ICLR 2026 论文列表

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) achieve strong predictive performance but offer limited transparency in their decision-making. Self-Interpretable GNNs (SI-GNNs) address this by generating built-in explanations, yet their training objectives are misaligned with evaluation criteria such as faithfulness. This raises two key questions: (i) can faithfulness be explicitly optimized during training, and (ii) does such optimization genuinely improve explanation quality? We show that faithfulness is intrinsically tied to explanation self-consistency and can therefore be optimized directly. Empirical analysis further reveals that self-inconsistency predominantly occurs on unimportant features, linking it to redundancy-driven explanation inconsistency observed in recent work and suggesting untapped potential for improving explanation quality. Building on these insights, we introduce a simple, model-agnostic self-consistency (SC) training strategy. Without changing architectures or pipelines, SC consistently improves explanation quality across multiple dimensions and benchmarks, offering an effective and scalable pathway to more trustworthy GNN explanations.

We introduce GDPval, a benchmark evaluating AI model capabilities on real-world economically valuable knowledge-work tasks. GDPval covers the majority of Department of Labor O*NET Work Activities for 44 occupations across the top 9 sectors contributing to U.S. GDP (Gross Domestic Product). Tasks are constructed from the representative work of industry professionals with an average of 14 years of experience. We find that frontier model performance on GDPval is improving roughly linearly over time, and that the current best frontier models are approaching industry experts in deliverable quality. We analyze the potential for frontier models, when paired with human oversight, to perform GDPval tasks cheaper and faster than unaided experts. We also demonstrate that increased reasoning effort, increased task context, and increased scaffolding improves model performance on GDPval. Finally, we open-source a gold subset of 220 tasks and provide a public automated grading service to facilitate future research in understanding real-world model capabilities.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been extensively studied for their memory ability, yet the capacity to selectively forget during inference remains underexplored. We introduce ICF-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating In-Context Forgetting (ICF). We define ICF as the ability of LLMs to selectively forget interference information while retaining useful knowledge in context without parameter updates. Built on high-quality datasets, ICF-Bench comprises 2k multi-turn dialogues with annotations that reflect realistic scenarios. Extensive experiments of advanced LLMs on ICF-Bench reveal that: (1) models perform well without forgetting interference but struggle significantly when interference is present; (2) stronger memory capacity without forgetting interference does not transfer into stronger ICF capacity, highlighting an asymmetry between memory and ICF; and (3) context length has different effects on ICF capacity across scenarios. These findings expose critical vulnerabilities of current LLMs in terms of privacy protection, adaptability, and user autonomy. Our code and data will be available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/ICF-Bench-B1C7.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have significantly advanced the integration of visual and textual understanding. However, their ability to generate code from multimodal inputs remains limited. In this work, we introduce VisCodex, a unified framework that seamlessly merges vision and coding language models to empower MLLMs with strong multimodal code generation abilities. Leveraging a task vector-based model merging technique, we integrate a state-of-the-art coding LLM into a strong vision-language backbone, while preserving both visual comprehension and advanced coding skills. To support training and evaluation, we introduce the Multimodal Coding Dataset (MCD), a large-scale and diverse collection of 598k samples, including high-quality HTML code, chart image-code pairs, image-augmented StackOverflow QA, and algorithmic problems. Furthermore, we propose InfiBench-V, a novel and challenging benchmark specifically designed to assess models on visually-rich, real-world programming questions that demand a nuanced understanding of both textual and visual contexts. Extensive experiments show that VisCodex achieves state-of-the-art performance among open-source MLLMs and approaches proprietary models like GPT-4o, highlighting the effectiveness of our model merging strategy and new datasets.

