Backdoor Attacks

Machine unlearning has emerged as an inevitable AI mechanism to support GDPR requirements such as revoking user consent through the "right to be forgotten". However, existing approaches often leave residual traces that make them vulnerable to data reconstruction attacks. In this work, we propose ReTrace, the first reconstruction attack framework that uniquely formulates unlearned data recovery on large-scale deep architectures as a reinforcement learning (RL) problem. By treating residual unlearning traces as reward signals, ReTrace guides a generator to actively explore the input space and converge toward the forgotten data distribution. This RL-guided approach enables both instance-level recovery of individual samples and distribution-level reconstruction of unlearned classes. We provide a theoretical foundation showing that the RL objective converges to an exponential-tilted distribution that amplifies forgotten regions. Empirically, ReTrace achieves up to 73.1\% instance-level recovery and reduces FID and KL scores beyond state-of-the-art baselines, UIA (IEEE S\&P 2024) and HRec (NeurIPS 2024). Strikingly, on the challenging task of text unlearning, it improves BLEU scores by nearly 100\% over black-box baselines while preserving distributional fidelity, demonstrating that RL can recover even high-dimensional and structured modalities. Furthermore, ReTrace demonstrates effectiveness across both convolutional (ResNet) and transformer-based models, with Distil-BERT as the largest architecture attacked to date. These results show that current unlearning methods remain vulnerable, highlighting the need for robust and provably private mechanisms.

Backdoor attacks pose a significant threat to machine learning models, allowing adversaries to implant hidden triggers that alter model behavior when activated. Although gradient ascent (GA)-based unlearning has been proposed as an efficient backdoor removal approach, we identify a critical yet overlooked issue: vanilla GA does not eliminate the trigger but shifts its impact to different classes, a phenomenon we call trigger shifting. To address this, we propose Robust Gradient Ascent (RGA), which introduces a dynamic penalty mechanism to regulate GA's strength and prevent excessive unlearning. Our experiments show that RGA effectively removes backdoors while preserving model utility, offering a more reliable defense against backdoor attacks.

This work investigates Poisoned Sample Detection (PSD), a promising defense approach against backdoor attacks. However, we observe that the effectiveness of many advanced PSD methods degrades significantly under weak backdoor attacks (\eg, low poisoning ratios or weak trigger patterns). To substantiate this observation, we conduct a statistical analysis across various attacks and PSD methods, revealing a strong correlation between the strength of the backdoor effect and the detection performance. Inspired by this, we propose amplifying the backdoor effect through training with Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM). Both theoretical insights and empirical evidence validate that SAM enhances the activations of top Trigger Activation Change (TAC) neurons while suppressing others. Based on this, we introduce SAM-enhanced PSD, a simple yet effective framework that seamlessly improves existing PSD methods by extracting detection features from the SAM-trained model rather than the conventionally trained model. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that our approach significantly improves detection performance under both strong and weak backdoor attacks, achieving an average True Positive Rate (TPR) gain of +34.3% over conventional PSD methods. Overall, we believe that the revealed correlation between the backdoor effect and detection performance could inspire future research advancements.

Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) represent a promising alternative to autoregressive language models, using bidirectional masked token prediction. Yet their susceptibility to privacy leakage via Membership Inference Attacks (MIA) remains critically underexplored. This paper presents the first systematic investigation of MIA vulnerabilities in DLMs. Unlike the autoregressive models' single fixed prediction pattern, DLMs' multiple maskable configurations exponentially increase attack opportunities. This ability to probe many independent masks dramatically improves detection chances. To exploit this, we introduce SAMA (Subset-Aggregated Membership Attack), which addresses the sparse signal challenge through robust aggregation. SAMA samples masked subsets across progressive densities and applies sign-based statistics that remain effective despite heavy-tailed noise. Through inverse-weighted aggregation prioritizing sparse masks' cleaner signals, SAMA transforms sparse memorization detection into a robust voting mechanism. Experiments on nine datasets show SAMA achieves 30\% relative AUC improvement over the best baseline, with up to 8$\times$ improvement at low false positive rates. These findings reveal significant, previously unknown vulnerabilities in DLMs, necessitating the development of tailored privacy defenses.

