ICML 2026 Papers

Designing microstructures with coupled cross-physics objectives is a fundamental challenge where traditional topology optimization is often computationally prohibitive and deep generative models frequently suffer from physical hallucinations. We introduce AutoMS, a multi-agent neuro-symbolic framework that reformulates inverse design as an LLM-driven evolutionary search. AutoMS leverages LLMs as semantic navigators to decompose complex requirements and coordinate agent workflows, while a novel Simulation-Aware Evolutionary Search (SAES) mechanism handles low-level numerical optimization via local gradient approximation and directed parameter updates. This architecture achieves a state-of-the-art 83.8\% success rate on 17 diverse cross-physics tasks, significantly outperforming both traditional evolutionary algorithms and existing agentic baselines. By decoupling open-ended semantic orchestration from simulation-grounded numerical search, AutoMS provides a robust pathway for navigating complex physical landscapes that remain intractable for standard generative or purely linguistic approaches.

Multi-agent debate has shown promise for improving the reasoning of large language models, yet recent theory suggests its benefits are highly regime-dependent. While interaction can amplify informative signals under corrective conditions, symmetric debate dynamics are neutral in expectation, often making majority voting preferable. We reconcile these views by arguing that debate is effective only when invoked at the right time and with appropriate structure. Based on this insight, we propose LASE: Leader-Adaptive Structured Engagement, a leader-centric multi-agent debate framework that selectively engages interaction only in non-neutral regimes. LASE introduces an asymmetric leader–supporter architecture that enables directed information flow and selective signal amplification, while defaulting to simple aggregation otherwise. Experiments across diverse reasoning benchmarks show that LASE achieves multi-agent-level performance with near single-agent token cost, substantially improving efficiency over static debate and voting baselines.

Multi-token prediction (MTP) architecture is widely adopted in LLMs. MTP blocks can be appended to the tail of model to predict additional tokens. However, when training with pipeline parallel, MTP leads to more pipeline bubbles and deteriorates the pipeline efficiency. Based on in-depth analysis of MTP architectures and loss functions, we have identified the parallel nature of the MTP blocks, and leverage it for superior pipeline scheduling. We propose AdaHC, an adaptive pipeline scheduling framework for accelerating LLMs training with MTP block(s). AdaHC splits the output heads into chunks and reassembles the chunks to generate balanced pipeline stages, and performs adaptive activation forwarding to preserve the numerical equivalence. Experimental results show that AdaHC improves the training throughput of SOTA LLMs with diverse MTP configurations by 1.35$\times$ on average. This work paves a new direction for practical pipeline training.

Causal inference typically assumes centralized access to individual-level data. Yet, in practice, data are often decentralized across multiple sites, making centralization infeasible due to privacy, logistical, or legal constraints. We address this problem by estimating the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) from decentralized observational data via a Federated Learning (FL) approach, allowing inference through the exchange of aggregate statistics rather than individual-level data. We propose a novel method to estimate propensity scores via a federated weighted average of local scores using Membership Weights (MW), defined as probabilities of site membership conditional on covariates. MW can be flexibly estimated with parametric or non-parametric classification models using standard FL algorithms. The resulting propensity scores are used to construct Federated Inverse Propensity Weighting (Fed-IPW) and Augmented IPW (Fed-AIPW) estimators. In contrast to meta-analysis methods, which fail when any site violates positivity, our approach exploits heterogeneity in treatment assignment across sites to improve overlap. We show that Fed-IPW and Fed-AIPW perform well under site-level heterogeneity in sample sizes, treatment mechanisms, and covariate distributions. Theoretical analysis and experiments on simulated and real-world data demonstrate clear advantages over meta-analysis and related approaches.

Assisting non-expert users to develop complex interactive websites has become a popular task for LLM-powered code agents. However, existing code agents tend to only generate frontend web pages, masking the lack of real full-stack data processing and storage with fancy visual effects. Notably, constructing production-level full-stack web applications is far more challenging than only generating frontend web pages, demanding careful control of data flow, comprehensive understanding of constantly updating packages and dependencies, and accurate localization of obscure bugs in the codebase. To address these difficulties, we introduce FullStack-Agent, a unified agent system for full-stack agentic coding that consists of three parts: (1) FullStack-Dev, a multi-agent framework with strong planning, code editing, codebase navigation, and bug localization abilities. (2) FullStack-Learn, an innovative data-scaling and self-improving method that back-translates crawled and synthesized website repositories to improve the backbone LLM of FullStack-Dev. (3) FullStack-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark that systematically tests the frontend, backend and database functionalities of the generated website. Our FullStack-Dev outperforms the previous state-of-the-art method by 8.7\%, 38.2\%, and 15.9\% on the frontend, backend, and database test cases respectively. Additionally, FullStack-Learn raises the performance of a 30B model by 9.7\%, 9.5\%, and 2.8\% on the three sets of test cases through self-improvement, demonstrating the effectiveness of our approach.

