ICLR 2026 论文列表

RNA secondary structure forms the basis for folding and function, with non-canonical (NC) interactions indispensable for catalysis, regulation, and molecular recognition. Despite their importance, predicting NC base pairs remains challenging due to the absence of a standardized benchmark for systematic evaluation. To address this, we introduce NC-Bench, the first benchmark dedicated to NC base-pair prediction. NC-Bench provides 925 curated RNA sequences with 6,708 high-quality NC annotations, fine-grained edge and orientation classification tasks, and IsoScore-based embedding evaluation, offering a rigorous foundation for systematic assessment. Building on this, we propose NCfold, a dual-branch framework that couples sequence features with structural priors derived from RNA foundation models (RFMs) via Representative Embedding Fusion (REF) and REF-weighted self-attention. The closed-loop design iteratively refines sequence and structure representations, alleviating data sparsity and enhancing predictive accuracy. Experiments on NC-Bench show that NCfold outperforms existing methods, with zero-shot and ablation studies confirming its effectiveness and underscoring the need for NC-specific benchmarks. Together, NC-Bench and NCfold establish a systematic foundation for NC base-pair prediction, advancing our understanding of RNA structure and enabling next-generation RNA-centric applications. The datasets and codes are publicly available at https://github.com/heqin-zhu/NCBench.

Instructed code editing, where LLMs directly modify a developer's existing code based on a user instruction, is becoming a widely used interaction mode in AI coding assistants. However, few benchmarks directly evaluate this capability and current datasets often rely on artificial sources. We introduce EditBench, a benchmark for evaluating LLM code editing capabilities grounded in real-world usage, i.e.,~user instructions and code contexts collected in the wild. EditBench comprises of 545 problems, multiple natural and programming languages, and a diverse set of real-world use cases, ranging from resolving errors to adding features. EditBench introduces context-dependent problems that require the model to understand code context, highlighted code, and cursor position in addition to the user instruction. We evaluate 40 diverse LLMs and observe that EditBench is a challenging set of problems where only 3 models score over 60\%. We find that model performance varies across different categories of user instructions. Further, we find that varying levels of contextual information greatly affect task success rate, with performance varying up to 11\%, indicating the importance of evaluating with realistic context.

One of the most challenging problems in graph machine learning is generalizing across graphs with diverse properties. Graph neural networks (GNNs) face a fundamental limitation: they require separate training for each new graph, preventing universal generalization across diverse graph datasets. A critical challenge facing GNNs lies in their reliance on labeled training data for each individual graph, a requirement that hinders the capacity for universal node classification due to the heterogeneity inherent in graphs --- differences in homophily levels, community structures, and feature distributions across datasets. Inspired by the success of large language models (LLMs) that achieve in-context learning through massive-scale pre-training on diverse datasets, we introduce NodePFN. This universal node classification method generalizes to arbitrary graphs without graph-specific training. NodePFN learns posterior predictive distributions (PPDs) by training only on thousands of synthetic graphs generated from carefully designed priors. Our synthetic graph generation covers real-world graphs through the use of random networks with controllable homophily levels and structural causal models for complex feature-label relationships. We develop a dual-branch architecture combining context-query attention mechanisms with local message passing to enable graph-aware in-context learning. Extensive evaluation on 23 benchmarks demonstrates that a single pre-trained NodePFN achieves 71.27% average accuracy. These results validate that universal graph learning patterns can be effectively learned from synthetic priors, establishing a new paradigm for generalization in node classification.

Generative foundation models (GenFMs), such as large language models and text-to-image systems, have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various downstream applications. As they are increasingly deployed in high-stakes applications, assessing their trustworthiness has become both a critical necessity and a substantial challenge. Existing evaluation efforts are fragmented, rapidly outdated, and often lack extensibility across modalities. This raises a fundamental question: how can we systematically, reliably, and continuously assess the trustworthiness of rapidly advancing GenFMs across diverse modalities and use cases? To address these gaps, we introduce TrustGen, a dynamic and modular benchmarking system designed to systematically evaluate the trustworthiness of GenFMs across text-to-image, large language, and vision-language modalities. TrustGen standardizes trust evaluation through a unified taxonomy of over 25 fine-grained dimensions—including truthfulness, safety, fairness, robustness, privacy, and machine ethics—while supporting dynamic data generation and adaptive evaluation through three core modules: Metadata Curator, Test Case Builder, and Contextual Variator. Taking TrustGen into action to evaluate the trustworthiness of 39 models reveals four key insights. (1) State-of-the-art GenFMs achieve promising overall trust performance, yet significant limitations remain in specific dimensions such as hallucination resistance, fairness, and privacy preservation. (2) Contrary to prevailing assumptions, open-source models now rival and occasionally surpass proprietary systems in trustworthiness metrics. (3) The trust gap among top-performing models is narrowing, likely due to increased industry convergence on best practices. (4) Trustworthiness is not an isolated property; it interacts complexly with other behaviors, such as helpfulness and ethical decision-making. TrustGen is a transformative step toward standardized, scalable, and actionable trustworthiness evaluation, supporting dynamic assessments across diverse modalities and trust dimensions that evolve alongside the generative AI landscape.