Federated Prompt Learning has emerged as a communication-efficient and privacy-preserving paradigm for adapting large vision-language models like CLIP across decentralized clients. However, the security implications of this setup remain underexplored. In this work, we present the first study of backdoor attacks in Federated Prompt Learning. We show that when malicious clients inject visually imperceptible, learnable noise triggers into input images, the global prompt learner becomes vulnerable to targeted misclassification while still maintaining high accuracy on clean inputs. Motivated by this vulnerability, we propose SABRE-FL, a lightweight, modular defense that filters poisoned prompt updates using an embedding-space anomaly detector trained offline on out-of-distribution data. SABRE-FL requires no access to raw client data or labels and generalizes across diverse datasets. We show, both theoretically and empirically, that malicious clients can be reliably identified and filtered using an embedding-based detector. Across five diverse datasets and four baseline defenses, SABRE-FL outperforms all baselines by significantly reducing backdoor accuracy while preserving clean accuracy, demonstrating strong empirical performance and underscoring the need for robust prompt learning in future federated systems.

The proliferation of diverse data across users and organizations has driven the development of machine learning methods that enable multiple entities to jointly train models while minimizing data sharing. Among these, *multitask learning* (MTL) is a powerful paradigm that leverages similarities among multiple tasks, each with insufficient samples to train a standalone model, to solve them simultaneously. MTL accomplishes this by learning a *shared representation* that captures common structure between tasks and generalizes well across them all. Despite being designed to be the smallest unit of shared information necessary to effectively learn patterns across multiple tasks, these shared representations can inadvertently leak sensitive information about the particular tasks they were trained~on. In this work, we investigate privacy leakage in shared representations through the lens of inference attacks. Towards this, we propose a novel, *black-box task-inference* threat model where the adversary, given the embedding vectors produced by querying the shared representation on samples from a particular task, aims to determine whether the task was present in the multitask training dataset. Motivated by analysis of tracing attacks on mean estimation over mixtures of Gaussian distributions, we develop efficient, purely black-box attacks on machine learning models that exploit the dependencies between embeddings from the same task without requiring shadow models or labeled reference data. We evaluate our attacks across vision and language domains when MTL is used for personalization and for solving multiple distinct learning problems, and demonstrate that even with access only to fresh task samples rather than training data, a black-box adversary can successfully infer a task's inclusion in training.

Backdoor attacks pose a serious threat to deep neural networks (DNNs), allowing adversaries to implant triggers for hidden behaviors in inference. Defending against such vulnerabilities is especially difficult in the post-training setting, since end-users lack training data or prior knowledge of the attacks. Model merging offers a cost-effective defense; however, latest methods like weight averaging (WAG) provide reasonable protection when multiple homologous models are available, but are less effective with fewer models and place heavy demands on defenders. We propose a module-switching defense (MSD) for disrupting backdoor shortcuts. We first validate its theoretical rationale and empirical effectiveness on two-layer networks, showing its capability of achieving higher backdoor divergence than WAG, and preserving utility. For deep models, we evaluate MSD on Transformer and CNN architectures and design an evolutionary algorithm to optimize fusion strategies with selective mechanisms to identify the most effective combinations. Experiments shown that MSD achieves stronger defense with fewer models in practical settings, and even under an underexplored case of collusive attacks among multiple models--where some models share same backdoors--switching strategies by MSD deliver superior robustness against diverse attacks.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance across natural language tasks, but remain vulnerable to backdoor attacks. Recent model editing-based approaches enable efficient backdoor injection by directly modifying parameters to map specific triggers to attacker-desired responses. However, these methods often suffer from safety fallback, where the model initially responds affirmatively but later reverts to refusals due to safety alignment. In this work, we propose DualEdit, a dual-objective model editing framework that jointly promotes affirmative outputs and suppresses refusal responses. To address two key challenges -- balancing the trade-off between affirmative promotion and refusal suppression, and handling the diversity of refusal expressions -- DualEdit introduces two complementary techniques. (1) Dynamic loss weighting calibrates the objective scale based on the pre-edited model to stabilize optimization. (2) Refusal value anchoring compresses the suppression target space by clustering representative refusal value vectors, reducing optimization conflict from overly diverse token sets. Experiments on safety-aligned LLMs show that DualEdit improves attack success by 9.98\% and reduces safety fallback rate by 10.88\% over baselines.

