ICML 2026 Papers

Modern language models are trained almost exclusively on token sequences produced by a fixed tokenizer, an external lossless compressor often over UTF‑8 byte sequences, thereby coupling the model to that compressor. This work introduces proxy compression, an alternative training scheme that preserves the efficiency benefits of compressed inputs while providing an end-to-end, raw-byte interface at inference time. During training, one language model is jointly trained on raw byte sequences and compressed views generated by external compressors; through the process, the model learns to internally align compressed sequences and raw bytes. This alignment enables strong transfer between the two formats, even when training predominantly on compressed inputs which are discarded at inference. Extensive experiments on code language modeling demonstrate that proxy compression substantially improves training efficiency and significantly outperforms pure byte-level baselines given fixed compute budgets. As model scale increases, these gains become more pronounced, and proxy-trained models eventually match or rival tokenizer approaches, all while operating solely on raw bytes and retaining the inherent robustness of byte-level modeling.

Reinforcement learning (RL) for large language models (LLMs) relies on imperfect reward supervision, necessitating constraints on policy updates to prevent overfitting. Nevertheless, the widely adopted KL constraint over-penalizes actions with low reference probabilities and lacks the sparsity to discard marginal policy shifts. In contrast, the L1-norm offers a distinct mechanism that is more tolerant of low-probability actions yet strictly suppresses minor probability perturbations. Motivated by this, we propose Magnitude-Regularized Policy Optimization (MRPO), which enforces an L1-norm constraint on policy updates. We demonstrate that MRPO permits substantial probability boosts for low-probability actions and induces sparse updates, ensuring invariance to noise that preserves the top-ranking order. Furthermore, MRPO admits a TRPO-style monotonic improvement bound under standard regularity assumptions and achieves a tighter approach to optimality than KL-based methods in single-step scenarios. Empirically, MRPO delivers exceptional results across diverse scenarios, notably doubling the performance gains of GRPO in preference alignment, outperforming DAPO in mathematical reasoning, and surpassing DPO in offline settings using only binary rewards.

Text-to-Image (T2I) models have made significant strides in visual realism and semantic consistency, yet they often perpetuate and amplify societal biases. Existing evaluation methods typically address only single-dimensional biases, lacking perspectives to uncover model biases at social-related deeper semantic levels. We introduce HoloFair, a comprehensive benchmark framework for multidimensional demographic bias analysis. Built upon our large-scale fairness-oriented dataset and the SpaFreq (Spatial-Frequency) attribute classifier, this framework proposes the Multi-attribute, Group-wise Bias Index (MGBI) metric, designed to assess both intrinsic diversity and conditional biases. Beyond evaluation, we further introduce Fair-GRPO, a reinforcement-learning-based debiasing method that alters the distribution of generative models through a designed multi-objective reward function. E.g., experiments on the SD3.5-Medium model demonstrate that Fair-GRPO significantly improves multidimensional fairness while maintaining high image quality. We also analyze potential reward hacking phenomena and provide corresponding mitigation strategies.

Visual outcomes are increasingly central to multimodal large language models, making reliable and fine-grained verification essential for scaling generalist foundation models. In this work, we investigate ***multimodal meta-verification***, which leverages verifier-generated rationales rather than decision-only signals, and explore how to effectively incorporate meta-verification feedback into multimodal verifier training. We identify two key findings. First, symbolic verifier outputs (e.g., bounding boxes) outperform textual explanations as meta-verification rationales, enabling efficient rule-based reinforcement learning rewards while avoiding reliance on model-based rewards from auxiliary judge models. Second, decoupling reinforcement learning objectives for binary judgment and meta-verification substantially outperforms joint reward optimization, due to intrinsic differences in output structure and learning dynamics. Based on these insights, we train **OmniVerifier-M1**, a generalist visual verifier leveraging symbolic meta-verification and decoupled reinforcement learning. OmniVerifier-M1 provides robust verification and fine-grained error localization, and further enables **M1-TTS**, a verifier-driven agentic generation system achieving dynamic region-level self-correction. This approach paves the way for more reliable, interpretable, and fine-grained multimodal verification, supporting safer and more controllable foundation model deployment.

