paperlist.ai

AI conference papers

AI conference paper library

Search papers from 30+ top conferences, including NeurIPS, ICLR, ICML, CVPR, ACL and AAAI. Filter by keyword, then open any paper for its abstract, authors and links.

arXiv

Less can be More: Relieving RAG Bottlenecks via Evidence Frontloading and Pressure-Adaptive Budgeting

Weibin Cai, Reza Zafarani

Existing methods for improving Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) efficiency mainly optimize downstream LLM generation, such as context compression or serving optimization. However, RAG is an end-to-end system, and its bottleneck can shift between upstream reranking and downstream generation under different serving loads and reranking budgets.In this paper, we first empirically characterize this shifting-bottleneck behavior and show that upstream reranking can become the dominant bottleneck under high query rates or large reranking budgets. Reducing the reranking budget can relieve this bottleneck, but it may also drop supporting evidence and degrade recall. To address this problem, we propose \textbf{\textsf{PACE}} (\textbf{P}rioritized \textbf{A}daptive \textbf{C}overage of \textbf{E}vidence), a training-free framework that combines \textit{evidence frontloading} with \textit{pressure-adaptive budgeting}. \textsf{PACE} first reorders candidates by marginal evidence coverage, prioritizing documents that are query-relevant, complementary, and useful for forming multi-hop evidence chains. We show that this objective is monotone submodular, giving greedy selection a $(1-1/e)$ approximation guarantee. \textsf{PACE} then dynamically adjusts the reranking budget according to the relative pressure of the reranker and the LLM. Experiments on three multi-hop QA datasets and online serving simulations show that \textsf{PACE} improves evidence recall, reduces p95 latency under ranking-heavy workloads. More importantly, the two components together reveal that \textit{less can be more}: an evidence-dense top-ranked candidates enable higher final recall with fewer reranked documents.

arXiv

Apples to Apples? Towards Comparable Crosslingual Language Model Evaluation

Xiulin Yang, Ethan Gotlieb Wilcox, Catherine Arnett

Crosslingual evaluation of language models that enables fair comparisons remains a fundamental challenge in multilingual NLP. Existing studies adopt a variety of downstream tasks and intrinsic metrics with different theoretical justifications, yet there has been little empirical investigation into whether these approaches yield meaningful crosslingual conclusions. We systematically examine crosslingual evaluation approaches using controlled monolingual language models trained on parallel data with varying tokenizer vocabulary sizes and model sizes, and further validate our findings on multilingual LLMs. We further discuss challenges in achieving comparable downstream evaluation across languages. Our results show that several widely used normalized metrics introduce crosslinguistic biases rooted in tokenization, encoding, and orthographic differences. In contrast, sentence-level negative log-likelihood computed over semantically equivalent sequences provides more meaningful and consistent crosslingual comparisons.

arXiv

MTDiag: A Multi-Turn Diagnostic Dataset Towards Clinically Meaningful LLM Evaluation

Pia Chouayfati, Alexander M. Fichtl, Miriam Anschütz, George Doumat, Georg Groh

Clinical diagnosis is fundamentally interactive and incremental, yet the dominant paradigm for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) in medicine remains static QA benchmarks or template-based dialogues. These benchmarks say little about whether a model can serve as a diagnostic agent in a dynamic clinical encounter, with LLMs showing significant accuracy and reliability degradation in multi-turn settings. To address this issue, we present MTDiag, a large multi-turn diagnostic dialogue dataset constructed from three heterogeneous sources: DDXPlus, MIMIC-IV, and published case reports (AJCR), covering common ED presentations as well as long-tail rare and atypical conditions. All cases are normalized into a canonical schema anchored in the most comprehensive and widely-adopted medical knowledge bases (UMLS concept identifiers, with ICD-10 diagnosis codes). We release the schema, a UserLM-8B-based utterance-generation pipeline, and the physician-validated dataset that converts structured clinical evidence into natural-language utterances. Importantly, we introduce and motivate clinical knowledge-grounded metrics for evaluating LLMs as diagnostic agents, beyond diagnostic accuracy, for the task of multi-turn differential diagnosis.

arXiv

HealthBench-Psych: A Mental Health Subset of OpenAI's HealthBench

Matthew Flathers, Phuong Anh Nguyen, Jill Noorily, Julian Herpertz, Meiting Chen, Jasreen Multani, Samuel Powell, Mason Granof, Mark Kalinch, John Torous

