ICML 2026 Papers

Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models enable conditional computation but face deployment challenges due to the memory wall: while few experts are activated per token, the entire model must reside in memory. Existing expert pruning methods primarily rely on independent ranking, failing to account for the complex inter-dependencies and redundancies between experts. In this paper, we formulate post-training MoE pruning as a reconstruction-driven subset selection problem, aiming to minimize layer-output distortion under a cardinality constraint. We introduce SCHUR-A*, an algorithm that leverages A* search to achieve globally optimal expert selection within each layer. To maintain computational tractability, we derive a novel, admissible heuristic upper bound using a Schur-complement-based relaxation of the reconstruction objective. This tight bound allows for aggressive pruning of the search space while mathematically guaranteeing optimality. Furthermore, we propose an automated strategy to balance fidelity and memory reduction across heterogeneous layers via knee-point detection. Extensive experiments on Qwen3-30B-A3B demonstrate that SCHUR-A* significantly outperforms greedy and ranking-based baselines, maintaining comparable performance even under aggressive pruning ratios.

We present Move-Then-Operate, a Vision–language–action framework that explicitly decouples robotic manipulation into two distinct behavioral phases: coarse relocation (move) and contact-critical interaction (operate). Unlike monolithic policies that conflate these heterogeneous regimes, our architecture employs a dual-expert policy routed by a learnable phase selector, introducing a structural inductive bias that isolates phase-specific dynamics. Phase labels are automatically generated via an MLLM-based pipeline conditioned on lightweight contextual cues such as end-effector velocity and subtask decomposition to ensure alignment with human motor patterns. Evaluated on the RoboTwin2 benchmark, our method achieves an average success rate of $68.9\%$, outperforming the monolithic $\pi_0$ baseline by +$24\%$. It matches or exceeds models trained on $10\times$ more data and reaches peak performance in $40\%$ fewer training steps, demonstrating that architectural disentanglement of move and operate phases is a highly effective and efficient strategy for mastering high-precision manipulation.

Large language models are beginning to introduce a new paradigm for compilation: instead of only assisting at the source level, they can operate directly on **intermediate representations (IRs)**, the compiler’s internal code representation, Early studies suggest that LLM-guided optimization can sometimes rival traditional compiler optimizations on selected programs, but evidence remains fragmented. Yet the community still lacks a rigorous IR-level benchmark that tests whether a model not only understands IR but can rewrite it under compiler-grade semantic constraints with meaningful performance impact. We present **CIRBench**, a benchmark of 800 curated IR instances spanning four compiler-oriented tracks: Analysis infers IR properties, Repair fixes invalid IR, Refactor applies a single semantics-preserving compiler optimization, and Transform performs performance-oriented rewrites, together mirroring core optimization responsibilities in modern compilers. CIRBench combines verifier, equivalence checking, and end-to-end performance measurement into a unified, layered correctness-aware evaluation of LLMs on IR. On six mainstream LLMs, CIRBench shows that current models fail on many IR analysis and rewriting instances and on median underperform the compiler baseline, but we also observe a maximum speedup of $4.96\times$ over -O3. These findings highlight both the opportunities and the remaining challenges of using LLMs inside optimizing compilers.

Despite the rapid development of AI reviewers, evaluating such systems remains challenging: metrics favor overlap with human reviews over correctness. However, since human reviews often cover only a subset of salient issues and sometimes contain mistakes, they are unreliable as gold references. To address this, we build category-specific benchmark subsets and skip evaluation when the corresponding human reviews are missing to strengthen ***Co***mpleteness. We also leverage reviewer--author--meta-review discussions as expert annotations and filter unreliable reviews accordingly to strengthen ***Co***rrectness. Finally, we introduce `CoCoReviewBench`, which curates 3,900 papers from ICLR and NeurIPS to enable reliable and fine-grained evaluation of AI reviewers. Analysis shows that AI reviewers remain limited in correctness and are prone to hallucinations, and highlights reasoning models as more effective reviewers, motivating further directions for improving AI reviewers. Benchmarks and models are available at <https://github.com/hexuandeng/CoCoReviewBench>.

Reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) is crucial for deploying graph neural networks (GNNs) in safety-critical settings, yet dominant solutions either rely on costly multi-pass sampling or require retraining—often using *black-box auxiliary* models—to obtain evidential semantics. We propose **X-EviProbe**, a simple and parameter-free *post-hoc* framework that turns a *frozen* GNN into an evidential predictor with a decomposable view of epistemic vs. aleatoric uncertainty. X-EviProbe constructs class-wise Dirichlet evidence by probing the frozen latent space and the model’s native outputs, and incorporates graph structure via lightweight evidence-strength propagation. This yields a transparent evidential representation without retraining or additional neural components. Extensive experiments on seven benchmarks show that X-EviProbe consistently ranks among the top methods for both OOD detection and misclassification detection, improving AUROC by up to **33.4%** and **8.7%** over the strongest baselines.

