paperlist.ai

AI conference papers

AI conference paper library

Search papers from 30+ top conferences, including NeurIPS, ICLR, ICML, CVPR, ACL and AAAI. Filter by keyword, then open any paper for its abstract, authors and links.

arXiv

Training Agents to Evolve with Their Harness: TaoLive Digital Avatar Agent Technical Report

TaoLive AIGC LLM Team, Yuhan Sun, Wenhao Lin, Yongdong Luo, Yibo Hu, Meiguang Jin, Junfeng Ma, Weihang Pan, Jiaxin Zhao, Zulong Chen

AI-powered digital avatar streamers must answer product questions, engage viewers, and execute marketing strategies in real time, demanding low latency, frequent strategy updates, and accurate yet effective responses. Evolvable Harnesses, whose Skills, Hooks, prompts, and tools can be updated independently of model weights, enable rapid iteration but expose a trade-off: large models adapt zero-shot yet are too slow, whereas compact models meet latency targets but overfit to fixed Harness configurations. We propose Harness-Aware Training (HAT), which trains compact models to adapt to changing Harnesses. Its key component, Harness-State Augmentation (HSA), applies task-preserving transformations to Skill identifiers and content, tool schemas, prompt structures, and Hook functions. Training proceeds in three stages: HSA-SFT learns reasoning and tool use from strong-model trajectories across diverse environments; General On-Policy Distillation restores generalization lost during SFT; and HSA-RL improves robustness to changing Harnesses through reinforcement learning in augmented environments. Across four evaluation sets, HAT achieves 94.8 on Live-Stream QA (base: 80.3; strongest general LLM: 93.0) and 94.6 on Harness-Variant QA (base: 75.4). Unlike Fixed-Harness SFT, which lowers IFEval by 7.7 points from the base model, HAT avoids this regression and reaches 83.5. On one NVIDIA H20 GPU, the optimized system delivers P50 and P95 latencies of 3.4 s and 8.1 s. Deployed in Taobao Live's digital-avatar service, it also yields positive online A/B test results for GMV and item-page views.

arXiv

Framework for Grounding Healthcare LLMs in a Causal Knowledge Graph: A Cardiovascular Example Pilot

Ummara Mumtaz, Aimen Noor, Awais Ahmed

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly proposed for healthcare decision support, but their evaluations still reward single-answer accuracy rather than reasoning about interventions, mechanisms, harms, evidence, and uncertainty. We propose a reproducible, graph-centered evaluation framework for intervention-oriented LLM behavior in healthcare and stress-test it in a cardiovascular pilot. The framework has four components: (i) a domain causal knowledge graph in which assertions are first-class, provenance-preserving nodes with stable identifiers; (ii) a scenario-conditioned subgraph extraction step that, given any clinical scenario, retrieves the relevant reified-assertion subgraph; (iii) four controlled grounding conditions that vary how the retrieved subgraph is composed into the model's context (ungrounded C1, knowledge-graph C2, causal-graph C3, integrated C4); and (iv) an automated scoring pipeline, anchored on assertion identifiers, that computes intervention accuracy, and other evaluation measures on a single pass. To test the framework, we built a category-balanced scenario generator across eight reasoning failure modes and instantiated it on a cardiovascular graph. The metric panel discriminates conditions along interpretable, non-redundant axes: C4 obtains the strongest causal edge F1 (0.838), adverse-effect F1 (0.833), evidence accuracy (0.738), and unsupported claim rate (0.114), while C1 obtains the highest raw intervention accuracy (0.948) with no measurable causal or evidential grounding.

arXiv

Towards Understanding On-Policy Distillation through the Lens of Test-Time Scaling

Xinmu Ge, Zizhuo Zhang, Yu Huang, Jianing Zhu, Lin Yuan, Wanli Gu, Weichang Wu, Weiran Huang, Xiaolu Zhang, Bo Han, JUN ZHOU, Jiangchao Yao

