AACL 2025 论文列表

Rising mental health issues among youth have increased interest in automated approaches for detecting early signs of psychological distress in digital text. One key focus is the identification of cognitive distortions, irrational thought patterns that have a role in aggravating mental distress. Early detection of these distortions may enable timely, low-cost interventions. While prior work has focused on English clinical data, we present the first in-depth study of cross-lingual and cross-register generalization of cognitive distortion detection, analyzing forum posts written by Dutch adolescents. Our findings show that while changes in language and writing style can significantly affect model performance, domain adaptation methods show the most promise

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong linguistic capabilities, but little is known about how they encode psycholinguistic knowledge across languages. We investigate whether and how LLMs exhibit human-like psycholinguistic responses under different linguistic identities using two tasks: sound symbolism and word valence. We evaluate two models, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct, under monolingual and bilingual prompting in English, Dutch, and Chinese. Behaviorally, both models adjust their outputs based on prompted language identity, with Qwen showing greater sensitivity and sharper distinctions between Dutch and Chinese. Probing analysis reveals that psycholinguistic signals become more decodable in deeper layers, with Chinese prompts yielding stronger and more stable valence representations than Dutch. Our results demonstrate that language identity conditions both output behavior and internal representations in LLMs, providing new insights into their application as models of cross-linguistic cognition.

Detoxification, the task of rewriting harmful language into non-toxic text, has become increasingly important amid the growing prevalence of toxic content online. However, high-quality parallel datasets for detoxification, especially for hate speech, remain scarce due to the cost and sensitivity of human annotation. In this paper, we propose a novel LLM-in-the-loop pipeline leveraging GPT-4o-mini for automated detoxification. We first replicate the ParaDetox pipeline by replacing human annotators with LLM and show that LLM performs comparably to the human annotation. Building on this, we construct ParaDeHate, a large-scale parallel dataset specifically for hate speech detoxification. We release ParaDeHate as a benchmark of over 8,000 hate/non-hate text pairs and evaluate a wide range of baseline methods. Experimental results show that models such as BART fine-tuned on ParaDeHate achieve better performance in style accuracy, content preservation, and fluency, demonstrating the effectiveness of LLM-generated detoxification text as a scalable alternative to human annotation.

Large language models are increasingly adapted to downstream tasks through fine-tuning. Full supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods, such as Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), are two dominant approaches. While PEFT methods are widely used for their computational efficiency, the implications of their configurations (e.g., rank) remain under-explored in downstream Q&A tasks and generalisation. In this work, we perform a comprehensive evaluation across multiple reasoning and recall datasets, conducting a rank sweep to quantify the trade-off between SFT and PEFT. We also compare the accuracy of PEFT and SFT models across in-domain and out-of-domain adaptation, highlighting distinct generalisation behaviour and task-specific forgetting. We demonstrate that LoRA achieves competitive and in some cases superior performance compared to SFT, particularly on reasoning tasks at specific rank values. Additionally, we analyze the internal representations via spectral features and layer-wise attention structures, offering insights into representational drift and structural changes in attention patterns.

In the legal domain, Fact-based Judgment Prediction and Explanation (FJPE) aims to predict judicial outcomes and generate grounded explanations using only factual information, mirroring early-phase legal reasoning. Motivated by the overwhelming case backlog in the Indian judiciary, we introduce TathyaNyaya, the first large-scale, expert-annotated dataset for FJPE in the Indian context. Covering judgments from the Supreme Court and multiple High Courts, the dataset comprises four complementary components, NyayaFacts, NyayaScrape, NyayaSimplify, and NyayaFilter, that facilitate diverse factual modeling strategies. Alongside, we present FactLegalLlama, an instruction-tuned LLaMa-3-8B model fine-tuned to generate faithful, fact-grounded explanations. While FactLegalLlama trails transformer baselines in raw prediction accuracy, it excels in generating interpretable explanations, as validated by both automatic metrics and legal expert evaluation. Our findings show that fact-only inputs and preprocessing techniques like text simplification and fact filtering can improve both interpretability and predictive performance. Together, TathyaNyaya and FactLegalLlama establish a robust foundation for realistic, transparent, and trustworthy AI applications in the Indian legal system.

