paperlist.ai

AI conference papers

AI conference paper library

Search papers from 30+ top conferences, including NeurIPS, ICLR, ICML, CVPR, ACL and AAAI. Filter by keyword, then open any paper for its abstract, authors and links.

arXiv

Project2Task: Graph-Guided Project-Level Planning for Autonomous Research

Huirui Xu, Runtao Xu, Shuo Ren, Jiajun Zhang

Research agents can increasingly search literature, propose hypotheses, generate code, run experiments, and draft manuscripts from a single topic. However, a research project is not merely a larger task: it is a long-horizon agenda that must be advanced through multiple bounded tasks with distinct but related objectives, parallel alternatives, and dependency-aware sequences. Existing single-task systems often treat the project as one oversized task, produce a flat set of vague or overlapping tasks, or leave task boundaries and execution order to manual coordination. We introduce Project2Task, a graph-guided project-level planning layer for autonomous research. Given a project brief, it represents candidate contributions as innovation atoms and organizes them in a directed lineage graph. A lightweight Bernoulli block-model objective selects among horizontal, vertical, and hybrid portfolio decompositions. Project2Task then generates bounded tasks with explicit contribution ownership, repairs overlaps and missing execution fields, and emits dependency-aware task contracts that specify objectives, inputs, expected artifacts, evaluation requirements, boundary constraints, dependencies, and execution order. The contracts are independent of any particular downstream research executor and support integration of task outputs into a coherent project-level result. On a benchmark of ten project briefs yielding roughly 30 tasks, manuscript-based portfolio evaluation gives Project2Task an average quality score of 7.15, compared with 4.58 for the Brief Baseline and 5.31 for the Topic-only Setting. Integrating its contracts with AutoResearchClaw increases average downstream task accuracy from 0.536 to 0.759. These results demonstrate the value of explicit project-to-task planning for producing coherent, non-redundant, and executable research-task portfolios.

arXiv

Sharding Prevents LLM Oversight Failures and Adversarial Exploitation

Victor Akinwande, J Zico Kolter, Aran Nayebi

Giving an LLM judge more compute does not necessarily make it check more requirements. When one call must return many verdicts, some decisions become weakly grounded in the evidence, even when that call receives the same token or tool budget as a panel of separate calls. Across expert-graded research replications, legal work, and clinical-trial assessments, agreement with experts falls as the number of verdicts per call grows. We identify sharding as the intervention that mitigates this failure in model-based oversight. Sharding partitions the requirements into smaller groups, assigns each group to a separate call, and aggregates the verdicts. Against a single call with the panel's full budget, sharding improves agreement while holding the model, evidence, total budget, and per-decision budget fixed. Overall, we find that a sharded weaker judge can outperform a more capable holistic judge and match that judge even when the latter receives the panel's full budget. Additionally, we find that sharding exhibits robustness against adversaries. A best-of-N adversary can hold the underlying work fixed, vary only its presentation, and increase an overloaded judge's acceptance of genuinely unmet criteria severalfold. Wherever sharding reduces baseline error, it removes this adversarial advantage, keeping over-acceptance low even as the adversary's search widens. Sharding does not address attacks that persuade the judge separately on each criterion rather than exploiting overload. In that setting, we find that debate-style opposition on top of sharding withstands such adaptive re-optimization.

arXiv

Risk-Aware Decision Policies for Agents Under Noisy Perception

David Szczecina

Perception in biological systems is inherently noisy, requiring organisms to make decisions under uncertainty where misclassification can be costly or fatal. We present an Artificial Life predator-prey model of foraging under noisy perception, and compare agent performance when using various policies that take into account their noisy predictions. Through controlled experiments under both symmetric and asymmetric perceptual noise, we show that blindly trusting perceptual labels leads to catastrophic failure as noise increases, while uncertainty-aware strategies significantly improve survival and reduce fatal errors. We further observe qualitative regime shifts in behaviour, with agents transitioning from exploratory to conservative strategies as uncertainty increases. Our model links risk-sensitive foraging, ecological information use, and Artificial Life by showing that explicit information gathering can improve robustness when perception is unreliable. These results highlight the importance of uncertainty-aware decision-making and provide an interpretable artificial life analogue to robust learning with noisy labels.