General-purpose health benchmarks increasingly anchor claims about LLM medical performance, but they are not always resolved by clinical specialty, making domain-specific performance hard to isolate. Mental health is of acute public-health concern as millions of people turn to LLMs for psychological support, and most existing evaluations are bespoke academic benchmarks that are difficult to integrate into developer workflows. We introduce HealthBench-Psych and HealthBench-Psych-Hard. We screened HealthBench's 5,000 physician-rubric conversations for mental-health relevance with a transparent LLM-applied rubric, then validated the subset through two rounds of blinded clinician review with concealed known-exclude controls, yielding 610 conversations (12.2% of the corpus). Evaluating 20 frontier and open models under a cross-vendor panel of three LLM judges, we find a statistically tied frontier cluster, measurable refusal behavior in two models, and near-identical rankings across judges ($τ\ge 0.92$). We release the subset, pipeline, model responses, grades, and analysis code as a reusable resource.

arXiv

Padamitra: Grounded Glossary Generation for Classical Sanskrit

Manoj Balaji Jagadeeshan, Sai Pragnaan Marala, Pawan Goyal

We introduce grounded glossary generation, a structured task requiring models to recover semantically meaningful Sanskrit phrases and produce translation-grounded meanings from a sloka-translation pair, formalizing the traditional patha commentary practice as an evaluable NLP objective. We construct a benchmark of 31,316 sloka-translation-glossary triples from the Valmiki Ramayana and Srimad Bhagavatam, paired with two metrics: Jaccard for phrase recovery and Meaning Faithfulness for semantic consistency. Across zero-shot, few-shot, and instruction fine-tuned variants of Gemma-3n-E4B, Gemma-3-12B, Phi-4, and Qwen3.5-9B, instruction fine-tuning substantially outperforms prompting, while explicit segmentation yields gains. Error analysis identifies over-segmentation of sandhi and samasa compounds as the dominant failure mode, pointing to morphological modeling as the key bottleneck for faithful Sanskrit lexical decomposition.

arXiv

Retrieve, Match, Escalate: Accurate and Scalable Product Linking with VLM-Distilled Cross-Encoders and Agentic VLMs

Jian Wang, Steven Xu, Sanjyot Thete, Maryam Barouti, Tom Tang, Elaine Wu, Charu Sareen, Kyle MacDonald

Product linking, the entity-resolution task of mapping merchant product records to canonical catalog products, consolidates fragmented listings so downstream search, recommendation, and advertising see one clean entry per product. At marketplace scale, billions of noisy, multi-category records must be resolved against tens of millions of canonical products, where scoring every candidate with a single model is either too weak for the hard cases or too costly for the easy ones. We present a production retrieve-then-match cascade that spends computation in proportion to difficulty: retrieval surfaces plausible matches, a lightweight text cross-encoder auto-resolves the high-confidence majority, and an agentic multimodal vision-language model settles the ambiguous remainder by inspecting product images and issuing web searches for evidence that is in neither record. The cross-encoder is distilled from millions of dual-VLM-consensus labels, retiring human annotation from the training set, and is calibrated to auto-accept links at a 98% precision bar validated against a smaller operator-certified audit. The agent is a self-hosted open-weight model that reaches a closed frontier VLM's precision at a four-point recall cost (88% versus 92%) for roughly one-seventh the per-pair cost, with no fine-tuning. Per-pair cost spans nearly five orders of magnitude from the cheap cross-encoder to the frontier VLM, so escalating only the hard tail to the agent raises end-to-end link coverage from the cheap stage's 68% to 77%.

arXiv

Behind the [MASK]: Disentangling Representation and Faithfulness in DAPF-Based Dementia Detection

Pardis Ranjbar-Noiey, Natalie Parde

Spoken-language analysis via prompt-based domain-adaptive models is a promising direction for low-resource, non-invasive dementia screening, but such models remain internally opaque. We study the interpretability of the Domain-Adapted models via Prompt-based Fine-tuning (DAPF) framework, which casts dementia detection as diagnosis-related masked-token prediction. We interpret DAPF and strong baselines using a variety of probing and analysis techniques, finding that DAPF achieved the best overall performance (accuracy=0.83 and macro-F1=0.83) with diagnosis most recoverable from its [MASK] representation. However, this representational advantage did not extend to token-level explanation faithfulness. DAPF attributions primarily reflected language task vocabulary, discourse markers, and transcription artifacts, with perturbation tests showing weak or negative effects. This suggests that its masked-token interface determines diagnosis information without producing faithful token-level explanations.