Coreference resolution is a fundamental task in natural language processing that involves linking different references to the same entity within a text. However, existing models often struggle to reliably identify referential relationships in contexts with extensive length or complex modifiers. This study proposes a data augmentation technique adding adjective phrases and employing a prompt-based adversarial filtering pipeline to address these challenges. Specifically, we generated and inserted contextually appropriate adjective phrases through the interaction between GPT-4o-mini based Few-shot Prompting and a Discriminative Language Model. The grammatical and semantic consistency of these phrases was validated via human evaluation and inter-annotator agreement (IAA) procedures. The generated synthetic dataset was integrated with existing data, leading to enhanced model performance. On the LitBank dataset, the CoNLL-F1 score increased by up to 1.7%, while the synthetic dataset improved linguistic diversity and the complexity of referential structures. The proposed pipeline represents a significant step towards developing coreference resolution models capable of better capturing linguistic variety and demonstrating robustness under challenging conditions.

Language-specific neurons, units in LLMs that strongly correlate with individual languages have been shown to influence model behavior by deactivating them. However, their role in amplification remains underexplored.This work investigates the effect of amplifying language-specific neurons through interventions across 18 languages, including low-resource ones, using three models primarily trained in different languages. We compare amplification factors by their effectiveness in steering to the target language using a proposed Language Steering Shift (LSS) evaluation score, then evaluate it on downstream tasks: commonsense reasoning (XCOPA, XWinograd), knowledge (Include), and translation (FLORES). The optimal amplification steering factors effectively steer output toward nearly all tested languages. Intervention using this factor on downstream tasks improves self-language performance in some cases but generally degrades cross-language results. These findings highlight the effect of language-specific neurons in multilingual behavior, where amplification can be beneficial especially for low-resource languages, but provides limited advantage for cross-lingual transfer.

Effective tool pre-selection via retrieval is essential for AI agents to select from a vast array of tools when identifying and planning actions in the context of complex user queries. Despite its central role in planning, this aspect remains underexplored in the literature. Traditional approaches rely primarily on similarities between user queries and tool descriptions, which significantly limits retrieval accuracy, specifically when handling multi-step user requests. To address these limitations, we propose a Knowledge Graph (KG)-based tool retrieval framework that captures the semantic relationships between tools and their functional dependencies. Our retrieval algorithm leverages ensembles of 1-hop ego tool graphs to model direct and indirect connections between tools, enabling more comprehensive and contextual tool selection for multi-step tasks. We evaluate our approach on a synthetically generated internal dataset across six defined user classes, extending previous work on coherent dialogue synthesis and tool retrieval benchmarks. Results demonstrate that our tool graph-based method achieves 91.85% tool coverage on the micro-average CompleteRecall metric, compared to 89.26% for re-ranked semantic-lexical hybrid retrieval, the strongest non-KG baseline in our experiments. These findings support our hypothesis that the structural information modeled in the graph provides complementary signals to pure similarity matching, particularly for queries requiring sequential tool composition.

Rapid information access is vital during wildfires, yet traditional data sources are slow and costly. Social media offers real-time updates, but extracting relevant insights remains a challenge. In this work, we focus on multimodal wildfire social media data, which, although existing in current datasets, is currently underrepresented in Canadian contexts. We present WildFireCan-MMD, a new multimodal dataset of X posts from recent Canadian wildfires, annotated across twelve key themes. We evaluate zero-shot vision-language models on this dataset and compare their results with those of custom-trained and baseline classifiers. We show that while baseline methods and zero-shot prompting offer quick deployment, custom-trained models outperform them when labelled data is available. Our best-performing custom model reaches 84.48±0.69% f-score, outperforming VLMs and baseline classifiers. We also demonstrate how this model can be used to uncover trends during wildfires, through the collection and analysis of a large unlabeled dataset. Our dataset facilitates future research in wildfire response, and our findings highlight the importance of tailored datasets and task-specific training. Importantly, such datasets should be localized, as disaster response requirements vary across regions and contexts.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are predominantly assessed based on their common sense reasoning, language comprehension, and logical reasoning abilities. While models trained in specialized domains like mathematics or coding have demonstrated remarkable advancements in logical reasoning, there remains a significant gap in evaluating their code generation capabilities. Existing benchmark datasets fall short in pinpointing specific strengths and weaknesses, impeding targeted enhancements in models’ reasoning abilities to synthesize code. To bridge this gap, our paper introduces an innovative, pedagogical benchmarking method that mirrors the evaluation processes encountered in academic programming courses. We introduce CodeEval, a multi-dimensional benchmark dataset designed to rigorously evaluate LLMs across 24 distinct aspects of Python programming. The dataset covers three proficiency levels—beginner, intermediate, and advanced—and includes both class-based and function-based problem types with detailed problem specifications and comprehensive test suites. To facilitate widespread adoption, we also developed RunCodeEval, an open-source execution framework that provides researchers with a ready-to-use evaluation pipeline for CodeEval. RunCodeEval handles test execution, context setup, and metrics generation, enabling researchers to quickly obtain detailed insights into model strengths and weaknesses across complexity levels, problem types, and programming categories. This combination enables targeted evaluation and guides improvements in LLMs’ programming proficiencies.