Dataset distillation aims to find a small synthetic training set, such that training on the synthetic data achieves similar performance to training on a larger training dataset. Early methods solve this by interpreting the distillation problem as a bi-level optimization problem. On the other hand, disentangled methods bypass pixel-space optimization by matching data distributions and using generative techniques, leading to better computational complexity in terms of size of both training and distilled datasets. We demonstrate that by using latent spaces, the empirically successful disentangled methods can be reformulated as an optimal quantization problem, where a finite set of points is found to approximate the underlying probability measure. In particular, we link disentangled dataset distillation methods to the classical problem of optimal quantization, and are the first to demonstrate consistency of distilled datasets for diffusion-based generative priors. We propose Dataset Distillation by Optimal Quantization (DDOQ), based on clustering in the latent space of latent diffusion models. Compared to a similar clustering method D4M, we achieve better performance and inter-model generalization on the ImageNet-1K dataset using the same model and with trivial additional computation, achieving SOTA performance in higher image-per-class settings. Using the distilled noise initializations in a stronger diffusion transformer model, we obtain competitive or SOTA distillation performance on ImageNet-1K and its subsets, outperforming recent diffusion guidance methods.

Imitation learning for manipulation has a well-known data scarcity problem. Unlike natural language and 2D computer vision, there is no Internet-scale corpus of data for dexterous manipulation. One appealing option is egocentric human video, a passively scalable data source. However, existing large-scale datasets such as Ego4D do not have native hand pose annotations and do not focus on object manipulation. To this end, we use Apple Vision Pro to collect EgoDex: the largest and most diverse dataset of dexterous human manipulation to date. EgoDex has 829 hours of egocentric video with paired 3D hand and finger tracking data collected at the time of recording, where multiple calibrated cameras and on-device SLAM can be used to precisely track the pose of every joint of each hand. The dataset covers a wide range of diverse manipulation behaviors with everyday household objects in 194 different tabletop tasks ranging from tying shoelaces to folding laundry. Furthermore, we train and systematically evaluate imitation learning policies for hand trajectory prediction on the dataset, introducing metrics and benchmarks for measuring progress in this increasingly important area. By releasing this large-scale dataset, we hope to push the frontier of robotics, computer vision, and foundation models. EgoDex is publicly available for download.

Inferring ground truth from noisy, crowdsourced labels is a fundamental challenge in machine learning. For decades, the dominant paradigm has relied on dataset-specific parameter estimation, a non-scalable method that fails to transfer knowledge. Recent efforts toward universal aggregation models do not account for the structural and behavioral complexities of human-annotated crowdsourcing, resulting in poor real-world performance. To address this gap, we introduce CrowdFM, a foundation model for crowdsourced label aggregation. At its core, CrowdFM is a bipartite graph neural network that is pre-trained on a vast, domain-randomized synthetic dataset. By leveraging a size-invariant initialization and attention-based message passing, it learns universal principles of collective intelligence and generalizes to new, unseen datasets. Extensive experiments on 22 real-world benchmarks show that our single, fixed model consistently matches or surpasses bespoke, per-dataset methods in both accuracy and efficiency. Furthermore, the representations learned by CrowdFM readily support diverse downstream applications, such as worker assessment and task assignment. Code and pre-trained models will be made publicly available upon acceptance.

