ICLR 2026 论文列表

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) improves large language model (LLM) perplexity but can also degrade trustworthiness—leading to the generation of untruthful, biased, or unsafe content during user interactions. These issues are often traced back to specific phrases or patterns in the training data. However, correcting them usually requires expensive retraining or new data collection. In this work, we propose a two-stage, compute-efficient repair of the post-SFT models that enhances trustworthiness while preserving the downstream performance. In the first stage, we identify the training samples responsible for failures on trustworthiness metrics like truthfulness, stereotypical bias, and machine ethics—and select a small, diverse subset of these examples using a determinantal point process (DPP)-based regularization. In the second stage, we repair the model under the framework of proximal Bregman response function (PBRF) using a gradient ascent update, which enhances trustworthiness while preserving downstream task performance (perplexity). We evaluate our method on multiple LLMs of varying sizes and demonstrate up to 21\% improvement in trustworthiness metrics with minimal impact ($\leq1$ %) on perplexity. Our method provides a computationally efficient approach to enhance post-SFT models and offers a practical alternative to hours of retraining required for model repair

Honesty alignment—the ability of large language models (LLMs) to recognize their knowledge boundaries and express calibrated confidence—is essential for trustworthy deployment. Existing methods either rely on training-free confidence estimation (e.g., token probabilities, self-consistency) or training-based calibration with correctness annotations. While effective, the latter demands costly, large-scale labeling. We introduce Elicitation-Then-Calibration (EliCal), a two-stage framework that first elicits internal confidence using inexpensive self-consistency supervision, then calibrates this confidence with a small set of correctness annotations. This design substantially reduces annotation requirements while improving generalization across tasks. To support a large-scale study, we release HonestyBench, a benchmark covering ten free-form QA datasets with 560k training and 70k evaluation instances annotated with correctness and self-consistency signals. Experiments show that EliCal achieves near-optimal alignment with only 1k correctness annotations ($\sim$0.18\% of full supervision) and better alignment performance on unseen MMLU tasks than the calibration-only baseline, offering a scalable solution toward universal honesty alignment in LLMs.

Recent advancements in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable multimodal perception capabilities, garnering significant attention. While numerous evaluation studies have emerged, assessing LVLMs both holistically and on specialized tasks, fine-grained image tasks—fundamental to computer vision—remain largely unexplored. To fill this gap, we introduce a comprehensive fine-grained evaluation benchmark, i.e., FG-BMK, comprising 1.01 million questions and 0.28 million images. Our evaluation systematically examines LVLMs from both human-oriented and machine-oriented perspectives, focusing on their semantic recognition and fine-grained feature representation capabilities. Through extensive experiments on twelve representative LVLMs/VLMs, we uncover key findings regarding the influence of training paradigms, modality alignment, perturbation susceptibility, and fine-grained category reasoning on task performance. This work provides critical insights into the limitations of current LVLMs and offers guidance for future data construction and model design in the development of more advanced LVLMs. Our code is open-source and available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/FG-BMK-7B51.

Planning physically feasible dexterous hand manipulation is a central challenge in robotic manipulation and Embodied AI. Prior work typically relies on object-centric cues or precise hand-object interaction sequences, foregoing the rich, compositional guidance of open-vocabulary instruction. We introduce UniHM, the first framework for unified dexterous hand manipulation guided by free-form language commands. We propose a Unified Hand-Dexterous Tokenizer that maps heterogeneous dexterous-hand morphologies into a single shared codebook, improving cross-dexterous hand generalization and scalability to new morphologies. Our vision language action model is trained solely on human-object interaction data, eliminating the need for massive real-world teleoperation datasets, and demonstrates strong generalizability in producing human-like manipulation sequences from open-ended language instructions. To ensure physical realism, we introduce a physics-guided dynamic refinement module that performs segment-wise joint optimization under generative and temporal priors, yielding smooth and physically feasible manipulation sequences. Across multiple datasets and real-world evaluations, UniHM attains state-of-the-art results on both seen and unseen objects and trajectories, demonstrating strong generalization and high physical feasibility.