arXiv

Certified Feedforward Tracking for Unknown Nonlinear Systems via Invertible Neural Networks

Berk Altiner, Rajasree Sarkar, Arunava Banerjee, Zongxuan Sun, Kenneth Kim

In this paper, we address the certification of datadriven feedforward control for periodic tracking of unknown nonlinear systems under partial state measurements. To this end, we adopt an invertible neural network (INN) as a surrogate for the unknown system. This choice allows us to bypass solving a nonconvex inversion problem, eliminating the associated inversion errors and reducing tracking error certification to a surrogate modeling problem. We then apply conformal prediction to provide finite-sample probabilistic guarantees on the surrogate modeling error which, through the derived tracking error bound, yield marginal certificates on feedforward tracking error. Finally, we demonstrate the approach on a DC-motor-driven mechanical load with nonlinear friction.

arXiv

When Privileged Guidance Misaligns: State-Matched Routing and Contextualized Self-Distillation for Multi-Turn Agents

Junzhuo Liu, Weiwei Li, Jun Ling, Peng Wang

Privileged on-policy distillation provides dense supervision for multi-turn agents by allowing a synchronized teacher to re-score the student's response at every turn with access to training-only references, such as successful trajectories. In interactive environments, however, the student's preceding actions continually change the execution state. As the student takes different actions or completes subgoals in a different order, its rollout may reach states not covered by the reference, making the reference an unreliable source of guidance for the state actually reached. Applying privileged distillation indiscriminately therefore creates state--reference mismatch. This mismatch motivates a central objective: providing privileged reference guidance that remains compatible with the student's current execution state. We introduce State-Matched Routing and Contextualized Self-Distillation (SMRC-SD), which explicitly determines when and how a privileged trajectory should guide an on-policy student. At each turn, SMRC-SD verifies whether the student's current execution state matches a supported state along the reference trajectory. Distillation is applied only at matched states, filtering out turns for which the reference lacks locally compatible guidance. For each matched state, SMRC-SD further constructs state-conditioned teacher context from the successful trajectory, grounding supervision in the state actually reached. Across ALFWorld and WebShop, SMRC-SD consistently outperforms unconditional successful full-path distillation. With Qwen3-1.7B, it improves task success from $0.746$ to $0.865$ on ALFWorld and from $0.574$ to $0.693$ on WebShop. Controlled routing and context ablations support both selecting locally supported turns and constructing state-compatible teacher context as contributors to these gains. Code is available at https://github.com/liujunzhuo/SMRC-SD.

arXiv

PD-GS: Phoneme-Driven 3DGS for Audio-Driven Talking Heads

Ao Fu, Yi Zhou

3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) enables fast, photorealistic talking-head rendering, yet accurate lip articulation remains elusive: mouth motion is often over-smoothed and may violate hard articulatory constraints such as bilabial closures, producing the notorious ``leaky mouth'' artifact. A key difficulty is that brief, discrete articulatory events are inferred from a continuous acoustic embedding under a regression objective, which biases predictions toward averaged mouth configurations. While modern self-supervised speech encoders provide rich prosodic and phonetic cues, they do not provide an explicit, frame-aligned linguistic target that reliably disambiguates closure-level events. We propose \textbf{Phoneme-Driven Gaussian Splatting (PD-GS)}, which augments a 3DGS talker with time-aligned phoneme tokens obtained from an automatic ASR and forced-alignment pipeline. Our core component, the \textbf{Linguistic Fusion Module (LFM)}, adaptively fuses continuous audio context with discrete phoneme embeddings through a learned gate, allowing the model to preserve smooth audio-driven dynamics while strengthening phoneme guidance on articulation-critical segments. PD-GS is trained purely from monocular video using image reconstruction and lip landmark supervision. On HDTF, PD-GS achieves the best lip geometry among the compared baselines (LMD 2.66) and qualitatively reduces closure violations in challenging phoneme sequences, yielding more linguistically faithful neural avatars.