Evaluating the faithfulness of attribution methods remains an open challenge. Standard metrics such as Insertion and Deletion Scores rely on heuristic input perturbations (e.g., zeroing pixels), which often push samples out of the data distribution (OOD). This can distort model behavior and lead to unreliable evaluations. We propose FUD, a novel evaluation framework that reconstructs masked regions using score-based diffusion models to produce in-distribution, semantically coherent inputs. This distribution-aware approach avoids the common pitfalls of existing Attribution Evaluation Methods (AEMs) and yields assessments that more accurately reflect attribution faithfulness. Experiments across models show that FUD produces significantly different—and more reliable—judgments than prior approaches. Our implementation is available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/FUD-CCD5/

Post-training quantization (PTQ) is an attractive approach for compressing diffusion models to speed up the sampling process and reduce the memory footprint. Most existing PTQ methods uniformly sample data from various time steps in the denoising process to construct a calibration set for quantization and consider calibration samples equally important during quantization process. However, treating all calibration samples equally may not be optimal. One notable property in the denoising process of diffusion models is low-frequency features are primarily recovered in early stages, while high-frequency features are recovered in later stages of the denoising process. However, none of previous works on quantization for diffusion models consider this property to enhance the effectiveness of quantized models. In this paper, we propose a novel meta-learning approach for PTQ of diffusion models that jointly optimizes the contributions of calibration samples and the weighting of frequency components at each time step for quantizing noise estimation networks. Specifically, our approach automatically learns to assign optimal weights to calibration samples while selectively focusing on mimicking specific frequency components of data generated by the full-precision noise estimation network at each denoising time step. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-10, LSUN-Bedrooms, FFHQ, and ImageNet datasets demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art PTQ methods for diffusion models.

Real-world enterprise data intelligence workflows encompass data engineering that turns raw sources into analytical-ready tables and data analysis that convert those tables into decision-oriented insights. We introduce DAComp, a benchmark of 236 tasks that mirrors these complex workflows. Data engineering (DE) tasks require repository-level engineering on industrial schemas, including designing and building multi-stage SQL pipelines from scratch and evolving existing systems under evolving requirements. Data analysis (DA) tasks pose open-ended business problems that demand strategic planning, exploratory analysis through iterative coding, interpretation of intermediate results, and the synthesis of actionable recommendations. Engineering tasks are scored through execution-based, multi-metric evaluation. Open-ended tasks are assessed by a reliable, experimentally validated LLM-judge, which is guided by hierarchical, meticulously crafted rubrics. Our experiments reveal that even state-of-the-art agents falter on DAComp. Performance on DE tasks is particularly low, with success rates under 10\%, exposing a critical bottleneck in holistic pipeline orchestration, not merely code generation. Scores on DA tasks also average below 40\%, highlighting profound deficiencies in open-ended reasoning and demonstrating that engineering and analysis are distinct capabilities. By clearly diagnosing these limitations, DAComp provides a rigorous and realistic testbed to drive the development of truly capable autonomous data agents for enterprise settings. Our data and code are available at \url{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DAComp-397A}.

Deep Research (DR) is an emerging agent application that leverages large language models (LLMs) to address open-ended queries. It requires the integration of several capabilities, including multi-step reasoning, cross-document synthesis, and the generation of evidence-backed, long-form answers. Evaluating DR remains challenging because responses are lengthy and diverse, admit many valid solutions, and often depend on dynamic information sources. We introduce ResearchRubrics, a standardized benchmark for DR built with over 2,800+ hours of human labor that pairs realistic, domain-diverse prompts with 2,500+ expert-written, fine-grained rubrics to assess factual grounding, reasoning soundness, and clarity. We also propose a new complexity framework for categorizing DR tasks along three axes: conceptual breadth, logical nesting, and exploration. In addition, we develop human and model-based evaluation protocols that measure rubric adherence for DR agents. We evaluate several state-of-the-art DR systems and find that even leading agents like Gemini’s DR and OpenAI’s DR achieve under 68% average compliance with our rubrics, primarily due to missed implicit context and inadequate reasoning about retrieved information. Our results highlight the need for robust, scalable assessment of deep research capabilities, to which end we release ResearchRubrics (including all prompts, rubrics, and evaluation code) to facilitate progress toward well-justified research assistants.

Recent advances in image editing models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in executing explicit instructions, such as attribute manipulation, style transfer, and pose synthesis. However, these models often face challenges when dealing with implicit editing instructions, which describe the cause of a visual change without explicitly detailing the resulting outcome. These limitations arise because existing models rely on uniform editing strategies that are not equipped to handle the complex world knowledge and reasoning required for implicit instructions. To address this gap, we introduce WorldEdit, a dataset specifically designed to enable world-driven image editing. WorldEdit consists of high-quality editing samples, guided by paraphrased instructions that align with real-world causal logic. Furthermore, we provide WorldEdit-Test for evaluating the existing model's performance on causal editing scenarios. With WorldEdit, we use a two-stage training framework for fine-tuning models like Bagel, integrating with a causal verification reward. Our results show that the proposed dataset and methods significantly narrow the gap with GPT-4o and Nano-Banana, demonstrating competitive performance not only in instruction following but also in knowledge plausibility, where many open-source systems typically struggle.

