ICLR 2026 论文列表

Graph Domain Adaptation (GDA) aims to bridge distribution shifts between domains by transferring knowledge from well-labeled source graphs to given unlabeled target graphs. One promising recent approach addresses graph transfer by discretizing the adaptation process, typically through the construction of intermediate graphs or stepwise alignment procedures. However, such discrete strategies often fail in real-world scenarios, where graph structures evolve continuously and nonlinearly, making it difficult for fixed-step alignment to approximate the actual transformation process. To address these limitations, we propose \textbf{DiffGDA}, a \textbf{Diff}usion-based \textbf{GDA} method that models the domain adaptation process as a continuous-time generative process. We formulate the evolution from source to target graphs using stochastic differential equations (SDEs), enabling the joint modeling of structural and semantic transitions. To guide this evolution, a domain-aware network is introduced to steer the generative process toward the target domain, encouraging the diffusion trajectory to follow an optimal adaptation path. We theoretically show that the diffusion process converges to the optimal solution bridging the source and target domains in the latent space. Extensive experiments on 14 graph transfer tasks across 8 real-world datasets demonstrate DiffGDA consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.

Although Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have progressed in solving complex problems, their chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning often contains harmful content that can persist even when the final responses appear safe. We show that this issue still remains in existing methods which overlook the unique significance of safe reasoning, undermining their trustworthiness and posing potential risks in applications if unsafe reasoning is accessible for and exploited by malicious users. We therefore shift our focus to aligning the safety of reasoning itself in this paper and explore process supervision as the solution. However, simply rewarding safe reasoning proves inadequate due to low rollout diversity and limited training signals. To tackle this challenge, we first delve into the characteristics of safe reasoning and uncover several critical insights that 1) safe reasoning is often consolidated by a few critical steps of _safety triggers_; 2) _compliance cues_ strongly correlate with unsafe continuations; and 3) corrective interventions reliably steer unsafe trajectories towards safer traces. Motivated by these, we propose **Intervened Preference Optimization (IPO)**, an alignment method that enforces safe reasoning by substituting compliance steps with safety triggers and constructing pairs for preference learning with strong signals. Experiments on jailbreak and adversarial safety benchmarks demonstrate that IPO remarkably improves overall safety regarding both reasoning and responses, outperforming SFT-based and RL-based baselines with a relative reduction of over 30\% in harmfulness, while preserving excellent performance across diverse reasoning tasks. The results highlight the importance of explicit alignment for reasoning and provide a practical path to safer LRMs.

Although continuous-time consistency models (e.g., sCM, MeanFlow) are theoretically principled and empirically powerful for fast academic-scale diffusion, its applicability to large-scale text-to-image and video tasks remains unclear due to infrastructure challenges in Jacobian-vector product (JVP) computation and the limitations of evaluation benchmarks like FID. This work represents the first effort to scale up continuous-time consistency to general application-level image and video diffusion models, and to make JVP-based distillation effective at large scale. We first develop a parallelism-compatible FlashAttention-2 JVP kernel, enabling sCM training on models with over 10 billion parameters and high-dimensional video tasks. Our investigation reveals fundamental quality limitations of sCM in fine-detail generation, which we attribute to error accumulation and the “mode-covering” nature of its forward-divergence objective. To remedy this, we propose the score-regularized continuous-time consistency model (rCM), which incorporates score distillation as a long-skip regularizer. This integration complements sCM with the “mode-seeking” reverse divergence, effectively improving visual quality while maintaining high generation diversity. Validated on large-scale models (Cosmos-Predict2, Wan2.1) up to 14B parameters and 5-second videos, rCM generally matches the state-of-the-art distillation method DMD2 on quality metrics while mitigating mode collapse and offering notable advantages in diversity, all without GAN tuning or extensive hyperparameter searches. The distilled models generate high-fidelity samples in only $1\sim4$ steps, accelerating diffusion sampling by $15\times\sim50\times$. These results position rCM as a practical and theoretically grounded framework for advancing large-scale diffusion distillation. Code is available at https://github.com/NVlabs/rcm.

