ICML 2026 Papers

Progress in neural combinatorial optimization for Dynamic Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problem (DFJSP) is currently hindered by a methodological tension: static benchmarks encourage benchmark overfitting, while uncalibrated generators obscure algorithmic capability with stochastic noise. To resolve this, we introduce \textbf{DynaSchedBench}, a diagnostic framework for DFJSP that rigorously controls the instance-generation process. Instead of relying on parameter sampling, our approach utilizes Sequential Event-Space Calibrator (SESC) that computes a novel Schedule Stress Index (SSI) to stratify instances by difficulty. We demonstrate that SESC is substantially more computationally efficient than evolutionary baselines while converging reliably to the target metrics. The framework integrates modular components for instance generation, snapshot-based simulation, agents, evaluation, and visualization, thereby enabling rigorous testing of reactive and lookahead-based policies. Leveraging this calibrated environment, we identify key limitations of LLM-based scheduling agents. Specifically, in step-wise online decision-making for dynamic scheduling, we identify an ``Observability Paradox'': providing agents with oracle access to full structural information can degrade policy performance, underperforming concise information. Furthermore, despite substantial token overhead, tool-augmented and refinement strategies fail to reliably improve performance, and most LLM agents fail to consistently surpass strong dispatching baselines—behaving more like robust heuristic approximators than superior optimizers.

Agent memory systems must accommodate continuously growing information while supporting efficient, context-aware retrieval for downstream tasks. Abstraction is essential for scaling agent memory, yet it often comes at the cost of specificity, obscuring the fine-grained details required for effective reasoning. We introduce Memora, a harmonic memory representation that structurally balances abstraction and specificity. Memora organizes information via its *primary abstractions* that index concrete memory values and consolidate related updates into unified memory entries, while *cue anchors* expand retrieval access across diverse aspects of the memory and connect related memories. Building on this structure, we employ a retrieval policy that actively exploits these memory connections to retrieve relevant information beyond direct semantic similarity. Theoretically, we show that standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Knowledge Graph (KG)-based memory systems emerge as special cases of our framework. Empirically, Memora establishes a new state-of-the-art on the LoCoMo and LongMemEval benchmarks, demonstrating better retrieval relevance and reasoning effectiveness as memory scales.

Time series anomaly detection(TSAD) is a critical task, but developing models that generalize to unseen data in a zero-shot manner remains challenging. Existing foundation models for TSAD often rely on reconstruction-error scoring at inference time, which can miss subtle anomalies that are well reconstructed and can falsely flag complex but normal patterns in unseen domains. We introduce TimeRCD, a foundation model for TSAD built on Relative Context Discrepancy (RCD), a pre-training paradigm that trains the model to detect anomalies by comparing a query pattern with its surrounding context. This relational formulation, implemented with a standard Transformer architecture, enables the model to infer normality from the input context rather than relying on fixed global normal patterns. We further construct a large-scale synthetic corpus with context-dependent anomaly labels to provide supervised pre-training signals for RCD. Experiments across diverse benchmarks show that TimeRCD outperforms existing general-purpose and anomaly-specific foundation models in most zero-shot TSAD settings, while remaining competitive with dataset-specific full-shot baselines. These results provide empirical evidence that RCD is an effective direction for building robust and generalizable TSAD models.

Concerns over dataset misuse in deep learning have highlighted the need for effective auditing. Unlike existing intrusive methods that require dataset modifications, which risk model performance and security, we present DataGuard, a non-intrusive framework for quantitative dataset auditing. Specifically, DataGuard integrates three key components: 1) a differential comparison between the target dataset and auxiliary non-training datasets, 2) an information-forensic analysis establishing formal inequalities to distinguish training data; and 3) a multivariate statistical test that translates these discrepancies into rigorous auditing scores. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DataGuard can detect both full and partial dataset usage without false positives while remaining robust under diverse training scenarios, offering a principled, information-theoretic solution for transparent AI development.