Deep Research Agents (DRAs) are emerging as one of the most practical classes of LLM-based agents. Given an open-ended research task, they find, analyze, and synthesize large numbers of online sources to produce a comprehensive report at the level of a research analyst. This can compress hours of manual desk research into minutes. However, a comprehensive benchmark for systematically evaluating the capabilities of these agents remains absent. To bridge this gap, we introduce DeepResearch Bench, a benchmark consisting of 100 PhD-level research tasks, each meticulously crafted by domain experts across 22 distinct fields. To evaluate DRAs comprehensively, we propose two complementary and fully automated methodologies. The first is a reference-based method with adaptive criteria to assess the quality of generated research reports. The second evaluates a DRA’s information‑retrieval and collection capabilities by assessing its effective citation count and overall citation accuracy. By conducting extensive human consistency experiments, we demonstrate that our evaluation methods are highly aligned with expert judges and faithfully reflect human judgments of quality differences among DRA-generated content. We are open-sourcing DeepResearch Bench and key components of these frameworks to accelerate the development of practical LLM-based agents.

Despite the impressive performance of LLM-powered agents, their adoption for Electronic Health Record (EHR) data access remains limited by the absence of benchmarks that adequately capture real-world clinical data access flows. In practice, two core challenges hinder deployment: query ambiguity from vague user questions and value mismatch between user terminology and database entries. To address this, we introduce EHR-ChatQA an interactive database question answering benchmark that evaluates the end-to-end workflow of database agents: clarifying user questions, using tools to resolve value mismatches, and generating correct SQL to deliver accurate answers. To cover diverse patterns of query ambiguity and value mismatch, EHR-ChatQA assesses agents in a simulated environment with an LLM-based user across two interaction flows: Incremental Query Refinement (IncreQA), where users add constraints to existing queries, and Adaptive Query Refinement (AdaptQA), where users adjust their search goals mid-conversation. Experiments with state-of-the-art LLMs (e.g., o4-mini and Gemini-2.5-Flash) over five i.i.d. trials show that while agents achieve high Pass@5 of 90-95% (at least one of five trials) on IncreQA and 60-80% on AdaptQA, their Pass^5 (consistent success across all five trials) is substantially lower by 35-60%. These results underscore the need to build agents that are not only performant but also robust for the safety-critical EHR domain. Finally, we provide diagnostic insights into common failure modes to guide future agent development.

Model-level explanations for Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) aim to identify class-discriminative motifs that capture how a classifier recognizes a target class. Because the true motifs relied on by the classifier are unobservable, most approaches evaluate explanations by their target class score. However, class score alone is not sufficient as high-scoring explanations may be pathological or may fail to reflect the full range of motifs recognized by the classifier. To bridge this gap, this work introduces sufficiency risk as a formal criterion for whether explanations adequately represent the classifier’s reasoning, and derives distribution-free certificates that upper-bound this risk. Building on this foundation, three metrics are introduced: Coverage, Greedy Gain Area (GGA), and Overlap which operationalize the certificates to assess sufficiency, efficiency, and redundancy in explanations. To ensure practical utility, finite-sample concentration bounds are developed for these metrics, providing confidence intervals that enable statistically reliable comparison between explainers. Experiments on synthetic data and with three state-of-the-art explainers on four real-world datasets demonstrate that these metrics reveal differences in explanation quality hidden by class scores alone. Designed to complement class score, they constitute the first theoretically certified framework for evaluating model-level explanations of GNNs.

Modern deep neural networks remain challenging to interpret due to the opacity of their latent representations, impeding model understanding, debugging, and debiasing. Concept Embedding Models (CEMs) address this by mapping inputs to human-interpretable concept representations from which tasks can be predicted. Yet, CEMs fail to represent inter-concept relationships and require concept annotations at different granularities during training, limiting their applicability. In this paper, we introduce *Hierarchical Concept Embedding Models* (HiCEMs), a new family of CEMs that explicitly model concept relationships through hierarchical structures. To enable HiCEMs in real-world settings, we propose *Concept Splitting*, a method for automatically discovering finer-grained sub-concepts from a pretrained CEM’s embedding space without requiring additional annotations. This allows HiCEMs to generate fine-grained explanations from limited concept labels, reducing annotation burdens. Our evaluation across multiple datasets, including a user study and experiments on *PseudoKitchens*, a newly proposed concept-based dataset of 3D kitchen renders, demonstrates that (1) Concept Splitting discovers human-interpretable sub-concepts absent during training that can be used to train highly accurate HiCEMs, and (2) HiCEMs enable powerful test-time concept interventions at different granularities, leading to improved task accuracy.