arXiv

A Primer on Computational Semantics for Artificial Intelligence Systems

Casey Kennington

As people adopt transformer-based language models (e.g., ChatGPT and Gemini) for an increasing number of use-cases, it is important to know how such models learn and represent the meaning of the language, and to be more informed about what language is. This document is an attempt to help the reader understand how linguistic meaning (i.e., semantics) is approached from different fields of scientific and philosophical examination. I also explain three primary semantic theories: formal semantics, grounded semantics, and distributional semantics then compare how transformer-based language models differ from how humans learn language.

arXiv

The Imperfective Paradox Is Not Necessarily in Large Language Models: A Benchmark Failure Before a Model Failure

Kaiqiao Han, Yizhou Sun

The imperfective paradox provides a useful test of compositional semantic analysis. Recent work constructs an NLI benchmark and reports that models frequently infer completed telic events from progressive descriptions, attributing this behavior to a Teleological Bias. It further argues that prompting interventions cause a Calibration Crisis. We reexamine the benchmark and conclusions and show that it is substantially affected by conceptual and evaluation mis-specifications. We identify three conceptual mis-specifications. In particular, Aspectual Reduction affects the benchmark construction, analysis, experiments, and conclusions. Under a strict NLI standard, 76% of Group A instances do not explicitly rule out culmination. In our native-speaker annotation, 38% of Group A examples and 29% of the Group C examples were judged to permit an alternative interpretation. To control these issues and lexical variation, we construct Lexically Matched Minimal Pairs. At the evaluation level, we formulate event-semantic NLI as a Multi-step Reasoning Problem and assess both intermediate semantic decisions and final predictions. Our results show that models often do not affirm culmination but nevertheless accept the corresponding simple-past hypothesis, a pattern we characterize as Sufficiency Bias. We further show that prompting interventions produce a Decision Shift among labels without reliably improving the underlying semantic understanding and reasoning. Intermediate and oracle-guided analyses identify two additional failure modes: errors in compositional aspectual classification and Surface-form Attraction toward surface-associated answers. Our experiments on Qwen-7B with suitable prompts, GPT-5.4, and Qwen-72B provide initial evidence for the context sensitivity of aspectual classification and suggest that these models can achieve performance comparable to that of human annotators.

arXiv

Does Fine-Tuning Undo Activation Steering? Behavioural Recovery Without Weight-Edit Reversal

Philipp E. Glass, Allan Tucker, Yongmin Li, Alina Miron

Activation steering can be embedded directly into a language model's weights, shaping behaviour without inference-time intervention and offering a way to encode alignment prior to release. However, models are routinely fine-tuned after deployment, and it is unknown whether embedded interventions survive this. We study the stability of embedded steering for refusal suppression and brevity induction across five instruction-tuned models (3B-14B) under non-adversarial SFT and RLHF. Behaviourally, preservation tracks the training data: steering degrades when optimisation pressure contradicts the targeted behaviour and persists otherwise, with refusal ablation losing 64% of its effect on average under SFT. Mechanistically, however, the weight edit survives almost untouched even where behaviour reverts: mean vector recovery is $ρ= 0.004$, and the fine-tuning update along the steering direction is near-orthogonal to its pre-edit weight pattern (mean $\cosθ= 0.074$). When steered behaviour degrades, fine-tuning does not achieve it by dismantling or reversing the steering mechanism itself. Embedded steering is therefore mechanistically durable but functionally vulnerable, and requires behavioural re-validation after downstream training.

arXiv

FrontierChallenge: Evaluating Scientific Workflow Completion

Liangcai Su, Zhaopeng Feng, Zhuo Chen, Zhen Zhang, Xiang Lin, Ruilin Li, Handuo Zhang, Ning Wang, Kailong Wen, Yueqi Guo, Feng Xing, Yiling Guo, Chenxiong Qian, Simon Shaolei Du, Lidong Bing, Xinyu Wang