Recent advances in LipSync generation technology have led to the creation of highly realistic videos, posing severe societal risks. However, existing defense strategies struggle against LipSync forgeries, as state-of-the-art generative models not only optimize for the lip synchronization but also significantly eliminate visual artifacts, resulting in the lack of key detection signals. Inspired by the inherent biological coupling between lip movements and head poses in natural speech, we observe that generative models fundamentally disrupt this global coordination when optimizing for local lip motion. In this paper, we propose LipDA, a novel framework for joint LipSync Detection and Attribution, which takes advantage of the inconsistency between head and lip. For detection, the framework learns to quantify this discrepancy by contrasting lip and pose features from authentic versus forged videos. For attribution, our method is designed to capture the unique temporal dynamics and audio-visual synchronization patterns that act as generative fingerprints, enabling source tracing. To validate our approach, we conduct extensive experiments on two challenging LipSync benchmarks as well as on our own proposed large-scale and multi-generator dataset, LipSyncBench-A. LipDA achieves over 97% AUC in detection and 97.5% accuracy in model attribution, significantly outperforming existing methods.

Generative AI is reshaping healthcare, yet most existing advances rely on hospital-grade devices, which limits their accessibility and potential for health management outside clinical settings. With the proliferation of portable devices and telemedicine, healthcare is shifting toward home-based Diagnosis-It-Yourself (DIY) care. Despite this promise, several distinctive challenges remain: (i) home-collected data are heterogeneous, exacerbated by the absence of standardized large-scale datasets; (ii) models require adaptation to variable task demands and evolving individual conditions; (iii) the broad spectrum of home care tasks lacks a unified benchmark for systematic evaluation. In this paper, we present **DIYHealth Suite**, a comprehensive framework designed to address these challenges through a tailored dataset, model, and benchmark. We first curate **DIYHealth-900K**, a large-scale multimodal dataset capturing diverse real-world home care scenarios. Building on this, we propose **DIYHealthGPT**, an adaptive foundation model for home-based health management, powered by the novel Hybrid Hyper Low-Rank Adaptation technique. Finally, we establish **DIYHealthBench**, the first benchmark to evaluate foundation models on home care tasks. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DIYHealthGPT delivers state-of-the-art performance over both general-purpose and medical-specific baselines on 11 home care tasks in both open-QA and closed-QA settings, laying the groundwork for the next generation of personalized health management at home.

Personalized federated learning has emerged as a popular approach to training on devices holding statistically heterogeneous data, known as clients. However, most existing approaches require a client to have labeled data for training or finetuning in order to obtain their own personalized model. In this paper we address this by proposing FLowDUP, a novel method that is able to generate a personalized model using only a forward pass with unlabeled data. The generated model parameters reside in a low-dimensional subspace, enabling efficient communication and computation. FLowDUP's learning objective is theoretically motivated by our new transductive multi-task PAC-Bayesian generalization bound, that provides performance guarantees for unlabeled clients. The objective is structured in such a way that it allows both clients with labeled data and clients with only unlabeled data to contribute to the training process. To supplement our theoretical results we carry out a thorough experimental evaluation of FLowDUP, demonstrating strong empirical performance on a range of datasets with differing sorts of statistically heterogeneous clients. Through numerous ablation studies, we test the efficacy of the individual components of the method.

Dataset distillation (DD) aims to replace a full training set with a tiny synthetic one, yet current theories neither explain why heterogeneous matching objectives (gradient, distribution, trajectory) work nor provide a quantitative boundary for robustness under configuration changes (optimizer, architecture, augmentation). We propose **configuration-dynamics-error (CDE) analysis** for a broad class of matching-based DD methods, a unified generalization framework that treats a training configuration as an update operator inducing optimization dynamics and measures distillation robustness by the test-risk gap between models trained on distilled versus full data. Within this framework, gradient, distribution, and trajectory matching reduce the same dynamics-induced risk gap, explaining why these heterogeneous objectives can all support dataset distillation. CDE yields two predictive laws: within a fixed configuration, the gap decays as $\mathcal{O}(k^{-1/2})$ with the distilled set size $k$ until a configuration-dependent floor, explaining IPC saturation and indicating when reducing the floor is more valuable than enlarging $k$. Across configurations, an order-tight coverage law formalizes the utility boundary: the required $k$ grows linearly with the configuration diversity captured by covering-number complexity. Experiments with representative DD methods and configuration changes exhibit predictive behavior consistent with both laws.

