paperlist.ai

AI conference papers

AI conference paper library

Search papers from 30+ top conferences, including NeurIPS, ICLR, ICML, CVPR, ACL and AAAI. Filter by keyword, then open any paper for its abstract, authors and links.

arXiv

UniREditBench: A Unified Reasoning-based Image Editing Benchmark

feng han, Yibin Wang, Chenglin Li, Zheming Liang, Dianyi Wang, Yang Jiao, Zhipeng Wei, Chao Gong, Cheng Jin, Jiaqi Wang

Recent advances in multi-modal generative models have driven substantial improvements in image editing. However, current generative models still struggle with handling diverse and complex image editing tasks that require implicit reasoning, underscoring the need for a comprehensive benchmark to systematically assess their performance across various reasoning scenarios. Existing benchmarks primarily focus on single-object attribute transformation in realistic scenarios, which, while effective, encounter two key challenges: (1) they largely overlook multi-object interactions as well as game-world scenarios that involve human-defined rules, which are common in real-life applications; (2) they only rely on textual references to evaluate the generated images, potentially leading to systematic misjudgments, especially in complex reasoning scenarios. To this end, this work proposes UniREditBench, a unified benchmark for reasoning-based image editing evaluation. It comprises 2,700 meticulously curated samples, covering both real- and game-world scenarios across 8 primary dimensions and 18 sub-dimensions. To improve evaluation reliability, we introduce multimodal dual-reference evaluation, providing both textual and ground-truth image references for each sample assessment. Furthermore, we design an automated multi-scenario data synthesis pipeline and construct UniREdit-Data-100K, a large-scale synthetic dataset with high-quality chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning annotations. We fine-tune Bagel on this dataset and develop UniREdit-Bagel, demonstrating substantial improvements in both in-domain and out-of-distribution settings. Through thorough benchmarking of both open-source and closed-source image editing models, we reveal their strengths and weaknesses across various aspects.

arXiv

Symbolic Graphics Programming with Large Language Models

Yamei Chen, Haoquan Zhang, Yangyi Huang, Zeju Qiu, Kaipeng Zhang, Yandong Wen, Weiyang Liu

Large language models (LLMs) excel at program synthesis, yet their ability to produce symbolic graphics programs (SGPs) that render into precise visual content remains underexplored. We study symbolic graphics programming, where the goal is to generate an SGP from a natural-language description. This task also serves as a lens into how LLMs understand the visual world by prompting them to generate images rendered from SGPs. Among various SGPs, our paper sticks to scalable vector graphics (SVGs). We begin by examining the extent to which LLMs can generate SGPs. To this end, we introduce SGP-GenBench, a comprehensive benchmark covering object fidelity, scene fidelity, and compositionality (attribute binding, spatial relations, numeracy). On SGP-GenBench, we discover that frontier proprietary models substantially outperform open-source models, and performance correlates well with general coding capabilities. Motivated by this gap, we aim to improve LLMs' ability to generate SGPs. We propose a reinforcement learning (RL) with verifiable rewards approach, where a format-validity gate ensures renderable SVG, and a cross-modal reward aligns text and the rendered image via strong vision encoders (e.g., SigLIP for text-image and DINO for image-image). Applied to Qwen-2.5-7B, our method substantially improves SVG generation quality and semantics, achieving performance on par with frontier systems. We further analyze training dynamics, showing that RL induces (i) finer decomposition of objects into controllable primitives and (ii) contextual details that improve scene coherence. Our results demonstrate that symbolic graphics programming offers a precise and interpretable lens on cross-modal grounding.

arXiv

MotionStrata: Hierarchical Motion Latents for Compact Video Autoencoding

Wenzhang SUN, Huaize Liu, Chunfeng Wang, Biao Gong, Hao Li, Changqing Zou

First-frame-conditioned video autoencoders represent a clip with persistent content and a compact motion code. Although this removes much of the appearance redundancy, the remaining motion is typically compressed with a homogeneous latent geometry. Such representations use the same temporal support for broad scene evolution and fine-grained, frame-specific details. We introduce MotionStrata, which organizes a fixed motion budget into Global Motion and Detailed Motion. Temporally compressed Global queries summarize broad evolution, whereas frame-aligned Detailed queries preserve fine-grained structures whose configuration varies across frames. Frequency-guided routing and coarse-to-fine training establish this hierarchy without increasing motion dimensionality. Experiments show that MotionStrata maintains high reconstruction quality under aggressive compression and outperforms uniform and alternative grouped representations. Additional experiments evaluate hierarchical representation, downstream generation, and decoding cost. These results support hierarchical motion organization as a useful design principle for compact video autoencoding.