On-policy distillation (OPD) has emerged as a promising post-training technique for enhancing LLM reasoning. It is commonly believed to enable the student model to distill knowledge from a stronger teacher model, thereby expanding capabilities beyond the pre-OPD base model. In this study, we examine this view through the lens of test-time scaling by varying the sampling budget K and evaluating performance with pass@K and avg@K. Specifically, across several OPD variants, we observe that OPD-trained models maintain superior avg@K performance across sampling budgets, while the advantage in pass@K gradually shifts to the pre-OPD base models as K increases. These results suggest that OPD primarily improves sampling efficiency rather than consistently expanding the student's reasoning capability boundary. The pass@K dynamics throughout OPD training further reveal a progressive shift toward stronger small-K performance at the expense of the large-K capability boundary. Furthermore, a problem-level solvability analysis using pass@1024 as the criterion reveals an asymmetry: OPD causes more previously solvable problems to become unsolvable than previously unsolvable problems to become solvable. Together, these findings suggest that, from the perspective of capability expansion, OPD behaves more like an "illusory distillation": its apparent gains arise primarily from improved sampling efficiency rather than from acquiring genuinely new reasoning capabilities from the teacher.

arXiv

Do LLM Recommenders Know When They're Hallucinating? Auditing Confidence Calibration in Catalog Faithfulness

Srijith Ravikumar

LLM recommenders for top-K item suggestion regularly emit titles outside the target catalog. Prior audits report a binary out-of-domain rate; none ask whether the model knew. We jointly audit hallucination rate (OOD@10) and verbalized-confidence calibration (ECE, Brier, reliability) for four zero-shot LLM recommenders from four independent vendors (Mistral Large, Llama-3.3-70B, GPT-OSS-120B, Claude Sonnet 4.6), not grounded or fine-tuned systems, across three catalogs (MovieLens-25M, Amazon Reviews 2023 Toys, Yelp Open Dataset), stratified by item popularity. Measuring catalog membership is itself the hard part: on identical outputs the reported rate moves by an order of magnitude with the string matcher used, and F1 cannot separate the candidates. We validate the instrument against 201 human judgments and select on net bias, where the adopted one is off by -0.040 against +0.144 for the common fuzzy rule. Hallucination is then strongly catalog-dependent (0.6-2.7% on MovieLens, 11.6-38.7% on Yelp, 49.3-61.0% on Amazon Toys). Each model holds a near-constant confidence level barely responsive to the catalog, while the catalog-hit rate swings 60 points, so the sign of the error is set by where a model's constant lands against a catalog's accuracy: 7 of the twelve cells are under-confident and 5 over-confident, all four under-confident on MovieLens, all four over-confident on Amazon Toys. We read this as an elicitation mismatch: "Just Ask" elicits a generic quality rating, not a catalog-membership probability. A conformal abstention threshold over verbalized confidence changes hallucination by at most 1.65 pp across four alpha levels, because the channel cannot separate correct items from hallucinations. We recommend that audits report calibration alongside OOD, validate the matcher producing the OOD number, and use catalog-anchored elicitation.

arXiv

DynaKRAG: A Unified Framework for Learnable Evidence Control in Multi-Hop Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Chenyu Zhou, Yaqi Wu, Xiaolei Guo, Jiaqi Huang, Xianfa Zhang, Junxu Zhang, Zhuo Yu, Zhubo Shi, Jianghao Lin, Dongdong Ge

Multi-hop retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) acquires evidence sequentially, with each document contributing supporting facts, bridge entities, query refinements, or sufficient evidence for answering. Evidence acquisition can involve iterative retrieval, query reformulation, evidence assessment, and sufficiency checking. We introduce DynaKRAG, a unified evidence-action framework that learns a shared state-conditioned policy for coordinating these operations. At each step, a deterministic validity layer constructs the executable action set, a learned continuation gate selects between answer generation and further evidence acquisition, and a learned advantage scorer ranks feasible evidence operations by their predicted gain relative to immediate answer generation. The selected operation updates the shared state and may enable additional operations. Across HotpotQA, 2Wiki, and MuSiQue with Qwen2.5-7B, GPT-4o-mini, and Llama-3.1-8B, DynaKRAG ranks first among the compared methods in both EM and F1 for all nine dataset--backbone pairs. Relative to matched-backbone baseline method, DynaKRAG improves F1 in every pair while achieving total-token efficiency gains of 10.1--34.3\% and retrieval-call efficiency gains of 15.1--43.4\%, establishing Pareto dominance under these measures. With Qwen2.5-7B, terminal evidence compression further improves answer quality across all three datasets while reducing the context passed to final answer generation by 54.4\%--71.5\%. These results demonstrate that unified, state-conditioned evidence control supports strong answer quality, efficient retrieval, and compact answer-generation contexts.

