paperlist.ai

AI conference papers

AI conference paper library

Search papers from 30+ top conferences, including NeurIPS, ICLR, ICML, CVPR, ACL and AAAI. Filter by keyword, then open any paper for its abstract, authors and links.

arXiv

VIABLE: A Visually Impaired Assistance Benchmark for VLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation

Yi Zhao, Siqi Wang, Zhe Hu, Yushi Li, Jing Li

AI-based Visually Impaired Assistance (VIA) remains challenging, largely due to the high cost of human evaluation. The VLM-as-a-Judge paradigm may offer a promising alternative, although it has mostly been studied in general domains. We therefore ask whether such judges can be trusted for VIA tasks. To investigate this question, we introduce VIABLE (Visually Impaired Assistance Benchmark for VLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation), the first benchmark for VLM-as-a-Judge evaluation in VIA. VIABLE contains over 300K judgment samples across three scenarios and introduces an Effectiveness--Impartiality--Stability framework with a 12-mode failure taxonomy. Based on VIABLE, our systematic study of seven judges across different model scales shows that existing models are largely unreliable across all evaluation axes. The strongest judge, GPT-5.4, achieves only 52.6% single-failure diagnostic accuracy, yet exhibits the highest self-preference rate at 94.2%; while open-source judges are strongly biased and adversarially fragile. To address these issues, we propose VIA-Judge-Agent, a model-agnostic inference-time harness that augments judges with visual evidence extraction and a taxonomy-guided workflow. It enables positive improvements in diagnostic accuracy and downstream VIA responses more preferred by BLV users. Data and code are available at: https://github.com/YiyiyiZhao/VIABLE

arXiv

Skill-Conditioned Gated Self-Distillation for LLM Reasoning

Jiazhen Huang, Xiao Chen, Xiao Luo, Yong Dai, Senkang Hu, Yuzhi Zhao

On-policy self-distillation (SD) improves LLM reasoning by using teacher-side privileged information (PI) to turn sparse verifier outcomes into dense token-level supervision. Existing methods usually assume trusted PI, such as reference answers or successful traces. We ask whether PI can instead come from an experience-derived skill bank, where retrieved skills are compact and reusable but may also be irrelevant or misleading. We propose Skill-Conditioned Gated Self-Distillation (SGSD), which formulates skill-based SD as teacher hypothesis validation rather than unconditional imitation. SGSD retrieves skill-mistake pairs, constructs a multi-teacher pool, and lets all skill-conditioned teachers score the same plain-prompt student rollout. The verifier validates each teacher's polarity: supporting a success or suppressing a failure gives positive supervision, while the opposite stance is reversed. A robust gated objective then distills informative teacher-student disagreements while suppressing uncertain or extreme signals. Experiments on multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that SGSD consistently improves over GRPO and remains competitive with answer-conditioned OPSD under a weaker PI assumption. For example, on Qwen3-1.7B, SGSD outperforms GRPO by 6.2% and OPSD by 1.7% on average on AIME24, AIME25, and HMMT25.

arXiv

Tournament-GRPO: Group-Wise Tournament Rewards for Reinforcement Learning in Open-Ended Long-Form Generation

Zixuan Yang, Yiqun Chen, Wei Yang, Erhan Zhang, Zihan Shen, Xiaochi Wei, Yan Gao, Yi Wu, Yao Hu, Jiaxin Mao

Reinforcement learning in open-ended long-form generation is challenging because reliable reference answers and automatic metrics are often unavailable. Existing rubric-based methods typically rely on pointwise LLM-as-a-judge scoring, but absolute scores are difficult to calibrate across complex responses, may provide weak discrimination among same-query rollouts, and can become saturated during optimization. We propose Tournament-GRPO, a group-wise reward framework that converts rubric-guided LLM judgments into relative rewards through repeated multi-round tournaments among same-query rollouts. Tournament-GRPO compares candidates within groups, accumulates tournament outcomes, and normalizes them into group-wise rewards for GRPO training. Experiments on Deep Research Bench show that Tournament-GRPO consistently outperforms existing reward-design baselines, achieving a 4.52-point overall-score improvement over the strongest baseline. Further analyses show that tournament rewards provide a favorable effectiveness--efficiency trade-off and that tournament design affects training dynamics. These results suggest that rubric-guided tournament comparison provides an effective reward signal for reinforcement learning in open-ended long-form generation.