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have achieved impressive performance on challenging tasks, yet their deep reasoning often incurs substantial computational costs. To achieve efficient reasoning, existing reinforcement learning methods still struggle to construct short reasoning path during the rollout stage, limiting effective learning. Inspired by Evidence Accumulation Models, we find that LRMs have accumulated sufficient information early in reasoning, making further reasoning steps redundant. Based on this insight, we propose Just-Enough Thinking (JET), which trains models to proactively terminate unnecessary reasoning. JET performs trajectory truncation during rollout to expose the model to short, distributionally consistent reasoning paths. Besides, it uses a quality-controlled length reward to better encourage concise reasoning while maintaining correctness. Extensive experiments demonstrate that JET significantly improves reasoning efficiency without sacrificing accuracy. In particular, JET delivers a 4.6% accuracy improvement while reducing the output length by 46.3% on the Olympiad benchmark using DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B. Our code is available in the GitHub.

Foundation models are reshaping EEG analysis, yet an important problem of EEG tokenization remains a challenge. This paper presents TFM-Tokenizer, a novel tokenization framework that learns a vocabulary of time-frequency motifs from *single-channel* EEG signals and encodes them into discrete tokens. We propose a dual-path architecture with time–frequency masking to capture robust motif representations, and it is model-agnostic, supporting both lightweight transformers and existing foundation models for downstream tasks. Our study demonstrates three key benefits: *Accuracy:* Experiments on four diverse EEG benchmarks demonstrate consistent performance gains across both single- and multi-dataset pretraining settings, achieving up to 11% improvement in Cohen’s Kappa over strong baselines. *Generalization:* Moreover, as a plug-and-play component, it consistently boosts the performance of diverse foundation models, including BIOT and LaBraM. *Scalability:* By operating at the single-channel level rather than relying on the strict 10–20 EEG system, our method has the potential to be device-agnostic. Experiments on ear-EEG sleep staging, which differs from the pretraining data in signal format, channel configuration, recording device, and task, show that our tokenizer outperforms baselines by 14%. A comprehensive token analysis reveals strong class-discriminative, frequency-aware, and consistent structure, enabling improved representation quality and interpretability. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/TFM-Token-FE33.

Despite their impressive performance, generative image models trained on large-scale datasets frequently fail to produce images with seemingly simple concepts -- e.g., human hands or objects appearing in groups of four -- that are reasonably expected to appear in the training data. These failure modes have largely been documented anecdotally, leaving open the question of whether they reflect idiosyncratic anomalies or more structural limitations of these models. To address this, we introduce a systematic approach for identifying and characterizing "conceptual blindspots" -- concepts present in the training data but absent or misrepresented in a model's generations. Our method leverages sparse autoencoders (SAEs) to extract interpretable concept embeddings, enabling a quantitative comparison of concept prevalence between real and generated images. We train an archetypal SAE (RA-SAE) on DINOv2 features with 32,000 concepts -- the largest such SAE to date -- enabling fine-grained analysis of conceptual disparities. Applied to four popular generative models (Stable Diffusion 1.5/2.1, PixArt, and Kandinsky), our approach reveals specific suppressed blindspots (e.g., bird feeders, DVD discs, and whitespaces on documents) and exaggerated blindspots (e.g., wood background texture and palm trees). At the individual datapoint level, we further isolate memorization artifacts -- instances where models reproduce highly specific visual templates seen during training. Overall, we propose a theoretically grounded framework for systematically identifying conceptual blindspots in generative models by assessing their conceptual fidelity with respect to the underlying data-generating process.