Generating runnable front-end code from UI screenshots is a long-standing goal in automated software engineering. Existing MLLM-based methods predominantly focused on HTML/CSS, leaving multi-framework generation for React/Vue/Angular underexplored. Naively modifying prompts leads to substantial performance gaps across multi-framework and highly framework-specific error modes. To address this, we propose MulFCoder, a framework-conditioned multi-agent method that explicitly encodes framework constraints to bring multi-framework differences into a decidable rule space. MulFCoder orchestrates four agents: Grounder constructs an ElementTable, ContentTable, and macro-layout regions from detected UI elements; Planner builds a DOM-like hierarchical layout tree, produces a task schedule, and derives a framework-specific file Contract; Writer generates structured file writes or patches within a restricted edit window; Judger enforces lightweight, framework-conditioned constraints to accept or reject updates and trigger bounded repairs, preventing drift and deadlocks without expensive builds. Experiments demonstrate that MulFCoder substantially improves compilation success rate and reduces framework-specific errors, with particularly pronounced gains on Angular.

Despite the remarkable progress of Large Language Model (LLM) based Multi-Agent Systems, most research focuses on optimizing coordination topology while largely underexploring the equally critical problem: how to transmit and optimize messages among agents effectively? Current communication schemes typically rely on the direct concatenation of first-order neighbor responses, which induces a restricted evidence receptive field and leads to the dilution of crucial insights over multi-hop paths. To address these limitations, we propose the Multi-Order Communication (MOC) scheme, which reconstructs the inter-agent communication to capture multi-hop dependencies and incorporates a structural message consolidation strategy to ensure efficiency. Specifically, we formalize the communication mechanism to construct a structured multi-order evidence stream, and subsequently design a Semantic-Topological Merging algorithm to optimize semantic fidelity within token constraints. Extensive experiments across six diverse datasets and LLM backbones of varying parameter scales demonstrate that MOC consistently improves task performance and reduces communication costs.

Large Language Model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems often suffer from high communication cost due to redundant interactions, as existing methods optimize communication structures without explicitly measuring whether exchanged messages contribute to the final decision. To better utilize the semantic information in the execution stage to further optimize the structure of multi-agent systems and reduce token costs, we propose **AgentTailor**, a cost-aware framework that evaluates the semantic contribution of communication edges via an edge judgment mechanism, and employs an **Edge Prediction Network (EPN)** to estimate edge utilities through virtual execution without invoking LLMs. Experiments show that AgentTailor achieves the best average accuracy (91.36\%) on six datasets of diverse fields, while reducing total tokens by 21.2\%--61.6\%. Our work demonstrates that explicitly modeling semantic edge contribution is crucial for scalable and efficient multi-agent systems, providing a principled approach to communication optimization that goes beyond structural heuristics. The code is available at https://github.com/Pt3Y/AgentTailor.

Existing fair multi-view clustering methods typically suffer from a severe trade-off between clustering utility and fairness, while incurring prohibitive quadratic complexity on large-scale datasets. To address these challenges, we propose Causal Disentangled Anchor Learning (CDAL), a novel framework that achieves scalable fairness via structural disentanglement. Guided by a structural causal model perspective, CDAL utilizes a dual-anchor mechanism to structurally separate latent representations into orthogonal semantic and sensitive subspaces. We further ensure statistical independence through a linearized Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) constraint, which is optimized via an efficient alternating scheme. Theoretically, we prove the identifiability of the disentangled factors and guarantee the algorithm's global convergence and linear time complexity $\mathcal{O}(n)$. Extensive experiments on large-scale benchmarks demonstrate that CDAL outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving a superior utility-fairness trade-off. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/Tracesource/CDAL.

As Large Language Models transition to autonomous agents, user inputs frequently violate cooperative assumptions (e.g., implicit intent, missing parameters, false presuppositions, or ambiguous expressions), creating execution risks that text-only evaluations do not capture. Existing benchmarks typically assume well-specified instructions or restrict evaluation to text-only, single-turn clarification, and thus do not measure multi-turn disambiguation under grounded execution risk. We introduce DRIFT-BENCH, the first diagnostic benchmark that evaluates agentic pragmatics under input faults through multi-turn clarification across state-oriented and service-oriented execution environments. Grounded in classical theories of communication, DRIFT-BENCH provides a unified taxonomy of cooperative breakdowns and employs a persona-driven user simulator with the Rise evaluation protocol. Experiments show substantial performance drops under these faults, with clarification effectiveness varying across user personas and fault types. DRIFT-BENCH connects clarification studies with agent benchmarking, providing a framework to diagnose failures arising from faulty user inputs.