We study Vector Linking: given two embedding clouds produced by different black-box encoders over partially overlapping datasets, recover cross-model object correspondences using only vectors. Empirically and theoretically, we show that independently trained contrastive encoders exhibit local geometric consistency: short-range distances are approximately preserved up to a scale factor, while long-range distances are not due to model-specific distortion. Building on this, we propose an iterative, reference-based geometric embedding hashing that recovers vector links from a tiny seed set of paired anchors. It represents each vector by distances to sampled paired anchors, proposes candidate links via hash-space matching, and aggregates evidence across views in a Beta--Bernoulli posterior to bootstrap high-confidence links as new anchors. Experiments across multiple benchmarks and embedding model pairs demonstrate accurate and robust linking under varying overlap, seed budgets, and out-of-domain references, with applications to vector database integration and cross-model clustering. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/DBgroup-Edinburgh/VecLinking}.

We study the problem of neural logistic bandits, where the main task is to learn an unknown reward function within a logistic link function using a neural network. Existing approaches either exhibit unfavorable dependencies on $\kappa$, where $1/\kappa$ represents the minimum variance of reward distributions, or suffer from direct dependence on the feature dimension $d$, which can be huge in neural network–based settings. In this work, we introduce a novel Bernstein-type inequality for self-normalized vector-valued martingales that is designed to bypass a direct dependence on the ambient dimension. This lets us deduce a regret upper bound that grows with the effective dimension $\widetilde{d}$, not the feature dimension, while keeping a minimal dependence on $\kappa$. Based on the concentration inequality, we propose two algorithms, NeuralLog-UCB-1 and NeuralLog-UCB-2, that guarantee regret upper bounds of order $\widetilde{O}(\widetilde{d}\sqrt{\kappa T})$ and $\widetilde{O}(\widetilde{d}\sqrt{T/\kappa})$, respectively, improving on the existing results. Lastly, we report numerical results on both synthetic and real datasets to validate our theoretical findings.

Large language models have revolutionized natural language processing but face significant challenges of high storage and runtime costs, due to the transformer architecture's reliance on self-attention, particularly the large KV cache for long-sequence inference. Recent efforts to reduce KV cache size by pruning less critical entries based on attention weights remain empirical and lack formal grounding. This paper presents a formal study on identifying critical KV cache entries by analyzing attention output perturbation. Our analysis reveals that, beyond attention weights, the value states within KV entries and pretrained parameter matrices are also crucial. Based on this, we propose a perturbation-constrained selection algorithm that optimizes the worst-case output perturbation to identify critical entries. We demonstrate that our algorithm is a universal, plug-and-play enhancement that incurs negligible computational overhead. When integrated with three state-of-the-art cache eviction methods on three distinct LLMs, our algorithm significantly reduces the compression loss by more than \textit{half} on average across 29 datasets from the Ruler and LongBench benchmarks. Further perturbation analysis, at both the head and layer levels, confirms the principles underlying our effectiveness. This work offers a new, formally grounded perspective to cache eviction , opening promising avenues for future research. The code is publicly available at \url{https://github.com/FFY0/DefensiveKV}.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) demonstrate remarkable visual understanding, yet their reliability in interactive settings is severely undermined by hallucination snowballing: a phenomenon where initial errors amplify across conversational turns, leading to a collapse in coherence. This failure reveals a fundamental vulnerability where models progressively neglect visual grounding in favor of over-relying on polluted textual history. Existing benchmarks are predominantly confined to single-turn VQA, which fail to capture the complex dynamics of error propagation in long-horizon interactions. To address this, we introduce MM-Snowball, the first benchmark for fine-grained diagnosis of hallucination snowballing within dialogues. Extensive evaluation shows that our benchmark poses a significant challenge even to advanced MLLMs and reveals the inefficacy of existing mitigation methods designed for single-turn VQA. To counteract this degradation, we propose Conflict-Aware Visual Rectification (CAVR). This training-free method mitigates snowballing through a synergistic dual-mechanism that refreshes visual grounding at the representation level and rectifies output distributions at the logit level, effectively re-anchoring the model to visual facts. Experiments demonstrate that CAVR achieves state-of-the-art performance, offering a promising path toward more reliable interactive AI. Data and code are available at: https://frenkie-chiang.github.io/MM-Snowball

