ICLR 2026 Papers

Automatic radiology reporting assists radiologists in diagnosing abnormalities in radiology images, where grounding the automatic diagnosis with abnormality locations is important for the report interpretability. However, existing supervised-learning methods could lead to learning the superficial statistical correlations between images and reports, lacking multi-faceted reasoning to critique the relevant regions on which radiologists would focus. Recently, self-critical reasoning has been investigated in test-time scaling approaches to alleviate hallucinations of LLMs with increased time complexity. In this work, we focus on chest X-ray report generation with particular focus on clinical accuracy, where self-critical reasoning is alternatively introduced into the model architecture and their training objective, preferred by the real-time automatic reporting system. In particular, three types of self-critical reasoning are proposed to critique the hypotheses of grounded abnormalities compared to i) alternative abnormalities, ii) alternative patient's X-ray image, and iii) potential false negative abnormalities. To realize this, we propose a novel Radiology Self-Critiquing Reporting (RadSCR) framework, which constructs the abnormality proposals for each localized abnormality region and verify them by the proposed self-critiquing mechanisms accordingly. The critiqued results of the abnormality proposals are then integrated to generate the completed report with interpretable diagnostic process. Our experiments show the state-of-the-art performance achieved by RadSCR in the grounded report generation and diagnosis critiquing, demonstrating its effectiveness in generating the clinically accurate report.

Time series foundation models (TSFMs) are a potential class of powerful, general-purpose tools for forecasting and related temporal tasks, but their behavior is strongly shaped by subtle inductive biases in their design. Rather than developing a new model and claiming that it is better than existing TSFMs, e.g., by winning on existing benchmarks, our objective is to understand how the various "knobs" of the training process affect model quality. Using a mix of theory and controlled empirical evaluation, we identify and show how various design choices (e.g., patch size, embedding choice, training objective, etc.) lead to implicit biases in fundamental model properties (e.g., temporal behavior, geometric structure, how aggressively or not the model regresses to the mean, etc.), and how these biases can be intuitive or counterintuitive, depending on properties of the model and data. We illustrate in a case study on outlier handling how multiple biases interact in complex ways.

While spiking neural networks (SNNs) provide a biologically inspired and energy-efficient computational framework, their robustness and the dynamic advantages inherent to biological neurons remain significantly underutilized owing to oversimplified neuron models. In particular, conventional leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neurons often omit the dynamic conductance mechanisms inherent in biological neurons, thereby limiting their capacity to cope with noise and temporal variability. In this work, we revisit dynamic conductance from a functional perspective and uncover its intrinsic role as a bio-inspired gating mechanism that modulates information flow. Building on this insight, we introduce the Dynamic Gated Neuron~(DGN), a novel spiking unit in which membrane conductance evolves in response to neuronal activity, enabling selective input filtering and adaptive noise suppression. We provide a theoretical analysis showing that DGN possess enhanced stochastic stability compared to standard LIF models, with dynamic conductance intriguingly acting as a disturbance rejection mechanism. DGN-based SNNs demonstrate superior performance across extensive evaluations on anti-noise tasks and temporal-related benchmarks such as TIDIGITS and SHD, consistently exhibiting excellent robustness. To the best of our knowledge, for the first time, our results establish bio-inspired dynamic gating as a key mechanism for robust spike-based computation, providing not only theoretical guarantees but also strong empirical validations. This work thus paves the way for more resilient, efficient, and biologically inspired spiking neural networks.

Structural biology has long been dominated by the one sequence, one structure, one function paradigm, yet many critical biological processes—from enzyme catalysis to membrane transport—depend on proteins that adopt multiple conformational states. Existing multi-state design approaches rely on post-hoc aggregation of single-state predictions, achieving poor experimental success rates compared to single-state design. We introduce DynamicMPNN, an inverse folding model explicitly trained to generate sequences compatible with multiple conformations through joint learning across conformational ensembles. Trained on 46,033 conformational pairs covering 75\% of CATH superfamilies and evaluated using Alphafold 3, DynamicMPNN outperforms ProteinMPNN by up to 25% on decoy-normalized RMSD and by 12% on sequence recovery across our challenging multi-state protein benchmark.