arXiv

Inspecting Training Dynamics of Similarity Development in Supervised Vision Networks

Katarzyna Filus, Mateusz Żarski

For trustworthy and human-aware artificial intelligence, models should be evaluated beyond accuracy, among others through error predictability and semantic alignment. Similarity is central to these aspects, as it influences which classes a model considers related and confusable. Similarity manifests in multiple forms, including semantic similarity, which can serve as a proxy for human similarity perception. While similarity perception is often imposed in computer vision, little attention has been paid to its natural emergence during supervised training. Existing studies are largely limited to static and qualitative analyzes and lack a systematic, training-time perspective. Therefore, we analyze how similarity perception evolves and aligns with model error patterns and semantics in supervised vision networks. As an enabler, we introduce Deep Similarity Inspector (DSI) - a systematic, training-time framework that unifies complementary views on similarity within a single methodology. Using DSI, we analyzed Convolutional and Transformer-based Networks and showed that both architectures develop rich similarity structures through three phases - initial similarity surge, refinement, stabilization - while exhibiting clear differences. We also identified the mistake refinement phenomenon, in which networks improve mistakes with time.

arXiv

Judge a Book by its Cover: Investigating Multi-Modal LLMs for Multi-Page Handwritten Document Transcription

Benjamin Gutteridge, Matthew Thomas Jackson, Toni Kukurin, Xiaowen Dong

Handwriting text recognition (HTR) remains a challenging task. Existing approaches require fine-tuning on labeled data, which is impractical to obtain for real-world problems, or rely on zero-shot tools such as OCR engines and multi-modal LLMs (MLLMs). MLLMs have shown promise both as end-to-end transcribers and as OCR post-processors, but to date there is little empirical research evaluating different MLLM prompting strategies for HTR, particularly for the case of multi-page documents. Most handwritten documents are multi-page, and share context such as semantic content and handwriting style across pages, yet MLLMs are typically used for transcription at the page level, meaning they throw away this shared context. They are also typically used as either text-only post-processors or image-only OCR alternatives, rather than leveraging multiple modes. This paper investigates a suite of methods combining OCR, LLM post-processing and MLLM end-to-end transcription, for the task of zero-shot multi-page handwritten document transcription. We introduce a benchmark for this task from existing single-page datasets, including a new dataset, Malvern-Hills. Finally, we introduce OCR+PAGE-1 and OCR+PAGE-N, prompting strategies for multi-page transcription that outperform existing methods by sharing content across pages while minimizing prompt complexity.

arXiv

CADSpotting: Robust Panoptic Symbol Spotting on Large-Scale CAD Drawings

Fuyi Yang, Jiazuo Mu, Yanshun Zhang, Mingqian Zhang, Junxiong Zhang, Yongjian Luo, Lan Xu, Jingyi Yu, Yujiao Shi, Yingliang Zhang

We introduce CADSpotting, an effective method for panoptic symbol spotting in large-scale architectural CAD drawings. Existing approaches often struggle with symbol diversity, scale variations, and overlapping elements in CAD designs, and typically rely on additional features (e.g., primitive types or graphical layers) to improve performance. CADSpotting overcomes these challenges by representing primitives through densely sampled points with only coordinate attributes, using a unified 3D point cloud model for robust feature learning. To enable accurate segmentation in large drawings, we further propose a novel Sliding Window Aggregation (SWA) technique that combines weighted voting and Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS). Moreover, we introduce LS-CAD, a new large-scale dataset comprising 45 finely annotated floorplans, each covering approximately 1,000 $m^2$, significantly larger than prior benchmarks. LS-CAD will be publicly released to support future research. Experiments on FloorPlanCAD and LS-CAD demonstrate that CADSpotting significantly outperforms existing methods. We also showcase its practical value by enabling automated parametric 3D interior reconstruction directly from raw CAD inputs.