arXiv

Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements

Ryo Kanazawa, Koyo Hidaka, Teppei Miyamoto, Takayuki Kato, Tomoki Ando, Chenguang Wang, Dayuan Jiang, Naofumi Fujita, Shuhei Saitoh, Atomu Kondo, Koki Arakawa, Daiho Nishioka

Building Information Modeling (BIM) projects increasingly use Information Delivery Specification (IDS) to formalize information requirements in a machine-checkable XML format. Because IDS conditions are grounded in the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) vocabulary, authoring them requires expertise in IFC concepts, validation tools, and property set conventions. Existing benchmarks for structured generation do not adequately capture the additional burden of vocabulary conformance and external-validator agreement that IDS imposes. We present Ishigaki-IDS-Bench, the first publicly released benchmark for IDS generation from BIM information requirements. The benchmark contains 166 examples spanning 83 practical scenarios authored in Japanese and English by six BIM/IDS experts, each paired with a gold IDS file and metadata covering input format, turn setting, target IFC versions, and construction domain. Evaluation proceeds in two stages: (i) formal validity scored by the buildingSMART IDSAuditTool along Processability, Structure, and Content, and (ii) content fidelity scored by facet-level macro-F1 against the gold IDS. Across 10 LLMs in zero-shot, the highest Facet F1 is 65.6%, achieved by GPT-5.5, while the highest Content pass rate is only 33.1%, achieved by Claude Opus 4.5. Ishigaki-IDS-Bench is released on Hugging Face (DOI 10.57967/hf/8873) under CC BY 4.0, and the evaluation code is released on Zenodo (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20550510) under Apache-2.0.

arXiv

Token-weighted Direct Preference Optimization with Attention

Chengyu Huang, Zhuohang Li, Sheng-Yen Chou, Claire Cardie

Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) aligns Large Language Models with human preferences without the need for a separate reward model. However, DPO treats all tokens in responses equally, neglecting the differing importance of individual tokens. Existing token-level PO methods compute the token weights using either token-position-based heuristic functions or probability estimates given by a separately trained model, which lacks robustness and incurs extra training cost. In contrast, we propose Token-weighted DPO (TwDPO) -- a novel training objective grounded on token-weighted RL -- and AttentionPO -- an instantiation of TwDPO that uses attention from the LLM itself to estimate token weights. AttentionPO prompts the LLM to serve as a pairwise judge and check where the model attends when comparing the responses. This design makes AttentionPO content-aware, adjusting weights based on response content, and efficient, incurring only two extra forward passes per example. Experiment results show that AttentionPO significantly improves performance on AlpacaEval, MT-Bench, and ArenaHard, surpassing existing Preference Optimization methods.

arXiv

Omanic: Towards Step-wise Evaluation of Multi-hop Reasoning in Large Language Models

Xiaojie Gu, Sherry T. Tong, Aosong Feng, Sophia Simeng Han, Jinghui Lu, Yingjian Chen, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo, Chanjun Park, Rex Ying, Irene Li