arXiv

How Does Research Evolve? Tracing Cross-Domain Trajectories in NLP, ML, and CV Through Claim-Grounded Typed Citations

Abdul Muntakim, Md Abdullah Al Hafiz Khan, Sadid Hasan, Yong Pei

How does research evolve, and can we trace it at the level of individual claims? Scientific progress is not simply a uniform accumulation of facts. Existing citation graphs usually collapse these roles into a single homogeneous edge type, limiting how we can analyze scientific progress. We introduce SciTraj, a typed citation corpus for tracing research evolution across natural language processing, machine learning, and computer vision. SciTraj includes 32,559 papers published between 2015 and 2024 and 573,126 directed edges spanning six research-relation types. Unlike traditional citation graphs, each edge is paired with the claim sentence that motivates its label. Claim-driven relations are verified by natural language inference against their local in-paper context. The corpus further organizes these relations into multi-step typed trajectories that trace how ideas develop across papers and over time. We evaluate the corpus along three dimensions. First, a three-annotator pilot achieves Fleiss' $κ=0.74$ and 79.9\% majority-vote precision for relation labels, indicating substantial agreement and reliable labeling. Second, corpus-level analyses reveal clear disciplinary siloing in the directional flow of research relations. Topic analysis further identifies rapidly growing clusters dominated by vision and LLM-related research and declining clusters associated with several classical machine-learning topics. We further evaluate SciTraj using a temporally split link-prediction benchmark and a year-shuffle falsifiability test that distinguishes genuine temporal signal from year-correlated content. Under this setting, \textsc{SciTraj-Pair} performs strongly, but its AUC drops by 0.288 when publication years are shuffled, showing that its predictions depend not only on content but also on the temporal order in which research develops.

arXiv

SCAR: Semantic Continuity-Aware Retrieval for Efficient Context Expansion in RAG

Nathanaël Langlois

Fixed-length chunking in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) often leads to boundary fragmentation, where critical evidence is split across segments, degrading retrieval recall. While static windowing and parent retrieval improve recall, they introduce significant token overhead. We propose SCAR (Semantic Continuity-Aware Retrieval), an adaptive retrieval policy that selectively expands neighboring chunks by weighing query-neighbor relevance against a structural continuity penalty. SCAR uses a relative expansion threshold tied to each retrieved chunk's own query-relevance, yielding an approximately scale-invariant decision rule that transfers across embedding models without recalibration. Across four diverse corpora (RFC, GDPR, a 10-K report, and a Merger agreement; N=320 queries; 160 boundary-fragmented), SCAR achieves 92.8% recall on boundary-fragmented queries with only 7.84 chunks, a 22.9% reduction compared to static windowing (10.16 chunks). Paired bootstrap tests (B=10,000) confirm the chunk reduction is highly significant (p<0.0001, Cohen's d=-1.49, large effect), with a small recall difference (Cohen's d=-0.33). The policy transfers across three embedding models (text-embedding-3-large, BGE-large-en-v1.5, zembed-1) using the same single hyperparameter setting, and downstream RAGAS evaluation on the 10-K corpus confirms SCAR preserves generation faithfulness while reducing context tokens by 27.1%.

arXiv

GRACE: Step-Level Benchmark for Faithful Reasoning over Context

Hoang Pham, Dong Le, Anh Tuan Luu

Many reasoning tasks require models to reason over input context, from document-grounded question answering to rule-based deduction. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting produces traces that appear transparent, yet individual steps can silently deviate from the source evidence, even when the final answer is correct. Existing methods detect hallucinations at the response level but fail to identify where in the chain a failure occurs or what type it is. We introduce GRACE, the first human-annotated step-level faithfulness benchmark with a data-driven error taxonomy for context-grounded textual reasoning. GRACE covers CoT traces from 10 models across 4 source datasets, with each step annotated for faithfulness, error category, and natural language explanation. A data-driven taxonomy, discovered bottom-up via unsupervised clustering, organizes failures into two tracks: GRACE-Inference (deductive errors) and GRACE-Grounding (factual grounding errors), with four categories each. The evaluation set is human-annotated and challenging by design. Our experiments reveal substantial headroom for current models. In addition, integrating step-level faithfulness signals into reinforcement learning pipelines improves both downstream accuracy and reasoning reliability.