arXiv

TRIBE: Predicting Team Performance via Communication Behavior Ensembles

Ali Jalal-Kamali, Nikolos Gurney, David V. Pynadath, Fred Morstatter

Designing autonomous agents that effectively assist human teams hinges on understanding team dynamics, often without task specific knowledge. We present TRIBE, a domain independent approach that reveals team behavioral dynamics invisible to traditional performance metrics. We show that communication patterns can categorize teams into performance predictive behavioral tribes, as early as 10% into the task, enabling timely interventions. We test TRIBE on four diverse datasets and demonstrate that communication patterns predict team performance while the prediction strength varies by the degree a task structure allows for behavioral freedom. Our temporal analysis reveals that AI agents significantly alter team behavioral trajectories while human advisors align with natural dynamics, and that teams maintain behavioral flexibility throughout collaboration. Further, we compare TRIBE to Llama and optimize the pipeline, achieving significant speedup with performance improvement.

arXiv

On the use of foundation models in cognitive science

Raj Sanjay Shah, Alex Warstadt, Michael Frank, Sashank Varma

A host of recent studies have evaluated the cognitive and developmental alignment of Foundation Models (FMs). These investigations include evaluations of their correspondence to adult performance across a range of cognitive domains, as well as whether aspects of model training track children's cognitive development. However, using FMs as candidate cognitive models poses significant methodological and conceptual challenges. A key question underlies this effort: under what conditions does behavioral alignment justify treating FMs as explanatory models of cognition? In this paper, we articulate a four-stage inferential framework for evaluating FMs as cognitive and developmental models: adapting human experimental tasks to model-compatible formats, specifying linking hypotheses that map model outputs to human measures, evaluating behavioral correspondence, and comparing across candidate models or manipulations. We clarify the role of linking hypotheses in mapping model outputs to human behavioral measures, identify challenges that constrain alignment claims, and propose principles for theory-driven and comparative evaluation. Throughout, we argue that behavioral fit alone is insufficient. Alignment becomes scientifically meaningful only when embedded within explicit theoretical commitments, theory-diagnostic tasks, and systematic contrastive evaluation across candidate models.

arXiv

Jako Tako or Fluent? Presenting PoVisLE: A Polish Vision-Language Evaluation

Anna Kołos, Grzegorz Statkiewicz, Karolina Seweryn, Katarzyna Kowol, Karolina Piosek, Wojciech Kusa

Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved strong performance on tasks such as image captioning, visual question answering, and image-to-text generation. However, they are predominantly trained on English-centric data, which limits their ability to handle culturally grounded visual understanding and leads to failures in interpreting region-specific meanings, symbolic content, and context-dependent visual cues. Existing benchmarks for cultural competence are often template-driven and focused on surface-level recognition, making them insufficient for evaluating deeper linguistic and pragmatic understanding in culturally situated settings. We introduce PoVisLE, a monocultural vision-language benchmark for Polish designed to evaluate culturally grounded multimodal understanding under a grounded evaluation paradigm, where language is interpreted in interaction with visual context. The dataset contains 1,117 images and 2,366 manually annotated VQA pairs. Overall, our dataset provides a controlled and challenging resource for assessing culturally grounded vision-language understanding beyond surface-level recognition.

arXiv

The No-Meaning Falsity: The Structural Impossibility of the Arbitrary Sign in Classical Arabic

Elnaserledinellah Mahmoud Abdelwahab

This paper investigates whether the postmodern claim of unrestricted semantic indeterminacy, and its foundational Saussurean axiom of the arbitrary sign, are compatible with the structural architecture of Classical Arabic. We develop a formal mathematical model of Arabic non concatenative morphology in which lexical meaning is determined by the interaction between an invariant root and a morphosyntactic pattern. Within this framework, we establish a Morphological Correspondence Theorem, demonstrating that every lexical item is uniquely generated by a root pattern pair, and a Semantic Localization Theorem, proving that lexical meaning is determined at the derivational level prior to surface realization. To address Saussurean weaker notion of relative arbitrariness, we formalize it via conditional Kolmogorov complexity, defining arbitrariness algorithmically as the no rule property. We prove that general relative arbitrariness is formally undecidable, while Arabic relative arbitrariness is decidable and provably less than 1 for its motivated signifiers (Levels W and M), establishing a strict system complexity asymmetry over Indo-European languages.

arXiv

Evaluating Dedicated Monolingual and Joint Multilingual Causal Models for Dravidian Languages

Venkata Naga Sai Vishnu Rohit Pulipaka

Dravidian languages, mainly Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, and Malayalam make up only a small part of the data used to train multilingual language models, so it's not clear how much per-language ability these models actually keep. I have trained five GPT-2 architecture models from scratch to compare four monolingual models (one each for Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, and Malayalam, each with its own 32K-vocabulary subword tokenizer) against one multilingual model sharing a 64K-vocabulary subword tokenizer across all four languages. All the 5 models are trained on cleaned CC-100, Wikipedia, and Samanantar data. I have tested the models on perplexity, bits-per-byte, tokenizer efficiency, and fine-tuning results which are compared against mGPT. The monolingual models outperform mGPT on sentiment classification and named entity recognition, and their tokenizers proved more efficient than the shared multilingual model across all the languages tested.