Determining the complexity, or Intrinsic Dimension (ID), of data is fundamental to efficient and interpretable representation learning. This is particularly challenging in multi-modal settings when trying to learn disentangled representations for shared and private information. Existing techniques leave a critical gap: they are often static, uni-modal, or in the case of contrastive methods, adapt only to the shared ID implicitly. We introduce Fidelity-Guided Rank Optimization (FiGuRO), a framework for approximating the ID of uni- and multi-modal data under constraints of model capacity and hyperparameters. FiGuRO learns the dimensions of low-rank projections using truncated singular value decomposition and an algorithm that determines when to reduce or increase dimension and in which latent space. Disentanglement of shared and private information arises as an emergent property of this optimization, eliminating the need for complex auxiliary loss functions. We demonstrate that FiGuRO outperforms existing ID estimation techniques and is more robust to hyperparameter changes. Across simulations and real-world data, FiGuRO captures distinct ID scales and varying subspace ratios, and decomposes shared and private information successfully. Furthermore, we show that FiGuRO can be applied to modern uni-modal pretrained models, enabling efficient, post-hoc disentanglement of multi-modal representations.

The explosive growth of open-source model repositories has created a Model Jungle, where checkpoints are frequently shared without adequate documentation or metadata. While weight-space learning offers a pathway to identify and analyze these models directly from their parameters, processing full-scale weights is computationally prohibitive. Probing-based methods have emerged as a lightweight alternative, extracting permutation-equivariant representations via learnable probe vectors. However, existing probing methods are limited by a single-view design: they capture first-order structures but fail to encode the rich, higher-order correlation patterns inherent in row--column interactions. To bridge this gap, we introduce MVProbe, a multi-perspective probing framework that synthesizes first-order signals with interaction-aware (Gram-based) views. Our approach is theoretically grounded; we analyze the scaling laws of different probing orders to derive a principled standardization and fusion strategy that ensures balanced contributions from all branches. On the Model Jungle benchmark, MVProbe consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art ProbeX across diverse architectures, including ResNet, SupViT, MAE, and DINO.

Researchers have shown that neural similarity among humans predicts social closeness and cooperative success, whereas innovation often emerges from interactions among dissimilar individuals. We investigate whether these principles extend to artificial intelligence by examining interactions between large language models. In our experiments, 276 model pairs interact across eight games spanning both cooperation and novelty. We find that pairs with more similar representation spaces achieve significantly higher cooperation but exhibit reduced novelty and creativity. The effects of representational similarity on cooperation and novelty remain robust even after controlling for other factors such as performance disparity and model size. We also find that similarity in the early layers consistently shows the strongest association with cooperation and novelty, compared to the middle and later layers. This suggests that a central factor underlying these patterns could be the extent to which the two models share lexical and semantic grounding. Overall, representational similarity can be an important consideration in multi-agent system design.

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have produced many specialized multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) that share common foundational LLMs, forming distinct model lineages. It remains unclear whether a fundamental behavioral link exists between the foundational LLMs and downstream variants. We investigate this question by quantifying head-level context-truthfulness scores. Across diverse LLM and MLLM lineages, including Vicuna-, Qwen2.5-, LLaMA2-, and Mistral-based models, we find that Truth Scores are strongly preserved within model families, even after instruction tuning or multimodal adaptation. We further show that this inheritance is consistent with attention-head weight preservation, and that context-truthful heads attend to query-relevant evidence. Building on this finding, we propose TruthProbe, a soft-gating strategy that amplifies context-truthful heads while preserving other head contributions. TruthProbe improves contextual truthfulness on HaluEval and reduces multimodal hallucination on POPE and CHAIR, with base-LLM Truth Scores transferring effectively to their fine-tuned LLM and MLLM descendants. Code is available at https://github.com/miso-choi/TruthProbe.