Foundation model-driven agents often struggle with long-horizon planning due to the transient nature of purely prompting-based reasoning. While existing skill induction methods mitigate this by distilling experience into state-blind parameterized scripts, they fail to capture the conditional logic required for robust execution in dynamic environments. In this paper, we propose Neuro-Symbolic Skill Induction (NSI), a framework that lifts interaction traces into modular, logic-grounded programs. By synthesizing explicit control flows and dynamic variable binding, NSI empowers agents to discover when and why to act. This paradigm enables the efficient generalization, allowing agents to induce skills from few-shot examples and flexibly adapt to unseen goals. Experiments on a series of agentic tasks demonstrate that NSI consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, empowering agents to self-evolve into architects of logic-grounded skills. Project Page: https://sh-jj.github.io/NSI.

While existing multi-agent systems (MAS) can handle complex problems by enabling collaboration among multiple agents, they are often highly task-specific, relying on manually crafted agent roles and interaction prompts, which leads to increased architectural complexity and limited reusability across tasks. Moreover, most MAS communicate primarily through natural language, making them vulnerable to error accumulation and instability in long-context, multi-stage interactions within internal agent histories. In this work, we propose \textbf{Agent Primitives}, a set of reusable latent building blocks for LLM-based MAS. Inspired by neural network design, where complex models are built from reusable components, we observe that many existing MAS architectures can be decomposed into a small number of recurring internal computation patterns. Based on this observation, we instantiate three primitives (Review, Voting and Selection, and Planning and Execution), all communicating via key–value (KV) cache to mitigate information degradation across multi-stage interactions. To enable automatic system construction, an Organizer agent automatically selects and composes primitives for each query, guided by a lightweight knowledge pool of previously successful configurations, forming a primitive-based MAS. Experiments show that primitives-based MAS improve average accuracy by 12.0–16.5\% over single-agent baselines, reduce token usage and inference latency by approximately 3$\times$–4$\times$ compared to text-based MAS, while incurring only 1.3$\times$–1.6$\times$ overhead relative to single-agent inference and providing more stable performance across model backbones.

Responsible investing aims to generate positive impact across Environment (E), Society (S), and Governance (G), and rating companies along these dimensions is now widespread, making ESG scores highly popular. Allocating retail capital with sustainability in mind could be transformational, yet it remains unclear how individual investors can do so in practice. Current ESG solutions cannot model high-dimensional, multi-modal time series capturing the joint evolution of ESG risks, financial returns, news, and sentiment, even though this domain requires jointly reasoning over distinct numerical signals where both numerical proximity and semantic type must be preserved. To bridge this gap, we introduce a novel domain-aware $\textbf{representation learning framework}$ that learns geometry-preserving representations for heterogeneous time series using value-aware tokens with block-wise $\textbf{orthogonal embeddings}$. To capture trajectory-level structure, we introduce $\textbf{FACET}$ tokens and train the model using a geometry-preserving loss. The resulting model jointly learns to forecast future values and to organize entities in a representation space that reflects their temporal evolution. Trained on ESG, returns, news, and sentiment, the domain-aware LLM learns a representation space that enables accurate ESG forecasting, trajectory-based grouping, and latent-space search for superior asset selection and downstream application like portfolio rebalancing

Diffusion Policy has dominated action generation due to its strong capabilities for modeling multi-modal action distributions, but its multi-step denoising processes make it impractical for real-time visuomotor control. Existing caching-based acceleration methods typically rely on $\textit{static}$ schedules that fail to adapt to the \textit{dynamics} of robot-environment interactions, thereby leading to suboptimal performance. In this paper, we propose $\underline{\textbf{S}}$parse $\underline{\textbf{A}}$ction$\underline{\textbf{G}}$en $(\textbf{SAG})$ for extremely sparse action generation. To accommodate the iterative interactions, SAG customizes a rollout-adaptive prune-then-reuse mechanism that first identifies prunable computations globally and then reuses cached activations to substitute them during action diffusion. To capture the rollout dynamics, SAG parameterizes an observation-conditioned diffusion pruner for environment-aware adaptation and instantiates it with a highly parameter- and inference-efficient design for real-time prediction. Furthermore, SAG introduces a one-for-all reusing strategy that reuses activations across both timesteps and blocks in a zig-zag manner, minimizing the global redundancy. Extensive experiments on multiple robotic benchmarks demonstrate that SAG achieves up to 4$\times$ generation speedup without sacrificing performance. Project Page: https://sparse-actiongen.github.io/.