arXiv

CosmosAlign: Adapting a World Foundation Model for Generative Traffic Video Forecasting

Quang Minh Dinh, Tuan Kiet Doan

Generative traffic video forecasting aims to synthesize long-horizon, temporally coherent future videos of traffic scenes from a short observation history and textual descriptions. In this paper, we present CosmosAlign, a generative traffic video forecasting framework built upon the pretrained Cosmos3-Nano world foundation model. Our approach is motivated by the observation that successfully adapting large pretrained world models to downstream forecasting tasks depends primarily on distribution alignment rather than increased model capacity. To this end, we propose a two-stage LoRA adaptation strategy that first aligns the conditioning-mode distribution with the target forecasting task, and then aligns the training captions with the model's native structured prompting interface through an LLM-based re-captioning pipeline. During inference, we further improve prediction quality using a fully training-free procedure consisting of consensus-based medoid sample selection and motion-adaptive blending of static scene regions. CosmosAlign achieves a final score of 76.49 on the AI City Challenge 2026 Track 5 benchmark, ranking first on the final leaderboard. Our code is publicly available at https://quangminhdinh.github.io/CosmosAlign/.

arXiv

IntelliAudit: Using Large Language Models to Evaluate Audit Controls

Allison Wilson, Sina Moradi Sabet, Diar Shakimov, Panteha Shahrivar, Mohammad Reza Bagheri, Dean Konenkamp, Mohammad A. Tayebi

IT audits require auditors to judge whether heterogeneous organizational evidence satisfies semantic security and compliance controls. This judgment is difficult to automate because relevant evidence is distributed across policies, records, spreadsheets, and operational artifacts, and because audit conclusions depend on evidentiary sufficiency rather than keyword matching. We present IntelliAudit, a retrieval-grounded multi-agent system for IT audit evidence evaluation. Given a control and an evidence corpus, IntelliAudit retrieves relevant artifacts, generates an evidence-grounded assessment, challenges adverse findings, adjudicates disagreements, and produces an auditor-facing recommendation with cited evidence, rationale, missing-evidence analysis, and remediation guidance. We instantiate IntelliAudit on ISO/IEC 27001 and evaluate it across multiple simulated organizations using expert auditor review and audit-readiness user feedback. The evaluation shows that IntelliAudit can support control interpretation, evidence-grounded reasoning, and audit-preparation workflows, while also revealing the importance of human oversight for calibrating sufficiency judgments and correcting overly permissive recommendations. These results suggest that retrieval-grounded multi-agent systems can assist audit evidence review, but should remain decision-support tools rather than autonomous certification systems.

arXiv

Keep It Simple: Multi-Key Episodic Memory Retrieval for Ultra-Long Video Understanding

Yeeun Choi, Youngbeom Yoo, Joon-Young Lee, Hyolim Kang, Seon Joo Kim

When videos extend from hours to days, directly processing them end-to-end becomes impractical for current Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs). This ultra-long setting necessitates a two-stage paradigm: query-agnostic memory construction followed by retrieval-based inference. Prior work invests in complex memory construction to pre-model high-level relations in videos, despite not knowing the downstream query at build time. We instead prioritize high-recall retrievability during memory building, and defer query-specific, high-level relation composition to inference time. To this end, we propose MERIT(Multi-key Episodic Retrieval with Inference-time Temporal expansion), a simple yet effective agentic framework for ultra-long video understanding. First, we formulate an episodic multi-key representation that enables precise retrieval of fine-grained memories through a simple key-matching mechanism. Second, we introduce a neighbor filtering mechanism to capture broader semantic context without the massive computational overhead of global memory construction. This is achieved by expanding the temporal scope exclusively around the retrieved segments at inference time. By leveraging simple key-matching with this on-demand temporal expansion, MERIT achieves state-of-the-art performance across three long-video benchmarks: EgoLifeQA, LVBench, and Video-MME (Long).

arXiv

SurveyReview: A Reviewer-Aligned Benchmark for Survey Evaluators

Yuheng Zhang, Yuanchun Wang, Fanjin Zhang, Ruyu Zhao, Juanzi Li, Jie Tang, Jing Zhang