Simulated environments are a key piece in the success of Reinforcement Learning (RL), allowing practitioners and researchers to train decision making agents without running expensive experiments on real hardware. Simulators remain a security blind spot, however, enabling adversarial developers to alter the dynamics of their released simulators for malicious purposes. Therefore, in this work we highlight a novel threat, demonstrating how simulator dynamics can be exploited to stealthily implant action-level backdoors into RL agents. The backdoor then allows an adversary to reliably activate targeted actions in an agent upon observing a predefined "trigger", leading to potentially dangerous consequences. Traditional backdoor attacks are limited in their strong threat models, assuming the adversary has near full control over an agent's training pipeline, enabling them to both alter and observe agent's rewards. As these assumptions are infeasible to implement within a simulator, we propose a new attack "Daze" which is able to reliably and stealthily implant backdoors into RL agents trained for real world tasks without altering or even observing their rewards. We provide formal proof of Daze's effectiveness in guaranteeing attack success across general RL tasks along with extensive empirical evaluations on both discrete and continuous action space domains. We additionally provide the first example of RL backdoor attacks transferring to real, robotic hardware. These developments motivate further research into securing all components of the RL training pipeline to prevent malicious attacks.

Pre-trained language models have achieved remarkable success across a wide range of natural language processing (NLP) tasks, particularly when fine-tuned on large, domain-relevant datasets. However, they remain vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where adversaries embed malicious behaviors using trigger patterns in the training data. These triggers remain dormant during normal usage, but, when activated, can cause targeted misclassifications. In this work, we investigate the internal behavior of backdoored pre-trained encoder-based language models, focusing on the consistent shift in attention and gradient attribution when processing poisoned inputs; where the trigger token dominates both attention and gradient signals, overriding the surrounding context. We propose an inference-time defense that constructs anomaly scores by combining token-level attention and gradient information. Extensive experiments on text classification tasks across diverse backdoor attack scenarios demonstrate that our method significantly reduces attack success rates compared to existing baselines. Furthermore, we provide an interpretability-driven analysis of the scoring mechanism, shedding light on trigger localization and the robustness of the proposed defense.

Multimodal fusion (MMF) is crucial for autonomous driving perception, combining camera and LiDAR streams for reliable scene understanding. However, its reliance on precise temporal synchronization introduces a vulnerability: adversaries can exploit network-induced delays to subtly misalign sensor streams, degrading MMF performance. To address this, we propose AION, a lightweight, plug-in defense tailored for the autonomous driving scenario. AION integrates continuity-aware contrastive learning to learn smooth multimodal representations and a DTW-based detection mechanism to trace temporal alignment paths and generate misalignment scores. AION demonstrates strong and consistent robustness against a wide range of temporal misalignment attacks on KITTI and nuScenes, achieving high average AUROC for camera-only (0.9493) and LiDAR-only (0.9495) attacks, while sustaining robust performance under joint cross-modal attacks (0.9195 on most attacks) with low false-positive rates across fusion backbones. Code will be publicly released upon acceptance (currently available at \url{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/AION-F10B}).

Leading language model (LM) providers like OpenAI and Anthopic allow customers to fine-tune frontier LMs for specific use cases. To prevent abuse, these providers apply filters to block fine-tuning on overtly harmful data. In this setting, we make three contributions: First, while past work has shown that safety alignment is superficial, we correspondingly demonstrate that existing fine-tuning attacks are "shallow" -- attacks target only the first several tokens of the model response, and consequently can be blocked by generating the first several response tokens with an aligned model. Second, we conceptually illustrate how to make attacks deeper by introducing a new fine-tuning attack that trains models to first refuse harmful requests before answering them; this ``refuse-then-comply" strategy bypasses shallow defenses and produces harmful responses that evade output filters. Third, we demonstrate the potency of our new fine-tuning attack by jailbreaking both open-source models equipped with defenses and production models, achieving attack success rates of 57% and 72% against GPT-4o and Claude Haiku, respectively. Our attack received a $2000 bug bounty from OpenAI and was acknowledged as a vulnerability by Anthropic.

Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have propelled embodied agents by enabling direct perception, reasoning, and planning task-oriented actions from visual inputs. However, such vision-driven embodied agents open a new attack surface: visual backdoor attacks, where the agent behaves normally until a visual trigger appears in the scene, then persistently executes an attacker-specified multi-step policy. We introduce BEAT, the first framework to inject such visual backdoors into VLM-based embodied agents using objects in the environments as triggers. Unlike textual triggers, object triggers exhibit wide variation across viewpoints and lighting, making them difficult to implant reliably. BEAT addresses this challenge by (1) constructing a training set that spans diverse scenes, tasks, and trigger placements to expose agents to trigger variability, and (2) introducing a two-stage training scheme that first applies supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and then our novel Contrastive Trigger Learning (CTL). CTL formulates trigger discrimination as preference learning between trigger-present and trigger-free inputs, explicitly sharpening the decision boundaries to ensure precise backdoor activation. Across various embodied agent benchmarks and VLMs, BEAT achieves attack success rates up to 80\%, while maintaining strong benign task performance, and generalizes reliably to out-of-distribution trigger placements. Notably, compared to naive SFT, CTL boosts backdoor activation accuracy up to 39\% under limited backdoor data. These findings expose a critical yet unexplored security risk in VLM-based embodied agents, underscoring the need for robust defenses before real-world deployment.

Recently, diffusion models have been recognized as state-of-the-art models for image generation due to their ability to produce high-quality images. However, recent studies have shown that diffusion models are susceptible to backdoor attacks, where an attacker can activate hidden biases using a specific trigger pattern, causing the model to generate a predefined target. Fortunately, executing backdoor attacks is still challenging, as they typically require substantial time and memory to perform parameter-based fine-tuning. In this paper, we are the first to reveal the **spatio-temporal redundancy** in backdoor attacks on diffusion models. **Regarding spatial redundancy**, we observed the *enrichment phenomenon*, which reflects the abnormal gradient accumulation induced by backdoor injection. **Regarding temporal redundancy**, we observed a marginal effect associated with specific time steps, indicating that only a limited subset of time steps plays a critical role in backdoor injection. Building on these findings, we present a novel framework, *STEDiff*, comprising two key components: *STEBA* and *STEDF*. *STEBA* is a spatio-temporally efficient accelerated attack strategy that achieves up to **15.07×** speedup in backdoor injection while reducing GPU memory usage by **82%**. *STEDF* is a detection framework leveraging spatio-temporal features, by modeling the enrichment phenomenon in weights and anisotropy across time steps, which achieves a backdoor detection rate of up to **99.8%**. Our code is available at: [https://github.com/paoche11/STEDiff](https://github.com/paoche11/STEDiff).

Backdoor attacks pose severe security threats to large language models (LLMs), where a model behaves normally under benign inputs but produces malicious outputs when a hidden trigger appears. Existing backdoor removal methods typically assume prior knowledge of triggers, access to a clean reference model, or rely on aggressive finetuning configurations, and are often limited to classification tasks. However, such assumptions fall apart in real-world generative LLM settings. In this work, we propose a new framework for purifying **generative LLM** without any prior trigger knowledge or clean references. Through systematic sanity checks, we find that backdoor associations are redundantly encoded across MLP layers, while attention modules primarily amplify trigger signals without establishing the behavior. Leveraging this insight, we shift the focus from isolating specific backdoor triggers to cutting off the trigger–behavior associations, and design an immunization-inspired elimination approach: by constructing multiple synthetic backdoored variants of the given suspicious model, each trained with different malicious trigger–behavior pairs, and contrasting them with their clean counterparts. The recurring modifications across variants reveal a shared **"backdoor signature"**—analogous to antigens in a virus. Guided by this signature, we neutralize highly suspicious components in LLM and apply lightweight finetuning to restore its fluency, producing purified models that withstand diverse backdoor attacks and threat models while preserving generative capability.

CLIP, known for its strong semantic matching capabilities derived from large-scale pretraining, has been shown to be vulnerable to backdoor attacks in prior work. In this work, we find that such attacks leave a detectable trace. This trace manifests as a divergence in how image features align with the CLIP's text manifold where semantically similar texts cluster. Specifically, benign images exhibit *deep benign matching*, where their features are close not only to the predicted text caption but also to the broader manifold of semantically equivalent variants of that caption. In contrast, poisoned images display *shallow malicious matching*, where their features shallowly align with the specific target caption but remain distant from its semantic neighborhood. Leveraging this insight, we propose **Subspace Detection**, a novel test-time poisoned image detection method against backdoored CLIP. First, for a test image, we approximate its corresponding local text manifold by constructing a low-dimensional subspace from semantically equivalent variants of its predicted text. Second, within this board subspace, we probe a region-of-interest that maximally amplifies the separation between the two types of images: benign images remain close due to deep matching, while poisoned images deviate significantly due to shallow matching. Finally, we identify whether the test image is poisoned by measuring its deviation from this region; a large deviation indicates a poisoned image. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms existing detection methods against SoTA backdoor attacks and exhibits robust detection performance across multiple downstream datasets.

