ICLR 2026 Papers

Wearable devices such as AI glasses are transforming voice assistants into always-available, hands-free collaborators that integrate seamlessly with daily life, but they also introduce challenges like egocentric audio affected by motion and noise, rapid micro-interactions, and the need to distinguish device-directed speech from background conversations. Existing benchmarks largely overlook these complexities, focusing instead on clean or generic conversational audio. To bridge this gap, we present WearVox, the first benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate voice assistants in realistic wearable scenarios. WearVox comprises 3,842 multi-channel, egocentric audio recordings collected via AI glasses across five diverse tasks including Search-Grounded QA, Closed-Book QA, Side-Talk Rejection, Tool Calling, and Speech Translation, spanning a wide range of indoor and outdoor environments and acoustic conditions. Each recording is accompanied by rich metadata, enabling nuanced analysis of model performance under real-world constraints. We benchmark leading proprietary and open-source speech Large Language Models (SLLMs) and find that most real-time SLLMs achieve accuracies on WearVox ranging from 29\% to 59\%, with substantial performance degradation on noisy outdoor audio, underscoring the difficulty and realism of the benchmark. Additionally, we conduct a case study with two new SLLMs that perform inference with single-channel and multi-channel audio, demonstrating that multi-channel audio inputs significantly enhance model robustness to environmental noise and improve discrimination between device-directed and background speech. Our results highlight the critical importance of spatial audio cues for context-aware voice assistants and establish WearVox as a comprehensive testbed for advancing wearable voice AI research.

The rapid progress of AI and robotics may profoundly transform society, as humans and robots begin to coexist in shared communities, bringing both opportunities and challenges. To explore this future, we present Virtual Community—an open-world platform for humans, robots, and society—built on a universal physics engine and grounded in real-world 3D scenes. With Virtual Community, we aim to enable the study of embodied social intelligence at scale. To support these, Virtual Community features: 1) An open-source multi-agent physics simulator that supports robot, human, and their interactions within a society; 2) A large‑scale, real‑world aligned environment generation pipeline, including vast outdoor space, diverse indoor scenes, and a community of grounded agents with rich characters and appearances. Leveraging Virtual Community, we propose two novel challenges. The Community Planning Challenge evaluates multi‑agent reasoning and planning in open‑world settings, such as cooperating to help agents with daily activities and efficiently connecting other agents. The Community Robot Challenge requires multiple heterogeneous robots to collaborate in solving complex open‑world tasks. We evaluate various baselines and demonstrate the challenges in both high‑level open‑world task planning and low‑level cooperation controls. We have open-sourced our project and hope that Virtual Community will unlock further study of human-robot coexistence in open worlds.

Recent vision language models (VLMs) have made remarkable strides in generative modeling with multimodal inputs, particularly text and images. However, their susceptibility to generating harmful content when exposed to unsafe queries raises critical safety concerns. While current alignment strategies primarily rely on supervised safety fine-tuning with curated datasets, we identify a fundamental limitation we call the "safety mirage", where supervised fine-tuning inadvertently reinforces spurious correlations between superficial textual patterns and safety responses, rather than fostering deep, intrinsic mitigation of harm. We show that these spurious correlations leave fine-tuned VLMs vulnerable even to a simple one-word modification-based attack, where substituting a single word in text queries with a spurious correlation-inducing alternative can effectively bypass safeguards. Additionally, these correlations contribute to the over-prudence, causing fine-tuned VLMs to refuse benign queries unnecessarily. To address these issues, we show machine unlearning (MU) as a powerful alternative to supervised safety fine-tuning, as it avoids biased feature-label mappings and directly removes harmful knowledge from VLMs while preserving their general capabilities. Extensive evaluations across safety benchmarks show that under MU-based alignment reduces the attack success rate by up to 60.27% and cuts unnecessary rejections by over 84.20%.

With the rapid development of foundation video generation technologies, long video generation models have exhibited promising research potential thanks to expanded content creation space. Recent studies reveal that the goal of long video generation tasks is not only to extend video duration but also to accurately express richer narrative content within longer videos. However, due to the lack of evaluation benchmarks specifically designed for long video generation models, the current assessment of these models primarily relies on benchmarks with simple narrative prompts (e.g., VBench). To the best of our knowledge, our proposed NarrLV is the first benchmark to comprehensively evaluate the Narrative expression capabilities of Long Video generation models. Inspired by film narrative theory, (i) we first introduce the basic narrative unit maintaining continuous visual presentation in videos as Temporal Narrative Atom (TNA), and use its count to quantitatively measure narrative richness. Guided by three key film narrative elements influencing TNA changes, we construct an automatic prompt generation pipeline capable of producing evaluation prompts with a flexibly expandable number of TNAs. (ii) Then, based on the three progressive levels of narrative content expression, we design an effective evaluation metric using the MLLM-based question generation and answering framework. (iii) Finally, we conduct extensive evaluations on existing long video generation models and the foundation generation models that underpin them. Experimental results demonstrate that our metric aligns closely with human judgments. The derived evaluation outcomes reveal the detailed capability boundaries of current video generation models in narrative content expression.