The rapid advancement of large language models has transformed survey writing from a months-long manual effort into an automated process. As generation scales, reliable evaluation becomes the bottleneck, and LLMs are increasingly used as survey evaluators. However, existing approaches largely rely on off-the-shelf LLM-as-a-judge methods without systematic alignment to human reviewers, and there remains a lack of systematic frameworks for quantifying alignment with human reviewers. To address this gap, we propose SurveyReview, a reviewer-aligned, multi-dimensional benchmark and dataset for survey evaluation. We collect and annotate 675 survey papers with 1,630 review reports. We structure authentic peer-review reports by converting free-form comments into four-dimensional scores (Readability, Criticalness, Comprehensiveness, Structure) paired with supporting rationales. We further release standardized train/test splits and an evaluation protocol to measure alignment between automatic evaluators and human reviewers. To validate the benchmark, we develop SurveyAlign, a strong baseline evaluator by fine-tuning Qwen3-32B with LoRA on our annotated data, augmented with external knowledge for knowledge-intensive dimensions. On the test set, SurveyAlign substantially improves reviewer alignment over prompt-based judging with GPT-5.2, reducing average MSE from 2.28 to 1.38 and MAE from 1.15 to 0.69 across all four dimensions. Our contributions are twofold: (1) we establish the first multi-dimensional, reviewer-aligned dataset with a reproducible evaluation framework for survey reviewing; (2) we develop a strong baseline evaluator that substantially improves alignment with human reviewers, providing a competitive reference for future research. Our code and data are available at https://surveyreview.github.io

arXiv

Embedding Initialization for Unseen Low-resource Languages in Multilingual NMT: A Case Study on Limbum-English Translation

Samiratu Ntohsi, Neza David Tuyishimire, Anesu Kafesu, Marvin Ogore, Samuel Oluwajunwonlo Babalola, Oche Ankeli

Multilingual neural machine translation models such as NLLB-200 cover 200 languages but leave thousands unsupported, including most Grassfields Bantu languages of Cameroon. When fine-tuning these models for an unseen language, practitioners must choose a proxy language token, yet no principled method exists for this selection. We implemented an embedding initialization strategy where a language token is the average of embeddings from multiple typologically related languages already in the mod el. We evaluate this approach on Limbum-to-English translation using a parallel corpus of 8,837 sentence pairs from New Testament text and a bilingual dictionary. We compare models: NLLB-200 zero-shot (chrF2++ = 12.5), a Transformer trained from scratch (chrF2++ = 14.5), NLLB-200 fine-tuned with a Swahili proxy token (chrF2++ = 47.3), and NLLB-200 with our averaged embedding initialization (chrF2++ = 46.7). We find that the multi-language initialization achieves performance comparable to the best single-language proxy. Both NLLB-200 variants improve over the from-scratch baseline by over 32 chrF2++ points. These results show that multilingual transfer is the dominant factor in extremely low-resource Bantu translation while eliminating the need for heuristic proxy selection. However, all systems fail to preserve tonal diacritics, highlighting an open challenge. We make our dataset and code available to support further research.

arXiv

From Single Chatbots to Governed Agent Ecosystems: An Agentic AI Pattern Catalogue and Orchestration Framework for Mission-Critical Hospital Information Management Systems

Manideep Dhar, Ritwik Singh, Sharat Chandra Kumar Manikonda

Hospitals are racing to embed AI, while coping with the surge in adaptation of the technology in other industries, into the triage management, documentation, scheduling, and revenue-cycle workflows, yet most deployments remain as fragmented pilots that stall at the edge of production, exposing patients and institutions to operational fragility, ungoverned risk, and mounting technical debt. At the same time, the global AI-in-healthcare market is projected to exceed nearly USD 1 trillion by 2034, according to the report of Fortune Business Insights, amplifying the financial consequences of architectural missteps and failed scaling strategies. This research proposes a compliance-first Agentic AI pattern catalogue and orchestration framework, purposely built for HIMS, moving beyond the single LLM chatbots and towards a governed ecosystem of autonomous and semi-autonomous agents. The framework extends by adding (i) a taxonomy of Agentic roles, (ii) a formal risk-stratification model that maps each pattern to risk tiers, human-in-the-loop checkpoints, and governance hooks, and (iii) a unified orchestration runtime capable of coordinating multi-agent workflows across EHR/HIMS landscapes such as Epic, Cerner, and MEDITECH. Technically the framework combines vLLM-based inference, optimized paging memory, confidential computing, and MCP based on-premise deployment, enforcing end-to-end encryption and policy-as-code controls aligned with HIPAA, GDPR, the EU AI Act, India's DPDP and DISHA Acts, ISO 27001, ISO 27002, ISO 14971 and IEC 62304. We exhibit how the proposed architecture is capable and efficient to reduce the documentation time, integration effort, and AI pilot attrition while constricting the governance and auditability, offering hospital leaders and governing authorities an urgently needed blueprint to convert AI investment into sustainable clinical, operational, and financial ROI