Tokenizers provide the fundamental basis through which text is represented and processed by language models (LMs). Despite the importance of tokenization, its role in LM performance and behavior is poorly understood due to the challenge of measuring the impact of tokenization in isolation. To address this need, we present TokSuite, a collection of models and a benchmark that supports research into tokenization's influence on LMs. Specifically, we release fourteen pre-trained models that use different off-the-shelf tokenizers but are otherwise identical, using the same architecture, dataset, training budget, and initialization. We also release a multilingual robustness benchmark that measures model performance under real-world perturbations in English, Chinese, Farsi, Italian, and Turkish, curated by native annotators. Together, TokSuite allows robust decoupling of the influence of a model's tokenizer, supporting a series of novel findings that elucidate the respective benefits and shortcomings of a wide range of popular tokenizers.

Electroencephalography foundation models (EEG-FMs) have advanced brain signal analysis, but the lack of standardized evaluation benchmarks impedes model comparison and scientific progress. Current evaluations rely on inconsistent protocols that render cross-model comparisons unreliable, while a lack of diagnostic analyses obscures the internal mechanisms driving transfer efficiency and scaling behaviors. To address this, we introduce **EEG-FM-Bench**, a unified system for the standardized evaluation of EEG-FMs. The benchmark integrates 14 datasets across 10 paradigms and incorporates diverse experimental settings, including multiple fine-tuning strategies, task organizations, and classifier configurations, supported by tools for gradient and representation analysis. Our experiments and analysis reveal several critical insights: (1) multi-task learning often acts as a useful regularizer that mitigates overfitting in data-scarce EEG contexts, although negative transfer can arise under specific task paradigms; (2) pre-training efficiency is currently limited by gradient conflicts between reconstruction objectives and downstream tasks; (3) under released checkpoints and a matched downstream protocol, model or data scale alone does not fully explain transfer performance, while objective alignment, adaptation compatibility, and EEG-specific design appear to be important factors. This benchmark enables fair comparison and reproducible analysis, providing a step toward fairer comparison and more interpretable analysis of EEG-FMs. Code is available at https://github.com/xw1216/EEG-FM-Bench.

Query-based universal sound separation is fundamental to intelligent auditory systems, aiming to isolate specific sources from mixtures. Despite recent advances, existing methods continue to suffer from residual interference in complex acoustic scenes. This performance limitation stems largely from a data bottleneck: in-the-wild datasets contain weak labels and severe co-occurrence of events. These flaws induce models to learn spurious correlations between background noise and target categories instead of robust acoustic features. To address this, we propose an automated pipeline that eliminates co-occurrence of events by mining high-purity single-event segments from in-the-wild datasets via a semantically consistent synthesis protocol. Utilizing this pipeline, we constructed Hive, a high-quality synthetic dataset comprising 2.4k hours of raw audio. Experimental results demonstrate that, compared with the state-of-the-art model SAM-Audio which was trained on a huge dataset $\sim$500 times larger than Hive, certain open-source models trained on Hive achieve competitive separation accuracy and perceptual quality. Moreover, these models exhibited remarkable zero-shot generalization on out-of-distribution evaluation benchmarks. These findings highlight that prioritizing purity of supervised signals enables significant data efficiency, offering a new paradigm for training robust auditory foundation models with reduced computational costs. Code and dataset are available at https://cslikai.cn/Hive.

