信息抽取

Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved remarkable progress, yet they often suffer from language bias, producing answers without relying on visual evidence. While prior work attempts to mitigate this issue through decoding strategies, architectural modifications, or curated instruction data, they typically lack a quantitative measure of how much individual training samples or tokens actually benefit from the image. In this work, we introduce Visual Information Gain (VIG), a perplexity-based metric that measures the reduction in prediction uncertainty provided by visual input. VIG enables fine-grained analysis at both sample and token levels, effectively highlighting visually grounded elements such as colors, spatial relations, and attributes. Leveraging this, we propose a VIG-guided selective training scheme that prioritizes high-VIG samples and tokens. This approach improves visual grounding and mitigates language bias, achieving superior performance with significantly reduced supervision by focusing exclusively on visually informative samples and tokens.

Graph neural networks are widely used for node classification, but they remain vulnerable to out-of-distribution (OOD) shifts in node features and graph structure. Prior work established that methods trained with standard supervised learning (SL) objectives tend to capture spurious signals from either features and/or structure, leaving the model fragile under distributional changes. To address this, we propose TIDE, a novel and effective Tri-Component Information Decomposition framework that explicitly decomposes information into feature-specific, structure-specific and joint components. TIDE aims to preserve only the label-relevant part of the joint information while filtering out spurious feature- and structure-specific information, thereby enhancing the separation between in-distribution (ID) and OOD nodes. Beyond the framework, we provide theoretical and empirical analyses showing that an information bottleneck objective is preferable to standard SL for graph OOD detection, with higher ID confidence and a greater entropy gap between ID and OOD data. Extensive experiments across seven datasets confirm the efficacy of Tide, achieving up to a 34% improvement in FPR95 over strong baselines while maintaining competitive ID accuracy. Code is available at https://github.com/DannyW618/TIDE.

Concerns over dataset misuse in deep learning have highlighted the need for effective auditing. Unlike existing intrusive methods that require dataset modifications, which risk model performance and security, we present DataGuard, a non-intrusive framework for quantitative dataset auditing. Specifically, DataGuard integrates three key components: 1) a differential comparison between the target dataset and auxiliary non-training datasets, 2) an information-forensic analysis establishing formal inequalities to distinguish training data; and 3) a multivariate statistical test that translates these discrepancies into rigorous auditing scores. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DataGuard can detect both full and partial dataset usage without false positives while remaining robust under diverse training scenarios, offering a principled, information-theoretic solution for transparent AI development.

In retrieval-augmented generation, language models can generate incorrect responses if they fail to utilize query-relevant content from the retrieved evidence. This shifts the focus of uncertainty quantification (UQ) toward assessing contextual grounding, i.e., whether predictions are supported by query-relevant tokens. Recent UQ methods unpack language models to characterize how inputs are processed. Nevertheless, these methods focus on a few layers and overlook the whole progressive propagation within the model, thereby failing to fully capture the grounding dynamics essential for reliable uncertainty estimation. We use information flow to build a layer-wise trace that reveals each context token’s contribution to the output, providing an interpretable basis for assessing reliability. From this analysis, we introduce two measures to calibrate prediction confidence. The first, \textit{simulatability}, posits that a prediction is more likely to be correct when context token contributions align closely with their true relevance. The second, \textit{concentration}, asserts that a response is more likely to be correct when it is derived from a narrow, focused subset of tokens. Experiments show that our method achieves an average AUROC of 0.709, exceeding the runner-up performance of 0.676, while maintaining moderate computational cost.

Cross-view geo-localization (CVGL) is fundamental for precise localization and navigation in GPS-denied environments, aiming to match ground or UAV imagery with satellite views. Existing approaches often rely on global feature alignment, but they suffer from substantial domain shifts induced by varying regional textures and weather conditions. This issue becomes even more pronounced in UAV-based scenarios, where the broader perspective inevitably introduces dense, fine-grained objects, creating significant visual clutter. To address this, we draw inspiration from Object-Centric Learning (OCL) and propose InfoGeo, an information-theoretic framework designed to enhance robustness and generalization. InfoGeo reformulates the optimization as an information bottleneck process with two core objectives: (i) maximizing view-invariant information by aligning the object-centric structural relations across views, and (ii) minimizing view-specific noisy signals through cross-view knowledge constraints. Extensive evaluations across diverse benchmarks and challenging scenarios demonstrate that InfoGeo significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods.