Large language models and vision-language models score high on many medical QA benchmarks; however, real-world clinical reasoning remains challenging because cases often involve multiple images and require cross-view fusion. We present MedThinkVQA, a benchmark that asks models to think with multiple images: read each image, merge evidence across views, and pick a diagnosis with stepwise supervision. We make three parts explicit: multi-image questions, expert-annotated stepwise supervision, and beyond-accuracy evaluation. Only MedThinkVQA combines all these parts in one expert-annotated benchmark. The dataset has 8,481 cases in total, with 751 test cases, and on average 6.51 images per case; it is expert-annotated and, at this level, larger and more image-dense than prior work (earlier maxima < 1.43 images per case). On the test set, GPT-5 achieves 57.39% accuracy, approximately 15 percentage points below the strongest result on the most challenging prior benchmark of a similar kind, while other strong models are lower (Qwen2.5-VL-32B: 39.54%, MedGemma-27B: 37.55%, InternVL3.5-38B: 43.14%). Giving expert findings and summaries brings clear gains, but using models' self-generated ones brings small or negative gains. Step-level evaluation shows where models stumble: errors center on image reading and cross-view integration in both decisive and non-decisive steps (>70%); when a step is decisive for the final choice, reasoning slips become more common (32.26%), while scenario and pure-knowledge slips are relatively rare (<10%). These patterns isolate and quantify the core obstacle: extracting and integrating cross-image evidence, rather than language-only inference.

Despite substantial progress in video understanding, most existing datasets are limited to Earth’s gravitational conditions. However, microgravity alters human motion, interactions, and visual semantics, revealing a critical gap for real-world vision systems. This presents a challenge for domain-robust video understanding in safety-critical space applications. To address this, we introduce MicroG-4M, the first benchmark for spatio-temporal and semantic understanding of human activities in microgravity. Constructed from real-world space missions and cinematic simulations, the dataset includes 4,759 clips covering 50 actions, 1,238 context-rich captions, and over 7,000 question–answer pairs on astronaut activities and scene understanding. MicroG-4M aims to support three core tasks: fine-grained multi-label action recognition, temporal video captioning, and visual question answering, thereby enabling a comprehensive evaluation of both spatial localization and semantic reasoning in microgravity contexts. We establish baselines using state-of-the-art models. All data, annotations, and code will be made publicly available upon decision.

Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) is a classical method for measuring similarity between time series, but its non-differentiability hinders integration into end-to-end learning frameworks. To address this, soft-DTW replaces the minimum operator with a smooth soft-min, enabling differentiability and efficient computation. Motivated by soft-DTW, we propose perturbed-DTW, a differentiable framework of DTW obtained by adding random perturbations to warping costs and taking the expected minimum. Under Gumbel noise, perturbed-DTW exactly recovers soft-DTW, providing a natural probabilistic interpretation of soft-DTW. We further generalize this framework by extending the Gumbel noise to the broader family of generalized extreme value (GEV) distributions, leading to a new class of soft-DTW variants. Building on this insight, we introduce nested-soft-DTW (ns-DTW), which integrates GEV perturbations into the dynamic programming formulation of perturbed-DTW. This extension induces alignments with tunable skewness, offering greater flexibility in modeling diverse alignment structures. We validate ns-DTW on barycenter computation, clustering, and classification, demonstrating its effectiveness over existing approaches.

In-context learning (ICL) enables pre-trained transformers (TFs) to perform few-shot learning across diverse tasks, fostering growing research into its underlying mechanisms. However, existing studies typically assume a causally-sufficient regime, overlooking spurious correlations and prediction bias introduced by hidden confounders (HCs). As HC commonly exists in real-world cases, current ICL understandings may not align with actual data structures. To fill this gap, we contribute the pioneer theoretical analysis towards a novel problem setup termed as ICL-HC, which offers understanding the effect of HC on the pre-training of TFs and the following ICL prediction. Our theoretical results entail that pre-trained TFs exhibits certain prediction bias with proportional to the confounding strength. To migrate such prediction bias, we further propose a gradient-free debiasing method named Double-Debiasing (DDbias) by collecting and prompting with extremely few unconfounded examples, correcting pre-trained TFs with unbiased ICL predictions. Extensive experiments on regression tasks across diverse designs of the TF architectures and data generation protocols verify both our theoretical results and the effectiveness of the proposed DDbias method.