In traditional information retrieval, corpus items compete with each other to occupy top ranks in response to a query. In contrast, in many recent retrieval scenarios associated with complex, multi-hop question answering or text-to-SQL, items are not self-complete: they must instead collaborate, i.e., information from multiple items must be combined to respond to the query. In the context of modern dense retrieval, this need translates into finding a small collection of corpus items whose contextual word vectors collectively cover the contextual word vectors of the query. The central challenge is to retrieve a near-optimal collection of covering items in time that is sublinear in corpus size. By establishing coverage as a submodular objective, we enable successive dense index probes to quickly assemble an item collection that achieves near-optimal coverage. Successive query vectors are iteratively `edited', and the dense index is built using random projections of a novel, lifted dense vector space. Beyond rigorous theoretical guarantees, we report on a scalable implementation of this new form of vector database. Extensive experiments establish the empirical success of DISCo, in terms of the best coverage vs. query latency tradeoffs.

The development of autonomous agents for complex, long-horizon tasks is a central goal in AI. However, dominant training paradigms face a critical limitation: reinforcement learning (RL) methods that optimize solely for final task success often reinforce flawed or inefficient reasoning paths, a problem we term inefficient exploration. This leads to agents that are brittle and fail to generalize, as they learn to find solutions without learning how to reason coherently. To address this, we introduce RLVMR, a novel frame-work that integrates dense, process-level supervision into end-to-end RL by rewarding verifiable, meta-reasoning behaviors. RLVMR equips an agent to explicitly tag its cognitive steps—such as planning, exploration, and reflection—and provides program-matic, rule-based rewards for actions that contribute to effective problem-solving. These process-centric rewards are combined with the final outcome signal and optimized using a critic-free policy gradient method. On the challenging ALFWorld and ScienceWorld benchmarks, RLVMR achieves new state-of-the-art results, with our 7B model reaching an 83.6% success rate on the most difficult unseen task split. Our analysis confirms these gains stem from improved reasoning quality, including significant reductions in redundant actions and enhanced error recovery, leading to more robust, efficient, and interpretable agents.

By pretraining to synthesize coherent images from perturbed inputs, generative models inherently learn to understand object boundaries and scene compositions. How can we repurpose these generative representations for general-purpose perceptual organization? We finetune Stable Diffusion and MAE (encoder+decoder) for category-agnostic instance segmentation using our instance coloring loss exclusively on a narrow set of object types (indoor furnishings and cars). Surprisingly, our models exhibit strong zero-shot generalization, accurately segmenting objects of types and styles unseen in finetuning. This holds even for MAE, which is pretrained on unlabeled ImageNet-1K only. When evaluated on unseen object types and styles, our best-performing models closely approach the heavily supervised SAM, and outperform it when segmenting fine structures and ambiguous boundaries. In contrast, existing promptable segmentation architectures or discriminatively pretrained models fail to generalize. This suggests that generative models learn an inherent grouping mechanism that transfers across categories and domains, even without internet-scale pretraining. Please see our website for additional qualitative figures, code, and a demo: https://reachomk.github.io/gen2seg/

In Vision–Language–Action (VLA) models, robustness to real-world perturbations is critical for deployment. Existing methods target simple visual disturbances, overlooking the broader multi-modal perturbations that arise in actions, instructions, environments, and observations. Here, we first evaluate the robustness of mainstream VLAs under 17 perturbations across four modalities. We find (1) actions as the most fragile modality, (2) Existing visual-robust VLA do not gain robustness in other modality, and (3) $\pi_0$ demonstrates superior robustness. To build multi-modal robust VLAs, we propose RobustVLA against perturbations in VLA inputs and outputs. For output robustness, we perform offline robust optimization against worst-case action noise that maximizes mismatch in flow matching objective. This can be seen as adversarial training, label smoothing, and outlier penalization. For input robustness, we enforce consistent actions across input variations that preserve task semantics. To account for multiple perturbations, we formulate robustness as a multi-armed bandit problem and apply an upper confidence bound algorithm to automatically identify the most harmful noise. Experiments on LIBERO demonstrate our RobustVLA delivers absolute gains over baselines of 12.6\% on the $\pi_0$ backbone and 10.4\% on the OpenVLA backbone across all 17 perturbations, achieving 50.6x faster inference than existing visual-robust BYOVLA that requires external LLMs, and a 10.4\% gain under mixed perturbations. On the real-world FR5 robot, under four types of multimodal perturbations, RobustVLA shows strong low-data performance, outperforming $\pi_0$ by $65.6\%$ success rate with 25 demonstrations. Even with abundant demos, our method still outperform $\pi_0$ by 30\% success rate. Code and demo videos available at https://github.com/gakakulicc/RobustVLA.

