ICLR 2026 Papers

Given the central role of charts in scientific, business, and communication contexts, enhancing the chart understanding capabilities of vision-language models (VLMs) has become increasingly critical. A key limitation of existing VLMs lies in their inaccurate visual grounding of infographic elements, including charts and human-recognizable objects (HROs) such as icons and images. However, chart understanding often requires identifying relevant elements and reasoning over them. To address this limitation, we introduce InfoDet, a dataset designed to support the development of accurate object detection models for charts and HROs in infographics. It contains 11,264 real and 90,000 synthetic infographics, with over 14 million bounding box annotations. These annotations are created by combining the model-in-the-loop and programmatic methods. We demonstrate the usefulness of InfoDet through three applications: 1) constructing a Thinking-with-Boxes scheme to boost the chart understanding performance of VLMs, 2) comparing existing object detection models, and 3) applying the developed detection model to document layout and UI element detection.

Reward models (RMs) are crucial for aligning large language models (LLMs) with diverse cultures. Consequently, evaluating their cultural awareness is essential for further advancing global alignment of LLMs. However, existing RM evaluations fall short in assessing cultural awareness due to the scarcity of culturally relevant evaluation datasets. To fill this gap, we propose Cultural Awareness Reward modeling Benchmark (CARB), covering 10 distinct cultures across 4 cultural domains. Our extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art RMs reveals their deficiencies in modeling cultural awareness and demonstrates a positive correlation between performance on CARB and downstream multilingual cultural alignment tasks. Further analysis identifies the spurious correlations within culture-aware reward modeling, wherein RM's scoring relies predominantly on surface-level features rather than authentic cultural nuance understanding. To address these, we propose Think-as-Locals to elicit deeper culturally grounded reasoning from generative RMs via reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) and employ well-designed rewards to ensure accurate preference judgments and high-quality structured evaluation criteria generation. Experimental results validate its efficacy in mitigating spurious features interference and advancing culture-aware reward modeling.

Dataset distillation aims to generate compact synthetic datasets that enable models trained on them to achieve performance comparable to those trained on full real datasets, while substantially reducing storage and computational costs. Early bi-level optimization methods (e.g., MTT) have shown promising results on small-scale datasets, but their scalability is limited by high computational overhead. To address this limitation, recent decoupled dataset distillation methods (e.g., SRe$^2$L) separate the teacher model pre-training from the synthetic data generation process. These methods also introduce random data augmentation and epoch-wise soft labels during the post-evaluation phase to improve performance and generalization. However, existing decoupled distillation methods suffer from inconsistent post-evaluation protocols, which hinders progress in the field. In this work, we propose **R**ectified **D**ecoupled **D**ataset **D**istillation (RD$^3$), and systematically investigate how different post-evaluation settings affect test accuracy. We further examine whether the reported performance differences across existing methods reflect true methodological advances or stem from discrepancies in evaluation procedures. Our analysis reveals that much of the performance variation can be attributed to inconsistent evaluation rather than differences in the intrinsic quality of the synthetic data. In addition, we identify general strategies that improve the effectiveness of distilled datasets across settings. By establishing a standardized benchmark and rigorous evaluation protocol, RD$^3$ provides a foundation for fair and reproducible comparisons in future dataset distillation research.

We introduce ACPBench Hard, a dataset of generative, open-ended questions which LLM models needs to answer in order to plan. Models that perform well on these tasks could in principle be integrated into a planner or be used directly as a policy. We discuss the complexity of these tasks as well as the complexity of validating the correctness of their answers and present validation algorithms for each task. Equipped with these validators, we test the performance of a variety of models on our tasks and find that for most of these tasks, the performance of even the largest models is still subpar. The models do not possess even the most basic capability of identifying which actions can be performed in a given state. No model outperforms any other on our proposed tasks and, with a few exceptions, all tested language models score below 65\%, indicating that even the current frontier language models as well as so-called reasoning models have a long way to go before they can reliably reason about planning.