arXiv

DevIntent: How Much Does LLM-Generated Code Violate Developer Intent?

Susana Haing, Natan Vidra, Spurthi Setty

Code generated by LLMs can violate a developer's implicit intentions when given an ambiguous prompt, yet standard benchmarks measure only whether code passes its stated test. We introduce the Intent Violation Rate (IVR) and a 49-problem pilot benchmark derived from HumanEval+. Each problem strips implicit constraints from a clarified prompt and encodes them as hidden constraint tests. IVR measures the fraction of LLM-generated solutions that pass the stated (visible) tests yet fail hidden constraint tests that capture unstated intent. Evaluating Claude Sonnet 4.6 and OpenAI GPT 4.1, we find both pass over 92\% of stated tests yet violate intent in over half of problems (54.5\% and 63.5\%), following a systematic, bimodal pattern consistent across both models. Out findings indicate that pass rates overstate how well generated code reflects developer intent.

arXiv

Mapping the City Through the Lens of Language Models

Wanqi Liu, Rong Zhao, Zhizhou Sha, Qinyu Cui, Yecheng Zhang

Language models often complete an underspecified reference to a city with unstated assumptions about urban size, form, infrastructure, environment, and function. We measure those assumptions without naming places. Ten open-weight checkpoints rate anonymized profiles derived from real morphological urban centres across 40 audited indicators and seven domains. The design combines constrained probability-based ratings, prespecified reliability screens, lineage-aware aggregation, multiple population weightings, an independent replication sample, and whole-profile validation. The clearest shared tendency favours urban profiles with larger developed area, faster recent growth, greater mapped infrastructure and non-residential capacity, and less sparse form. Most eligible directions recur in the replication data, and direct ratings of complete profiles show moderate agreement with the indicator-wise construction. Geographic differences shrink after accounting for city scale and development, while reliably measured paired tasks indicate that typicality and desirability are often closely aligned. The framework makes an otherwise vague notion of what models regard as an ordinary city empirically traceable. The resulting evidence delineates a shared yet model-dependent portrait of the city through the lens of language models.

arXiv

Cognitive Episodes in LLM Reasoning Traces Enable Interpretable Human Item Difficulty Prediction

Chenguang Wang, Ming Li, Xinyue Zeng, Zhuochun Li, Hong Jiao, Tianyi Zhou, Dawei Zhou

Predicting human item difficulty is central to educational assessment, where reliable estimates support fairness and effective test construction. Existing methods often depend on costly human calibration or item-level textual representations, providing limited evidence about the cognitive processes that make items difficult. We argue that difficulty should be viewed not only as a property of item text, but also as an observable consequence of the problem-solving burden an item induces. Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) offer scalable process evidence through reasoning traces, but such evidence must be structured to support interpretable modeling. To this end, we introduce Epi2Diff (Episode to Difficulty), a framework that maps LRM reasoning traces into cognitively grounded episode sequences. These episodes group trace segments into functional problem-solving states, enabling difficulty to be modeled through reasoning scale, effort allocation, and state transitions. Epi2Diff extracts compact episode-dynamic features and combines them with semantic item representations for human difficulty prediction. Experiments on four real-world human difficulty datasets show that Epi2Diff consistently outperforms strong baselines, including fine-tuned small language models, LLM in-context learning, and supervised LLM adaptation. On SAT-derived classification benchmarks, Epi2Diff achieves an 8.1% average relative gain over supervised LLM fine-tuning baselines. Further analyses show that harder items induce more effortful, iterative, and implementation-centered episode dynamics, rather than merely longer responses. These results demonstrate that cognitive episodes in LRM reasoning traces provide a predictive and interpretable process representation for human item difficulty, offering a new lens for educational measurement with reasoning models.

Keep browsing

More papers from top AI conferences

30+ top conferences, by conference, year, and topic.