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are a useful tool for uncovering human-interpretable features in the activations of large language models (LLMs). While some expect SAEs to find the true underlying features used by a model, our research shows that SAEs trained on the same model and data, differing only in the random seed used to initialize their weights, identify different sets of features. For example, in an SAE with 131K latents trained on a feedforward network in Llama 3 8B, only 30% of the features were shared across different seeds. We observed this phenomenon across multiple layers of three different LLMs, two datasets, and several SAE architectures. While ReLU SAEs trained with the L1 sparsity loss showed greater stability across seeds, SAEs using the state-of-the-art TopK activation function were more seed-dependent, even when controlling for the level of sparsity. Our results suggest that the set of features uncovered by an SAE should be viewed as a pragmatically useful decomposition of activation space, rather than an exhaustive and universal list of features ``truly used'' by the model.

Descriptive Multimodal Emotion Recognition (DMER) has garnered increasing research attention. Unlike traditional discriminative paradigms that rely on predefined emotion taxonomies, DMER aims to describe human emotional state using free-form natural language, enabling finer-grained and more interpretable emotion representations. However, this free-form prediction paradigm introduces new challenges regarding its evaluation. Previous works depend on ground-truth descriptions, but emotions are inherently tied to diverse human behaviors, and generating a comprehensive and accurate description is inherently demanding. Other researchers reformulate this problem into a more tractable human preference learning task, but pairwise preference annotation involves substantial manual effort. This leads to a question: *can we leverage multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) to achieve more cost-efficient preference annotation?* To answer this, we propose **EmoPrefer**, a pioneering work exploring the potential of LLMs in decoding human emotion preferences. Specifically, we construct the first emotion preference dataset, **EmoPrefer-Data**, featuring high-quality preference annotations from experts. Additionally, we introduce **EmoPrefer-Bench**, which evaluates the performance of various MLLMs and prompting techniques in preference prediction, while also revealing new strategies to enhance their performance. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work exploring the capabilities of LLMs in understanding human emotion preferences. Our work advances the field of DMER and lays the foundation for more intelligent human-computer interaction. Our data and code are released at https://github.com/zeroQiaoba/AffectGPT/tree/master/EmoPrefer.

Deepfake generation methods are evolving fast, making fake media harder to detect and raising serious societal concerns. Most deepfake detection and dataset creation research focuses on monolingual content, often overlooking the challenges of multilingual and code-switched speech, where multiple languages are mixed within the same discourse. Code-switching, especially between Arabic and English, is common in the Arab world and is widely used in digital communication. This linguistic mixing poses extra challenges for deepfake detection, as it can confuse models trained mostly on monolingual data. To address this, we introduce ArEnAV, the first large-scale Arabic-English audio-visual deepfake dataset featuring intra-utterance code-switching, dialectal variation, and monolingual Arabic content. It contains 387k videos and over 765 hours of real and fake videos. Our dataset is generated using a novel pipeline integrating four Text-To-Speech and two lip-sync models, enabling comprehensive analysis of multilingual multimodal deepfake detection. We benchmark our dataset against existing monolingual and multilingual datasets, state-of-the-art deepfake detection models, and a human evaluation, highlighting its potential to advance deepfake research. The dataset is [public](https://huggingface.co/datasets/kartik060702/ArEnAV-Full).

As Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve remarkable empirical success through scaling model and data size, pretraining has become increasingly critical yet computationally prohibitive, hindering rapid development. Despite the availability of numerous pretrained LLMs developed at significant computational expense, a fundamental real-world question remains underexplored: Can we leverage existing small pretrained models to accelerate the training of larger models? In this paper, we propose a Late-to-Early Training (LET) paradigm that enables LLMs to explicitly learn later knowledge in earlier steps and earlier layers. The core idea is to guide the early layers of an LLM during early training using representations from the late layers of a pretrained (i.e. late training phase) model. We identify two key mechanisms that drive LET's effectiveness: late-to-early-step learning and late-to-early-layer learning. These mechanisms significantly accelerate training convergence while robustly enhancing both language modeling capabilities and downstream task performance, enabling faster training with superior performance. Extensive experiments on 1.4B and 7B parameter models demonstrate LET's efficiency and effectiveness. Notably, when training a 1.4B LLM on the Pile dataset, our method achieves up to 1.6× speedup with nearly 5% improvement in downstream task accuracy compared to standard training, even when using a pretrained model with 10x fewer parameters than the target model.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown emerging potential in spatiotemporal reasoning, making them promising candidates for building urban agents that support diverse urban downstream applications. Despite these benefits, existing studies primarily focus on evaluating urban LLM agent on outcome-level metrics (e.g., prediction accuracy, traffic efficiency), offering limited insight into their underlying reasoning processes. As a result, the strengths and limitations of urban LLM agents in spatiotemporal reasoning remain poorly understood. To this end, we introduce USTBench, the first benchmark to evaluate LLMs’ spatiotemporal reasoning abilities as urban agents across four decomposed dimensions: spatiotemporal understanding, forecasting, planning, and reflection. Specifically, USTBench supports five diverse urban decision-making and four spatiotemporal prediction tasks, all running within our constructed interactive city environment UAgentEnv. The benchmark includes 62,466 structured QA pairs for process-based evaluation and standardized end-to-end task assessments, enabling fine-grained diagnostics and broad task-level comparison across diverse urban scenarios. Through extensive evaluation of fourteen leading LLMs, we reveal that although LLMs show promising potential across various urban downstream tasks, they still struggle in long-horizon planning and reflective adaptation in dynamic urban contexts. Notably, recent advanced reasoning models (e.g., DeepSeek-R1) trained on general logic or mathematical problems do not consistently outperform non-reasoning LLMs. This discrepancy highlights the need for domain-specialized adaptation methods to enhance urban spatiotemporal reasoning. Overall, USTBench provides a foundation to build more adaptive and effective LLM-based urban agents and broad smart city applications. Our project is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/USTBench.

E-commerce agents contribute greatly to helping users complete their e-commerce needs. To promote further research and application of e-commerce agents, benchmarking frameworks are introduced for evaluating LLM agents in the e-commerce domain. Despite the progress, current benchmarks lack evaluating agents' capability to handle mixed-type e-commerce dialogue and complex domain rules. To address the issue, this work first introduces a novel corpus, termed Mix-ECom, which is constructed based on real-world customer-service dialogues with post-processing to remove user privacy and add CoT process. Specifically, Mix-ECom contains 4,799 samples with multiply dialogue types in each e-commerce dialogue, covering four dialogue types (QA, recommendation, task-oriented dialogue, and chit-chat), three e-commerce task types (pre-sales, logistics, after-sales), and 82 e-commerce rules. Furthermore, this work build baselines on Mix-Ecom and propose a dynamic framework to further improve the performance. Results show that current e-commerce agents lack sufficient capabilities to handle e-commerce dialogues, due to the hallucination cased by complex domain rules. The dataset will be publicly available.

The rapid development and widespread adoption of Audio Large Language Models (ALLMs) require a rigorous assessment of their trustworthiness. However, existing evaluation frameworks, primarily designed for text, are not equipped to handle the unique vulnerabilities introduced by audio’s acoustic properties. We find that significant trustworthiness risks in ALLMs arise from non-semantic acoustic cues, such as timbre, accent, and background noise, which can be used to manipulate model behavior. To address this gap, we propose AudioTrust, the first framework for large-scale and systematic evaluation of ALLM trustworthiness concerning these audio-specific risks. AudioTrust spans six key dimensions: fairness, hallucination, safety, privacy, robustness, and authenticition. It is implemented through 26 distinct sub-tasks and a curated dataset of over 4,420 audio samples collected from real-world scenarios (e.g., daily conversations, emergency calls, and voice assistant interactions), purposefully constructed to probe the trustworthiness of ALLMs across multiple dimensions. Our comprehensive evaluation includes 18 distinct experimental configurations and employs human-validated automated pipelines to objectively and scalably quantify model outputs. Experimental results reveal the boundaries and limitations of 14 state-of-the-art (SOTA) open-source and closed-source ALLMs when confronted with diverse high-risk audio scenarios, thereby offering critical insights into the secure and trustworthy deployment of future audio models. Our platform and benchmark are publicly available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/AudioTrust-8715/.