arXiv

SearchAuditor: Auditing and Attributing Failures in Long-Horizon Search Agents

Zhixiang Liang, Yifei Liu, Yidan Huang, Haozhe Zhao, Beichen Huang, Jiaqi Wang, Nan Duan, Qiong Cao

Deep search agents tackle challenging questions through long-horizon web interactions, a process that is both complex and fragile: small reasoning errors may propagate through long, noisy trajectories into fluent but incorrect answers. Diagnosing such failures is difficult, requiring the manual inspection of extremely long execution traces, which could be beyond human capacity. We therefore introduce SearchAuditBench, a benchmark that evaluates whether LLM auditors can localize, attribute, and repair these failures, thereby reducing the human burden. SearchAuditBench comprises 1,243 failed trajectories, averaging 73.1 messages and 65.1K tokens, collected from eight open-weight models on five deep-search benchmarks, each expert-annotated with the critical error step, a search-specific root cause, and a reference repair with grading rubrics. We further propose SearchAuditor, a multi-perspective auditing framework that effectively localizes, attributes, and repairs search-agent failures through evidence-grounded adjudication. Experimental results show that even the strongest baseline, when powered by a frontier model like GPT-5.5, attains only a 26.6% end-to-end pass rate. In contrast, our SearchAuditor consistently outperforms all baselines across different frontier models, achieving an end-to-end pass rate of 32.3%, and resuming failed runs with its repairs enables agents to better recover from errors.

arXiv

Abstract Event Causal Rules: Induction and Application

Ziwei Zheng, Peiqiong Chen, Bang Wang

Event-centric intelligent analytical systems heavily depend on explicit causal event knowledge for risk early warning, decision-making support and narrative comprehension. Nevertheless, existing instance-level causal pairs suffer severe generalization deficits on low-frequency long-tail and unseen event combinations. To address this limitation, this work proposes Abstract Event Causal Rule (AECR), a novel relation-level causal abstraction paradigm that transforms concrete cause-effect pairs into generalized abstract causal logic while retaining their intrinsic causal relationships. We design a multi-agent Concrete-to-Abstract Causal Induction (CACI) system coupled with similarity-constrained clustering to distill trustworthy AECRs from noisy raw causal data, based on which two complete AECR knowledge bases are built. To validate the practical utility of abstract causal knowledge, we propose an Abstract Rule-Guided Causal Attention Encoder (AR-GCAE), which injects the retrieved AECRs into the causality Graph Event Prediction (CGEP) benchmark task via rule-guided attention layers and gated representation fusion. Quantitative experimental results reveal that applying AECRs substantially strengthens the generalization capacity of event causal reasoning and brings consistent performance improvements to event prediction, with the most prominent gains observed on rare and unseen event samples.

arXiv

A proximal subgradient method for nonconvex stochastic optimization under the Kurdyka-Łojasiewicz condition

Felipe Atenas, Alejandro Jofré, Pedro Pérez-Aros, David Torregrosa-Belén

This work introduces a proximal stochastic subgradient method for minimizing the sum of an expected cost, whose integrand is potentially nonsmooth and nonconvex, and a lower semicontinuous, prox-bounded function. We target a broad class of integrands obeying a nonsmooth, localized variant of the descent lemma in the decision variable, a structural assumption that simultaneously covers smooth losses with Lipschitz gradient and differences of such losses with convex functions. At each iteration the expected cost is replaced by a sample average that is progressively refined, and the proximal-subgradient stepsize is selected by an Armijo-type line search enforcing a sufficient-decrease property up to stochastic errors induced by the sample-based approximation. This framework accommodates substantially more general problem formulations than existing methods, in particular, it requires neither (weak) convexity of the regularizer nor a uniform bound on the variance of the stochastic oracle, and our analysis yields convergence guarantees that are new even in the smooth setting. Specifically, we establish almost sure convergence of the sequence of function values and stationarity of every accumulation point of the trajectories under the relaxed requirement that the sample-size sequence be merely nondecreasing and unbounded, with no prescribed growth rate. Leveraging the Kurdyka-Lojasiewicz (KL) property, we further upgrade this subsequential guarantee to convergence of the whole trajectory to a single stationary point. Finally, for exponential-type KL desingularizing functions and polynomially growing sample sizes, we derive explicit polynomial convergence rates, up to a logarithmic factor, for both the function values and the iterates.