Recent attempt in dataset distillation has been made to compress large-scale training datasets into compact synthetic versions, significantly reducing memory usage and training costs. While parameterization-based approaches have shown promising results on image datasets, their application to 3D point clouds remains largely unexplored due to the irregular and unordered nature of 3D data. In this paper, we first introduce a parameterization-based dataset distillation framework for 3D point clouds that enables the use of more diverse synthetic samples than conventional methods under the same memory budget. We first construct an initial synthetic dataset containing multiple anchor samples with a coarser resolution than the original sample. We also generate new samples by morphing the shapes of the anchor samples with learnable weights to improve the diversity of synthetic dataset. Moreover, we devise a uniformity-aware matching loss to ensure the structural consistency when comparing the original and synthetic datasets. Extensive experiments conducted on five standard benchmarks—ModelNet10, ModelNet40, ShapeNet, ScanObjectNN, and OmniObject3D—demonstrate that the proposed method effectively optimizes both the synthetic samples and the weights for shape morphing, outperforming existing dataset distillation methods.

The evaluation of code-generating Large Language Models (LLMs) is fundamentally constrained by two intertwined challenges: a reliance on static, easily contaminated problem sources and the use of superficial, low-rigor testing. This paper introduces a new benchmark construction philosophy, Dual Scaling, designed to systematically address both limitations. Our approach involves continuously scaling the source of problems from dynamic, real-world code repositories and systematically scaling the rigor of tests via automated, high-coverage Property-Based Testing (PBT). We instantiate this philosophy in CODE2BENCH, an end-to-end framework that leverages Scope Graph analysis for principled dependency classification and a 100% branch coverage quality gate to ensure test suite integrity. Using this framework, we construct CODE2BENCH-2509, a new benchmark suite with native instances in both Python and Java. Our extensive evaluation of 10 state-of-the-art LLMs on CODE2BENCH-2509, powered by a novel "diagnostic fingerprint" visualization, yields three key insights: (1) models exhibit a fundamental performance gap, excelling at API application (Weakly Self-Contained tasks) but struggling with algorithmic synthesis (Self-Contained tasks); (2) a model’s performance is profoundly shaped by the target language’s ecosystem, a nuance we are the first to systematically quantify; and (3) our rigorous, scaled testing is critical in uncovering an "illusion of correctness" prevalent in simpler benchmarks. Our work presents a robust, scalable, and diagnostic paradigm for the next generation of LLM evaluation in software engineering. The code, data, and results are available at https://code2bench.github.io/.

Table Question Answering (Table QA) in real-world settings must operate over both structured databases and semi-structured tables containing textual fields. However, existing benchmarks are tied to fixed data formats and have not systematically examined how representation itself affects model performance. We present the first controlled study that isolates the role of table representation by holding content constant while varying structure. Using a verbalization pipeline, we generate paired structured and semi-structured tables, enabling direct comparisons across modeling paradigms. To support detailed analysis, we introduce a diagnostic benchmark with splits along table size, join requirements, query complexity, and schema quality. Our experiments reveal consistent trade-offs: SQL-based methods achieve high accuracy on structured inputs but degrade on semi-structured data, LLMs exhibit flexibility but reduced precision, and hybrid approaches strike a balance, particularly under noisy schemas. These effects intensify with larger tables and more complex queries. Ultimately, no single method excels across all conditions, and we highlight the central role of representation in shaping Table QA performance. Our findings provide actionable insights for model selection and design, paving the way for more robust hybrid approaches suited for diverse real-world data formats.

Open-ended segmentation requires models capable of generating free-form descriptions of previously unseen concepts and regions. Despite advancements in model development, current evaluation protocols for open-ended segmentation tasks fail to capture the true semantic accuracy of the generated descriptions. We empirically demonstrate that embedding‐based similarity score mappings diverge significantly from human judgments. To address this issue, we introduce a novel mapping function that considers multiple lexical relationships between free‐form outputs and test‐vocabulary labels, yielding much closer alignment with human annotations. We integrate this mapping into a robust evaluation framework and re‐benchmark previous state‐of‐the‐art methods. Additionally, we present the first Multi-modal Large‐Language Model trained with a contrastive objective to jointly align visual regions and textual descriptions, achieving new state‐of‐the‐art results in open‐ended panoptic segmentation.