arXiv

SocraticPO: Policy Optimization via Interactive Guidance

Zirui Liu, Tingyue Pan, Jie Ouyang, Qi Liu, Xianquan Wang, Jiayu Liu, Qingchuan Li, Jing Sha, Zhenya Huang, Shijin Wang, Enhong Chen

Reinforcement learning (RL) for large language models usually supervises reasoning with scalar outcome rewards, such as binary correctness. Such rewards provide an optimization direction but rarely explain how a model should revise its mistaken reasoning, which can encourage shortcut learning and brittle policies. We propose \textbf{SocraticPO} (Socratic Policy Optimization), a policy-optimization framework that augments RL rollouts with Socratic-style natural-language guidance. During rollout, the student first answers independently; if the answer is incorrect, a teacher diagnoses the attempt and provides concise corrective guidance, after which the student continues under the expanded context. Crucially, this guidance is paired with reward decay: correct answers obtained after teacher intervention only receive decayed rewards, preventing the policy from treating teacher help as a free path to reward. Since SocraticPO only modifies the rollout process while leaving the standard expected-reward objective intact, it can be plugged into existing policy-gradient backends such as Reinforce++. Moreover, because the teacher provides only text-level guidance, SocraticPO can leverage stronger black-box teacher models without requiring access to logits or distribution matching. On undergraduate-level scientific reasoning benchmarks from SciKnowEval, SocraticPO improves over strong RL and self-distillation baselines. Ablations show that both targeted guidance and reward decay are necessary, with reward decay mitigating reliance on assisted correction.

arXiv

Verbalizing LLMs' assumptions to explain and control sycophancy

Myra Cheng, Isabel Sieh, Humishka Zope, Sunny Yu, Lujain Ibrahim, Aryaman Arora, Jared Moore, Desmond Ong, Dan Jurafsky, Diyi Yang

LLMs can be socially sycophantic, affirming users when they ask questions like "am I in the wrong?" rather than providing genuine assessment. We hypothesize that this behavior arises from LLMs' incorrect assumptions about the user, like underestimating how often users are seeking information over reassurance. We present Verbalized Assumptions, a framework for eliciting these assumptions from LLMs. Verbalized Assumptions provide insight into LLM sycophancy, delusion, and other safety issues: in social sycophancy datasets, "seeking validation" is the most frequent bigram in LLMs' assumptions. We provide evidence for a causal link between assumptions and sycophantic model behavior: we train linear probes on internal representations associated with Verbalized Assumptions and then use these probes for interpretable, fine-grained steering of social sycophancy. Finally, we identify a human-AI expectation gap that explains why LLMs default to sycophantic assumptions. On identical queries, people expect more objective and informative responses from AI than from other humans, but LLMs trained on human-human conversation do not account for this difference in expectations. Our work contributes a new understanding of assumptions as a mechanism for analyzing and controlling sycophancy.

arXiv

Vibe Coding on Trial: Operating Characteristics of Unanimous LLM Juries

Muhammad Aziz Ullah, Abdul Serwadda

Large Language Models (LLMs) are now good enough at coding that developers can describe intent in plain language and let the tool produce the first code draft, a workflow increasingly built into tools like GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Replit. What is missing is a reliable way to tell which model written queries are safe to accept without sending everything to a human. We study the application of an LLM jury to run this review step. We first benchmark 15 open models on 82 MySQL text to SQL tasks using an execution grounded protocol to get a clean baseline of which models are strong. From the six best models we build unanimous committees of sizes 1 through 6 that see the prompt, schema, and candidate SQL and accept it only when every member says it is correct. This rule matches safety first deployments where false accepts are more costly than false rejects. We measure true positive rate, false positive rate and Youden J and we also look at committees per generator. Our results show that single model judges are uneven, that small unanimous committees of strong models can cut false accepts while still passing many good queries, and that the exact committee composition matters significantly.