Creativity evaluation remains a challenging frontier for large language models (LLMs). Current evaluations heavily rely on inefficient and costly human judgments, hindering progress in enhancing machine creativity. While automated methods exist, ranging from psychological testing to heuristic- or prompting-based approaches, they often lack generalizability or alignment with human judgment. To address these issues, in this paper, we propose a novel pairwise-comparison framework for assessing textual creativity, leveraging shared contextual instructions to improve evaluation consistency. We introduce CreataSet, a large-scale dataset with 100K+ human-level and 1M+ synthetic creative instruction-response pairs spanning diverse open-domain tasks. Through training on CreataSet, we develop an LLM-based evaluator named CrEval. CrEval demonstrates remarkable superiority over existing methods in alignment with human judgments. Experimental results underscore the indispensable significance of integrating both human-generated and synthetic data in training highly robust evaluators, and showcase the practical utility of CrEval in boosting the creativity of LLMs. We will release all data, code, and models publicly to support further research.

Engineering design operates through hierarchical abstraction from system specifications to component implementations, requiring visual understanding coupled with mathematical reasoning at each level. While Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel at natural image tasks, their ability to extract mathematical models from technical diagrams remains unexplored. We present \textbf{CircuitSense}, a comprehensive benchmark evaluating circuit understanding across this hierarchy through 8,006+ problems spanning component-level schematics to system-level block diagrams. Our benchmark uniquely examines the complete engineering workflow: Perception, Analysis, and Design, with a particular emphasis on the critical but underexplored capability of deriving symbolic equations from visual inputs. We introduce a hierarchical synthetic generation pipeline consisting of a grid-based schematic generator and a block diagram generator with auto-derived symbolic equation labels. Comprehensive evaluation of eight state-of-the-art MLLMs, including both closed-source and open-source models, reveals fundamental limitations in visual-to-mathematical reasoning. Closed-source models achieve over 85\% accuracy on perception tasks involving component recognition and topology identification, yet their performance on symbolic derivation and analytical reasoning falls below 19\%, exposing a critical gap between visual parsing and symbolic reasoning. Models with stronger symbolic reasoning capabilities consistently achieve higher design task accuracy, confirming the fundamental role of mathematical understanding in circuit synthesis and establishing symbolic reasoning as the key metric for engineering competence. Our synthetic pipeline code is available at \href{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/CircuitSense-8AC7/README.md}{URL}.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have seen remarkable advancements, achieving state-of-the-art results in diverse applications. Fine-tuning, an important step for adapting LLMs to specific downstream tasks, typically involves further training on corresponding datasets. However, a fundamental discrepancy exists between current fine-tuning datasets and the token-level optimization mechanism of LLMs: most datasets are designed at the sentence-level, which introduces token-level noise, causing negative influence to final performance. In this paper, we propose XTF, an explainable token-level noise filtering framework. XTF decomposes the complex and subtle contributions of token-level data to the fine-tuning process into three distinct and explicit attributes (reasoning importance, knowledge novelty, and task relevance), which can be assessed using scoring methods, and then masks the gradients of selected noisy tokens accordingly to optimize the performance of fine-tuned LLMs. We conduct extensive experiments on three representative downstream tasks (math, code and medicine) across 7 mainstream LLMs. The results demonstrate that XTF can significantly improve downstream performance by up to 13.7% compared to regular fine-tuning. Our work highlights the importance of token-level dataset optimization, and demonstrates the potential of strategies based on attribute decomposition for explaining complex training mechanisms.

Contemporary coding-agent benchmarks applaud “first correct answer,” silently assuming infinite tokens, container minutes, and developer patience. In production, every LLM call, test re-run, and rollback incurs hard cost; agents that cannot budget these resources are dead on arrival. We close the gap with USACOArena, an ICPC-inspired arena where agents pay deterministic credits for every prompt, compilation, test, or rollback. A task becomes a cost–benefit negotiation under uncertainty: is a second sample worth 15\% of the remaining budget, or should the agent pivot to a cheaper heuristic? Real-time deduction exposes decision profiles hidden from static leaderboards: the tax of over-specialized generators, the ROI of early-exit heuristics, and the compound interest of lightweight scaffolding. Even identically seeded agents diverge in self-play, revealing a rich policy space where the same model oscillates between spendthrift submission sprees and parsimonious exploration. Released as a reproducible benchmark and zero-shot curriculum, USACOArena provides the traces, credit engine, and six state-of-the-art decision logs to catalyze research on coding agents that know when to stop.