Cartographic reasoning is the skill of interpreting geographic relationships by aligning legends, map scales, compass directions, map texts, and geometries across one or more map images. Although essential as a concrete cognitive capability and for critical tasks such as disaster response and urban planning, it remains largely unevaluated. Building on progress in chart and infographic understanding, recent large vision language model (LVLM) works on map visual question-answering (VQA) often simplify maps as a special case of charts. In contrast, map VQA demands comprehension of layered symbology (e.g., symbols, geometries, and text labels) as well as spatial relations tied to orientation and distance that often span multiple maps and are not captured by chart-style evaluations. To address this gap, we introduce FRIEDA, a benchmark for testing complex open-ended cartographic reasoning in LVLMs. FRIEDA sources real map images from documents and reports in various domains (e.g., geology, urban planning, and environmental assessment) and geographical areas. Following classifications in Geographic Information System (GIS) literature, FRIEDA targets all three categories of spatial relations: topological (border, equal, intersect, within), metric (distance), and directional (orientation). All questions require multi-step inference, and many require cross-map grounding and reasoning. We evaluate eleven state-of-the-art LVLMs under two settings: (1) the direct setting, where we provide the maps relevant to the question, and (2) the contextual setting, where the model may have to identify the maps relevant to the question before reasoning. Even the strongest models, Gemini-2.5-Pro and GPT-5-Think, achieve only 38.20\% and 37.20\% accuracy, respectively, far below human performance of 84.87\%. These results reveal a persistent gap in multi-step cartographic reasoning, positioning FRIEDA as a rigorous benchmark to drive progress on spatial intelligence in LVLMs.

Assessing the aesthetic quality of graphic design is central to visual communication, yet remains underexplored in vision–language models (VLMs). We investigate whether VLMs can evaluate design aesthetics in ways comparable to humans. Prior work faces three key limitations: benchmarks restricted to narrow principles and coarse evaluation protocols, a lack of systematic VLM comparisons, and limited training data for model improvement. In this work, we introduce AesEval-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark spanning four dimensions, twelve indicators, and three fully quantifiable tasks: aesthetic judgment, region selection, and precise localization. Then, we systematically evaluate proprietary, open-source, and reasoning-augmented VLMs, revealing clear performance gaps against the nuanced demands of aesthetic assessment. Moreover, we construct a training dataset to fine-tune VLMs for this domain, leveraging human-guided VLM labeling to produce task labels at scale and indicator-grounded reasoning to tie abstract indicators to concrete design regions.Together, our work establishes the first systematic framework for aesthetic quality assessment in graphic design.

While exocentric video synthesis has achieved great progress, egocentric video generation remains largely underexplored, which requires modeling first-person view content along with camera motion patterns induced by the wearer's body movements. To bridge this gap, we introduce a novel task of joint egocentric video and human motion generation, characterized by two key challenges: 1) Viewpoint Alignment: the camera trajectory in the generated video must accurately align with the head trajectory derived from human motion; 2) Causal Interplay: the synthesized human motion must causally align with the observed visual dynamics across adjacent video frames. To address these challenges, we propose EgoTwin, a joint video-motion generation framework built on the diffusion transformer architecture. Specifically, EgoTwin introduces a head-centric motion representation that anchors the human motion to the head joint and incorporates a cybernetics-inspired interaction mechanism that explicitly captures the causal interplay between video and motion within attention operations. For comprehensive evaluation, we curate a large-scale real-world dataset of synchronized text-video-motion triplets and design novel metrics to assess video-motion consistency. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the EgoTwin framework. Qualitative results are available on our project page: https://egotwin.pages.dev/.

