CVPR 2026 Papers

Long-Tail Class Incremental Learning (LTCIL) combines two fundamental challenges: catastrophic forgetting of past tasks and severe class imbalance. Existing approaches mitigate one challenge at a time, through rehearsal, reweighting, or classifier alignment, but they typically assume static priors and rely on multi-stage training. In contrast, we propose AdaPrior, a simple Bayesian framework that treats LTCIL as a problem of dynamic prior misalignment. Our key idea is to estimate model-induced priors online via an exponential moving average and use them for (i) debiasing during training (AdaPrior Loss), and (ii) lightweight post-hoc correction at inference. The combined approach unifies loss-level and inference-level debiasing without additional stages or heavy computation. We provide theoretical analysis showing that AdaPrior's prior estimator converges to the true model prior and that its logit adjustment yields well calibrated posteriors under mild assumptions. Extensive experiments on CIFAR100-LT, Food-101-LT, ImageNet-LT-subset, and iNaturalist18-subset demonstrate consistent gains over recent LTCIL baselines. Beyond accuracy, AdaPrior improves calibration, and forgetting curves, making it a practical and scalable solution for long-tail continual learning.

Prompt learning has emerged as an effective technique for fine-tuning large-scale foundation models for downstream tasks. However, conventional prompt learning methods are prone to overfitting and can struggle with out-of-distribution generalization. To address these limitations, Bayesian prompt learning has been proposed, which frames prompt optimization as a Bayesian inference problem to enhance robustness. This paper introduces Repulsive Bayesian Prompt Learning (ReBaPL), a novel method for Bayesian prompt learning, designed to efficiently explore the complex and often multimodal posterior landscape of prompts. Our method integrates a cyclical step-size schedule with a stochastic gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (SGHMC) algorithm, enabling alternating phases of exploration to discover new modes, and exploitation to refine existing modes. Furthermore, we introduce a repulsive force derived from a potential function over probability metrics (including Maximum Mean Discrepancy and Wasserstein distance) computed on the distributions of representations produced by different prompts. This representation-space repulsion diversifies exploration and prevents premature collapse to a single mode. Our approach allows for a more comprehensive characterization of the prompt posterior distribution, leading to improved generalization. In contrast to prior Bayesian prompt learning methods, our method provides a modular plug-and-play Bayesian extension of any existing prompt learning method based on maximum likelihood estimation. We demonstrate the efficacy of ReBaPL on several benchmark datasets, showing superior performance over state-of-the-art prompt learning methods.

Partial label learning (PLL) is a weakly supervised learning, where each instance is assigned a set of candidate labels and only one is true. However, due to potentially inaccurate annotations, existing PLL algorithms disambiguate labeling by minimizing the prediction loss, which leaves the model unaware of its prediction credibility. To address this issue, this paper proposes the evidential deep partial label learning (ED-PLL) to quantify disambiguation uncertainty, aiming to achieve candidate label disambiguation and reliability prediction. Firstly, we extend the evidence modeling mechanism to PLL, treating the candidate label set as the source of evidence for the label hypothesis, and using belief and credibility to model classification uncertainty, thereby guiding a more reliable disambiguation process. Meanwhile, we propose the expectation calculation under the Dirichlet distribution of non-candidate labels, which suppresses the output of non-candidate labels by using consistency regularization to further improve the accuracy of disambiguation. Furthermore, a conflict-aware regularization is proposed to evaluate the degree of conflict, which measures the consistency between instances within the class by combining the differences in the distribution of prediction results and model uncertainty, and thus improves the robustness of the model. In addition, this paper theoretically analyzes our method from the perspective of the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm, and the ED-PLL is compatible with any deep network or stochastic optimizer. Experiments on benchmark and real datasets verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

Understanding physical properties such as friction, stiffness, hardness, and material composition is essential for enabling robots to interact safely and effectively with their surroundings. However, existing 3D reconstruction methods focus on geometry and appearance and cannot infer these underlying physical properties. We present PhysGS, a Bayesian-inferred extension of 3D Gaussian Splatting that estimates dense, per-point physical properties from visual cues and vision--language priors. We formulate property estimation as Bayesian inference over Gaussian splats, where material and property beliefs are iteratively refined as new observations arrive. PhysGS also models aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties, enabling uncertainty-aware object and scene interpretation. Across object-scale (ABO-500), indoor, and outdoor real-world datasets, PhysGS improves accuracy of the mass estimation by up to 22.8%, reduces Shore hardness error by up to 61.2%, and lowers kinetic friction error by up to 18.1% compared to deterministic baselines. Our results demonstrate that PhysGS unifies 3D reconstruction, uncertainty modeling, and physical reasoning in a single, spatially continuous framework for dense physical property estimation.