Rotary Positional Embedding (RoPE) is a widely adopted technique for encoding position in language models, which, while effective, causes performance breakdown when input length exceeds training length. Prior analyses assert (rightly) that long inputs cause channels to rotate "out of distribution," but it is not clear how extra rotation relates to or causes pathological behavior. Through empirical analysis we advance a unified geometric understanding of attention behavior with RoPE. We find that attention induces tight clustering of separated key and query latent point clouds, allowing for creation of sink tokens: placeholders that allow attention heads to avoid token mixing when not required. RoPE applied to longer inputs damages this key/query cluster separation, producing pathological behavior by inhibiting sink token functionality. From this geometric perspective, we propose RoPE-ID (In Distribution), a straightforward modification that allows attention layers to generalize to longer inputs out of the box: apply RoPE with high frequency to a subset of channels. We demonstrate the effectiveness of RoPE-ID for extended inputs using 1B and 3B parameter Transformers on the LongBench and RULER information retrieval benchmarks.

Concerns have been raised that knowledge distillation may transfer test-set knowledge from a contaminated teacher to a clean student—a “data laundering” effect that potentially threatens evaluation integrity. In this paper, we assess the severity of this phenomenon. If these concerns regarding data laundering are minor, then distillation could be used to mitigate risks of direct data exposure. Across eight classification benchmarks, we find that substantial laundering is the exception rather than the rule: unlike the large performance gains from direct contamination, any accuracy inflation from laundering is consistently smaller and statistically insignificant in all but two cases. More broadly, we find that the two phenomena are weakly correlated, suggesting that laundering is not simply a diluted form of contamination but a distinct effect that arises primarily when benchmarks exhibit large train–test distribution gaps. Motivated by this, we conduct controlled experiments that systematically enlarge the train–test distance on two benchmarks where laundering was initially negligible, and observe that laundering becomes more significant as the gap widens. Taken together, our results indicate that knowledge distillation, despite rare benchmark-specific residues, can be expected to function as an effective decontamination technique that largely mitigates test-data leakage.

Transformer-based large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success, yet their standard attention mechanism incurs quadratic computation and memory costs with respect to sequence length, posing a major bottleneck for long-context training. Prior work tackles this challenge along two directions: (1) kernel-level optimizations, which accelerate dense and sparse attention operators; and (2) module-level strategies, often referred to as distributed attention or context parallel training, which scale attention across multiple devices. However, systematic evaluation still remains limited: operator-level comparisons are often incomplete, while context parallel strategies are typically framework-specific, with unclear performance analysis across contexts. To address these gaps, we propose a unified benchmark that integrates representative attention kernels and context parallel mechanisms with a modular and extensible interface for evaluation. The benchmark evaluates methods along two critical dimensions: (1) attention mask patterns, which strongly affect efficiency, scalability, and usability, and (2) sequence length and distributed scale, which determine performance under extreme long-context training. Through comprehensive experiments on the cluster of up to 96 GPUs, our benchmark enables reproducible comparisons, highlights method-specific trade-offs, and provides practical guidance for designing and deploying attention mechanisms in long-context LLM training.

Facts change over time, making it essential for Large Language Models (LLMs) to handle time-sensitive factual knowledge accurately and reliably. Although factual Time-Sensitive Question-Answering (TSQA) tasks have been widely developed, existing benchmarks often face manual bottlenecks that limit scalable and comprehensive TSQA evaluation. To address this issue, we propose TDBench, a new benchmark that systematically constructs TSQA pairs by harnessing temporal databases and database techniques, such as temporal functional dependencies, temporal SQL, and temporal joins. We also introduce a new evaluation metric called time accuracy, which assesses the validity of time references in model explanations alongside traditional answer accuracy for a more fine-grained TSQA evaluation. Extensive experiments on contemporary LLMs show how TDBench enables scalable and comprehensive TSQA evaluation while reducing the reliance on human labor, complementing current TSQA evaluation approaches that largely center on Wikipedia/Wikidata by enabling LLM evaluation on application-specific data.