arXiv

Adaptive Test-Time Compute Allocation for Block Diffusion Language Models in Complex Reasoning

Yi Lu, Deyang Kong, Jianing Wang, Linsen Guo, Xue Wang, Qi Guo, Tao Gui, Xuanjing Huang, Wei Ye, Shikun Zhang, Wei Wang

Recent advances in block diffusion language models have demonstrated competitive performance and strong scalability on reasoning tasks. However, their test-time compute allocation remains largely unexplored, leaving a critical speed-effectiveness trade-off unresolved in long Chain-of-Thought reasoning. To address this, we propose a unified test-time compute allocation framework that introduces adaptivity in both step-wise decoding and blockwise generation. At the decoding level, we propose Bounded Adaptive Confidence Decoding (BACD), a difficulty-aware sampling strategy that dynamically adjusts denoising based on model confidence, accelerating inference while controlling error accumulation. Beyond step-wise adaptivity, we introduce the Think Coarse, Critic Fine (TCCF) paradigm that allocates large block sizes for exploratory thinking and smaller block sizes for precise refinement. To stabilize training under varying block configurations, we adopt Progressive Block Size Extension, which mitigates quality degradation when scaling up block sizes. Extensive evaluations on six benchmarks show that our TDAR-8B model with BACD and TCCF achieves a 2.38$\times$ speedup and +3.4% average accuracy over the strong TraDo-8B baseline, unlocking the potential of block diffusion in complex reasoning.

arXiv

LakeHopper: Knowledge-Aware Adaptation of Column Type Annotators across Data Lakes

Yushi Sun, Xujia Li, Nan Tang, Quanqing Xu, Chuanhui Yang, Lei Chen

Column Type Annotation (CTA), which assigns a semantic type to a table column, underpins data integration, cleaning, and search over data lakes. State-of-the-art annotators are pre-trained language models (PLMs) fine-tuned on one particular corpus of tables, i.e., a source data lake, and they degrade sharply once deployed on a new (i.e., target) lake, whose tables and semantic type set both differ. Retraining per lake is prohibitive because it demands large volumes of expert annotations. We recast cross-lake adaptation as a knowledge management problem and make the resulting decomposition explicit: relative to a target annotator, a source annotator holds knowledge that must be discarded (source-specific), realigned and reused (shared), or acquired (target-specific). This decomposition exposes which part of the gap a general-purpose LLM can close and which part only target supervision can. Guided by it, we present LakeHopper, which adapts a source annotator under a fixed annotation budget through three coupled mechanisms: label-set realignment that transplants the output layer for shared types, LLM-verified gap discovery that localizes columns the annotator handles unreliably, and cluster-based propagation plus rehearsal fine-tuning that generalizes each flagged column into a labeling batch without erasing shared knowledge. Casting the LLM as a verifier of the annotator's own predictions rather than an annotator keeps every output inside the target type set, so LakeHopper structurally emits no out-of-domain labels, whereas prompted LLMs hallucinate types on 2.7-47.6% of columns. Across three data lake transfers of differing difficulty, LakeHopperlifts three PLM backbones by up to 71.4% relative macro-F1, reaches near-full-data quality with under 6% of the target labels, and matches fine-tuned table LLMs while training 27-131 times faster.

arXiv

CALIBURN: Self-Calibrated LLM Unlearning Alignment

Zhengbang Yang, Yisheng Zhong, Junyuan Hong, Zhuangdi Zhu

LLM unlearning aims to remove the influence of undesirable knowledge from pretrained language models, which offers a practical mechanism for addressing safety and privacy concerns. Existing unlearning approaches, such as Gradient Ascent, are prone to catastrophic forgetting. Alignment-based approaches provide an alternative direction, yet their effectiveness is limited by the quality of the reference model. In realistic settings, both methods still require large retention datasets to preserve general knowledge. We propose a principled method that quantifies the target LLM's confidence in undesirable knowledge and uses it to calibrate the model's unlearning gradient updates more precisely. It enables fine-grained control over forgetting while better preserving model utility, thus reducing the dependence on retention data or prohibitive unlearning training data. Extensive evaluations on multiple benchmarks, including MUSE and WMDP, show that our method achieves effective unlearning and improves the trade-off between knowledge removal and utility preservation compared with state-of-the-art methods.