Trajectory Optimization (TO) models have achieved remarkable success in offline reinforcement learning (offline RL). However, their vulnerability to backdoor attacks remains largely unexplored. We find that existing backdoor attacks in RL, which typically rely on reward manipulation throughout training, are largely ineffective against TO models due to their inherent sequence modeling nature and large network size. Moreover, the complexities introduced by high-dimensional continuous action further compound the challenge of injecting effective backdoors. To address these gaps, we propose TrojanTO, the first action-level backdoor attack against TO models. TrojanTO is a post-training attack and employs alternating training to forge a strong connection between triggers and target actions, ensuring high attack effectiveness. To maintain attack stealthiness, it utilizes trajectory filtering to preserve the benign performance and batch poisoning for trigger consistency. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that TrojanTO effectively implants backdoors across diverse tasks and attack objectives with a low attack budget (0.3\% of trajectories). Furthermore, TrojanTO exhibits broad applicability to DT, GDT, and DC, underscoring its scalability across diverse TO model architectures.

In machine learning, data curation is used to select the most valuable data for improving both model accuracy and computational efficiency. Recently, curation has also been explored as a solution for private machine learning: rather than training directly on sensitive data, which is known to leak information through model predictions, the private data is used only to guide the selection of useful public data. The resulting model is then trained solely on curated public data. It is tempting to assume that such a model is privacy-preserving because it has never seen the private data. Yet, we show that without further protection curation pipelines can still leak private information. Specifically, we introduce novel attacks against popular curation methods, targeting every major step: the computation of curation scores, the selection of the curated subset, and the final trained model. We demonstrate that each stage reveals information about the private dataset, and that even models trained exclusively on curated public data leak membership information about the private data that guided curation. These findings highlight the inherent privacy risks in data curation that were previously overlooked, and suggest that (1) in the context of curation, privacy analysis must extend beyond the training procedure to include the data selection process, and (2) true privacy-preserving curation will require new methods with formal privacy guarantees.

The memorization of training data by neural networks raises pressing concerns for privacy and security. Recent work has shown that, under certain conditions, portions of the training set can be reconstructed directly from model parameters. Some of these methods exploit implicit bias toward margin maximization, suggesting that properties often regarded as beneficial for generalization may actually compromise privacy. Yet despite striking empirical demonstrations, the reliability of these attacks remains poorly understood and lacks a solid theoretical foundation. In this work, we take a complementary perspective: rather than designing stronger attacks, we analyze the inherent weaknesses and limitations of existing reconstruction methods and identify conditions under which they fail. We rigorously prove that, without incorporating prior knowledge about the data, there exist infinitely many alternative solutions that may lie arbitrarily far from the true training set, rendering reconstruction fundamentally unreliable. Empirically, we further demonstrate that exact duplication of training examples occurs only by chance. Our results refine the theoretical understanding of when training set leakage is possible and offer new insights into mitigating reconstruction attacks. Remarkably, we demonstrate that networks trained more extensively, and therefore satisfying implicit bias conditions more strongly -- are, in fact, less susceptible to reconstruction attacks, reconciling privacy with the need for strong generalization in this setting.

Federated Learning (FL) was initially proposed as a privacy-preserving machine learning paradigm. However, FL has been shown to be susceptible to a series of privacy attacks. Recently, there has been concern about the Source Inference Attack (SIA), where an honest-but-curious central server attempts to identify exactly which client owns a given data point which was used in the training phase. Alarmingly, standard gradient obfuscation techniques with Differential Privacy have been shown to be ineffective against SIAs, at least without severely diminishing the accuracy. In this work, we propose a defense against SIAs within the widely studied shuffle model of FL, where an honest shuffler acts as an intermediary between the clients and the server. First, we demonstrate that standard naive shuffling alone is insufficient to prevent SIAs. To effectively defend against SIAs, shuffling needs to be applied at a more granular level; we propose a novel combination of parameter-level shuffling with the residue number system (RNS). Our approach provides robust protection against SIAs without affecting the accuracy of the joint model and can be seamlessly integrated into other privacy protection mechanisms. We conduct experiments on a series of models and datasets, confirming that standard shuffling approaches fail to prevent SIAs and that, in contrast, our proposed method reduce the attack’s accuracy to the level of random guessing.