We consider anonymous multi-agent path finding (MAPF) where a set of robots is tasked to travel to a set of targets on a finite, connected graph. We show that MAPF can be cast as a special class of multi-marginal optimal transport (MMOT) problems with an underlying Markovian structure, under which the exponentially large MMOT collapses to a linear program (LP) polynomial in size. Focusing on the anonymous setting, we establish conditions under which the corresponding LP is feasible, totally unimodular, and yields min-cost, integral~$(\{0,1\})$ transports that do not overlap in both space and time. To adapt the approach to large-scale problems, we cast the MAPF-MMOT in a probabilistic framework via Schrödinger bridges. Under standard assumptions, we show that the Schrödinger bridge formulation reduces to an entropic regularization of the corresponding MMOT that admits an iterative Sinkhorn-type solution. The Schrödinger bridge, being a probabilistic framework, provides a shadow (fractional) transport that we use as a template to solve a reduced LP and demonstrate that it results in near-optimal, integral transports at a significant reduction in complexity. Extensive experiments highlight the optimality and scalability of the proposed approaches.

Visual foundation models have achieved remarkable progress in scale and versatility, yet understanding the 3D world remains a fundamental challenge. While 2D images contain cues about 3D structure that humans readily interpret, deep models often fail to exploit them, underperforming on tasks such as multiview semantic consistency--crucial for applications including robotics and autonomous driving. We propose a self-supervised approach to enhance the 3D understanding of vision foundation models by (i) introducing a temporal nearest-neighbor consistency loss that finds corresponding points across video frames and enforces consistency between their nearest neighbors, (ii) incorporating reference-guided ordering that requires patch-level features to be not only expressive but also consistently aligned, and (iii) constructing a mixture of video datasets tailored to these objectives, thereby leveraging rich 3D information. Our method, 3DPoV, achieves state-of-the-art performance in keypoint matching under viewpoint variation, as well as in depth and surface normal estimation, and consistently improves a diverse set of backbones, including DINOv3.

Local post-hoc explanations are widely used to understand black-box models on tabular data, with Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) being a popular approach. LIME approximates a black-box model using a sparse linear surrogate in a local neighborhood, implicitly assuming feature-wise linear homogeneity. However, this assumption often fails when local feature effects exhibit heterogeneous or nonlinear behaviors, resulting in unfaithful and unstable explanations. Moreover, LIME relies on a decoupled feature selection procedure that is not aligned with the surrogate modeling objective, further exacerbating instability under local sampling. To address these limitations, we propose PL-LIME, a two-stage sparse local explanation framework that ensures objective consistency across stages. PL-LIME models feature-wise local effects using instance-anchored piecewise linear functions, providing a minimal yet principled extension beyond linear surrogates under a fixed explanation budget. Sparsity is enforced through a decoupled nonnegative shrinkage procedure that directly scales the estimated local effects, improving stability while preserving interpretability. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that PL-LIME achieves higher local fidelity and stability, and provides more reliable local explanations that capture finer-grained local effect structures than LIME.

Machine unlearning seeks to remove the influence of specific training data from a model, a need driven by privacy regulations and robustness concerns. Existing approaches typically modify model parameters, but such updates can be unstable, computationally costly, and limited by local approximations. We introduce Representation Unlearning, a framework that performs unlearning directly in the model’s representation space. Instead of modifying model parameters, we learn a transformation over representations that imposes an information bottleneck: maximizing mutual information with retained data while suppressing information about data to be forgotten. We derive variational surrogates that make this objective tractable and show how they can be instantiated in two practical regimes: when both retain and forget data are available, and in a zero-shot setting where only forget data can be accessed. Experiments across several benchmarks demonstrate that Representation Unlearning achieves more reliable forgetting, better utility retention, and greater computational efficiency than parameter-centric baselines.

A reliable reward model is essential for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences through reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). However, standard reward models are susceptible to spurious features that are not causally related to human labels. This can lead to *reward hacking*, where high predicted reward does not translate into better behavior. In this work, we address this problem from a causal perspective by proposing a factored representation learning framework that decomposes the model’s contextual embedding into (1) causal factors that are sufficient for reward prediction and (2) non-causal factors that capture reward-irrelevant attributes such as length or sycophantic bias. The reward head is then constrained to depend only on the causal component. In addition, we introduce an adversarial head trained to predict reward from the non-causal factors, while applying gradient reversal to discourage them from encoding reward-relevant information. Experiments on both mathematical and dialogue tasks demonstrate that our method learns more robust reward models and consistently improves downstream RLHF performance over state-of-the-art baselines. Analyses on length and sycophantic bias further validate the effectiveness of our method in mitigating reward hacking behaviors.