Deception is a pervasive feature of human communication and an emerging concern in large language models (LLMs). While recent studies document instances of LLM deception, most evaluations remain confined to single-turn prompts and fail to capture the long-horizon interactions in which deceptive strategies typically unfold. We introduce a new simulation framework, LH-Deception, for a systematic, empirical quantification of deception in LLMs under extended sequences of interdependent tasks and dynamic contextual pressures. LH-Deception is designed as a multi-agent system: a performer agent tasked with completing tasks and a supervisor agent that evaluates progress, provides feedback, and maintains evolving states of trust. An independent deception auditor then reviews full trajectories to identify when and how deception occurs. We conduct extensive experiments across 11 frontier models, spanning both closed-source and open-source systems, and find that deception is model-dependent, increases with event pressure, and consistently erodes supervisor trust. Qualitative analyses further reveal emergent, long-horizon phenomena, such as ``chains of deception", which are invisible to static, single-turn evaluations. Our findings provide a foundation for evaluating future LLMs in real-world, trust-sensitive contexts.

The Clock and Pizza interpretations, associated with architectures differing in either uniform or learnable attention, were introduced to argue that different architectural designs can yield distinct circuits for modular addition. In this work, we show that this is not the case, and that both the uniform and trainable attention architectures implement the same algorithm via topologically and geometrically equivalent representations. Our methodology goes beyond the interpretation of individual neurons and weights. Instead, we identify all of the neurons corresponding to each learned representation and then study the collective group of neurons as one entity. This method reveals that each learned representation is a manifold that we can study utilizing tools from topology. Based on this insight, we can statistically analyze the learned representations across hundreds of circuits to demonstrate the similarity between learned modular addition circuits that arise naturally from common deep learning paradigms.

Autoregressive (AR) models, despite their remarkable successes, encounter limitations in image generation due to sequential prediction of tokens, e.g. local image patches, in a predetermined row-major raster-scan order. Prior works improve AR with various designs of prediction units and orders, however, rely on human inductive biases. This work proposes Basis Autoregressive (BAR), a novel paradigm that conceptualizes tokens as basis vectors within the image space and employs an end-to-end learnable approach to transform basis. By viewing tokens $x_k$ as the projection of image $\mathbf{x}$ onto basis vectors $e_k$, BAR's unified framework refactors fixed token sequences through the linear transform $\mathbf{y}=\mathbf{Ax}$, and encompasses previous methods as specific instances of matrix $\mathbf{A}$. Furthermore, BAR adaptively optimizes the transform matrix with an end-to-end AR objective, thereby discovering effective strategies beyond hand-crafted assumptions. Comprehensive experiments, notably achieving a state-of-the-art FID of 1.15 on the ImageNet-256 benchmark, demonstrate the ability of BAR to overcome human biases and significantly advance image generation, including text-to-image synthesis.

Chess has played a uniquely important historical role as a testbed domain for artificial intelligence. Applying new architectures to improve absolute chess performance, and more recently to predict human moves at specified skill levels, has therefore garnered attention in the machine learning literature. Current approaches to these problems employ transformer models with widely varying architectural designs, and use unintuitive tokenization schemes that are not amenable to interpretability techniques, which hinders their applicability for teaching and human-AI interaction. We introduce Chessformer, a novel chess transformer model design that consists of an encoder-only model which processes chessboard squares as input tokens, instead of moves or the entire position, a dynamic positional encoding scheme that allows the model to flexibly adapt to the unique geometries present in chess, and an attention-based policy output design. We show that Chessformer advances the state of the art in all three major chess modeling goals: it significantly improves the chess-playing performance of a state-of-the-art chess engine, it surpasses the previous best human move-matching prediction performance with a much smaller model, and it enables substantial interpretability benefits. Our unified approach constitutes a broad advance across several important tasks in chess AI, and also demonstrates the benefits of carefully adapting transformers' tokenization systems, output systems, and positional encodings to reflect the structure of a domain of interest.

