multi-view clustering (MVC) framework tailored for remote sensing data. Unlike existing methods that transmit sensitive data features, our approach shares only privatized prototypes masked with adaptive noise, ensuring both communication efficiency and privacy preservation. First, we employ superpixel segmentation to reduce the spatial dimensionality of remote sensing data, lowering computational burdens. Furthermore, to resolve the inconsistency of cluster assignments across different clients, we design a co-occurrence structural alignment module that synchronizes local models. Finally, we incorporate a wasserstein prototype contrastive learning mechanism, which models clusters as distributions rather than points, to enhance global consistency and robustness against data heterogeneity. Extensive experiments on four public datasets demonstrate that our framework achieves superior clustering performance and efficiency compared to state-of-the-art methods.

Counterfactual reasoning is one of the fundamental facets of human cognition, involved in various tasks such as explanation, credit assignment, blame, and responsibility. It describes the queries what would have happened had some intervention been performed given that something else, corresponding to Layer 3 of the Pearl Causal Hierarchy. In this project, we examine a specific type of counterfactual quantities, called counterfactual direct (Ctf-DE), indirect (Ctf-IE), and spurious (Ctf-SE) effects for quantifying fairness in a sequential decision-making framework. Building on these measures, we formulate an online causally-fair learning problem with multiple long-term constraints and study it in both non-parametric contextual bandits and parametric logistic bandits settings. We achieve sublinear regret and violations bounds for both bandits settings with roundwise counterfactual fairness constraints (that are a priori unknown) without Slater's condition. For logistic bandits, our method achieves $\mathcal{O}(1)$ per-round time complexity using an online mirror descent estimator, yielding an efficient algorithm.

Recent work has explored optimizing LLM collaboration through Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL). However, most MARL fine-tuning approaches rely on predefined execution protocols, which often require centralized execution. Decentralized LLM collaboration is more appealing in practice, as agents can run inference in parallel with flexible deployments. Also, current approaches use Monte Carlo methods for fine-tuning, which suffer from high variance and thus require more samples to train effectively. Actor-critic methods are prevalent in MARL for dealing with these issues; thus, we developed Multi-Agent Actor-Critic (MAAC) methods to optimize decentralized LLM collaboration. In this paper, we analyze when and why these MAAC methods are beneficial. We propose 2 MAAC approaches, **CoLLM-CC** with a **C**entralized **C**ritic and **CoLLM-DC** with **D**ecentralized **C**ritics. Our experiments across writing, coding, and game-playing domains show that Monte Carlo methods and CoLLM-DC can achieve performance comparable to CoLLM-CC in short-horizon and dense-reward settings. However, they both underperform CoLLM-CC on long-horizon or sparse-reward tasks, where Monte Carlo methods require substantially more samples and CoLLM-DC struggles to converge.

Understanding complex interactions between brain regions is critical for early neurodegenerative disease classification such as Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and Parkinson’s Disease (PD). While graph-based models are widely used to analyze brain networks, most existing approaches primarily focus on pairwise interactions between directly connected nodes, limiting their ability to capture higher-order dependencies across multiple regions. Although hypergraph-based methods have been proposed to model higher-order relations, many rely on predefined hyperedges or restrict learning to hyperedge weights, reducing flexibility and limiting their capacity to capture multi-resolution structural patterns. In this regard, we introduce an adaptive multi-scale hyperedge learning framework, i.e., MuHL, which constructs hierarchical node features and dynamically learns high-order interaction through continuous hyper-edge construction over multi-resolution graph signals. Extensive experiments on multiple brain network benchmarks demonstrate that MuHL consistently improves disease classification performance across different stages, and further identifies key regions of interest (ROIs) and their group-wise interactions from the learned hyperedges that are associated with disease progression, highlighting its potential as a powerful tool for brain network analysis with neurodegenerative disorders.

Large language model (LLM)-powered multi-agent systems (MAS) enable agents to communicate and share information, achieving strong performance on complex tasks. However, this communication also creates an attack surface where malicious agents can propagate misinformation and manipulate group decisions, undermining MAS safety. Existing embedding-based defenses aim to detect and prune suspicious agents, but their effectiveness depends on a clear separation between the text embeddings of malicious and benign messages. Attackers can circumvent such defenses by crafting messages whose embeddings lie close to benign ones. We analyze this failure mode theoretically and validate it empirically with three attacks, Slow Drift, Benign Wrapper, and Chaos Seeding. Our analysis further reveals a fundamental limitation of embedding-based defenses: because they rely solely on the text embeddings, they ignore token-level confidence signals such as logits, which can remain informative when embeddings are not distinguishable under attack. We propose using confidence scores to prune or down-weight messages during MAS communication. Experiments show improved robustness across models, datasets, and communication topologies. Moreover, we find that the effectiveness of confidence signals decays over communication rounds, highlighting the importance of early intervention.