Despite the growing reasoning capabilities of recent large language models (LLMs), their internal mechanisms during the reasoning process remain underexplored. Prior approaches often rely on human-defined concepts (e.g., overthinking, reflection) at the word level to analyze reasoning in a supervised manner. However, such methods are limited, as it is infeasible to capture the full spectrum of potential reasoning behaviors, many of which are difficult to define in token space. In this work, we propose an unsupervised framework (namely, RISE: Reasoning behavior Interpretability via Sparse auto-Encoder) for discovering reasoning vectors, which we define as directions in the activation space that encode distinct reasoning behaviors. By segmenting chain-of-thought traces into sentence-level 'steps' and training sparse auto-encoders (SAEs) on step-level activations, we uncover disentangled features corresponding to interpretable behaviors such as reflection and backtracking. Visualization and clustering analyses show that these behaviors occupy separable regions in the decoder column space. Moreover, targeted interventions on SAE-derived vectors can controllably amplify or suppress specific reasoning behaviors, altering inference trajectories without retraining. Beyond behavior-specific disentanglement, SAEs capture structural properties such as response length, revealing clusters of long versus short reasoning traces. More interestingly, SAEs enable the discovery of novel behaviors beyond human supervision. We demonstrate the ability to control response confidence by identifying confidence-related vectors in the SAE decoder space. These findings underscore the potential of unsupervised latent discovery for both interpreting and controllably steering reasoning in LLMs.

Text-to-3D generation has advanced rapidly, yet state-of-the-art models, encompassing both optimization-based and feed-forward architectures, still face two fundamental limitations. First, they struggle with coarse semantic alignment, often failing to capture fine-grained prompt details. Second, they lack robust 3D spatial understanding, leading to geometric inconsistencies and catastrophic failures in part assembly and spatial relationships. To address these challenges, we propose VLM3D, a general framework that repurposes large vision-language models (VLMs) as powerful, differentiable {semantic and spatial critics}. Our core contribution is a {dual-query critic signal} derived from the VLM's "Yes/No" log-odds, which assesses both semantic fidelity and geometric coherence. We demonstrate the generality of this guidance signal across two distinct paradigms: (1) As a reward objective for optimization-based pipelines, VLM3D significantly outperforms existing methods on standard benchmarks. (2) As a test-time guidance module for feed-forward pipelines, it actively steers the iterative sampling process of SOTA native 3D models to correct severe spatial errors. VLM3D establishes a principled and generalizable path to inject the VLM's rich, language-grounded understanding of both semantics and space into diverse 3D generative pipelines.

AI Scientists have shown promising progress across multiple stages of the research pipeline, among which automatic scientific paper writing remains a formidable challenge. The Introduction writing is especially challenging, which demands not only linguistic fluency, but logical soundness and verifiable faithfulness. Most AI-assisted methods treat the task as text generation instead of reasoning and structuring, leading to severe drawbacks, *e.g.*, hallucinating citations. To address this, we first formulate the Content-Conditional Introduction Generation (CCIG) task, which requires grounding the Introduction in the paper's core evidence. We then propose **LECTOR**, a novel **Logic-Expression Co-Reinforcement Learning** framework that can strictly follow the scientist's logic, add high-quality citations and keep structured expressions. LECTOR first constructs a logic-reasoning graph from the paper's main body to serve as a verifiable logical blueprint. Subsequently, it employs a Logic-Expression Co-Rewarding mechanism to jointly optimize for both the graph's structural fidelity and the final narrative's quality. We conduct a dataset from *Nature Communications* papers to assess our method. Extensive experiments show consistent improvements in both logic fidelity and Introduction generation quality metrics, *e.g.*, Graph Quality **(+26.7%)**, Citation Quality **(+8.6%)**, and Paper Consistency **(+3.3%)**. Code and data are available at: https://github.com/Xiao-Youth/LECTOR