Plasticity—a neural network's ability to adapt to new tasks—is critical for continual and transfer learning. Existing measures, such as effective rank, dead neuron fraction, and weight norm, lack theoretical grounding and correlate poorly with performance on new tasks. We introduce *local redundancy*, an information-theoretic measure derived from universal compression theory. We define local redundancy as the worst-case redundancy of a local model family—parameters in an infinitesimal neighborhood along gradient directions—and show this is a principled measure of plasticity. Although local redundancy is intractable to compute exactly, we prove that the expected squared gradient norm on a synthetic memorization task provides an efficiently computable lower bound. Experiments on continual image classification and time series transfer learning demonstrate that local redundancy predicts downstream performance better than existing measures and enables pretraining checkpoint selection where validation loss plateaus.

Embedding-based representations in Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^d$ are a cornerstone of modern machine learning, where a major goal is to use the \emph{smallest dimension} that faithfully captures data relations. In this work, we prove sharp dimension--accuracy tradeoffs and identify a fundamental information-theoretic limitation: unless the embedding dimension $d$ is chosen close to the ground-truth dimension $D$, accuracy undergoes a sudden collapse. Our main result shows that this phenomenon arises even in standard contrastive learning settings, where supervision is limited to a set of $m$ anchor--positive--negative triplets $(i,j,k)$ encoding distance comparisons $\mathrm{dist}(i,j) < \mathrm{dist}(i,k)$. Specifically, given triplets realizable by an unknown ground-truth embedding in $D$ dimensions, we prove that there exists constant $c < 1$, such that \emph{every embedding of dimension at most $cD$ violates almost half of the triplets}, yielding accuracy as low as a trivial one-dimensional solution that ignores the input. We complement our information-theoretic bounds with strong computational hardness results: under the Unique Games Conjecture, even if the given triplets are nearly realizable in $D=1$ dimension, no polynomial-time algorithm---\textit{regardless of its dimension}---can achieve accuracy above the trivial 50% baseline.

Diffusion models do not recover semantic structure uniformly over time. Instead, samples transition from semantic ambiguity to class commitment within a narrow regime. Recent theoretical work attributes this transition to dynamical instabilities along class-separating directions, but practical methods to detect and exploit these windows in trained models are still limited. We show that tracking the class-conditional entropy of a latent semantic variable given the noisy state provides a reliable signature of these transition regimes. By restricting the entropy to semantic partitions, the entropy can furthermore resolve semantic decisions at different levels of abstraction. We validate our method on EDM2-XS and Stable Diffusion 1.5, where class-conditional entropy consistently isolates the noise regimes critical for semantic structure formation. Finally, we use our framework to quantify how guidance redistributes semantic information over time. Together, these results connect information-theoretic and statistical physics perspectives on diffusion and provide a principled basis for time-localized control.

When does learning elicit \textit{existing} knowledge, and when does it primarily teach \textit{new} capabilities? We find that the amount of generalizable information language models learn during training predicts the origins of their emergent capabilities. Minuscule amounts of information---in many cases, a few bits in a single example---can unlock large fractions of models' maximum performance when capabilities are \textit{elicited} rather than \textit{taught}. We quantify these learning regimes using excess description length (EDL), an information-theoretic measure of generalizable information learned during training. We find that elicitation and teaching exhibit distinct EDL signatures that characterize the predominant learning mechanism as information scales: elicitation requires orders of magnitude less information than teaching to comparable performance. We demonstrate that EDL provides a practical tool for quantitatively estimating the maximum amount of predictive information models can compress from data into trainable parameters during learning. These capacity limits describe optimal tradeoffs between data and parameter count that robustly predict when parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods (\textit{e.g.}, LoRA) will underperform full fine-tuning.

As language model (LM) agents become increasingly capable and adopted in real-world applications, there is a growing need for scalable evaluation frameworks beyond costly, manually designed benchmarks. We propose information-theoretic evaluation based on empowerment, an information-theoretic measure of an agent’s influence on future states through its actions. To handle the unique challenges of text-based environments, we introduce EELMA (Estimating Empowerment of Language Model Agents), an algorithm for approximating effective empowerment from multi-turn text interactions. We demonstrate EELMA on textual games and realistic web and tool-use environments, showing that empowerment strongly correlates with average task performance. We further analyze how empowerment varies across models, environment complexity, and agent configurations, and show that high-empowerment states and actions often mark pivotal moments for general capabilities. These results establish empowerment as a goal-agnostic metric that complements task-success measures for LM-agent evaluation. Code available: https://github.com/Jinyeop3110/EELMA

Modeling decision-making outside of controlled environments requires accounting for asynchronous, exogenous signals, such as notifications or algorithmic feeds, that dynamically alter user response times. Standard Drift-Diffusion Models (DDM) become analytically intractable when drift rates vary continuously with time. In this paper, we derive a closed-form analytical approximation for the first-passage time distribution of a single-boundary DDM with time-dependent drift, valid in the high-threshold regime. The main result allows us to analytically study the optimal timing of external signals to maximize the probability of a user response within our approximation framework. To evaluate our response time model, we conduct an extensive empirical comparison with state-of-the-art methods for user watch-time prediction and evaluation in simulated environments.