Scientific agents increasingly analyze data, execute code, and produce research artifacts, yet most benchmarks emphasize final answers, isolated programs, or a single domain. We introduce FrontierChallenge, a cross-domain benchmark comprising 300 end-to-end scientific workflows. In this paper, we release and evaluate 97 of these tasks, spanning quantum chemistry, molecular dynamics, materials characterization, analytical chemistry, life science, and electrochemistry/environment. Each task provides fixed inputs and specifies a bundle of required scientific deliverables. We evaluate twelve frontier models with three agent scaffolds. Pass Rate measures the fraction of tasks satisfying the full-completion criterion, while Avg. Score captures partial progress. Each of the best-performing configurations completed only 20 of the 97 released tasks, yielding a Pass Rate of 20.6%. Partial progress translated especially poorly into complete delivery in analytical chemistry and electrochemistry/environment: Avg. Scores reached 87.6 and 94.9, but the highest Pass Rates were only 4% and 0%. Among non-passing Claude Code trajectories, 75.5% still ended with language claiming completion. These findings show that neither high partial scores nor confident claims of completion reliably indicate that a scientific task has been fully delivered, highlighting the need to evaluate end-to-end workflow execution and the completeness of scientific deliverables together.

arXiv

Can We Read the Mind of an Audio LLM? A Verbalizable, Multilingual Middle-Layer Workspace

Jiajun Fan, Jingyuan Li, Prashanth Gurunath Shivakumar, Qi Luo, Jia-Hong Huang, M. Maruf, Roger Ren, Yile Gu, Rahul Pandey, Ge Liu, Ivan Bulyko

An audio language model is a black box in a specific way: we see what it says, never what it works out on the way there, and chain-of-thought monitoring helps only if the model writes its reasoning down. Reading a base Qwen3-Omni with a logit lens at the audio-token positions, we find that the answer to a spoken question becomes legible - in words - in the model's middle layers, before it emits any token. Five findings follow. (1) The readout carries concepts in neither the question, the options, nor the model's own transcription: on a clip whose verbatim transcription is empty garbling, it reconstructs Watergate and scandal, passes through the role president, and resolves to Nixon - a hidden multi-hop chain, read with no chain-of-thought. (2) The content is language-agnostic: one audio-inferred concept surfaces in several scripts at once, and 38% of top-1 readouts are Chinese on English inputs. (3) It is paralinguistic: given the same clip as audio and as the model's own emotion-free caption, the audio mind forms the sound source, speaker role, or affect that the caption discards, and answers correctly more often. (4) The audio-driven signal is absent at the input, turns on about a tenth of the way into the network, separates most cleanly from the text prior in the middle band (35-80% of depth), and activation patching shows it is causally used and committed before the last fifth of the layers. (5) Deleting single layers maps the pipeline: reading the sound in is localized to the entry layers and answer delivery to the output layer, while retrieval is distributed across the interior. Throughout, a waveform-swap control - identical text, only the sound changed - isolates the audio-driven signal from a prior over the printed options. This is a qualitative account of what an audio model works out before it speaks: the quantities are controls, not benchmark scores.

arXiv

When Probing Accuracy Saturates, Fragility Resolves: A Complementary Metric for LLM Pre-Training Analysis

Orion Reblitz-Richardson

Standard linear probing declares a property "encoded" when a classifier on hidden states achieves high accuracy. The protocol works well on a snapshot but breaks across pre-training, with probe accuracy saturating within the first few thousand steps, leaving most of training invisible to the instrument. We introduce fragility, a complementary per-layer metric defined as the activation-noise level at which probe accuracy collapses. Fragility is sensitive to both the margin of separability and the redundancy of representation, both of which keep evolving long after accuracy plateaus. Applied to open-checkpoint language models, fragility recovers structure that accuracy alone cannot see. Moralized representations, our interest, emerge in stages, with high-accuracy detection of morally loaded words first and compositional encoding later. Because probe accuracy on its own tracks how lexically separable a dataset is, we establish the compositional encoding directly, by showing it transfers across construction types that share no contrast tokens. Where probing accuracy returns a flat answer, fragility returns a structured one. Raw critical noise also shows a layer-depth gradient, but we identify and correct a confound that, to our knowledge, has gone undocumented in noise-injection probing. That is, deeper layers carry larger activations, so a fixed absolute noise makes them look more robust than they are. Rescaling per layer removes most of the gradient, while within-layer comparisons stay valid and still separate identical-accuracy corpora by fragility. We recommend RMS-normalized critical noise for cross-layer claims and raw critical noise for within-layer comparisons.

arXiv

Reconstruction of Personally Identifiable Information from Proprietary Data in Supervised Fine-Tuned Models