Conversion of spoken mathematical expressions is a challenging task that involves transcribing speech into a strictly structured symbolic representation while addressing the ambiguity inherent in the pronunciation of equations. Although significant progress has been achieved in automatic speech recognition (ASR) and language models (LM), the problem of converting spoken mathematics into LaTeX remains underexplored. This task directly applies to educational and research domains, such as lecture transcription or note creation. Based on ASR post-correction, prior work requires 2 transcriptions, focuses only on isolated equations, has a limited test set, and provides neither training data nor multilingual coverage. To address these issues, we present the first fully open-source large-scale dataset, comprising over 66,000 human-annotated audio samples of mathematical equations and sentences in English and Russian, drawn from diverse scientific domains. In addition to the ASR post-correction models and few-shot prompting, we apply audio language models, demonstrating comparable character error rate (CER) results on the MathSpeech benchmark (28\% vs. 30\%) for the equations conversion. In contrast, on the proposed S2L-equations benchmark, our models outperform the MathSpeech model by a substantial margin of more than 36 percentage points, even after accounting for LaTeX formatting artifacts (27\% vs. 64\%). We establish the first benchmark for mathematical sentence recognition (S2L-sentences) and achieve an equation CER of 40\%. This work lays the groundwork for future advances in multimodal AI, with a particular focus on mathematical content recognition.

Deep research---producing comprehensive, citation-backed reports by searching across hundreds of live websites---marks an important frontier for agentic systems. To rigorously evaluate this ability, three principles are essential: tasks should be (1) user-centric, reflecting realistic information needs, (2) dynamic, requiring up-to-date information beyond parametric knowledge, and (3) unambiguous, ensuring consistent interpretation across users. Existing benchmarks fall short of these principles, often focusing on narrow domains or posing ambiguous questions that hinder fair comparison. Guided by these principles, we introduce LiveResearchBench, a benchmark of 100 expert-curated tasks spanning daily life, enterprise, and academia, each requiring extensive, dynamic, real-time web search and synthesis. Built with over 1,500 hours of human labor, LiveResearchBench provides a rigorous basis for systematic evaluation. To evaluate citation-grounded long-form reports, we present DeepEval, a comprehensive suite covering both content- and report-level quality: checklists for coverage and presentation, rubric-tree assessments of citation accuracy and traceability, and metrics for consistency and depth of analysis. Using LiveResearchBench and DeepEval, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of frontier deep research systems, including single-agent web search, single-agent deep research, and multi-agent systems. Our analysis reveals current strengths, recurring failure modes, and key system components needed to advance reliable, insightful deep research.

Graph Neural Networks (\textsc{Gnn}s) are increasingly being deployed in sensitive, user-centric applications where regulations such as the GDPR mandate the ability to remove data upon request. This has spurred interest in graph unlearning, the task of removing the influence of specific training data from a trained \textsc{Gnn} without retraining from scratch. While several unlearning techniques have recently emerged, the field lacks a principled benchmark to assess whether these methods truly provide a practical alternative to retraining and, if so, how to choose among them for different workloads. In this work, we present the first systematic benchmark for \textsc{Gnn} unlearning, structured around three core desiderata: \emph{efficiency} (is unlearning faster than retraining?), \emph{utility} (does the unlearned model preserve predictive performance and align with the retrained gold standard?), and \emph{forgetting} (does the model genuinely eliminate the influence of removed data?). Through extensive experiments across diverse datasets and deletion scenarios, we deliver a unified assessment of existing approaches, surfacing their trade-offs and limitations. Crucially, our findings show that most unlearning techniques are not yet practical for large-scale graphs. At the same time, our benchmarking yields actionable guidelines on when unlearning can be a viable alternative to retraining and how to select among methods for different workloads, thereby charting a path for future research toward more practical, scalable, and trustworthy graph unlearning.