Generalized Category Discovery (GCD) aims to recognize known classes while autonomously discovering novel ones in open-world settings. However, current approaches primarily focus on designing clustering objectives, often overlooking a critical bottleneck: standard vision backbones yield high-rank, entangled token representations that are ill-suited for unsupervised discovery of latent concepts and structures. In this paper, we propose Compositional Primitive Fields (CPF-GCD), a novel representation learning framework that reshapes the feature space to make such latent structure identifiable by enforcing a low-rank compositional organization. Our core hypothesis is that all categories, whether known or novel, can be expressed as compositions and spatial arrangements of a finite set of learnable visual primitives that capture reusable concepts. CPF instantiates this geometric constraint via a spatial field mechanism. Inserted between the backbone and the head, it rewrites noisy patch tokens through low-rank primitive mixtures, effectively decomposing images into reusable atomic parts and their spatial layouts. By explicitly modeling the spatial distribution of primitives, CPF enables novel categories to emerge naturally as new activation patterns over a shared vocabulary. This shifts the focus of representation from merely partitioning global embeddings to constructing a structured and separable primitive field. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CPF serves as a generic, plug-and-play module that consistently boosts performance across diverse GCD baselines, validating that identifying and leveraging low-rank compositional structure is a crucial inductive bias for open-world recognition.

Infrared and visible image fusion aims to integrate complementary modalities, while existing Euclidean methods impose rigid distance metrics that distort multi-modal interactions and parent-to-child semantic hierarchies. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a text-driven fusion framework empowered by hyperbolic manifold learning. During training, BLIP-extracted text prompts serve as topological anchors within the hyperbolic space, guiding vision-attribute alignment through hyperbolic embeddings that naturally accommodate varying semantic granularities. By exploiting the exponential volume growth dictated by the Poincaré ball's negative curvature, this approach seamlessly embeds hierarchical trees to encode coarse-to-fine semantics without metric saturation, while the vast peripheral space prevents texture distortion during cross-modal fusion. At inference, the fusion process autonomously adapts to input content using the learned text-attribute priors, completely eliminating the need for textual input. Experimental results show our method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches on benchmark datasets, with code available at https://github.com/Shaoyun2023/TEDFusion.

Communication costs are a major bottleneck in distributed learning and first-order optimization. A common approach to alleviate this issue is to compress the gradient information exchanged between agents. However, such compression typically degrades the convergence guarantees of gradient-based methods. Error feedback mechanisms provide a simple and computationally cheap remedy for this issue, but numerous variants have been proposed, and their relative performance remains poorly understood. This paper provides tight convergence analyses for two of the main error-feedback algorithms from the literature, the classic Error Feedback method (EF) and Error Feedback 21 (EF21), by identifying optimal step-size choices and constructing optimal Lyapunov functions tailored to each method. The results hold independently of the number of agents and recover the known best guarantees possible in the single-agent regime.

Identifying temporal causal structure is fundamental to understanding complex systems. Neural Granger causality has emerged as a powerful paradigm for this task, leveraging the expressiveness of neural networks to model intricate nonlinear dynamics. Although complex architectures excel at predictive modeling, existing methods typically rely on simple local measures for causal discovery, which extract only partial information from the learned model and may miss global dependencies. To address this issue, we reformulate Granger causality as a feature attribution problem and propose the Information-Theoretic Shapley value (Info-Shap) to measure global feature importance. We first establish the theoretical equivalence between zero Info-Shap and Granger non-causality. On top of this, we construct two novel regularizers to suppress spurious relationships and mitigate overfitting. These regularizers are model-agnostic and can be seamlessly integrated into the training of any differentiable neural network. Through extensive experiments on synthetic and realistic datasets, we demonstrate that our method robustly recovers the underlying causal relationships, providing a flexible tool for causal discovery in high-dimensional nonlinear time series.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as automated evaluators that assign numeric scores to model outputs, a paradigm known as LLM-as-a-Judge. However, standard Reinforcement Learning (RL) methods typically rely on binary rewards (e.g., 0-1 accuracy), thereby ignoring the ordinal structure inherent in regression tasks; for instance, they fail to recognize that predicting 4 is significantly better than predicting 1 when the ground truth is 5. Conversely, existing regression-aware approaches are often confined to Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), limiting their ability to explore optimal reasoning paths. To bridge this gap, we propose REAL (Regression-Aware Reinforcement Learning), a principled RL framework designed to optimize regression rewards, and also proven to be optimal for correlation metrics. A key technical challenge is that the regression objective is explicitly policy-dependent, thus invalidating standard policy gradient methods. To address this, we employ the generalized policy gradient estimator, which naturally decomposes optimization into two complementary components: (1) exploration over Chain-of-Thought (CoT) trajectory, and (2) regression-aware prediction refinement of the final score. Extensive experiments across model scales (8B to 32B) demonstrate that REAL consistently outperforms both regression-aware SFT baselines and standard RL methods, exhibiting significantly better generalization on out-of-domain benchmarks. On Qwen3-32B specifically, we achieve gains of +8.40 Pearson and +7.20 Spearman correlation over the SFT baseline, and +18.30/+11.20 over the base model. These findings highlight the critical value of integrating regression objectives into RL exploration for accurate LLM evaluation.

The Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) distance provides a powerful framework for aligning structured data by comparing the intrinsic geometries of metric measure spaces, and has become a fundamental tool in machine learning. Most existing methods leverage entropy regularization to reduce the computational complexity to $\boldsymbol{\mathrm{O}}(n^3)$, where $n$ is the number of samples. However, this cubic time complexity remains a major bottleneck in large-scale applications, severely limiting the scalability. To address this challenge, we propose LoBCD-GW, an efficient GW optimization algorithm. Specifically, we reveal the data-dependent sparsity of large-magnitude updates to the coupling matrix and introduce a localized block coordinate selection strategy. This confines the optimization to a "selected set" of size $r$ (which is a parameter that depends on the given data set, and usually is much less than $n$), thereby reducing the complexity to $\boldsymbol{\mathrm{O}}(r^3)$. In addition, unlike prior acceleration methods often based on constraint relaxation, our method can guarantee the strict feasibility through a novel "marginal compensation mechanism" to synchronize local mass redistribution with global constraints. Finally, we conduct a set of experiments on various datasets, and the results demonstrate that our method achieves a $5.8\times$ speedup on large-scale graph alignment benchmarks, while maintaining state-of-the-art accuracy.

Conventional reinforcement learning strategies for visual generation typically employ sample-wise reward functions, yet this practice frequently results in reward hacking that degrades image diversity and introduces visual anomalies. To address these limitations, we present a novel framework that finetunes generative models using distribution-wise rewards, ensuring better alignment with real-world data distributions. Unlike rewards that evaluate samples individually, distribution-wise reward accounts for the data distribution of the samples, mitigating the mode collapse problem that occurs when all samples optimize towards the same direction independently. To overcome the prohibitive computational cost of estimating these rewards, we introduce a subset-replace strategy that efficiently provides reward signals by updating only a small subset of a generated reference set. Additionally, we apply RL to optimize post-hoc model merging coefficients, potentially mitigating the train-inference inconsistency caused by introducing stochastic differential equation (SDE) in regular RL practices. Extensive experiments show our approach significantly improves FID-50K across various base models, from 8.30 to 5.77 for SiT and from 3.74 to 3.52 for EDM2. Qualitative evaluation also confirms that our method enhances perceptual quality while preserving sample diversity.

Recent advances in multimodal foundation models unifying image understanding and generation have opened exciting avenues for tackling a wide range of vision-language tasks within a single framework. Despite progress, existing unified models often rely on extensive pretraining and suffer from slow generation speeds, limiting their practical deployment in real-time and resource-constrained settings. In this work, we introduce Layerwise Timestep-Expert Flow-based Transformer (LaTtE-Flow), a novel architecture that improves the efficiency of diffusion/flow-based Transformers within the unified model setting. LaTtE-Flow builds upon powerful pre-trained Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to inherit strong multimodal understanding capabilities, and extends them with a novel Layer-wise Timestep Experts flow-based architecture for efficient image generation. LaTtE-Flow distributes the flow-matching process across specialized groups of Transformer layers, each responsible for a distinct subset of timesteps. This design significantly improves sampling efficiency by activating only a small subset of layers at each sampling timestep. To further enhance performance, we propose a Timestep-Conditioned Residual Attention mechanism for efficient information reuse across layers. Experiments demonstrate that LaTtE-Flow achieves strong performance on multimodal understanding tasks, while achieving competitive image generation quality with around 6× faster inference speed compared to recent unified multimodal models.