arXiv

ASTELD: A Six-Axis Classification Framework for Autonomous AI Agents - Design, Evaluation, and an OpenClaw Case Study

Siyuan Li, Peng Shu, Churan Yu, Peilong Wang, Ruidong Zhang, Bowen Guo, Xinliang Li, Ruiyu Yan, Arif Hassan Zidan, Yi Pan, Wei Ruan, lifeng chen, Junhao Chen, Zhaojun Ding, Yiwei Li, Zhengliang Liu, Haixing Dai, Lin Zhao, Yu Bao, Xiang Li, Wei Zhang, Tianming Liu

Autonomous AI agent platforms differ substantially in architecture, security, tool integration, execution, autonomy, and deployment, yet the field lacks a common classification scheme for comparing these design choices. We propose ASTELD, an operational six-axis classification framework for autonomous AI agents: Architecture pattern, Security posture, Tool integration model, Execution paradigm, Level of autonomy and human control, and Deployment topology. ASTELD is constructed by synthesizing prior agent taxonomies with observable platform properties and explicit category-assignment rules. We evaluate its discriminative and explanatory utility by mapping eight representative frameworks and by using OpenClaw as an in-depth case study. The resulting profiles separate all eight platforms under their dominant configurations and reveal three cross-platform patterns: a security-accessibility diagonal, strong execution-architecture coupling, and capability convergence with persistent architectural differentiation. We further classify 50+ OpenClaw derivatives and find that innovation concentrates on the Security, Execution, and Deployment axes, indicating that ASTELD can explain where ecosystem fragmentation occurs. The OpenClaw case study also supplies a six-category vulnerability taxonomy, evidence from five institutional assessments, and adoption and governance analyses that connect platform coordinates to observed risks. These results position ASTELD as a reproducible method for comparing agent platforms, identifying unoccupied design regions, guiding framework selection, and organizing future empirical research. The analysis also exposes a consequential empty region: none of the evaluated systems combines local-first deployment with enterprise-grade security.

arXiv

Berkeley and Heiserman as an Unexhausted Architecture for Embodied Machine Intelligence

Christopher A. Tucker

Edmund C. Berkeley is usually remembered as a mediator between symbolic logic and early computing, yet that standard description understates the scope of his work. This paper argues for a stronger reading: Berkeley should also be understood as an early theorist of embodied machine intelligence. Across Berkeley's major writings on symbolic logic, machine intelligence, living robots, and Squee, intelligence appears not as disembodied symbol manipulation alone but as the organized coordination of sensing, storage, calculation, control, state, and action in physically realized machines. The paper's first contribution is interpretive: it reconstructs Berkeley as a thinker of machine architecture, temporally extended behavior, and environment-coupled control. Its second contribution is comparative: it reads Berkeley alongside David L. Heiserman to recover a shared descriptive scheme centered on sensing, state or memory, control, action, and adaptation. Its third contribution is critical: it uses that scheme to assess current embodied-AI discourse. The broader claim is that contemporary LLM-centered robotics often demonstrates impressive capability without an equally explicit account of persistence, recoverability, maintenance, and structured modification of conduct through experience.

arXiv

Beyond the Library: An Agentic Framework for Autoformalizing Research Mathematics