Learning to Defer (L2D) enables a classifier to abstain from predictions and defer to an expert, and has recently been extended to multi-expert settings. In this work, we show that multi-expert L2D is fundamentally more challenging than the single-expert case. With multiple experts, the classifier's underfitting becomes inherent, which seriously degrades prediction performance, whereas in the single-expert setting it arises only under specific conditions. We theoretically reveal that this stems from an intrinsic expert identifiability issue: learning which expert to trust from a diverse pool, a problem absent in the single-expert case and renders existing underfitting remedies failed. To tackle this issue, we propose PiCCE (**Pi**ck the **C**onfident and **C**orrect **E**xpert), a surrogate-based method that adaptively identifies a reliable expert based on empirical evidence. PiCCE effectively reduces multi-expert L2D to a single-expert–like learning problem, thereby resolving multi-expert underfitting. We further prove its statistical consistency and ability to recover class probabilities and expert accuracies. Extensive experiments across diverse settings, including real-world expert scenarios, validate our theoretical results and demonstrate improved performance.

Cooperation is central to multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), yet learned coordination can be fragile when external perturbations disrupt inter-agent interactions. Prior robust MARL methods have primarily considered value-oriented attacks, leaving a gap in robustness when interaction structures themselves are corrupted. In this paper, we propose an interaction-breaking adversarial learning (IBAL) framework that takes an information-theoretic view to construct attacks that impede coordination by perturbing agents’ observations and actions, and trains agents to perform reliably under such disruptions. Empirically, our approach improves robustness over existing robust MARL baselines across diverse attack settings and yields stronger performance even under agent-missing scenarios. Our code is available at https://sunwoolee0504.github.io/IBAL.

We present SWE-Bench Pro, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate software engineering capabilities through complex, realistic programming challenges. This benchmark extends beyond traditional algorithmic problems to encompass the full spectrum of professional software development tasks. The dataset comprises 1,865 problems sourced from 41 active software engineering repositories, spanning 123 unique programming languages and various application domains. The benchmark is structured into public and private components, with public access to problems from 11 repositories and private evaluation sets from 12 repositories across 4 distinct problem categories. SWE-Bench Pro addresses limitations of existing evaluation frameworks by incorporating problems that reflect real-world software engineering scenarios, including substantial codebases, complex enterprise applications, and multi-file projects requiring sophisticated reasoning and code modification skills. Problems range from early-stage startup environments to enterprise-level applications, with the private commercial set remaining inaccessible to maintain evaluation integrity while enabling public access to representative problems for professional development. Our evaluation methodology employs diverse coding approaches and models under controlled conditions, ensuring robust performance assessment across multiple programming paradigms. Results demonstrate significant performance variations across different problem categories, with traditional algorithmic challenges showing notably higher success rates compared to complex, multi-file engineering tasks. The benchmark reveals substantial gaps in current capabilities for handling real-world software engineering scenarios, particularly in areas requiring deep contextual understanding, cross-file reasoning, and integration with existing large-scale systems. This work contributes a more comprehensive and realistic evaluation framework for assessing software engineering capabilities, providing insights into current limitations and establishing a foundation for future development in automated software engineering tools and methodologies.

Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) agents facilitate Graphical User Interface (GUI) automation but struggle with long-horizon, cross-application tasks due to limited context windows. While memory systems provide a viable solution, existing paradigms struggle to adapt to dynamic GUI environments, suffering from a granularity mismatch between high-level intent and low-level execution, and context pollution where the static accumulation of outdated experiences drives agents into hallucination. To address these bottlenecks, we propose the Darwinian Memory System (DMS), a self-evolving architecture that constructs memory as a dynamic ecosystem governed by the law of "survival of the fittest." DMS decomposes complex trajectories into independent, reusable units for compositional flexibility, and implements Utility-driven Natural Selection to track survival value, actively pruning suboptimal paths and inhibiting high-risk plans. This evolutionary pressure compels the agent to derive superior strategies. Extensive experiments on real-world multi-app benchmarks validate that DMS boosts general-purpose MLLMs without training costs or architectural overhead, achieving average gains of 18.0% in success rate and 33.9% in execution stability, while reducing task latency, establishing it as an effective self-evolving memory system for GUI tasks. The implementation is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DMS-C48C.

In this paper, we study cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) where the joint reward exhibits submodularity, which is a natural property capturing diminishing marginal returns when adding agents to a team. Unlike standard MARL with additive rewards, submodular rewards model realistic scenarios where agent contributions overlap (e.g., multi-drone surveillance, collaborative exploration). We provide the first formal framework for this setting and develop algorithms with provable guarantees on sample efficiency and regret bound. For known dynamics, our greedy policy optimization achieves a $1/2$-approximation with polynomial complexity in the number of agents $K$, overcoming the exponential curse of dimensionality inherent in joint policy optimization. For unknown dynamics, we propose a UCB-based learning algorithm achieving a $1/2$-regret of $O(H^2KS\sqrt{AT})$ over $T$ episodes.