Evaluating the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) solely from final answers can obscure failures in intermediate steps, especially in multi-hop QA benchmarks without step-level annotations. To address this gap, we introduce Omanic, an open-domain 4-hop QA benchmark designed not only to measure final-answer accuracy but also to diagnose where reasoning breaks down. Omanic contains 10,296 machine-generated training examples (OmanicSynth) and 967 expert-reviewed human-annotated evaluation examples (OmanicBench), with each evaluation question decomposed into single-hop sub-questions, intermediate answers, and structured graph topologies. Experiments with proprietary and open-source LLMs show that Omanic is challenging, while step-wise analysis reveals a later-hop bottleneck, factual knowledge floor, and error propagation along reasoning chains. Fine-tuning on OmanicSynth transfers to six reasoning and mathematics benchmarks, yielding a 7.41-point average gain and validating its effectiveness as supervision for reasoning-capability transfer. We release the data at https://huggingface.co/datasets/li-lab/Omanic and the code at https://github.com/XiaojieGu/Omanic.

arXiv

MedPriv-Bench: Benchmarking the Privacy-Utility Trade-off of Large Language Models in Medical Open-Ended Question Answering

Shaowei Guan, Yu Zhai, Hin Chi Kwok, Jiawei DU, Xinyu Feng, Jing Li, Harry Qin, Vivian Hui

Recent advances in Retrieval-Augmented Generation enable LLMs to ground outputs in clinical evidence, but connections to external databases create the risk of contextual leakage, where unique combinations of medical details enable patient re-identification without explicit identifiers. Existing healthcare benchmarks emphasize accuracy while overlooking this risk. To fill this gap, we present MedPriv-Bench, the first benchmark for jointly evaluating privacy preservation and clinical utility in medical open-ended question answering. Our framework utilizes a multi-agent, human-in-the-loop pipeline to synthesize sensitive medical contexts and clinically relevant queries that create realistic privacy pressure. We also establish an automated evaluation protocol using a fine-tuned RoBERTa-NLI model, which achieved an instance-level F1 score of 75.3%, sensitivity of 90.7%, and an average inference time of 0.056 s per sample against human annotations. Across nine LLMs and three privacy-preserving methods, we observed a pervasive privacy-utility trade-off. Relative to unprotected Med42-v2-8B (utility 3.87/5; leakage 72.8%), supervised fine-tuning improved utility to 4.25 and reduced leakage to 38.9%, whereas local differential privacy reduced leakage to 20.5% but lowered utility to 3.03. These results demonstrate the need for domain-specific benchmarks to validate medical AI systems in privacy-sensitive settings.

arXiv

LocalSUG: City-Preference-Enhanced LLM for Query Suggestion in Local-Life Services

Jinwen Chen, Shiwen Zhang, Shuai Gong, Zheng Zhang, Yachao Zhao, Lingxiang Wang, Haibo Zhou, Wei Lin, Hainan Zhang

In local-life service platforms, query suggestion reduces user effort by generating candidate queries from input prefixes. Traditional multi-stage systems rely heavily on historical popular queries, limiting their ability to capture long-tail and emerging demand. Although LLMs provide strong semantic generalization, their deployment in local-life services faces three challenges: insufficient city-preference awareness, exposure bias in preference optimization, and strict online latency constraints. We propose LocalSUG, an LLM-based query suggestion framework for local-life services. LocalSUG mines city-preference-enhanced candidates from term co-occurrence and injects them into prompts as dynamic references rather than fusing them into model parameters. This allows the model to adapt to changing city preferences, such as merchant openings or closures, while reducing stale or locally invalid suggestions. We further introduce a beam-search-driven GRPO algorithm to align training with inference-time decoding and optimize relevance together with business-oriented rewards. Finally, quality-aware beam acceleration and vocabulary pruning reduce online latency while preserving generation quality. Offline evaluations and large-scale online A/B testing show that LocalSUG improves CTR by +0.35% and reduces the no-result rate by 3.98%, demonstrating its effectiveness in real-world deployment.

arXiv

EstLLM: Enhancing Estonian Capabilities in Multilingual LLMs via Continued Pretraining and Post-Training

Aleksei Dorkin, Taido Purason, Emil Kalbaliyev, Hele-Andra Kuulmets, Marii Ojastu, Mark Fišel, Tanel Alumäe, Eleri Aedmaa, Krister Kruusmaa, Kairit Sirts