Arshia Soltani Moakhar, Iman Gholami, Max Springer, Mahdi JafariRaviz, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in mathematical reasoning, they frequently produce subtle errors that evade human detection. Formal mathematical languages like Lean 4 offer mechanical proof checking, strongly motivating the need for autoformalization: the automatic translation of natural language mathematics into verifiable code. Recent trends indicate that general-purpose LLMs, heavily optimized for standard programming, now outperform smaller models explicitly fine-tuned for Lean. Leveraging this shift, we introduce *Theo*, an agentic autoformalization framework powered by general coding LLMs. At the core of our system is an orchestrator that manages a multi-agent pipeline tailored for research-level mathematics. Because cutting-edge research frequently relies on concepts outside the scope of existing libraries like Mathlib, our system dynamically extends necessary type definitions and validates them via a novel Auxiliary Lemma technique before formalizing the primary theorems. We applied our approach to PutnamBench, producing machine-checked Lean proofs for a random sample of 32 problems. Furthermore, we evaluate our system on seven research papers---five from the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC) and two recent OpenAI manuscripts---spanning combinatorics, communication complexity, mechanism design, learning theory, number theory, discrete geometry, and graph theory. We successfully formalize their main theorems and proofs and validate the generated formalizations with human experts; notably, two developments require no axioms beyond Lean's kernel. All of our formalizations are available at https://beyondthelibrary.github.io/formal_arxiv/.

arXiv

As You Wish: Mission Planning with Formal Verification using LLMs in Precision Agriculture

Marcos Abel Zuzuárregui, Stefano Carpin

Though robotic systems are now being commercialized and deployed in various industries, many of these systems are highly specialized and often require an advanced skill set to operate and ensure they perform as instructed. To mitigate this problem, we recently introduced a mission planner leveraging LLMs to synthesize mission plans in precision agriculture based on mission descriptions provided in natural language. While the system demonstrates impressive performance, it also suffers from the inherent ambiguities of natural language. In this paper, we extend our system to address this issue by introducing multiple feedback loops in the planning architecture that leverage linear temporal logic (LTL) to ensure the mission planning system meets the specifications formulated by the user while still using natural language. To mitigate potential bias, this is achieved by using two different commercial LLMs in charge of the specification and verification subtasks. Through extensive experiments, we highlight the strengths and limitations of integrating mission verification into a fully autonomous pipeline, particularly regarding an LLM's ability to generate valuable LTL formulas, and show how our proposed implementation addresses and solves these challenges.

arXiv

Plausible Patients, Impossible Populations: Auditing Epidemiological Fidelity in Large Language Model Mental Health Simulations

Patrick Keough

Language models asked to simulate psychiatric patients produce cases that survive inspection one at a time and populations that match no real one. We gave GPT-4o-mini, Gemini-3-Flash, DeepSeek-V3 and GLM-4.7 each of 120 demographic cohorts under two framings, one written as a clinician enters a patient and one as a person describes themselves, and scored all 28,800 responses against survey-weighted PHQ-8 anchors derived from NHANES microdata. Case by case the output holds up: 97.3% of elevated presentations satisfy the DSM-5 gateway rule, violating it at 2.68% against a chance null of 10.4%. As populations, four things fail at once. Every benchmarkable group returns inflated by 2.8 to 5.5 PHQ-8 points, and 18.2% of simulated patients screen at the treatment threshold against 7.5% of adults. Population Black-White and Hispanic-White disparities do not survive the simulation, with two models attenuating each gap and two flattening or inverting it. Symptom covariance reorganizes by cohort, putting the error beyond any recalibration, and demographic offsets do not stack, so a correction fitted on marginals misses the cells by about 0.4 points either way. And the answer does not hold still: at the decoding a deployment inherits, a third of patients change severity category between two draws of one prompt and one in five crosses the line from watchful waiting to treatment. We read the four together as one failure, and name the gap between case-level plausibility and population-level failure the coherence-fidelity dissociation. Individual cases clear a formal rule a case review would apply; the populations they compose fail every comparison we can construct against a real one. Gender identity carries an extreme on both symptom structure and regeneration stability, and no federal benchmark exists to check any of it. The patients look right. They do not represent real populations.