Spatial intelligence is essential for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) operating in the complex physical world. Existing benchmarks, however, probe only single-image relations and thus fail to assess the multi-image spatial reasoning that real-world deployments demand. We introduce MMSI-Bench, a VQA benchmark dedicated to multi-image spatial intelligence. Six 3D-vision researchers spent more than 300 hours meticulously crafting 1,000 challenging, unambiguous multiple-choice questions from over 120,000 images, each paired with carefully designed distractors and a stepwise reasoning process. We conduct extensive experiments and evaluate 37 open-source and proprietary MLLMs, observing a wide gap: the strongest open-source model attains roughly 30\% accuracy and OpenAI's GPT-5 reasoning model reaches 40\%, while humans score 97\%. These results underscore the challenging nature of MMSI-Bench and the substantial headroom for future research. Leveraging the annotated reasoning processes, we also provide an automated error analysis pipeline that diagnoses four dominant failure modes, including (1) grounding errors, (2) overlap-matching and scene-reconstruction errors, (3) situation-transformation reasoning errors, and (4) spatial-logic errors, offering insights for advancing spatial intelligence.

Existing red-teaming benchmarks, when adapted to new languages via direct translation, fail to capture socio-technical vulnerabilities rooted in local culture and law, creating a critical blind spot in LLM safety evaluation. To address this gap, we introduce CAGE (Culturally Adaptive Generation), a framework that systematically adapts the adversarial intent of proven red-teaming prompts to new cultural contexts. At the core of CAGE is the Semantic Mold, a novel approach that disentangles a prompt's adversarial structure from its cultural content. This approach enables the modeling of realistic, localized threats rather than testing for simple jailbreaks. As a representative example, we demonstrate our framework by creating KoRSET, a Korean benchmark, which proves more effective at revealing vulnerabilities than direct translation baselines. CAGE offers a scalable solution for developing meaningful, context-aware safety benchmarks across diverse cultures.

AI tasks differ in complexity and are best addressed with different computation strategies (e.g., combinations of models and decoding methods). Hence, an effective routing system that maps tasks to the appropriate strategies is crucial. Most prior methods build the routing framework by training a *single* model across *all* strategies, which demands full retraining whenever new strategies appear and leads to high overhead. Attempts at such continual routing, however, often face difficulties with generalization. Prior models also typically use a *single* input representation, limiting their ability to capture the full complexity of the routing problem and leading to sub-optimal routing decisions. To address these gaps, we propose CONCUR, a **con**tinual routing framework that supports both **c**onstrained and **u**nconstrained **r**outing (i.e., routing with or without a budget). Our *modular* design trains a separate predictor model for each strategy, enabling seamless incorporation of new strategies with low additional training cost. Our predictors also leverage *multiple* representations of both tasks and computation strategies to better capture overall problem complexity. Experiments on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution, knowledge- and reasoning-intensive tasks show that our method outperforms the best single strategy and strong existing routing techniques with higher end-to-end accuracy and lower inference cost in both continual and non-continual settings, while also reducing training cost in the continual setting.

Labeling errors in datasets are common, arising in a variety of contexts, such as human labeling and weak labeling. Although neural networks (NNs) can tolerate modest amounts of these errors, their performance degrades substantially once the label error rate exceeds a certain threshold. We propose the Rockafellian Relaxation Method (RRM) -- an architecture-independent, loss reweighting approach to enhance the capacity of neural network methods to accommodate noisy labeled data. More precisely, it functions as a wrapper, modifying any methodology's training loss - particularly, the supervised component. Experiments indicate RRM can provide an increase to accuracy across classification tasks in computer vision and natural language processing (sentiment analysis). This observed potential for increase holds irrespective of dataset size, noise generation (synthetic/human), data domain, and adversarial perturbation.