Training large neural networks on large-scale datasets requires substantial computational resources, particularly for dense prediction tasks such as object detection. Although dataset distillation (DD) has been proposed to alleviate these demands by synthesizing compact datasets from larger ones, most existing work focuses solely on image classification, leaving the more complex detection setting largely unexplored. In this paper, we introduce OD$^3$, a novel optimization-free data distillation framework specifically designed for object detection. Our approach involves two stages: first, a candidate selection process in which object instances are iteratively placed in synthesized images based on their suitable locations, and second, a candidate screening process using a pre-trained observer model to remove low-confidence objects. We perform our data synthesis framework on MS COCO and PASCAL VOC, two popular detection datasets, with compression ratios ranging from 0.25% to 5%. Compared to the prior solely existing dataset distillation method on detection and conventional core set selection methods, OD$^3$ delivers superior accuracy, establishes new state-of-the-art results, surpassing prior best method by more than 14% on COCO mAP$_{50}$ at a compression ratio of 1.0%. Code is available at https://github.com/VILA-Lab/OD3.

Cybersecurity operations demand assistant LLMs that support diverse workflows without exposing sensitive data. Existing solutions either rely on proprietary APIs with privacy risks or on open models lacking domain adaptation. To bridge this gap, we curate 11.8B tokens of cybersecurity-focused continual pretraining data via large-scale web filtering and manual collection of high-quality resources, spanning 28.6K documents across frameworks, offensive techniques, and security tools. Building on this, we design an agentic augmentation pipeline that simulates expert workflows to generate 266K multi-turn cybersecurity samples for supervised fine-tuning. Combined with general open-source LLM data, these resources enable the training of RedSage, an open-source, locally deployable cybersecurity assistant with domain-aware pretraining and post-training. To rigorously evaluate the models, we introduce RedSage-Bench, a benchmark with 30K multiple-choice and 240 open-ended Q\&A items covering cybersecurity knowledge, skills, and tool expertise. RedSage is further evaluated on established cybersecurity benchmarks (e.g., CTI-Bench, CyberMetric, SECURE) and general LLM benchmarks to assess broader generalization. At the 8B scale, RedSage achieves consistently better results, surpassing the baseline models by up to +5.59 points on cybersecurity benchmarks and +5.05 points on Open LLM Leaderboard tasks. These findings demonstrate that domain-aware agentic augmentation and pre/post-training can not only enhance cybersecurity-specific expertise but also help to improve general reasoning and instruction-following. All models, datasets, and code will be released to advance reproducibility and open cybersecurity LLM research.

Evaluating progress in large language models (LLMs) is often constrained by the challenge of verifying responses, limiting assessments to tasks like mathematics, programming, and short-form question-answering. However, many real-world applications require evaluating LLMs in processing professional documents, synthesizing information, and generating comprehensive reports in response to user queries. We introduce ProfBench: a set of over 7000 response-criterion pairs as evaluated by human-experts with professional knowledge across Physics PhD, Chemistry PhD, Finance MBA and Consulting MBA. We build robust and affordable LLM-Judges to evaluate ProfBench rubrics, by mitigating self-enhancement bias and reducing the cost of evaluation by 2-3 orders of magnitude, to make it fair and accessible to the broader community. Our findings reveal that ProfBench poses significant challenges even for state-of-the-art LLMs, with top-performing models like GPT-5-high achieving only 65.9\% overall performance. Furthermore, we identify notable performance disparities between proprietary and open-weight models and provide insights into the role that extended thinking plays in addressing complex, professional-domain tasks.