arXiv

An Axiomatic Benchmark for Evaluation of Scientific Novelty Metrics

Miri Liu, ChengXiang Zhai

The rigorous evaluation of the novelty of a scientific paper is, even for human scientists, a challenging task. With the increasing interest in AI scientists, it is becoming more and more important that this task be automatable and reliable, lest attention and compute be wasted on ideas that have already been explored. Due to the challenge of quantifying ground-truth novelty, however, existing novelty metrics generally validate against noisy, confounded signals such as citation counts or peer review scores. We introduce a benchmark that compares novelty metrics without requiring explicit novelty labels. It tests whether scores move correctly under controlled pool manipulations, organized under three axioms requiring that scores fall as the pool covers more of a paper's content, rise as the pool loses relevance, and fall as the pool moves later in time. Indeed, we show that even for the most direct human signal, ICLR reviewer novelty scores, the axis of novelty is entangled with quality. Across ten systems, from embedding metrics to AI scientist novelty checks, we find that surface redundancy is largely solved but conceptual redundancy is not, and that embedding metrics and LLM-based metrics both have their places; future metrics should combine such approaches for better novelty evaluation. We release our benchmark and evaluation code to enable this research.

arXiv

SkillMOO: Multi-Objective Optimization of Agent Skills for Software Engineering

Jingzhi Gong, Ruizhen Gu, Zhiwei Fei, Yazhuo Cao, Lukas Twist, Alina Geiger, Shuo Han, Dominik Sobania, Federica Sarro, Jie M. Zhang

Agent skills are increasingly used to configure coding agents for software engineering (SE) tasks, yet current practice treats them as static, hand-crafted assets, or evolved on pass rate alone. This is insufficient: a skill can improve task success while substantially raising token cost, or introducing misleading guidance. We argue that SE agent skill bundles can be treated as multi-objective search objects and present SkillMOO, a framework that evolves skill bundles through LLM-proposed edits and NSGA-II Pareto selection on pass rate and inference cost. Evaluated across all 16 SkillsBench SE tasks, SkillMOO achieves the top pass rate rank on 11 of 12 non-zero-pass tasks while achieving cost reductions of up to 31.7% over static bundles, with pass rate gains up to 21 percentage points. Analysis of 38 skill edits shows that pruning and substitution dominate successful operations, offering actionable principles for skill bundle design. Thereby, the current practice of deploying skills without cost-aware validation leaves better skill configurations unexplored, motivating a new class of cost-aware, search-based skill engineering.

arXiv

GrandCode: Achieving Grandmaster Level in Competitive Programming via Agentic Reinforcement Learning

Ornith Team, Xiaoya Li, Guoyin Wang, Songqiao Su, Chris Shum, Jiwei Li

Competitive programming remains one of the last few human strongholds in coding against AI. The best AI system to date still underperforms the best humans competitive programming: the most recent best result, Google's Gemini~3 Deep Think, attained 8th place even not being evaluated under live competition conditions. In this work, we introduce GrandCode, a multi-agent RL system designed for competitive programming. The capability of GrandCode is attributed to two key factors: (1) It orchestrates a variety of agentic modules (hypothesis proposal, solver, test generator, summarization, etc) and jointly improves them through post-training and online test-time RL; (2) We introduce Agentic GRPO specifically designed for multi-stage agent rollouts with delayed rewards and the severe off-policy drift that is prevalent in agentic RL. GrandCode is the first AI system that consistently beats all human participants in live contests of competitive programming: in the most recent three Codeforces live competitions, i.e., Round~1087 (Mar 21, 2026), Round~1088 (Mar 28, 2026), and Round~1089 (Mar 29, 2026), GrandCode placed first in all of them, beating all human participants, including legendary grandmasters. GrandCode shows that AI systems have reached a point where they surpass the strongest human programmers on the most competitive coding tasks.