Large multimodal 3D vision-language models show strong generalization across diverse 3D tasks, but their performance still degrades under domain shifts. This has motivated recent studies on test-time adaptation (TTA), which enables models to adapt online using test-time data. Among existing TTA methods, cache-based mechanisms are widely adopted to leverage previously observed samples for online prediction refinement. However, they store limited historical information, leading to progressive information loss as the test stream evolves. In addition, their prediction logits are fused heuristically, making adaptation unstable. To address these limitations, we propose BayesMM, a multimodal Bayesian distribution learning framework for test-time point cloud analysis. BayesMM models textual priors and streaming visual features of each class as Gaussian distributions. Textual parameters are derived from semantic prompts, while visual parameters are updated online with arriving samples. The two modalities are fused via Bayesian model averaging, which automatically adjusts their contributions based on posterior evidence. This yields a unified prediction that adapts to evolving test-time data without training. Extensive experiments on multiple point cloud benchmarks demonstrate that BayesMM maintains robustness under distributional shifts, yielding over 4 percent average improvement.

Accurate uncertainty estimation is essential for reliable appearance-based gaze tracking. However, domain shifts between training and testing often lead to incorrect uncertainty estimates, which is a problem overlooked in existing uncertainty-aware gaze tracking models. To overcome this problem efficiently, we formulate uncertainty estimation as a conditional distribution problem and treat the correction process as an output-level conditional distribution matching task. We therefore introduce a data-efficient post-hoc calibration method to align the predicted, high-error conditional distribution with the empirically observed distribution extracted from a small set of calibration samples. To more faithfully assess the accuracy of the resulting uncertainty estimates, we further introduce a new metric, Coverage Probability Error (CPE), to quantify the distribution-level mismatch between prediction and observation. We validate the calibration procedure across four domain shift scenarios to demonstrate improved uncertainty accuracy and its practical benefits.

The rapid proliferation of pretrained models and open repositories has made model merging a convenient yet risky practice, allowing free-riders to combine fine-tuned models into a new multi-capability model without authorization. Such unauthorized model merging not only violates intellectual property rights but also undermines model ownership and accountability. To address this issue, we present MergeGuard, a proactive dual-stage weight protection framework that disrupts merging compatibility while maintaining task fidelity. In the first stage, we redistribute task-relevant information across layers via L2-regularized optimization, ensuring that important gradients are evenly dispersed. In the second stage, we inject structured perturbations to misalign task subspaces, breaking curvature compatibility in the loss landscape. Together, these stages reshape the model's parameter geometry such that merged models collapse into destructive interference while the protected model remains fully functional. Extensive experiments on both vision (ViT-L-14) and language (Llama2, Gemma2, Mistral) models demonstrate that MergeGuard reduces merged model accuracy by up to 90% with less than 1.5% performance loss on the protected model.

Causal graphs play a crucial role in AI research as they reveal the data generation processes underlying real-world machine learning and computer vision tasks. Recent studies have leveraged causal graphs to develop more robust and interpretable models. However, limited or biased data often lead to inaccurate causal graph estimation, reducing a model's transferability to unseen domains. To address this challenge, we propose a novel framework that performs Bayesian inference over causal graphs to capture potential underlying causal relations and identify invariant causal features for DG prediction. The key advantage of our framework lies in its ability to quantify causal graph uncertainty in the context of prediction tasks and incorporate it into the prediction process. Our proposed uncertainty provides valuable insights into (i) the reliability of our method on specific datasets, (ii) the alignment between learned causal graphs and unseen test domains, and (iii) the confidence of our predictions. In particular, we go beyond merely quantifying uncertainty and leverage it as weighting factors in a weighted Bayesian inference scheme. Empirical results on multiple benchmark distribution-shift datasets show that our algorithm, **C**ausal **G**raph **U**ncertainty-guided **Bayes**ian Inference (CGU-Bayes), outperforms existing DG methods on challenging datasets and achieves state-of-the-art performance overall.