Learning in high-dimensional MDPs with complex state dynamics became possible with the progress achieved in reinforcement learning research. At the same time, deep neural policies have been observed to be highly unstable with respect to the minor variations in their state space, causing volatile and unpredictable behaviour. To alleviate these volatilities, a line of work suggested techniques to cope with this problem via explicitly regularizing the temporal difference loss to ensure local $\epsilon$-invariance in the state space. In this paper, we provide theoretical foundations on the impact of $\epsilon$-local invariance training on the deep neural policy manifolds. Our comprehensive theoretical and experimental analysis reveals that standard reinforcement learning inherently learns counterfactual values while recent training techniques that focus on explicitly enforcing $\epsilon$-local invariance cause policies to lose counterfactuality, and further result in learning misaligned and inconsistent values. In connection to this analysis, we further highlight that this line of training methods break the core intuition and the true biological inspiration of reinforcement learning, and introduce an intrinsic gap between how natural intelligence understands and interacts with an environment in contrast to AI agents trained via $\epsilon$-local invariance methods. The misalignment, inaccuracy and the loss of counterfactuality revealed in our paper further demonstrate the need to rethink the approach in establishing truly reliable and generalizable reinforcement learning policies.

While large reasoning models have shown remarkable ability to generate long chains-of-thought (CoTs) in English, we still lack understanding of how these long-form reasoning abilities transfer to the vast majority of the world’s languages. In this work, we systematically investigate four key stages of model development–scaling, pretraining, post-training, and inference–to understand how long CoT capabilities extend beyond English. We compare two reasoning settings across nine non-English target languages: En-CoT, where models process target-language inputs, but reason in English; and Target-CoT, where models both process inputs and generate long CoTs in the target language. We find that scaling reasoning model size improves multilingual task performance in En-CoT, but Target-CoT performance lags behind. This gap widens for tasks requiring long, multi-step CoTs such as mathematical reasoning. Shifting to pretraining, we find that adding a specialized reasoning stage enhances En-CoT performance but degrades Target-CoT, whereas broad multilingual pretraining improves both modes simultaneously. Given the scarcity of high-quality reasoning traces in languages other than English, we explore synthetic data curation approaches for post-training. We demonstrate that fine-tuning on reasoning traces automatically translated from gold English traces outperforms fine-tuning on target-language traces distilled from large reasoning models. Finally, we report disparities in inference efficiency between languages and uncover language-specific failure modes in CoTs. We release models, datasets, and code to foster further research.

Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at problem solving by generating chain of thoughts in natural language, but such verbal thinking is computationally costly and prone to overthinking. Recent work instead proposes a latent thinking architecture Huginn-3.5B, which represents intermediate reasoning steps as sequence of latent representations. However, latent thoughts lack interpretability and are difficult to supervise, raising concerns about the correctness and reliability of its latent thinking processes. In this paper, we provide a systematic study of how Huginn-3.5B thinks in the latent space and how external supervision signals can improve its latent thinking processes. We show that latent thoughts leading to correct versus incorrect answers exhibit highly distinguishable patterns, and that a latent classifier can reliably predict answer correctness directly from latent thoughts. Leveraging these insights, we propose Latent Thinking Optimization (LTO), a probabilistic algorithm that employs the latent classifier as a Latent Reward Model (LRM) to optimize the latent thinking processes. Extensive experiments across diverse reasoning tasks demonstrate that LRM is highly effective in detecting incorrect latent thinking patterns, and LTO can significantly improve the latent thinking processes. Furthermore, we show that LRM can generalize across diverse domains, and LTO can be seamlessly applied to general LLMs to improve their thinking processes. In contrast to verbal thinking, our method demonstrates that reward modeling and scaling test-time thinking with supervision can be performed directly in the latent space, highlighting its potential as a general, efficient, and domain-agnostic approach to improving the thinking processes of LLMs.