In the AI4Chemistry scenario, utilizing heterogeneous data at different fidelity levels is a common and core issue. High-fidelity data is accurate but scarce, while low-fidelity data is abundant but biased. Traditional multi-fidelity methods typically identify cross-fidelity biases based on paired samples under different fidelity labels. However, due to the mismatch in dataset input distribution and the complexity of the biases themselves, these methods are difficult to implement in real-world scientific environments. To address this, we propose a trusted information subset decomposition framework that can efficiently utilize multi-fidelity data without requiring paired samples. Multi-fidelity label supervision is decomposed into three complementary subsets: a trusted information subset based on the absolute value of high-fidelity labels; a trusted subset that captures the reliability of the high-fidelity and medium-fidelity label intervals through adaptive constraints; and an ordered trusted subset representing the numerical relationships within the same fidelity level. These subsets are then integrated into a unified end-to-end model, enabling the reasonable utilization of medium- and low-fidelity information. Extensive experiments on various molecular and material property benchmarks demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art multifidelity and singlefidelity baseline methods, and exhibits good robustness under real-world unpaired multifidelity conditions.

Decentralized class continual learning refers to a paradigm where distributed clients continuously acquire new classes while retaining previously learned information without relying on a central server. With increasing emphasis on privacy preservation, there is a growing need for on-demand unlearning, introducing two key challenges: Historical Class Unlearning and Network-Wide Knowledge Entanglement. In this work, we propose a decentralized continual learning framework with on-demand unlearning (DCU), which is the first attempt at achieving class continual learning and arbitrary-time class unlearning in a distributed setting. Specifically, our proposed DCU comprises three main stages: prototypes extraction, prototype-guided continual learning, and unlearning with disposable prototypes. Firstly, the prototypes extraction mechanism is designed to capture the class-specific concepts as lightweight, disposable embeddings. Then, the synthetic data guided by these prototypes can be combined with real data to achieve incremental learning through distillation. Besides, synthetic samples with noisy label are used to guide the adjustment of the model's decision boundary, effectively erasing the influence of the target class while preserving other classes' knowledge. Extensive experiments conducted on two datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our DCU in dynamic learning and target class unlearning.

Many real-world design problems involve optimizing an expensive black-box function $f(x)$, for which Bayesian Optimization is a sample-efficient framework. However, while the basic black-box setting returns a scalar reward, real-world experiments often generate a wealth of useful information. We introduce a new setting where an experiment generates high-dimensional auxiliary information $h(x)$ along with $f(x)$; moreover, a history of relevant, previously-solved tasks is available for accelerating optimization. We develop a novel method based on a neural model which predicts $f(x)$ for unseen designs given a few-shot context containing observations of $h(x)$. We evaluate our method on two challenging domains, robotic hardware design and hyperparameter tuning. On both domains, our method achieves improved few-shot prediction and faster design optimization, outperforming several multi-task optimization methods.

Multimodal learning aims to integrate information from heterogeneous data sources to improve representation quality and downstream task performance. A key challenge lies in aligning modality-specific representations while suppressing modality-dependent noise and redundancy. The Information Bottleneck (IB) principle provides a principled framework for learning task-relevant representations. Existing multimodal IB methods primarily apply the IB principle to fused multimodal representation and rely on restrictive distributional assumptions, such as Gaussian latent priors induced by variational autoencoders, which may not hold in practice. In this paper, we propose Information Bottleneck–based Multimodal Alignment (IBMA), a novel multimodal learning framework that enforces the IB principle for both the fused multimodal representation and modality-specific representations. IBMA introduces modality-specific representation alignment that guides each modality-specific encoder to learn informative and task-relevant representations aligned with the complementary modality, thereby enhancing cross-modal semantic consistency. Moreover, we derive a novel, efficient, and distribution-free variational upper bound for the IB loss that avoids unrealistic assumptions on latent feature distributions and is readily optimized using standard stochastic gradient descent. Extensive experiments demonstrate that IBMA achieves superior performance compared to existing multimodal learning methods, validating the effectiveness of modality-specific representation alignment. The code for IBMA is available at https://github.com/Statistical-Deep-Learning/IBMA.