Sae Furukawa, Alina Oprea

Supervised Finetuning (SFT) has become one of the primary methods for adapting a large language model (LLM) with extensive pre-trained knowledge to domain-specific, instruction-following tasks. SFT datasets, composed of instruction-response pairs, often include user-provided information that may contain sensitive data such as personally identifiable information (PII), raising privacy concerns. This paper studies the problem of targeted PII reconstruction from models fine- tuned on proprietary SFT data, in which an adversary attempts to recover PII associated with a specific identity. We construct multi-turn, user-centric Q&A datasets in sensitive domains, specifically medical and legal settings, that incorporate PII to enable realistic evaluation of leakage. We then propose COVA, a coverage-aware decoding algorithm for targeted PII reconstruction under prefix-based attacks. Using COVA, we study how the amount of information available about a target user affects the recovery of their PII from SFT models. Across datasets, COVA consistently improves PII reconstruction over baseline decoding methods, and even limited contextual knowledge can substantially increase an adversary's success. Our findings demonstrate that small, proprietary SFT datasets can induce meaningful privacy leakage through the reconstruction of target-PII associations learned during fine-tuning.

arXiv

AEL: Evolving Agent Harness in Open-Ended Environments

Wujiang Xu, Jiaojiao Han, Minghao Guo, Kai Mei, Xi Zhu, Han Zhang, Dimitris N. Metaxas

LLM Agents Harnesses are hand-designed and stay fixed, so agents accumulate experience but never learn how to use it: which memories to retrieve, when retrieved evidence is misleading, and when the retrieval strategy itself should change. We introduce Agent Evolving Learning (AEL), a two-timescale framework that evolves the harness, recasting memory use as online policy selection. A fast Thompson Sampling bandit selects among memory-retrieval policies episode by episode, while slow LLM reflection follows a diagnose-before-prescribe principle: it first explains why performance degraded, then injects a targeted new retrieval policy as a bandit arm when the current pool plateaus. AEL outperforms ten self-improving and nonLLM baselines on a sequential portfolio benchmark, lifting Sharpe by 27% over the strongest memory-only variant with the lowest variance among all stochastic methods, and generalizes to a support-ticket routing stream, where it improves accuracy by 18% over reflectionfree Thompson Sampling and by 51% over the best prior baseline. Mechanism studies further show that the gains are causal: reflection helps precisely when regimes demand different retrieval behavior, and is provably no-harm/nogain when the best policy is stable. Code and data: https://github.com/WujiangXu/AEL.

arXiv

Time is Not a Label: Continuous Phase Rotation for Temporal Knowledge Graphs and Agentic Memory

Weixian Waylon Li, Jiaxin Zhang, Xianan Jim Yang, Tiejun Ma, Yiwen Guo

Structured memory representations such as knowledge graphs are central to autonomous agents and other long-lived systems. However, most existing approaches model time as discrete metadata, either sorting by recency (burying old-yet-permanent knowledge), simply overwriting outdated facts, or requiring an expensive LLM call at every ingestion step, leaving them unable to distinguish persistent facts from evolving ones. To address this, we introduce RoMem, a drop-in temporal knowledge graph module for structured memory systems, applicable to agentic memory and beyond. A pretrained Semantic Speed Gate maps each relation's text embedding to a volatility score, learning from data that evolving relations (e.g., "president of") should rotate fast while persistent ones (e.g., "born in") should remain stable. Combined with continuous phase rotation, this enables geometric shadowing: obsolete facts are rotated out of phase in complex vector space, so temporally correct facts naturally outrank contradictions without deletion. On temporal knowledge graph completion, RoMem achieves state-of-the-art results on ICEWS05-15 (72.6 MRR). Applied to agentic memory, it delivers 2-3x MRR and answer accuracy on temporal reasoning (MultiTQ), dominates hybrid benchmark (LoCoMo), preserves static memory with zero degradation (DMR-MSC), and generalises zero-shot to unseen financial domains (FinTMMBench).

arXiv

OpenSanctions Pairs: Large-Scale Entity Matching with LLMs

Chandler Smith, Magnus Sesodia, Friedrich Lindenberg, Christian Schroeder de Witt