Few-shot learning (FSL) aims to generalize to novel categories with only a few samples. Recent approaches incorporate large language models (LLMs) to enrich visual representations with semantic embeddings derived from class names. However, they overlook progressive and adaptive alignment between vision and language from low-level to high-level semantics, resulting in limited semantic gains. To address these challenges, we propose Dual-level Vision–Language Alignment with Reinforcement Learning gating (DVLA-RL), which consists of Dual-level Semantic Construction (DSC) and RL-gated Attention (RLA). Specifically, DSC conditions LLMs on both class names and support samples to generate discriminative attributes, progressively selects the most relevant ones, and then synthesizes them into coherent class descriptions. This process provides complementary low-level attributes and high-level descriptions, enabling both fine-grained grounding and holistic class understanding. To dynamically integrate dual-level semantics along with the visual network layers, RLA formulates cross-modal fusion as a sequential decision process. A lightweight policy trained with episodic REINFORCE adaptively adjusts the contributions of self-attention and cross-attention to integrate textual and visual tokens. As a result, shallow layers refine local attributes and deep layers emphasize global semantics, enabling more precise cross-modal alignment. This achieves class-specific discrimination and generalized representations with merely a few support samples. DVLA-RL achieves new state-of-the-art performance across nine benchmarks in three diverse FSL scenarios.

The remarkable success of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) has driven advances in multimodal embeddings, yet existing models remain inherently discriminative, limiting their ability to benefit from reasoning-driven generation paradigm. In this work, we pioneer the exploration of generative embeddings, unifying embedding tasks within a generative paradigm. We propose UME-R1, a universal multimodal embedding framework consisting of a two-stage training strategy: a cold-start supervised fine-tuning equips the model with reasoning capabilities and enables it to generate both discriminative and generative embeddings; a subsequent reinforcement learning enhances reasoning and further optimizes generative embedding quality. This pioneering work reveals four key insights: 1) generative embeddings unlock substantial performance gains over conventional discriminative embeddings by leveraging the powerful generative reasoning capabilities of MLLMs; 2) discriminative and generative embeddings are complementary, whose combined oracle performance far exceeding that of either alone; 3) RL can effectively enhance generative embeddings, establishing a scalable optimization paradigm.; 4) repeated sampling at inference boosts downstream task coverage (pass@k), highlighting the inference-time scalability potential of generative embeddings. Evaluated on the MMEB-V2 benchmark across 78 tasks spanning video, image, and visual documents, UME-R1 significantly outperforms conventional discriminative embedding models and offers a foundation for more interpretable, reasoning-driven generative multimodal embeddings.

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) test-time computing have introduced the capability to perform intermediate chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning (thinking) before generating answers. While increasing the thinking budget yields smooth performance improvements at inference time, the relationship between LLM capability, query complexity, and optimal budget allocation remains poorly understood for achieving compute-optimal inference. To address this challenge, we utilize $\textit{self-consistency}$, the agreement among multiple reasoning paths, as a proxy for thinking necessity. We first identify that lower self-consistency indicates when queries require extended thinking to reach correct answers. Building on this insight, we introduce $\texttt{Sonata}$ (Self-Consistency-Guided Adapter for Thinking Allocation), a lightweight approach that adaptively allocates thinking budgets to optimize the performance-efficiency tradeoff. $\texttt{Sonata}$ includes an adapter trained offline on a calibration dataset to predict self-consistency directly from the last layer hidden representations during the query prefilling stage. This prediction then guides on-the-fly budget allocation before thinking. The adapter is general, transferable across diverse tasks once trained, and introduces $<1$$\textperthousand$ computational overhead during inference. Notably, Sonata is compatible with existing CoT compression methods, enabling further efficiency gains when managing thinking budgets across queries. Extensive experiments on multiple models (Qwen3-8B, Qwen3-32B, GPT-OSS-120B, Qwen3-235B-A22B) and benchmarks~(AIME25, GSM8K, MATH500, GPQA, LiveCodeBench) demonstrate that $\texttt{Sonata}$ achieves $20\\%$ to $60\\%$ reduction in thinking tokens while maintaining the same accuracy, or up to $2\\%$ improvement in accuracy with the same token cost.