We study networked binary classification on a directed acyclic graph (DAG), where each agent observes only a subset of the feature coordinates. Agents act sequentially along the DAG: each receives logits from its parents, augments its local features with these logits, fits a logistic predictor by minimizing binary cross-entropy (BCE), and forwards its logit to its outgoing neighbors. We ask whether this sequential distributed protocol achieves information aggregation: can a downstream agent attain small excess loss compared to the best logistic predictor with access to all features? This question was studied for linear regression under squared loss by Kearns, Roth, and Ryu (2026). Extending their guarantees to classification is nontrivial because their squared-loss tools do not directly transfer to BCE with a logistic link. We analyze the resulting sequential logit-passing protocol and prove an excess-loss upper bound of $O(M/\sqrt{D})$ on depth-$D$ paths satisfying the $M$ coverage condition, namely that every contiguous block of $M$ agents collectively observes all features. We also prove complementary hard instances with excess loss at least $\Omega(k/D)$, where $k$ is the feature dimension. Together, these results show that network depth is a fundamental bottleneck for information aggregation in networked logistic regression.

Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) on sensitive datasets raises privacy concerns, as training data extraction (TDE) attacks can expose highly confidential information. Existing defenses against such attacks either lack formal privacy guarantees or incur substantial utility degradation. We observe that fine-tuning induces widespread probability shifts, yet preserving only a small subset of influential token-level deviations is sufficient; the remaining shifts can be aggressively smoothed with minimal impact on utility. Motivated by this insight, we propose SCP-$\Delta_r$, a Near Access Freeness (NAF)-based algorithm that operates on relative probabilities and explicitly smooths low-impact tokens using a base model. SCP-$\Delta_r$ achieves orders-of-magnitude better theoretical bounds than existing NAF based methods and provides strong empirical protection against TDE attacks with minimal performance loss.

Large language models (LLMs) achieve remarkable generative performance, yet their output quality is dependent on the decoding strategy. While sampling-based methods (e.g., top-k, nucleus) and search-and-select based methods (e.g., beam search, best-of-n, majority voting) can improve upon greedy decoding, both approaches suffer from limitations: sampling generally commits to a single path, while search often expends excessive computation regardless of task complexity. To address these, we introduce Entropy-informed DEcodiNg (EDEN), a plug-and-play, model-agnostic decoding framework that adaptively allocates computation based on the model’s own uncertainty, approximating higher-width beam search with *fewer expansions*. At each generation step, EDEN estimates the entropy of the output token distribution and adjusts the branching factor monotonically with the entropy, expanding more candidates in high-entropy regions and following a greedier path in low-entropy regions, improving token efficiency. Experiments across complex tasks, including mathematical reasoning, code generation, and scientific questions, demonstrate that EDEN consistently improves output quality over existing decoding strategies, achieving better accuracy-expansion trade-offs than fixed-width beam search. By treating next-token selection as a noisy maximisation problem, we prove that branching factors monotone in entropy are guaranteed to find better (i.e. more probable) continuations than any fixed branching factor within the same total expansion budget, and derive explicit regret rates characterising the benefit of the adaptive allocation.

Learning meaningful representations from medical time series (MedTS), such as ECG or EEG signals, is a critical challenge. These signals are often high-dimensional, variable-length, and rife with noise. Existing self-supervised approaches, such as Masked Autoencoders (MAEs), are highly effective for pre-training general-purpose encoders. However, they do not explicitly learn compact, fixed-size, or semantically interpretable latent representations, typically relying on heuristic aggregation strategies such as global average pooling or a designated [CLS] token. We propose a novel framework that compresses a variable-length MedTS into a fixed-size set of $k$ latent Fingerprint Tokens. Our architecture employs a cross-attention bottleneck to generate these tokens and is trained with a dual-objective function. The first objective is a reconstruction loss, which ensures the tokens are \textit{sufficient statistics} for the original data. The second, a diversity penalty based on the Total Coding Rate (TCR), explicitly minimizes the redundancy between tokens, encouraging them to become statistically \textit{disentangled} representations. We present the theoretical justification for our method, framing it as a novel \textbf{Disentangled Rate-Distortion} problem. This approach produces a low-dimensional, interpretable, and sample-efficient representation, where each token is encouraged to capture an independent factor of variation, paving the way for more robust digital biomarkers.

Triggerable watermarking enables model owners to assert ownership against model extraction attacks. However, most existing approaches require additional training, which limits post-deployment flexibility, and the lack of clear theoretical foundations makes them vulnerable to adaptive attacks. In this paper, we propose Neural Honeytrace, a plug-and-play watermarking framework that operates without retraining. We redefine the watermark transmission mechanism from an information perspective, designing a training-free multi-step transmission strategy that leverages the long-tailed effect of backdoor learning to achieve efficient and robust watermark embedding. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Neural Honeytrace reduces the average number of queries required for a worst-case t-test-based ownership verification to as low as 2% of existing methods, while incurring zero training cost.