Recent studies have shown that prompting large language models (LLMs) with role-playing personas can enhance their reasoning capabilities. While the benefits of role-playing personas in reasoning tasks are widely recognized, it remains uncertain whether a persona aligned with the given dataset can consistently achieve these improvements. In this work, we empirically investigate the potential drawbacks of using dataset-aligned personas (referred to as coarsely aligned personas) and introduce Jekyll & Hyde, a novel framework that enhances reasoning robustness by ensembling solutions from both role-playing and neutral (non-persona) prompts.Jekyll & Hyde first predicts an instance-specific persona tailored to each query using an LLM, then generates answers with both persona and neutral prompts, and finally selects the superior output through an LLM-based evaluator.Experimental results claim that across twelve widely used natural language reasoning datasets and three backbone large language models, Jekyll & Hyde consistently outperforms single-perspective LLMs, achieving an average accuracy gain of 9.98% on GPT‐4.We further demonstrate that using instance‐aligned personas yields more accurate and stable performance than using dataset-aligned personas.

Identifying rhetorical roles in legal judgments is a foundational step for automating legal reasoning, summarization, and retrieval. In this paper, we propose a novel Sequential Tolerance-based Classifier (SeqTNS) for rhetorical role classification in Indian legal documents. The proposed classifier leverages semantic similarity and contextual dependencies by using label sequence aware BiLSTMs on top of word embeddings from finetuned InLegalBERT model. These enriched embeddings are clustered into tolerance classes via a tolerance relation using a cosine distance threshold,enabling the model to make flexible, similarity-based predictions. We evaluate SeqTNS on two benchmark datasets annotated with thirteen and seven rhetorical roles, respectively. The proposed method outperforms fine-tuned transformer baselines (LegalBERT, InLegalBERT) as well as the previously developed tolerance relation-based (TNS) model, achieving a weighted F1 score of 0.78 on thirteen class dataset and a macro F1 of 0.83 on the seven class dataset, while reducing training time by 39-40% compared to state of the art BiLSTM-CRF models. The larger of our two datasets is substantial, containing over 40,000 sentences and 1.3M tokens, and serves as a challenging real world benchmark. Additionally, we use LIME for explainability and t-SNE to validate the coherence of tolerance-based clusters.

Full-duplex spoken dialogue models, which process audio input and output simultaneously, have been actively studied for their ability to naturally model turn-taking and non-verbal phenomena in addition to generating responses. Although these models enable natural conversational flow, they lack mechanisms for language understanding and dialogue management, making them difficult to apply to task-oriented dialogue systems. We propose a method for incorporating dialogue state tracking in task-oriented dialogue into Moshi, aiming to achieve a multi-channel, full-duplex task-oriented spoken dialogue model. We evaluated the proposed method on JMultiWOZ, a benchmark corpus for Japanese task-oriented dialogue, focusing on dialogue state tracking and response generation.

Generation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) texts in important works has become a common practice that can be used to misuse and abuse AI at various levels. Traditional AI detectors often rely on document-level classification, which struggles to identify AI content in hybrid or slightly edited texts designed to avoid detection, leading to concerns about the model’s efficiency, which makes it hard to distinguish between human-written and AI-generated texts. A sentence-level sequence labeling model proposed to detect transitions between human- and AI-generated text, leveraging nuanced linguistic signals overlooked by document-level classifiers. By this method, detecting and segmenting AI and human-written text within a single document at the token-level granularity is achieved. Our model combines the state-of-the-art pre-trained Transformer models, incorporating Neural Networks (NN) and Conditional Random Fields (CRFs). This approach extends the power of transformers to extract semantic and syntactic patterns, and the neural network component to capture enhanced sequence-level representations, thereby improving the boundary predictions by the CRF layer, which enhances sequence recognition and further identification of the partition between Human- and AI-generated texts. The evaluation is performed on two publicly available benchmark datasets containing collaborative human and AI-generated texts. Our experimental comparisons are with zero-shot detectors and the existing state-of-the-art models, along with rigorous ablation studies to justify that this approach, in particular, can accurately detect the spans of AI texts in a completely collaborative text.