Large language models (LLMs) are predominantly trained on English-centric data, resulting in uneven performance for smaller languages. We study whether continued pretraining (CPT) can improve Estonian capabilities in multilingual LLMs while preserving English and general reasoning performance. Using Llama 3.1 8B and Apertus 8B as base models, we apply CPT with Estonian-enriched multilingual replay, followed by mostly English supervised fine-tuning, preference optimization, and chat vector merging. Evaluation on Estonian benchmarks, targeted pairwise human evaluation, and an Estonian Chatbot Arena-style setup shows consistent improvements in Estonian language competence, reasoning, translation, and instruction-following. Although Apertus exhibits stronger Estonian capabilities before adaptation, the more English-centric Llama model achieves substantially larger gains after adaptation. While some English capabilities regress relative to the original instruction-tuned models, chat vector merging substantially restores English instruction-following and reasoning performance. These findings suggest that CPT with balanced multilingual replay and lightweight post-training alignment can substantially improve single-language capabilities in multilingual LLMs.

arXiv

Open Rubric System: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with Pairwise Adaptive Rubric

Ruipeng Jia, Yunyi Yang, Wen Wang, Yuxin Wu, Yongbo Gai, Siyuan Tao, Mengyu Zhou, Jianhe Lin, Xiaoxi Jiang, Guanjun Jiang

Scalar reward models compress multi-dimensional human preferences into a single opaque score, creating an information bottleneck that often leads to brittleness and reward hacking in open-ended alignment. We argue that robust alignment for non-verifiable tasks is fundamentally a principle generalization problem: reward should not be a learned function internalized into a judge, but an explicit reasoning process executed under inspectable principles. To operationalize this view, we present the Open Rubric System (OpenRS), a plug-and-play, rubrics-based LLM-as-a-Judge framework built around Pairwise Adaptive Meta-Rubrics (PAMR) and lightweight Pointwise Verifiable Rubrics (PVRs), which provide both hard-constraint guardrails and verifiable reward components when ground-truth or programmatic checks are available. OpenRS uses an explicit meta-rubric -- a constitution-like specification that governs how rubrics are instantiated, weighted, and enforced -- and instantiates adaptive rubrics on the fly by conditioning on the semantic differences between two candidate responses. It then performs criterion-wise pairwise comparisons and aggregates criterion-level preferences externally, avoiding pointwise weighted scalarization while improving discriminability in open-ended settings. To keep principles consistent yet editable across various domains, we introduce a two-level meta-rubric refinement pipeline (automated evolutionary refinement for general principles and a reproducible human-in-the-loop procedure for domain principles), complemented with pointwise verifiable rubrics that act as both guardrails against degenerate behaviors and a source of verifiable reward for objective sub-tasks. Finally, we instantiate OpenRS as reward supervision in pairwise RL training.

arXiv

PatientHub: A Unified Framework for Patient Simulation

Sahand Sabour, TszYam NG, Minlie Huang

As Large Language Models increasingly power role-playing applications, simulating patients has become a valuable tool for training counselors and scaling therapeutic assessment. However, prior work remains fragmented: existing approaches rely on incompatible, non-standardized profiles, prompts, and evaluation metrics, hindering reproducibility, fair comparison, and reuse. We introduce PatientHub, a unified and modular framework that standardizes the creation, simulation, and evaluation of LLM-based patients. Our framework provides 16 patient simulators, a graph-based orchestrator for multi-turn, multi-session interactions, and a configurable LLM-as-a-judge evaluator that supports multiple rubric types. Via our command-line interface, users can generate patient profiles, run simulations, and apply rubric-driven evaluation at the turn and session level. To demonstrate PatientHub's utility, we compare several supported simulators under a shared interaction protocol and showcase its extensibility by prototyping a new simulator variant with minimal additional code. By consolidating existing work into a single reproducible pipeline, our framework eliminates much of the infrastructure overhead that currently fragments this research and accelerates the development of new methods. Our code and data are publicly available via https://github.com/Sahandfer/PatientHub.