arXiv

What Language Models Know But Don't Say: Non-Generative Prior Extraction for Generalization

Sara Rezaeimanesh, Kundan Thind, Farzan Siddiqui, Mohammad M. Ghassemi

In domains like medicine and finance, large-scale labeled data is costly and often unavailable, leading to models trained on small datasets that struggle to generalize to real-world populations. Large language models contain extensive knowledge from years of research across these domains. We propose LoID (Logit-Informed Distributions), a deterministic method for extracting informative prior distributions for Bayesian logistic regression by directly accessing their token-level predictions. Rather than relying on generated text, we probe the model's confidence in opposing semantic directions (positive vs. negative impact) through carefully constructed sentences. By measuring how consistently the LLM favors one direction across diverse phrasings, we extract the strength and reliability of the model's belief about each feature's influence. We evaluate LoID on ten real-world tabular datasets under synthetic out-of-distribution (OOD) settings characterized by covariate shift, where the training data represents only a subset of the population. We compare our approach against (1) standard uninformative priors, (2) AutoElicit, a recent method that prompts LLMs to generate priors via text completions, (3) LLMProcesses, a method that uses LLMs to generate numerical predictions through in-context learning and (4) an oracle-style upper bound derived from fitting logistic regression on the full dataset. We assess performance using Area Under the Curve (AUC). Across datasets, LoID significantly improves performance over logistic regression trained on OOD data, recovering up to \textbf{59\%} of the performance gap relative to the oracle model. LoID outperforms AutoElicit and LLMProcessesc on 8 out of 10 datasets, while providing a reproducible and computationally efficient mechanism for integrating LLM knowledge into Bayesian inference.

arXiv

LuxIT: A Luxembourgish Instruction Tuning Dataset from Monolingual Seed Data

Julian Valline, Cedric Lothritz, Siwen Guo, Jordi Cabot

The effectiveness of instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) is often limited in low-resource linguistic settings due to a lack of high-quality training data. We introduce LuxIT, a monolingual instruction tuning dataset for Luxembourgish developed to mitigate this challenge. We synthesize the dataset from a corpus of native Luxembourgish texts, utilizing DeepSeek-R1-0528, chosen for its shown proficiency in Luxembourgish. Following generation, we apply a quality assurance process, employing an LLM-as-a-judge approach, retaining 227,507 high-quality instruction-answer pairs. To investigate the practical utility of the dataset, we fine-tune 14 smaller-scale LLMs ($\leq$15B parameters) on LuxIT and evaluate them on standardized Luxembourgish proficiency exams and five downstream NLP tasks. Training on LuxIT yields a mean accuracy change of +5.37 percentage points on language exams across all 14 models, with 12 of 14 showing improvement. On NLP downstream tasks, 9 of 14 models improve in macro-averaged F1, though gains on the two benchmarks do not systematically correlate. These results underscore the feasibility of leveraging monolingual synthetic data to improve LLM capabilities in low-resource languages, while highlighting the multi-faceted nature of language proficiency.

arXiv

GraphMed-LT: Patient-Specific Graph Memory with Latent Clinical Thought Refinement for Multi-Turn Medical Conversations

Zhaohan Meng, Zaiqiao Meng, Siwei Liu, Hao Xu, Ke Yuan, Iadh Ounis

Multi-turn medical question answering (QA) aims to model realistic clinical diagnosis, where a doctor gathers patient information across multiple turns of conversation. Existing multi-turn medical conversation systems have shown promising progress, but they often rely on accumulated conversation histories as memory, leaving clinical evidence fragmented across turns. We propose GraphMed-LT, a patient-specific graph memory approach with latent clinical thought refinement for multi-turn medical conversations. GraphMed-LT extracts patient-specific clinical triplets from patient responses, retrieves relevant knowledge triplets, and organises them into an incrementally updated graph memory. The graph memory is projected into graph-conditioned evidence tokens and refined inside a trainable doctor agent through hidden-state feedback, enabling the agent to update its internal clinical context before asking follow-up questions or producing the final answer. Experiments on three multi-turn medical QA benchmarks show that GraphMed-LT consistently outperforms existing multi-turn medical conversation baselines across multiple LLM backbones, achieving up to a 6.3 percentage-point absolute improvement over the strongest baseline. Further analyses show that GraphMed-LT asks more answerable follow-up questions and provides consistent gains across medical specialties.