Multi-agent systems built on large language models (LLMs) are expected to enhance decision-making by pooling distributed information, yet systematically evaluating this capability has remained challenging. We introduce HiddenBench, a 65-task benchmark grounded in the Hidden Profile paradigm, which isolates collective reasoning under distributed information from individual reasoning ability. Evaluating 15 frontier LLMs, we find that multi-agent LLMs achieve only 30.1% accuracy under distributed information, compared to 80.7% accuracy for single agents given complete information. We trace this gap to a systematic failure mode: agents cannot recognize or act under latent information asymmetry—they fail to reason about what others might know but have not yet expressed, leading to premature convergence on shared evidence while critical distributed facts remain unexplored. These failures persist across prompting strategies, communication depths, and group sizes—and worsen as groups scale. While some models (e.g., Gemini-2.5-Flash/Pro) outperform others, neither model scale nor individual reasoning accuracy reliably predicts collective performance. We further show that this bottleneck is actionable: a lightweight structured communication protocol substantially improves collective reasoning across model families. Our results identify failures in collective information exploration in decision-making as a key limitation of multi-agent LLMs, and provide a theory-grounded, reproducible framework for diagnosing collective reasoning failures.

Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems (MAS) show strong promise for complex reasoning, planning, and tool-augmented tasks, but designing effective MAS architectures remains labor-intensive, brittle, and hard to generalize. Existing automatic MAS generation methods either rely on code generation, which often leads to executability and robustness failures, or impose rigid architectural templates that limit expressiveness and adaptability. We propose Evolutionary Generation of Multi-Agent Systems (EvoMAS), which formulates MAS generation as structured configuration generation. EvoMAS performs evolutionary generation in configuration space. Specifically, EvoMAS selects initial configurations from a pool, applies feedback-conditioned mutation and crossover guided by execution traces, and iteratively refines both the candidate pool and an experience memory. We evaluate EvoMAS on diverse benchmarks, including BBEH, SWE-Bench, and WorkBench, covering reasoning, software engineering, and tool-use tasks. EvoMAS consistently improves task performance over both human-designed MAS and prior automatic MAS generation methods, while producing generated systems with higher executability and runtime robustness. EvoMAS outperforms the agent evolution method EvoAgent by +10.5 points on BBEH reasoning and +7.1 points on WorkBench. With Claude-4.5-Sonnet, EvoMAS also reaches 79.1% on SWE-Bench-Verified, matching the top of the leaderboard. Code is available at https://github.com/amazon-science/EvoMAS

Large language model (LLM)-based Multi-agent systems (MAS) have shown promise in tackling complex collaborative tasks, where agents are typically orchestrated via role-specific prompts. While the quality of these prompts is pivotal, jointly optimizing them across interacting agents remains a non-trivial challenge, primarily due to the misalignment between local agent objectives and holistic system goals. To address this, we introduce MASPO, a novel framework designed to automatically and iteratively refine prompts across the entire system. A core innovation of MASPO is its joint evaluation mechanism, which assesses prompts not merely by their local validity, but by their capacity to facilitate downstream success for successor agents. This effectively bridges the gap between local interactions and global outcomes without relying on ground-truth labels. Furthermore, MASPO employs a data-driven evolutionary beam search to efficiently navigate the high-dimensional prompt space. Extensive empirical evaluations across 6 diverse tasks demonstrate that MASPO consistently outperforms state-of-the-art prompt optimization methods, achieving an average accuracy improvement of 2.9. We release our code at https://github.com/wangzx1219/MASPO.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly advanced, with Gemini-3-Pro setting a new performance milestone. In this work, we explore collective intelligence as an alternative to monolithic scaling, and demonstrate that open-source LLMs' collaboration can surpass Gemini-3-Pro. We first revisit LLM routing and aggregation at scale and identify three key bottlenecks: (1) current train-free routers are limited by a query-based paradigm focusing solely on textual similarity; (2) recent aggregation methods remain largely static, failing to select appropriate aggregators for different tasks; (3) the complementarity of routing and aggregation remains underutilized. To address these problems, we introduce JiSi, a novel framework designed to release the full potential of LLMs' collaboration through three innovations: (1) Query-Response Mixed Routing capturing both semantic information and problem difficulty; (2) Support-Set-based Aggregator Selection jointly evaluating the aggregation and domain capacity of aggregators; (3) Adaptive Routing-Aggregation Switch dynamically leveraging the advantages of routing and aggregation. Comprehensive experiments on nine benchmarks demonstrate that JiSi can surpass Gemini-3-Pro with only 47% costs by orchestrating ten open-source LLMs, while outperforming mainstream baselines. It suggests that collective intelligence represents a novel path towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).

Robust signal enhancement at low SNR is fundamentally challenging because noise becomes strongly entangled with the signal and corrupts local time–frequency (TF) evidence. In this regime, fixed resolution short time Fourier transform (STFT) enhancement with purely data driven convolutional biases can become overconfident in unreliable TF regions, causing unstable suppression or residual artifacts. We propose FracKGMF, which couples Fractional Distance Decay Convolution (FracConv) with Knowledge Guided Multi-view Fusion (KGMF) for expressive TF modeling and reliability aware decisions under heavy corruption. FracConv introduces a lightweight fractional distance decay family that reshapes local interactions into long tailed receptive patterns, enabling aggregation of weak but globally consistent cues when per-bin observations are ambiguous. KGMF uses a wiener inspired reliability prior to calibrate multi-view fusion and reduce excessive suppression in uncertain regions. Experiments on speech and EM benchmarks show consistent improvements over state-of-the-art baselines, with particularly large gains under extremely low SNR, including a 33 dB average improvement on EM signals at -20 dB.