Recent progress in time-series forecasting has led to rapidly increasing architectural complexity, yet many reported State-of-the-Art gains are statistically fragile or misattributed. We argue that progress requires a shift from model selection to modular attribution, identifying which components truly drive performance. We propose CombinationTS, a self-contained probabilistic evaluation framework grounded in Evaluatology, the science of uncovering the effects. It decomposes forecasting models into orthogonal modules—Input Transformation, Embedding, Encoder, Decoder, and Output Transformation—and evaluates them under a shared evaluation condition space. By quantifying each component via marginalized performance ($\mu$) and stability ($\sigma$), CombinationTS enables robust attribution beyond fragile point estimates. Through large-scale paired evaluation, we uncover the Identity Paradox: once the data view (Embedding) is well-designed, a parameter-free Identity Encoder often matches or outperforms complex backbones.

We propose \emph{Euler Mean Flows (EMF)}, a flow-based generative framework for one-step and few-step generation that enforces long-range trajectory consistency with minimal sampling cost. The key idea of EMF is to replace the trajectory consistency constraint, which is difficult to supervise and optimize over long time scales, with a principled linear surrogate that enables direct data supervision for long-horizon flow-map compositions. We derive this approximation from the semigroup formulation of flow-based models and show that, under mild regularity assumptions, it faithfully approximates the original consistency objective while being substantially easier to optimize. This formulation leads to a unified, JVP-free training framework that supports both $u$-prediction and $x_1$-prediction variants, avoiding explicit Jacobian computations and significantly reducing memory and computational overhead. Experiments on image synthesis, particle-based geometry generation, and functional generation demonstrate improved optimization stability and sample quality under fixed sampling budgets, together with approximately $50\%$ reductions in training time and memory consumption compared to existing one-step methods for image generation.

Rank estimation under label noise poses a fundamental challenge, as ordinal annotations often exhibit structured uncertainty rather than simple label corruption. In this paper, we reformulate rank estimation with noisy ordinal labels as a stochastic ordering problem, in which each instance is inherently associated with multiple plausible ranks instead of a single deterministic label. Based on this view, we propose stochastic order learning (SOL), a learning framework that captures ordinal label uncertainty and learns an embedding space through two complementary objectives: a discriminative loss that structures instance-centroid interactions and a stochastic order loss that enforces probabilistic ordering relations between instances. Extensive experiments across diverse datasets demonstrate that SOL enables reliable rank estimation under various types and levels of label noise. The source code is available at https://github.com/cwlee00/SOL.

Preference alignment is a crucial post-training step for large language models (LLMs) to ensure their outputs align with human values. However, post-training on real human preference data raises privacy concerns, as these datasets often contain sensitive user prompts and human judgments. To address this, we propose **DPPrefSyn**, a novel algorithm for generating differentially private (DP) synthetic preference data to enable privacy-preserving preference alignment. DPPrefSyn is a principled framework grounded in the Bradley–Terry preference model and the intrinsic geometric structure of pairwise human preference data. It first learns an underlying preference model from private data with formal differential privacy guarantees, and then leverages the learned model together with public prompts to synthesize high-quality preference data. It exploits the shared linear structure of per-cluster reward models to effectively capture heterogeneous human preferences in private datasets, and leverages DP Principal Component Analysis (DP-PCA) to improve learning accuracy. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that DPPrefSyn achieves competitive alignment performance under strong DP guarantees. These findings highlight the potential of synthetic preference data as a practical alternative for privacy-preserving preference alignment across a broad range of applications. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to generate DP synthetic preference data for LLM alignment.

Test-time adaptation (TTA) can reduce error on new and different data by updating the model on these inputs during inference. However, these updates raise the issue of privacy w.r.t. the testing data, because the model parameters now depend on all past inputs. To control this privacy risk, we cast multiple popular TTA methods (Tent, EATA, SAR, DeYO, and COME) into differential privacy (DP) forms that apply per-sample gradient clipping and Gaussian noise for all updates. On ImageNet-C, our DP-TTA methods provide adequate privacy at small cost to accuracy, and in the low-privacy regime the clipping mechanism of DP can even improve the accuracy and stability of adaptation in the continual setting. These improvements to privacy and accuracy come at only modest computational overhead. These first results on private TTA raise awareness of the issue, inform the development of more private test-time updates, and identify per-sample clipping as an effective technique for improving the accuracy and stability of adaptation.