arXiv

Syntax-Guided Diffusion Language Models with User-Integrated Personalization

Ruqian Zhang, Yijiao Zhang, Juan Shen, Zhongyi Zhu, Annie Qu

Large language models have made revolutionary progress in generating human-like text, yet their outputs often tend to be generic, exhibiting insufficient structural diversity, which limits personalized expression. Recent advances in diffusion models have opened new opportunities for improving language generation beyond the limitations of autoregressive paradigms. In this work, we propose a syntax-guided diffusion language model that integrates structural supervision and personalized conditioning to enhance text quality, diversity, and controllability. We introduce a cascaded framework that generates syntactic guidance before conditional text generation, and further generalize it to a novel noncascaded architecture for better alignment between structure and content. By incorporating syntactic information in the generating process, the proposed model better captures the lexical and structural characteristics of stylistic sentence construction. To enable fine-grained personalization, we develop a shared representation mechanism that facilitates information integration across users, supporting both faithful stylistic generation and generalizable zero-shot inference. Extensive experiments on multiple tasks demonstrate the superiority of our approach in fluency, diversity, and stylistic fidelity. Further qualitative analyses highlight its interpretability and flexibility in learning personalized patterns.

arXiv

Text-ADBench: Text Anomaly Detection Benchmark Based on LLM Embeddings

Feng Xiao, Jicong Fan

Text anomaly detection is a critical task in natural language processing (NLP), with applications spanning fraud detection, misinformation identification, spam detection and content moderation, etc. Despite significant advances in large language models (LLMs) and anomaly detection algorithms, the absence of standardized and comprehensive benchmarks for evaluating the existing anomaly detection methods on text data limits rigorous comparison and development of innovative approaches. This work performs a comprehensive empirical study and introduces a benchmark for text anomaly detection, leveraging embeddings from diverse pre-trained language models across a wide array of text datasets. Our work systematically evaluates the effectiveness of embedding-based text anomaly detection by incorporating (1) early language models (GloVe, BERT); (2) multiple LLMs (LLaMA-2, LLaMA-3, Mistral, OpenAI embedding models (small, ada, large)); (3) multi-domain text datasets (news, social media, scientific publications); (4) comprehensive evaluation metrics (AUROC, AUPRC). Our experiments reveal a critical empirical insight: embedding quality significantly governs anomaly detection efficacy, and deep learning-based approaches demonstrate no performance advantage over conventional shallow algorithms (e.g., KNN, OCSVM) when leveraging LLM-derived embeddings. In addition, we observe strongly low-rank characteristics in cross-model performance matrices, which enables an efficient strategy for rapid model evaluation (or embedding evaluation) and selection in practical applications. Furthermore, by open-sourcing our benchmark toolkit that includes all embeddings from different models and code, this work provides a foundation for future research in robust and scalable text anomaly detection systems. Our code repository is at https://github.com/jicongfan/Text-Anomaly-Detection-Benchmark.

arXiv

MixLoRA-DSI: Dynamically Expandable Mixture-of-LoRA Experts for Rehearsal-Free Generative Retrieval over Dynamic Corpora

Tuan-Luc Huynh, Thuy-Trang Vu, Weiqing Wang, Trung Le, Dragan Gašević, Yuan-Fang Li, Thanh-Toan Do

Continually updating model-based indexes in generative retrieval with new documents remains challenging, as full retraining is computationally expensive and impractical under resource constraints. We propose MixLoRA-DSI, a novel framework that combines an expandable mixture of Low-Rank Adaptation experts with a layer-wise out-of-distribution (OOD)-driven expansion strategy. Instead of allocating new experts for each new corpus, our proposed expansion strategy enables sublinear parameter growth by selectively introducing new experts only when significant number of OOD documents are detected. Experiments on NQ320k and MS MARCO Passage demonstrate that MixLoRA-DSI outperforms full-model update baselines, with minimal parameter overhead and substantially lower training costs.

Keep browsing

More papers from top AI conferences

30+ top conferences, by conference, year, and topic.