Incremental Object Detection (IOD) enables AI systems to continuously learn new object classes over time while retaining knowledge of previously learned categories. This capability is essential for adapting to dynamic environments without forgetting prior information. Although existing IOD methods have made progress in mitigating catastrophic forgetting, they usually lack explicit and quantitative modeling of information conflicts during knowledge preservation, making task boundaries ambiguous. Such conflicts often stem from the fact that a single image can contain objects belonging to previous, present, and future tasks, where unlabeled past and future objects are often mistakenly treated as background. In this paper, we propose a novel approach grounded in Elastic Weight Consolidation (EWC) to alleviate conflict knowledge preservation caused by task interference. Specifically, we introduce the Interference Knowledge Isolated Elastic Weight Consolidation (IKI-EWC) framework for IOD, which leverages the mispredictions of the old detector on new task data to estimate task conflicts and suppresses them at the parameter level. By reformulating the Bayesian posterior of model parameters, we derive a mathematical relationship between previously learned knowledge and interference knowledge, enabling targeted elimination of conflicts during model weight updates. In addition, we also propose a prototype-based knowledge calibration (PKC) mechanism to further preserve old knowledge during the training of the objector's classification head. This method employs a learnable projection layer to compensate semantic drift in old class prototypes, and then jointly trains the classification head using both calibrated prototypes and current task features, thereby mitigating forgetting caused by classifier updates. Extensive experiments on PASCAL VOC and MS-COCO benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, outperforming state-of-the-art approaches across various settings.

With the rapid progress of large language models (LLMs) trained on every available piece of data, it becomes increasingly challenging to reliably evaluate their intelligence due to potential data contamination and benchmark overfitting. To overcome these challenges, we investigate a new angle of benchmarking LLMs' intelligence by evaluating their capability in forecasting real-world future events, a paradigm we call "LLM-as-a-Prophet". Such forecasting tasks require combination of sophisticated capabilities while remaining free from data contamination or overfitting. To systematically evaluate such predictive intelligence of LLMs, we introduce $\texttt{Prophet Arena}$, a general evaluation benchmark that continuously collects live forecasting tasks and decomposes each task into distinct pipeline stages, supporting our controlled and large-scale experimentation. Our comprehensive evaluation reveals that many LLMs already exhibit impressive forecasting capabilities, reflected in, e.g., their small calibration errors, consistent prediction confidence and promising market returns. However, we also uncover key bottlenecks even in frontier models, such as inaccurate event recalls, misunderstanding of data sources and slower information aggregation compared to markets when resolution nears.

Deep reasoning is fundamental for solving complex tasks, especially in vision-centric scenarios that demand sequential, multimodal understanding. However, existing benchmarks typically evaluate agents with fully synthetic, single-turn queries, limited visual modalities, and lack a framework to assess reasoning quality over multiple steps as required in real-world settings. To address this, we introduce Agent-X, a large-scale benchmark for evaluating vision-centric agents’ multistep and deep reasoning capabilities in real-world, multimodal settings. AgentX features 828 agentic tasks with authentic visual contexts, including images, multi-image comparisons, videos, and instructional text. These tasks span six major agentic environments: general visual reasoning, web browsing, security and surveillance, autonomous driving, sports, and math reasoning. Our benchmark requires agents to integrate tool use with explicit, stepwise decision-making in these diverse settings. In addition, we propose a fine-grained, step-level evaluation framework that assesses the correctness and logical coherence of each reasoning step and the effectiveness of tool usage throughout the task. Our results reveal that even the best-performing models, including GPT, Gemini, and Qwen families, struggle to solve multi-step vision tasks, achieving less than 50% full-chain success. These findings highlight key bottlenecks in current LMM reasoning and tool-use capabilities and identify future research directions in vision-centric agentic reasoning models

We introduce jqBench, a new benchmark for evaluating language models on JSON querying and transformation tasks, where the intent can be given specified using natural language and/or examples. Whereas jqBench is mainly aimed at using the `jq` tool, it can be used to evaluate other programming languages that query and/or transform JSON. Benchmarks are automatically created from two rich sources of data: Stack Overflow discussions (751 instances with instructions and examples, called jqStack) and the Spider dataset for SQL generation from natural language (893 instances with instructions and JSON Schema, called jqSpider). We describe and analyze the automated pipeline for benchmark creation, and perform extensive baseline experiments on different models to analyze the complexity and failure modes. Using implicit feedback, the best model (Claude Opus 4.1) scores 77% on the jqStack benchmarks and 81\% on the jqSpider benchmarks. Additionally, we show (1) that access to the documentation surprisingly does not help, (2) `jq` performs comparable to Python, and (3) that automatic feedback (and therefore examples) is crucial. Besides the final benchmarks, we release the intermediate artifacts from each generation step (including failed or invalid conversions) as well as an LLM-friendly version of the documentation, to facilitate further research on JSON querying and transformation.