Parameter shift rules (PSRs) are key techniques for efficient gradient estimation in variational quantum eigensolvers (VQEs). In this paper, we propose their Bayesian variant, where Gaussian processes with appropriate kernels are used to estimate the gradient of the VQE objective. Our Bayesian PSR offers flexible gradient estimation from observations at arbitrary locations with uncertainty information, and reduces to the generalized PSR in special cases. In stochastic gradient descent (SGD), the flexibility of Bayesian PSR allows reuse of observations in previous steps, which accelerates the optimization process. Furthermore, the accessibility to the posterior uncertainty, along with our proposed notion of gradient confident region (GradCoRe), enables us to minimize the observation costs in each SGD step. Our numerical experiments show that the VQE optimization with Bayesian PSR and GradCoRe significantly accelerates SGD, and outperforms the state-of-the-art methods, including sequential minimal optimization.

With the rapid advancement of data science, charts have evolved from simple numerical presentation tools to essential instruments for insight discovery and decision-making support. However, current chart data intelligence exhibits significant limitations in deep research capabilities, with existing methods predominantly addressing shallow tasks such as visual recognition or factual question-answering, rather than the complex reasoning and high-level data analysis that deep research requires. This limitation stems from two primary technical bottlenecks: at the training level, existing post-training techniques exhibit deficiencies in handling multi-dimensional reward signal interference and heterogeneous data gradient conflicts, preventing models from achieving balanced development across multiple capability dimensions; at the evaluation level, current methods remain limited to factual retrieval and basic computation, failing to assess end-to-end analytic reasoning and other deep research capabilities. To address the training challenge, we propose PRPO, which performs parallel optimization across reward dimensions and capability partitioning across data types, effectively disentangling conflicts between heterogeneous data and multi-dimensional reward signals while ensuring optimization stability. For the evaluation challenge, we construct MCDR-Bench based on the "error uniqueness principle," transforming subjective generation assessment into objective error identification through controllable error injection, enabling quantifiable evaluation of deep research capabilities. Experimental validation confirms that the proposed PRPO and MCDR-Bench jointly establish a unified framework that systematically advances chart deep research through enhanced collaborative training and objective evaluation.

The advancement of open-source text-to-image (T2I) models has been hindered by the absence of large-scale, reasoning-focused datasets and comprehensive evaluation benchmarks, resulting in a performance gap compared to leading closed-source systems. To address this challenge, We introduce FLUX-Reason-6M and PRISM-Bench (Precise and Robust Image Synthesis Measurement Benchmark). FLUX-Reason-6M is a massive dataset consisting of 6 million high-quality FLUX-generated images and 20 million bilingual (English and Chinese) descriptions specifically designed to teach complex reasoning. The image are organized according to six key characteristics: Imagination, Entity, Text rendering, Style, Affection, and Composition, and design explicit Generation Chain-of-Thought (GCoT) to provide detailed breakdowns of image generation steps. PRISM-Bench offers a novel evaluation standard with seven distinct tracks, including a formidable Long Text challenge using GCoT. Through carefully designed prompts, it utilizes advanced vision-language models for nuanced human-aligned assessment of prompt-image alignment and image aesthetics. Our extensive evaluation of 19 leading models on PRISM-Bench reveals critical performance gaps and highlights specific areas requiring improvement. Our dataset, benchmark, and evaluation code will be released.

Searching large and highly complex design spaces for a global optimum can be infeasible and unnecessary. A practical alternative is to iteratively refine the neighborhood of an initial design using local optimization methods such as gradient descent. We propose local entropy search (LES), a Bayesian optimization paradigm that explicitly targets the solutions reachable by the descent sequences of arbitrary iterative optimizers. The algorithm propagates the posterior belief over the objective through the optimizer, yielding a probability distribution over descent sequences. It then selects the next evaluation by maximizing mutual information with that distribution, using a practical combination of analytic entropy calculations and Monte-Carlo sampling of descent sequences. Empirical results on high-complexity synthetic objectives and benchmark problems show that LES achieves strong sample efficiency compared to existing local and global Bayesian optimization methods.