International enterprises, organizations, and hospitals collect large amounts of multi-modal data stored in databases, text documents, images, and videos. While there has been recent progress in the separate fields of multi-modal data exploration as well as in database systems that automatically translate natural language questions to database query languages, the research challenge of querying both structured databases and unstructured modalities (e.g., texts, images) in natural language remains largely unexplored.In this paper, we propose M^2EX, a system that enables multi-modal data exploration via language agents. Our approach is based on the following research contributions: (1) Our system is inspired by a real-world use case that enables users to explore multi-modal information systems. (2) M^2EX leverages an LLM-based agentic AI framework to decompose a natural language question into subtasks such as text-to-SQL generation and image analysis and to orchestrate modality-specific experts in an efficient query plan. (3) Experimental results on multi-modal datasets, encompassing relational data, text, and images, demonstrate that our system outperforms state-of-the-art multi-modal exploration systems, excelling in both accuracy and various performance metrics, including query latency, API costs, and planning efficiency, thanks to the more effective utilization of the reasoning capabilities of LLMs.

Causal reasoning is central to language understanding, yet remains under-resourced in Bangla. In this paper, we introduce the first large-scale dataset for causal inference in Bangla, consisting of over 11663 sentences annotated for causal sentence types (explicit, implicit, non-causal) and token-level spans for causes, effects, and connectives. The dataset captures both simple and complex causal structures across diverse domains such as news, education, and health. We further benchmark a suite of state-of-the-art instruction-tuned large language models, including LLaMA 3.3 70B, Gemma 2 9B, Qwen 32B, and DeepSeek, under zero-shot and three-shot prompting conditions. Our analysis reveals that while LLMs demonstrate moderate success in explicit causality detection, their performance drops significantly on implicit and span-level extraction tasks. This work establishes a foundational resource for Bangla causal understanding and highlights key challenges in adapting multilingual LLMs for structured reasoning in low-resource languages.

Language and culture are deeply intertwined, yet it has been unclear how and where multilingual large language models encode culture. Here, we build on an established methodology for identifying language-specific neurons to localize and isolate culture-specific neurons, carefully disentangling their overlap and interaction with language-specific neurons. To facilitate our experiments, we introduce MUREL, a curated dataset of 85.2 million tokens spanning six different cultures. Our localization and intervention experiments show that LLMs encode different cultures in distinct neuron populations, predominantly in upper layers, and that these culture neurons can be modulated largely independently of language-specific neurons or those specific to other cultures. These findings suggest that cultural knowledge and propensities in multilingual language models can be selectively isolated and edited, with implications for fairness, inclusivity, and alignment. Code and data are available at https://github.com/namazifard/Culture_Neurons

Large language models (LLMs) can suggest missing elements from items listed in a prompt, which can be used for list completion or similar item recommendation. However, their performance degrades when they are exposed to too many items, as they start to suggest items already included in the input list. This occurs at around 100 items for mid-2024 flagship LLMs. We evaluate this phenomenon on both synthetic problems (e.g., finding missing numbers in a given range of shuffled integers) and realistic movie recommendation scenarios. We refer to this issue as “attention overflow”, as avoiding repetition requires attending to all items simultaneously. Although iterative loops can mitigate this problem, their costs increase with the repetition rate, affecting the language models’ ability to derive novelty from lengthy inputs.

The discipline of physics stands as a cornerstone of human intellect, driving the evolution of technology and deepening our understanding of the fundamental principles of the cosmos. Contemporary literature includes some works centered on the task of solving physics problems—a crucial domain of natural language reasoning. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of frontier LLMs in solving physics problems, both mathematical and descriptive. We also employ a plethora of inference-time techniques and agentic frameworks to improve the performance of the models. This includes the verification of proposed solutions in a cumulative fashion by other, smaller LLM agents, and we perform a comparative analysis of the performance that the techniques entail. There are significant improvements when the multi-agent framework is applied to problems that the models initially perform poorly on. Furthermore, we introduce a new evaluation benchmark for physics problems, PhysicsEval, consisting of 19,609 problems sourced from various physics textbooks and their corresponding correct solutions scraped from physics forums and educational websites. Our code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/areebuzair/PhysicsEval.