We construct benchmark signatures that capture the capacity required for strong performance to characterize large language model (LLM) benchmarks and their meaningful overlaps. Formally, we define them as sets of salient tokens drawn from **in-the-wild** corpora whose LLM token perplexity, reflecting training exposure, is highly predictive of benchmark performance. We extract benchmark signatures via stepwise forward selection with linear regression in a large-scale meta-evaluation across 32 LLMs and 89 benchmarks spanning knowledge, coding, logic, instruction following, math, language, reasoning, missing-information detection, and cultural/world modeling. We then analyze how these signatures relate to both the semantic similarity of benchmark questions and the correlation structure of model performance. Performance-level overlaps remain universally high and semantic overlaps stay in a narrow mid-range, but signatures distinguish between benchmarks and illuminate nuanced differences in their capacity demands. For instance, signatures uniquely reveal substantial overlap among knowledge and reasoning benchmarks, whereas humanity- and culture-oriented benchmarks show relatively low similarity, lower even than typical cross-category overlap. Notably, performance-level results are strongly shaped by benchmark-**orthogonal** factors such as question format, whereas benchmark signatures remain robust to such confounds. We further reveal cross-functional overlaps among logic, math, language, instruction following, and cultural/world modeling, with coding emerging as the least overlapping domain, interacting only moderately with the ability of detecting missing information. Qualitative inspection of signatures shows that only the knowledge signature is aligned with actual knowledge, suggesting that LLMs may exhibit a distinctive semantic organization that differs from that of humans. Together, these findings offer insights into benchmark validity, LLM sensitivities, and the broad landscape of interconnected LLM capacities.

Learning-augmented scheduling uses ML predictions to improve decision-making under uncertainty. Many algorithms in this class have been proposed with better theoretical guarantees than the classic methods. Translating these theoretical results into practice, however, requires an understanding of real workloads. Such an understanding is hard to develop because existing production traces either lack the ground-truth processing times or are not publicly available, while synthetic benchmarks fail to represent real-world complexity. We fill this gap by introducing *Alibaba Trace for Learning-Augmented Scheduling (ATLAS)*, a research-ready dataset derived from Alibaba's Platform of Artificial Intelligence (PAI) cluster trace—a production system that processes hundreds of thousands of ML jobs per day. The ATLAS dataset has been cleaned and features engineered to represent the inputs and constraints of non-clairvoyant scheduling, including user tags, resource requests (CPU/GPU/memory), and job structures with ground-truth processing times. We develop a prediction benchmark reporting prediction error metrics, along with feature importance analysis, and introduce a novel multiple-stage ML model. We also provide a scheduling benchmark for minimizing the total completion time, max-stretch, and makespan. ATLAS is a reproducible foundation for researchers to study learning-augmented scheduling on real workloads, available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/non-clairvoyant-with-predictions-7BF8/.

Large language model-based agents show promise for software engineering, but environment configuration remains a bottleneck due to heavy manual effort and scarce large-scale, high-quality datasets. Existing benchmarks assess only end-to-end build/test success, obscuring where and why agents succeed or fail. We introduce the Environment Configuration Diagnosis Benchmark, EnConda-bench, which provides process-level trajectory assessment of fine-grained agent capabilities during environment setup-planning, perception-driven error diagnosis, feedback-driven repair, and action to execute the final environment configuration. Our task instances are automatically constructed by injecting realistic README errors and are validated in Docker for scalable, high-quality evaluation. EnConda-bench combines process-level analysis with end-to-end executability to enable capability assessments beyond aggregate success rates. Evaluations across state-of-the-art LLMs and agent frameworks show that while agents can localize errors, they struggle to translate feedback into effective corrections, limiting end-to-end performance. To our knowledge, EnConda-bench is the first framework to provide process-level internal capability assessment for environment configuration, offering actionable insights for improving software engineering agents.

From professional research to everyday planning, many tasks are bottlenecked by wide-scale information seeking, which is more repetitive than cognitively complex. With the rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs), automated search agents powered by LLMs offer a promising solution to liberate humans from this tedious work. However, the capability of these agents to perform such "wide-context" collection reliably and completely remains largely unevaluated due to a lack of suitable benchmarks. To bridge this gap, we introduce WideSearch, a new benchmark engineered to evaluate agent reliability on these large-scale collection tasks. The benchmark features 200 manually curated questions (100 in English, 100 in Chinese) from over 15 diverse domains, grounded in real user queries. Each task requires agents to collect large-scale atomic information, which could be verified one by one objectively, and arrange it into a well-organized output. A rigorous five-stage quality control pipeline ensures the difficulty, completeness, and verifiability of the dataset. We benchmark over 10 state-of-the-art agentic search systems, including single-agent, multi-agent frameworks, and end-to-end commercial systems. Most systems achieve overall success rates near 0\%, with the best performer reaching just 7\%. However, given sufficient time, cross-validation by multiple human testers can achieve a near 100\% success rate. These results demonstrate that present search agents have critical deficiencies in large-scale information seeking, underscoring urgent areas for future research and development in agentic search.

Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled impressive capabilities across diverse reasoning and generation tasks. However, their ability to understand and operate on real-world engineering problems—such as Printed Circuit Board (PCB) placement and routing—remains underexplored due to the lack of standardized benchmarks and high-fidelity datasets. To address this gap, we introduce PCB-Bench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed to systematically evaluate LLMs in the context of PCB design. PCB-Bench spans three complementary task settings: (1) text-based reasoning with approximately 3,700 expert-annotated instances, consisting of over 1,800 question-answer pairs and their corresponding choice question versions, covering component placement, routing strategies, and design rule compliance; (2) multimodal image-text reasoning with approximately 500 problems requiring joint interpretation of PCB visuals and technical specifications, including component identification, function recognition, and visual trace reasoning; (3) real-world design comprehension using over 170 complete PCB projects with schematics, placement files, and design documentation. We design structured evaluation protocols to assess both generative and discriminative capabilities, and conduct extensive comparisons across state-of-the-art LLMs. Our results reveal substantial gaps in current models’ ability to reason over spatial placements, follow domain-specific constraints, and interpret professional engineering artifacts. PCB-Bench establishes a foundational resource for advancing research toward more capable engineering AI, with implications extending beyond PCB design to broader structured reasoning domains. Data and code are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/ICLR_submission_PCB-Bench-CDC5.

The pursuit of human-like conversational agents has long been guided by the Turing test. For modern speech-to-speech (S2S) systems, a critical yet unanswered question is whether they can converse like humans. To tackle this, we conduct the first Turing test for S2S systems, collecting 2,968 human judgments on dialogues between 9 state-of-the-art S2S systems and 28 human participants. Our results deliver a clear finding: no existing evaluated S2S system passes the test, revealing a significant gap in human-likeness. To diagnose this failure, we develop a fine-grained taxonomy of 18 human-likeness dimensions and crowd-annotate our collected dialogues accordingly. Our analysis shows that the bottleneck is not semantic understanding but stems from paralinguistic features, emotional expressivity, and conversational persona. Furthermore, we find that off-the-shelf AI models perform unreliably as Turing test judges. In response, we propose an interpretable model that leverages the fine-grained human-likeness ratings and delivers accurate and transparent human-vs-machine discrimination, offering a powerful tool for automatic human-likeness evaluation. Our work establishes the first human-likeness evaluation for S2S systems and moves beyond binary outcomes to enable detailed diagnostic insights, paving the way for human-like improvements in conversational AI systems.

Recent advances in large language models have laid the foundation for multimodal LLMs (MLLMs), which unify text, speech, and vision within a single framework. As these models are rapidly evolving toward general-purpose instruction following across diverse and complex tasks, a key frontier is evaluating their crosslingual and multimodal capabilities over both short- and long-form inputs. However, existing benchmarks fall short in evaluating these dimensions jointly: they are often limited to English, mostly focus on a single modality at a time, rely on short-form inputs, or lack human annotations--hindering comprehensive assessment of model performance across languages, modalities, and task complexity. To address these gaps, we introduce MCIF (Multimodal Crosslingual Instruction Following), the first crosslingual human-annotated benchmark based on scientific talks on NLP and beyond. MCIF evaluates instruction following in crosslingual, multimodal settings over different input lengths and spans four macro-tasks: recognition, translation, question answering, and summarization. It covers three core modalities (speech, vision, and text) and four diverse languages (English, German, Italian, and Chinese), fully aligned across all dimensions. This parallel design enables a systematic evaluation of MLLMs' abilities to interpret instructions across languages and effectively integrate multimodal contextual information. Our benchmarking and analysis of 23 models highlight universal challenges across modalities and tasks, indicating substantial room for improvement in future MLLMs development. MCIF is released under CC-BY 4.0 license to promote open research.

As fine-tuning becomes impractical at scale, probing is emerging as the preferred evaluation protocol. However, standard linear probing can understate the capability of models whose pre-training optimizes local representations rather than an explicit global representation. This motivates attentive probing, an alternative that uses attention to selectively aggregate patch-level features. Despite growing adoption, attentive probing is still underexplored: existing approaches are often over-parameterized and computationally inefficient. In this work, we revisit attentive probing through the lens of the accuracy vs. parameter-efficiency trade-off. We present the first comprehensive study of existing methods, analyzing their design choices and benchmarking their performance. Building on these insights, we propose efficient probing (EP), a lightweight yet effective multi-query cross-attention mechanism that eliminates redundant projections and reduces the number of trainable parameters. Across multiple benchmarks and pre-training paradigms, EP consistently outperforms linear probing and previous attentive probing methods, and remains effective when combined with parameter-efficient fine-tuning. Beyond evaluation, our analysis uncovers emerging properties of EP, including complementary attention maps, which open new directions for leveraging probing beyond protocol design. Project page: https://vrg.fel.cvut.cz/ep/.