arXiv

MPIB: A Benchmark for Medical Prompt Injection Attacks and Clinical Safety in LLMs

Junhyeok Lee, Han Jang, Kyu Sung Choi

Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are increasingly integrated into clinical workflows. However, prompt injection attacks can steer these systems toward clinically unsafe or misleading outputs. We introduce the Medical Prompt Injection Benchmark (MPIB), a dataset-and-benchmark suite for evaluating clinical safety under both direct prompt injection and indirect, RAG-mediated injection across clinically grounded tasks. MPIB emphasizes outcome-level risk via the Clinical Harm Event Rate (CHER), which measures high-severity clinical harm events under a clinically grounded taxonomy, and reports CHER alongside ASR$_2$ to distinguish moderate-or-worse from high-severity outcomes. The benchmark comprises 9,697 curated instances constructed through multi-stage quality gates and clinical safety linting. Evaluating MPIB across a diverse set of baseline LLMs and defense configurations, we find that ASR$_2$ and CHER$_3$ can diverge substantially, and that observed rates vary depending on whether adversarial instructions appear in the user query or in retrieved context. The MPIB dataset and evaluation code are available on Hugging Face and GitHub, respectively.

arXiv

CASTLE: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Student-Tailored Personalized Safety in Large Language Models

Rui Jia, Ruiyi Lan, Fengrui Liu, Zhongxiang Dai, Bo Jiang, Jing Shao, Jingyuan Chen, Guandong Xu, Fei Wu, Min Zhang

Large language models (LLMs) have advanced the development of personalized learning in education. However, their inherent generation mechanisms often produce homogeneous responses to identical prompts. This one-size-fits-all mechanism overlooks the substantial heterogeneity in students cognitive and psychological, thereby posing potential safety risks to vulnerable groups. Existing safety evaluations primarily rely on context-independent metrics such as factual accuracy, bias, or toxicity, which fail to capture the divergent harms that the same response might cause across different student attributes. To address this gap, we propose the concept of Student-Tailored Personalized Safety and construct CASTLE based on educational theories. This benchmark covers 15 educational safety risks and 14 student attributes, comprising 92,908 bilingual scenarios. We further design three evaluation metrics: Risk Sensitivity, measuring the model ability to detect risks; Emotional Empathy, evaluating the model capacity to recognize student states; and Student Alignment, assessing the match between model responses and student attributes. Experiments on 18 SOTA LLMs demonstrate that CASTLE poses a significant challenge: all models scored below an average safety rating of 2.3 out of 5, indicating substantial deficiencies in personalized safety assurance.

arXiv

Ad Insertion in LLM-Generated Responses

Shengwei Xu, Zhaohua Chen, Xiaotie Deng, Zhiyi Huang, Grant Schoenebeck

Sustainable monetization of large language models (LLMs) remains a critical open challenge. Traditional search advertising, which relies on static keywords, fails to capture the fleeting, context-dependent user intent---the specific information, goods, or services a user seeks---embedded in conversational flows. Beyond the standard goal of social welfare maximization effective LLM advertising requires contextual coherence (aligning ads semantically with transient user intent), computational efficiency (avoiding user-facing latency), and adherence to ethical and regulatory standards, including privacy preservation and explicit ad disclosure. Although recent solutions have explored bidding at the token and query levels, neither category holistically satisfies these constraints. We propose a framework that resolves these tensions through two decoupling strategies. First, we decouple ad insertion from response generation to facilitate pre-screening and explicit disclosure. Second, we decouple bidding from specific user queries by using ``genres'' (high-level semantic clusters) as a proxy. This allows advertisers to bid on stable categories rather than sensitive real-time responses, reducing computational burden and privacy risks. Applying the VCG auction mechanism to this genre-based framework provides approximate guarantees for dominant-strategy incentive compatibility (DSIC), individual rationality (IR), and social welfare. In synthetic experiments with $10^5$ advertisers and 100 candidate slots, VCG clears in approximately 1.25 seconds on a consumer-grade laptop. Finally, we introduce an ``LLM-as-a-Judge'' metric for estimating contextual coherence. Its predictions correlate with mean human ratings at Spearman's $ρ\approx 0.66$ and have a higher correlation with the leave-one-out group mean than 29 of 36 individual raters (80.6\%).