The "end-to-end" label for LLMs is a misnomer. In practice, they depend on a non-differentiable decoding process that requires laborious, hand-tuning of hyperparameters like temperature and top-p. This paper introduces AutoDeco, a novel architecture that enables truly "end-to-end'' generation by learning to control its own decoding strategy. We augment the standard transformer with lightweight heads that, at each step, dynamically predict context-specific temperature and top-p values alongside the next-token logits. This approach transforms decoding into a parametric, token-level process, allowing the model to self-regulate its sampling strategy within a single forward pass. Through extensive experiments on eight benchmarks, we demonstrate that AutoDeco not only significantly outperforms default decoding strategies but also achieves performance comparable to an oracle-tuned baseline derived from "hacking the test set"—a practical upper bound for any static method. Besides, we demonstrate an emergent capability for instruction-based decoding control: the model learns to interpret natural language commands (e.g., ''generate with low randomness'') and adjusts its predicted temperature and top-p on a token-by-token basis, which may open a new paradigm for steerable and interactive LLM decoding.

Artificial Intelligence brings powerful new tools to sports, from automated officiating to tactical analysis, but these applications all depend on a core reasoning capability. Deeply understanding sports requires an intricate blend of fine-grained visual perception and rule-based reasoning—a challenge that pushes the limits of current multimodal models. To succeed, models must master three critical capabilities: perceiving nuanced visual details, applying abstract sport rule knowledge, and grounding that knowledge in specific visual evidence. Current sports benchmarks either cover single sports or lack the detailed reasoning chains and precise visual grounding needed to robustly evaluate these core capabilities in a multi-sport context. To address this gap, we introduce SportR, the first multi-sports large-scale benchmark designed to train and evaluate MLLMs on the fundamental reasoning required for sports intelligence. Our benchmark provides a dataset of 5,017 images and 2,101 videos. To enable granular evaluation, we structure our benchmark around a progressive hierarchy of question-answer (QA) pairs designed to probe reasoning at increasing depths—from simple infraction identification to complex penalty prediction. For the most advanced tasks requiring multi-step reasoning, such as determining penalties or explaining tactics, we provide 7,118 high-quality, human-authored Chain-of-Thought (CoT) annotations. In addition, our benchmark incorporates both image and video modalities and provides manual bounding box annotations to directly test visual grounding in the image part. Extensive experiments demonstrate the profound difficulty of our benchmark. State-of-the-art baseline models perform poorly on our most challenging tasks. While training on our data via Supervised Fine-Tuning and Reinforcement Learning improves these scores, they remain relatively low, highlighting a significant gap in current model capabilities. SportR presents a new challenge for the community, providing a critical resource to drive future research in multimodal sports reasoning. The dataset is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/ICLR2026-E071/.

Classifier-Free Guidance (CFG) is widely used in diffusion and flow-based generative models for high-quality conditional generation, yet its theoretical properties remain incompletely understood. By connecting CFG to the high-dimensional framework of diffusion regimes, we show that in sufficiently high dimensions it reproduces the correct target distribution—a “blessing-of-dimensionality” result. Leveraging this theoretical framework, we analyze how the well-known artifacts of mean overshoot and variance shrinkage emerge in lower dimensions, characterizing how they become more pronounced as dimensionality decreases. Building on these insights, we propose a simple nonlinear extension of CFG, proving that it mitigates both effects while preserving CFG’s practical benefits. Finally, we validate our approach through numerical simulations on Gaussian mixtures and real-world experiments on diffusion and flow-matching state-of-the-art class-conditional and text-to-image models, demonstrating continuous improvements in sample quality, diversity, and consistency.