arXiv

Gender-Based Heterogeneity in Youth Privacy-Protective Behavior for Smart Voice Assistants: Evidence from Multigroup PLS-SEM

Molly Campbell, Yulia Bobkova, Ajay Kumar Shrestha

This paper investigates how gender shapes privacy decision-making in youth smart voice assistant (SVA) ecosystems. Using survey data from 469 Canadian youths aged 16-24, we apply multigroup Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling to compare males (N=241) and females (N=174) (total N = 415) across five privacy constructs: Perceived Privacy Risks (PPR), Perceived Privacy Benefits (PPBf), Algorithmic Transparency and Trust (ATT), Privacy Self-Efficacy (PSE), and Privacy Protective Behavior (PPB). Results provide exploratory evidence of gender heterogeneity in selected pathways. The direct effect of PPR on PPB is stronger for males (Male: \b{eta} = 0.424; Female: \b{eta} = 0.233; p < 0.1), while the indirect effect of ATT on PPB via PSE is stronger for females (Female: \b{eta} = 0.229; Male: \b{eta} = 0.132; p < 0.1). Descriptive analysis of non-binary (N=15) and prefer-not-to-say participants (N=39) shows lower trust and higher perceived risk than the binary groups, motivating future work with adequately powered gender-diverse samples. Overall, the findings provide exploratory evidence that gender may moderate key privacy pathways, supporting more responsive transparency and control interventions for youth SVA use.

arXiv

Stochastic Parrots or Singing in Harmony? Testing Five Leading LLMs for their Ability to Replicate a Human Survey with Synthetic Data

Jason Miklian, Kristian Hoelscher, John E. Katsos

How well can AI-derived synthetic research data replicate the responses of human participants? An emerging literature has begun to engage with this question, which carries deep implications for organizational research practice. This article presents a comparison between a human-respondent survey of 420 Silicon Valley coders and developers and synthetic survey data designed to simulate real survey takers generated by five leading Generative AI Large Language Models: ChatGPT Thinking 5 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro plus Claude CoWork 1.123, Gemini Advanced 2.5 Pro, Incredible 1.0, and DeepSeek 3.2. Our findings reveal that while AI agents produced technically plausible results that lean more towards replicability and harmonization than assumed, none were able to capture the counterintuitive insights that made the human survey valuable. Moreover, deviations grouped together for all models, leaving the real data as the outlier. Our key finding is that while leading LLMs are increasingly being used to scale, replicate and replace human survey responses in research, these advances only show an increased capacity to parrot conventional wisdom in harmony with each other rather than revealing novel findings. If synthetic respondents are used in future research, we need more replicable validation protocols and reporting standards for when and where synthetic survey data can be used responsibly, a gap that this paper fills. Our results suggest that synthetic survey responses cannot meaningfully model real human social beliefs within organizations, particularly in contexts lacking previously documented evidence. We conclude that synthetic survey-based research should be cast not as a substitute for rigorous survey methods, but as an increasingly reliable pre- or post-fieldwork instrument for identifying societal assumptions, conventional wisdoms, and other expectations about research populations.

arXiv

A Lexical Analysis of online Reviews on Human-AI Interactions

Parisa Arbab, Xiaowen Fang

This study focuses on understanding the complex dynamics between humans and AI systems by analyzing user reviews. While previous research has explored various aspects of human-AI interaction, such as user perceptions and ethical considerations, there remains a gap in understanding the specific concerns and challenges users face. By using a lexical approach to analyze 55,968 online reviews from G2.com, Producthunt.com, and Trustpilot.com, this preliminary research aims to analyze human-AI interaction. Initial results from factor analysis reveal key factors influencing these interactions. The study aims to provide deeper insights into these factors through content analysis, contributing to the development of more user-centric AI systems. The findings are expected to enhance our understanding of human-AI interaction and inform future AI technology and user experience improvements.

Keep browsing

More papers from top AI conferences

30+ top conferences, by conference, year, and topic.