Many methods aim to enhance time series forecasting by decomposing the series through intricate model structures and prior knowledge, yet they are inevitably limited by computational complexity and the robustness of the assumptions. Our research uncovers that in the complex domain and higher-order hypercomplex spaces, the characteristic frequencies of time series naturally decrease. Leveraging this insight, we propose Numerion, a time series forecasting model based on multiple hypercomplex spaces. Specifically, grounded in theoretical support, we generalize linear layers and activation functions to hypercomplex spaces of arbitrary power-of-two dimensions and introduce a novel Real-Hypercomplex-Real Domain Multi-Layer Perceptron (RHR-MLP) architecture. Numerion utilizes multiple RHR-MLPs to map time series into hypercomplex spaces of varying dimensions, naturally decomposing and independently modeling the series, and adaptively fuses the latent patterns exhibited in different spaces through a dynamic fusion mechanism. Experiments validate the model’s performance, achieving state-of-the-art results on multiple public datasets. Visualizations and quantitative analyses comprehensively demonstrate the ability of multi-dimensional RHR-MLPs to naturally decompose time series and reveal the tendency of higher-dimensional hypercomplex spaces to capture lower-frequency features.

Personalizing text-to-image diffusion models involves integrating novel visual concepts from a small set of reference images while retaining the model’s original generative capabilities. However, this process often leads to overfitting, where the model ignores the user’s prompt and merely replicates the reference images. We attribute this issue to a fundamental misalignment between the true goals of personalization, which are subject fidelity and text alignment, and the training objectives of existing methods that fail to enforce both objectives simultaneously. Specifically, prior approaches often overlook the need to explicitly preserve the pretrained model’s output distribution, resulting in distributional drift that undermines diversity and coherence. To resolve these challenges, we introduce a Lipschitz-based regularization objective that constrains parameter updates during personalization, ensuring bounded deviation from the original distribution. This promotes consistency with the pretrained model’s behavior while enabling accurate adaptation to new concepts. Furthermore, our method offers a computationally efficient alternative to commonly used, resource-intensive sampling techniques. Through extensive experiments across diverse diffusion model architectures, we demonstrate that our approach achieves superior performance in both quantitative metrics and qualitative evaluations, consistently excelling in visual fidelity and prompt adherence. We further support these findings with comprehensive analyses, including ablation studies and visualizations.

Recent advances in multimodal large reasoning models (MLRMs) have substantially improved their ability to solve complex textual and visual tasks. However, these models tend to *overthink* on simple problems, producing unnecessarily lengthy reasoning traces, while *under-exploring* on challenging ones, leading to missed solutions. To address this imbalance, we propose **ARES**, a unified open-source framework for *adaptive reasoning* that dynamically allocates exploration effort based on task difficulty. Our approach is motivated by two key empirical findings: (i) while single-token entropy is noisy, *high window-entropy (HWE) tokens* (token-level entropies averaged under a sliding window) can reliably capture reasoning-critical moments; and (ii) reducing HWE usage benefits easy problems, while increasing it is essential for solving hard ones. Building on these insights, ARES introduces a two-stage training pipeline. In the *Adaptive Cold-Start* stage, we curate multimodal and textual data paired with reasoning traces of length proportional to problem difficulty, equipping the model with initial difficulty awareness. In the second stage, we develop *Adaptive Entropy Policy Optimization (AEPO)*, which uses HWE tokens as exploration triggers to decide *when to explore*, and a hierarchical entropy reward with dynamic KL control to decide *how much to explore*. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ARES achieves state-of-the-art performance and reasoning efficiency across diverse mathematical, logical, and multimodal benchmarks, while closing the gap to leading commercial systems under significantly lower inference costs. The anonymous code repository is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/ARES-60728M.