Long-horizon goal-conditioned tasks pose fundamental challenges for reinforcement learning (RL), particularly when goals are distant and rewards are sparse. While hierarchical and graph-based methods offer partial solutions, their reliance on conventional hindsight relabeling often fails to correct subgoal infeasibility, leading to inefficient high-level planning. To address this, we propose Strict Subgoal Execution (SSE), a graph-based hierarchical RL framework that integrates Frontier Experience Replay (FER) to separate unreachable from admissible subgoals and streamline high-level decision making. FER delineates the reachability frontier using failure and partial-success transitions, which identifies unreliable subgoals, increases subgoal reliability, and reduces unnecessary high-level decisions. Additionally, SSE employs a decoupled exploration policy to cover underexplored regions of the goal space and a path refinement that adjusts edge costs using observed low-level failures. Experimental results across diverse long-horizon benchmarks show that SSE consistently outperforms existing goal-conditioned and hierarchical RL methods in both efficiency and success rate.

Neuroscientists and computer vision scientists alike have relied on model-brain alignment benchmarks to find parallels between artificial and biological vision systems. These benchmarks rank models according to alignment measures (AM) such as representational similarity analysis (RSA) and linear predictivity (LP). However, recent works have revealed a number of problems with these rankings, such as their sensitivity towards the choice of AM, raising the deeper conceptual question of what it means for a model to be “brain-aligned.” Here, we introduce the notion of *alignment patterns* - characteristic patterns of alignment between brain regions-and posit that models should reproduce these patterns in order to be considered brain-aligned. First, we apply a standard benchmarking pipeline to a broad spectrum of vision models on the BOLD-Moments video fMRI dataset across visual regions of interest (ROIs). We find that, while this pipeline can identify nominally best predictive models, many other models fall within subject-level variability and are therefore practically equivalent in terms of brain alignment. We then apply our complementary relational criterion: a ROI-aligned model should reproduce that ROIs cross-region alignment pattern. We find that, while these patterns are highly stable across brains of different subjects, even top-ranked models fail to capture them. Notably, models that appear practically equivalent in predictive accuracy diverge sharply under the relational criterion, revealing both the limitations with respect to discriminative power of existing evaluation pipelines, as well as alignment pattern analysis as a way of increasing this discriminative power. Finally, we argue for a principled distinction between brain-predictivity and brain-alignment. For applications such as digital twins, prediction performance may suffice; but for understanding the inductive biases of the visual system, models should satisfy stricter distributional and relational criteria.

Minimizing the inference cost and latency of foundation models has become a crucial area of research. Optimization approaches include theoretically lossless methods and others without accuracy guarantees like quantization. In all of these cases it is crucial to ensure that the model quality has not degraded. However, even at temperature zero, model generations are not necessarily robust even to theoretically lossless model optimizations due to numerical errors. We thus require statistical tools to decide whether a finite-sample accuracy deviation is an evidence of a model's degradation or whether it can be attributed to (harmless) noise in the evaluation. We propose a statistically sound hypothesis testing framework based on McNemar's test allowing to efficiently detect model degradations, while guaranteeing a controlled rate of false positives. The crucial insight is that we have to confront the model scores on each sample, rather than aggregated on the task level. Furthermore, we propose three approaches to aggregate accuracy estimates across multiple benchmarks into a single decision. We provide an implementation on top of the largely adopted open source LM Evaluation Harness and provide a case study illustrating that the method correctly flags degraded models, while not flagging model optimizations that are provably lossless. We find that with our tests even empirical accuracy degradations of 0.3% can be confidently attributed to actual degradations rather than noise. Code: https://github.com/amazon-science/LLM-Accuracy-Stats

Classification with imbalanced data is a common challenge in machine learning, where minority classes form only a small fraction of the training samples. Classical theory, relying on large-sample asymptotics and finite-sample corrections, is often ineffective in high dimensions, leaving many overfitting phenomena unexplained. In this paper, we develop a statistical theory for high-dimensional imbalanced linear classification, showing that dimensionality induces truncation or skewing effects on the logit distribution, which we characterize via a variational problem. For linearly separable Gaussian mixtures, logits follow $\\mathsf{N}(0,1)$ on the test set but converge to $\\max\\{\\kappa,\\mathsf{N}(0,1)\\}$ on the training set---a pervasive phenomenon we confirm on tabular, image, and text data. This phenomenon explains why the minority class is more severely affected by overfitting. We further show that margin rebalancing mitigates minority accuracy drop and provide theoretical insights into calibration and uncertainty quantification.