Multimodal Large Language Models have made substantial progress on visual understanding tasks, yet they still perform poorly on high-resolution images. Prior work often attributes this limitation to perceptual constraints, arguing that MLLMs fail to recognize small objects and therefore rely on ''zoom-in" strategies to recover fine details. In contrast, our analysis shows that the dominant failure mode is background interference rather than object size. We study the "zoom-in" operation through a **hierarchical decoupling analysis** and propose the **Hierarchical Decoupling Framework**, a training-free method that turns implicit attention into explicit region selection. HiDe first performs Token-wise Attention Decoupling to disentangle question semantics and identify the most informative tokens, then uses their attention patterns to pinpoint the corresponding visual regions. It subsequently applies Layout-Preserving Decoupling to extract these regions from cluttered backgrounds and construct a compact representation that retains key spatial structure while filtering out irrelevant context. HiDe achieves state-of-the-art results on high-resolution benchmarks like Vstar Bench. It boosts Qwen2.5-VL 7B and InternVL3 8B to state of the art performance, reaching 92.1\% and 91.6\% on Vstar Bench, and even surpasses reinforcement learning based methods. After optimization, HiDe reduces memory usage by 75\% compared with the previous training-free approach. Code will be available at https://tennine2077.github.io/HiDe.github.io/.

Graph collaborative filtering (GCF) is a dominant paradigm in recommender systems, where contrastive learning (CL) objectives such as the Sampled Softmax (SSM) loss are widely used for optimization. However, it remains unclear how CL interacts with the prediction mechanism of GCF. By unfolding the prediction mechanism of GCF, we show that the user-item prediction score is computed by aggregating learnable weights over a large number of neighbor pairs formed by the multi-hop neighbors of the user and the item. This analysis suggests that effective optimization critically depends on which neighbor pairs are upweighted during training. Empirically, we find that effective recommendation is achievable by selectively upweighting only a small subset of neighbor pairs whose constituent neighbors are structurally similar to the target user and item, and that the effect of such selective upweighting varies across different neighbor pair types. Based on these findings, we analyze SSM and identify key limitations in its neighbor pair weight update dynamics. To address these limitations, we propose NT-SSM, an effective and principled CL objective that induces type-aware neighbor pair weight update dynamics. Experiments demonstrate consistent performance improvements over SSM across multiple datasets and GCF models.

Determining an effective data mixture is a key factor in Large Language Model (LLM) pre-training, where models must balance general competence with proficiency on hard tasks such as math and code. However, identifying an optimal mixture remains an open challenge, as existing approaches either rely on unreliable tiny-scale proxy experiments or require prohibitively expensive large-scale exploration. To address this, we propose Decouple Searching from Training Mix (DeMix), a novel framework that leverages model merging to predict optimal data ratios. Instead of training proxy models for every sampled mixture, DeMix trains component models on candidate datasets at scale and derives data mixture proxies via weighted model merging. This paradigm decouples search from training costs, enabling evaluation of unlimited sampled mixtures without extra training burden and thus facilitating better mixture discovery through more search trials. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DeMix breaks the trade-off between sufficiency, accuracy and efficiency, obtaining the optimal mixture with higher benchmark performance at lower search cost. Additionally, we release the DeMix Corpora, a comprehensive 22T-token dataset comprising high-quality pre-training data with validated mixtures to facilitate open research. Our code and DeMix Corpora is available at https://github.com/Lucius-lsr/DeMix.

From a statistical evidence perspective, we establish some asymptotic optimality properties of certain multiple testing rules based on the relative belief ratio (Evans, 2015). Under the two-groups model with an additive 0-1 loss and within a Bayesian decision theoretic asymptotic framework of Bogdan et al. (2011), we show that relative belief multiple testing rules induced by a simple one-group light-tailed normal prior with a single hyperparameter achieve the same asymptotic Bayes risk as the Bayes oracle benchmark. This risk is the minimum achievable in this asymptotic framework. Despite originating from a different starting point, the evidential relative belief approach enjoys oracle properties. The relative belief multiple testing approach is fundamentally different from existing Bayesian multiple testing procedures, virtually all induced by more complex heavy-tailed one-group global-local shrinkage priors using purely posterior-based inferences (Datta & Ghosh, 2013; Ghosh et al., 2016; Bhadra et al., 2017; Ghosh & Chakrabarti, 2017; Qin & Ghosh, 2025). By measuring statistical evidence via both the prior and posterior, the relative belief approach reveals an alternative new inferential paradigm for attaining asymptotic Bayes optimality under sparsity, one that does not rely on developing increasingly elaborate priors.