Oversmoothing has long been identified as a major limitation of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs): input node features are smoothed at each layer and converge to a constant non-informative representation, *if the weights of the GNN are sufficiently bounded*. This assumption is crucial: if, on the contrary, the weights are sufficiently large, then oversmoothing may be compensated. Theoretically, GNN could thus *learn* to not oversmooth. However, this does not really happen in practice, which prompts us to examine oversmoothing from an *optimization* point of view. In this paper, we analyze *backward oversmoothing*, that is, the notion that backpropagated errors are also subject to oversmoothing from output to input. With non-linearities, we outline the key role of the *interaction* between forward and backward smoothing. Moreover, we show that, due to backward oversmoothing, GNNs provably exhibit many *spurious stationary points*: as soon as the *last* layer is trained, the *whole* GNN is at a stationary point. As a result, we can exhibit regions where gradients are near-zero while the loss stays high. Additionally, we prove that this is *specific* to GNNs, and does not necessarily hold for Multi-Layer Perceptrons. This paper is a step toward a more complete comprehension of the optimization landscape of GNNs.

Recent work on text diffusion models offers a promising alternative to autoregressive generation, but controlling their safety remains underexplored. Existing safety approaches are geared toward autoregressive models and typically rely on post-hoc filtering or inference-time interventions. These are inadequate for effectively addressing safety risks in text diffusion models. We propose the *Safety-Aware Denoiser (SAD)*, a safety-guidance framework in text diffusion models. The SAD modifies the iterative denoising process such that the text sample at the final denoising step is steered toward *provably* safe regions of the text space. This inference-time method can integrate safety constraints into the denoiser, avoiding computationally expensive retraining of the underlying diffusion model and enabling flexible, lightweight safety guidance. We evaluate the safety of the generated text using the SAD, with respect to hazard taxonomy, memorization, and jailbreak. Experimental results show that SAD substantially reduces unsafe generations while preserving generation quality, diversity, and fluency, outperforming existing methods. These results demonstrate that our safety guidance during denoising provides an effective and scalable mechanism for enforcing safety in text diffusion models.

Multi-step retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a widely adopted strategy for enhancing large language models (LLMs) on tasks that demand global comprehension and intensive reasoning. Although many RAG systems incorporate a working memory to consolidate information, existing designs primarily function as a passive storage for isolated facts. This static nature overlooks crucial high-order correlations among primitive facts, thereby limiting models' capacity for multi-step reasoning and resulting in fragmented reasoning and weak global sense-making within extended contexts. We introduce HGMem, a hypergraph-based working memory system, extending the concept of memory beyond simple storage into a dynamic, expressive structure for complex reasoning and global understanding. In our approach, memory is represented as a hypergraph where hyperedges correspond to distinct memory units, enabling the progressive formation of high-order interactions within memory. This mechanism connects facts and thoughts around the focal problem, evolving the memory into an integrated and situated knowledge structure that provides strong propositions for deeper reasoning. We evaluate HGMem on several challenging global sense-making benchmarks. Extensive experiments and in-depth analyses demonstrate that our method consistently improves multi-step RAG and substantially outperforms strong baseline systems across diverse datasets.

Many real-world tasks are non-verifiable—there is no objective ground truth, and quality must be judged subjectively—making reward design for RL difficult. Existing approaches based on scalar rubric scores or single comparisons are often noisy, poorly calibrated, or provide sparse learning signals. We introduce Tournament Style RL (TSRL), which constructs rewards from rubric-guided pairwise judgments against a fixed set of anchor responses, using win-rate as the reward for policy optimization. This aggregation of comparisons against anchor responses yields a signal that is more robust to the judge noise by stabilizing the reference frame, reducing the variance in reward. We test across four non-verifiable tasks and two backbone LLMs, and find that TSRL improves average win-rate by $+43.8$ points over the base model and $+22.8$ points over the strongest baseline. TSRL scales with the number of anchors, remains robust under weak or partially corrupted judges, the results are supported by blinded human preference studies.