arXiv

TangramPuzzle: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models with Compositional Spatial Reasoning

Daixian Liu, Jiayi Kuang, Yinghui Li, Yangning Li, Di Yin, Haoyu Cao, Xing Sun, Ying Shen, Hai-Tao Zheng, Liang Lin, Philip S. Yu

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in visual recognition and semantic understanding, yet precise compositional spatial reasoning under geometric constraints remains underexplored. Existing benchmarks mainly assess coarse spatial relations and rarely support rigorous geometric verification or multiple valid solutions in constructive tasks. To address these limitations, we introduce TangramPuzzle, a benchmark comprising 668 validated configurations and 1,336 instances for evaluating compositional spatial reasoning under geometric constraints. We formulate the Tangram Construction Expression (TCE) to encode tangram configurations with machine-verifiable geometric specifications, together with a multi-solution-aware verifier that separately evaluates geometric validity and silhouette fidelity. TangramPuzzle covers two complementary evaluation tasks: part-to-whole Outline Prediction and whole-to-part End-to-End Assembly Generation. We conduct extensive evaluation experiments on advanced open-source and proprietary models, revealing an interesting insight: MLLMs tend to prioritize matching the target silhouette while neglecting geometric constraints, leading to distortions or deformations of the pieces.

arXiv

How Order-Sensitive Are LLMs? OrderProbe for Deterministic Structural Reconstruction

Zhaolu Kang, Yingjie He, Kehan Jiang, Leqi Zheng, Jiachen Qian, Qianyuan Zhang, Chunlei Meng, Yujie Feng, Yuan Wang, Stephen Dou, Aming WU, Pengxiang Zhao, Jiaxin Liu, Guansu Wang, Zeyu Zhang, Lei Wang, Qishi Zhan, Xiaomin He, Meisheng Zhang, Jianyuan Ni, Richeng Xuan

Large language models (LLMs) excel at semantic understanding, yet their ability to reconstruct internal structure from scrambled inputs remains underexplored. Sentence-level restoration is difficult to evaluate automatically because scrambled sentences often admit multiple valid reorderings. We introduce OrderProbe, a deterministic benchmark for structural reconstruction using fixed four-character expressions in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean, which have a unique canonical order and thus support exact-match scoring. We further propose a diagnostic framework that evaluates models beyond recovery accuracy, including Semantic Accuracy, Logical Validity, Structural Consistency, Robustness, and Information Density. Experiments on twelve widely used LLMs show that structural reconstruction remains difficult even for frontier systems: zero-shot recovery frequently falls below 35%. We also observe a consistent gap between meaning-oriented generation and exact structural reconstruction, suggesting that structural robustness is not an automatic byproduct of semantic competence.

arXiv

MauBERT: Universal Phonetic Inductive Biases for Few-Shot Acoustic Units Discovery

Angelo Ortiz Tandazo, Manel Khentout, Youssef Benchekroun, Thomas Hueber, Emmanuel Dupoux

This paper introduces MauBERT, a multilingual extension of HuBERT that leverages articulatory features for robust cross-lingual phonetic representation learning. We continue HuBERT pre-training with supervision based on a phonetic-to-articulatory feature mapping in 55 languages. Our models learn from multilingual data to predict articulatory features or phones, resulting in language-independent representations that capture multilingual phonetic properties. Through comprehensive ABX discriminability testing, we show MauBERT models produce more context-invariant representations than state-of-the-art multilingual self-supervised learning models. Additionally, the models effectively adapt to unseen languages and casual speech with minimal self-supervised fine-tuning (10 hours of speech). This establishes an effective approach for instilling linguistic inductive biases in self-supervised speech models.

arXiv

Bridging Business Intent and Data: A Benchmark for Automatic Relational Data Product Generation

Faisal Chowdhury, Sola Shirai, Sarthak Dash, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya, Horst Samulowitz

A data product is designed to address a specific business need by transforming raw data into a curated, usable asset that delivers actionable insights. Despite practical advances in related areas like text-to-SQL and ELT pipelines, there is no comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the end-to-end process of automatically generating such data products from high-level business requests. To fill this gap, we introduce DP-Bench, a first-of-its-kind benchmark for automatic data product creation, built by combining elements from existing ELT and text-to-SQL datasets. We also propose baseline methods using LLMs to generate data products, providing a foundation for future research in bridging natural language business intent and structured data representation. We make the DP-Bench dataset and code available at: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ibm-research/dp-bench.

arXiv

NeuronTune: Fine-Grained Neuron Modulation for Balanced Safety-Utility Alignment in LLMs

Birong Pan, Jianhao Chen, Mayi Xu, Qiankun Pi, Yuanyuan Zhu, Ming Zhong, Tieyun Qian

Ensuring robust safety alignment while preserving utility is critical for the reliable deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, current techniques fundamentally suffer from intertwined deficiencies: insufficient robustness against malicious attacks, frequent refusal of benign queries, degradation in generated text quality and general task performance, the former two reflecting tensions in robust safety and the latter constituting utility impairment. We attribute these limitations to the coarse-grained layer-wise interventions in existing methods. To resolve this, we propose NeuronTune, a fine-grained framework that pinpoints and modulates sparse neurons to achieve simultaneous safety-utility optimization. Our approach first pinpoints safety-critical and utility-preserving neurons across all layers via attack-aware attribution, then adapts meta-learning to adaptively modulate their activations. Crucially, the intervention scope of NeuronTune is dynamically controlled via neuron inclusion thresholds, providing a flexible mechanism to prioritize either security-critical or utility-priority requirements. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms existing state-of-the-art technologies, achieving superior model safety while maintaining excellent utility.

arXiv

A Modular Multitask Reasoning Framework Integrating Spatio-temporal Models and LLMs

Kethmi Hirushini Hettige, Jiahao Ji, Cheng Long, Shili Xiang, Gao Cong, Jingyuan Wang

Spatio-temporal data mining plays a pivotal role in informed decision making across diverse domains. However, existing models are often restricted to narrow tasks, lacking the capacity for multi-task inference and complex long-form reasoning that requires generation of in-depth, explanatory outputs. These limitations restrict their applicability to real-world, multi-faceted decision scenarios. In this work, we introduce STReason, a novel framework that integrates the reasoning strengths of large language models (LLMs) with the analytical capabilities of spatio-temporal models for multi-task inference and execution. Without task-specific fine-tuning, STReason leverages in-context learning to decompose complex natural language queries into modular, interpretable programs, which are then systematically executed to generate both numerical solutions and detailed reasoning rationales. By grounding all explanations in verified computational outputs, STReason inherently suppresses factual hallucinations common in direct-prompt LLM approaches. To enable rigorous evaluation, we construct a new benchmark dataset and propose a unified evaluation framework with metrics specifically designed for long-form spatio-temporal reasoning. Experimental results demonstrate that STReason significantly outperforms advanced LLM baselines across all reasoning metrics, particularly excelling in complex, reasoning-intensive spatio-temporal scenarios. Human evaluations further validate STReason's credibility and practical utility, demonstrating its potential to reduce expert workload and broaden the applicability to real-world spatio-temporal tasks.

Keep browsing

More papers from top AI conferences

30+ top conferences, by conference, year, and topic.