We release OpenSanctions Pairs, the first large-scale public benchmark for entity matching on sanctions and OSINT data. The dataset includes 755,540 expert-labeled pairs over 1 million entities, aggregated from 293 source datasets across 45 jurisdictions. It captures real-world diversity in compliance data, spanning multiple languages and writing systems (e.g., Latin, Cyrillic, Arabic), inconsistent structure, and time-varying provenance, and is substantially more heterogeneous than prior entity matching benchmarks. As baselines, we evaluate the production rule-based matcher (nomenklatura RegressionV1) alongside open- and closed-source LLMs in both zero- and few-shot settings, each tested with and without MIPROv2 prompt optimization to control for prompt sensitivity. The rule-based baseline reaches 91.3\% F1; GPT-4o achieves the best result at 99.0\% F1, and a locally deployable open-source model (DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B) achieves 98.2\% F1. The rule-based baseline and LLMs fail in complementary ways: rules over-match, while LLMs struggle with cross-script transliteration. These results suggest that pairwise matching performance is approaching a practical ceiling and shift attention toward pipeline components such as blocking, clustering, and uncertainty-aware review.

arXiv

Ladder Up, Memory Down: Low-Cost Fine-Tuning With Side Nets

Estelle Zheng, Nathan Cerisara, Sébastien Warichet, Emmanuel Helbert, Christophe Cerisara

Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) is often limited by the memory available on commodity GPUs. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods such as QLoRA reduce the number of trainable parameters, yet still incur high memory usage induced by the backward pass in the full model. We revisit Ladder Side Tuning (LST), a rarely explored PEFT technique that adds a lightweight side network, and show that it matches QLoRA's compute scaling slope while cutting peak memory by 50\%. Across different downstream benchmarks spanning natural language understanding, mathematical and LLM-critic tasks, LST has competitive performance with QLoRA's accuracy on average while being much more memory-efficient. This efficiency enables fine-tuning of 7B-parameter models on a single 12 GB consumer GPU with 2k-token contexts, requiring no gradient checkpointing\textemdash conditions under which QLoRA exhausts memory. Beyond memory efficiency, we also establish scaling laws showing that LST scales similarly to QLoRA. We exploit Ladder's architectural flexibility by introducing xLadder, a depth-extended variant that increases effective depth via cross-connections and shortens chain-of-thought (CoT) at fixed parameter count. Ladder is strong when memory is the bottleneck; xLadder builds on this by enabling deeper reasoning without additional memory overhead.

arXiv

ReFIne: A Framework for Trustworthy Large Reasoning Models with Reliability, Faithfulness, and Interpretability

Chung-En Sun, Ge Yan, Akshay Kulkarni, Tsui-Wei Weng

Recent advances in long chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning have largely prioritized answer accuracy and token efficiency, while overlooking aspects critical to trustworthiness. We argue that usable reasoning systems must be trustworthy, characterized by three properties: interpretability, faithfulness, and reliability. To this end, we propose ReFIne, a new training framework that integrates supervised fine-tuning with GRPO to encourage models to: (i) improve interpretability by producing structured, tag-based traces with high-level planning that are easier for humans to follow; (ii) enhance faithfulness by explicitly disclosing the decisive information guiding each solution, with consistent cross-section references; and (iii) promote reliability by providing self-assessments of both the derivation's soundness and the confidence of the final answer. We apply ReFIne to the Qwen3 models at multiple scales (1.7B/4B/8B) and evaluate across mathematical benchmarks of varying difficulty. Our experimental results show that ReFIne models generate clearer and better-structured reasoning traces (interpretability +44.0%), more faithfully expose their underlying decision process (faithfulness +18.8%), and offer informative confidence estimates (reliability +42.4%). These findings highlight an overlooked but important direction: reasoning models should be optimized not only for accuracy, but also for broader dimensions of trustworthiness. Our code is available at: https://github.com/Trustworthy-ML-Lab/Training_Trustworthy_LRM_with_Refine

arXiv

On the Idiosyncrasies of the Mandarin Chinese Classifier System

Shijia Liu, Hongyuan Mei, Adina Williams, Ryan Cotterell

While idiosyncrasies of the Chinese classifier system have been a richly studied topic among linguists (Adams and Conklin, 1973; Erbaugh, 1986; Lakoff, 1986), not much work has been done to quantify them with statistical methods. In this paper, we introduce an information-theoretic approach to measuring idiosyncrasy; we examine how much the uncertainty in Mandarin Chinese classifiers can be reduced by knowing semantic information about the nouns that the classifiers modify. Using the empirical distribution of classifiers from the parsed Chinese Gigaword corpus (Graff et al., 2005), we compute the mutual information (in bits) between the distribution over classifiers and distributions over other linguistic quantities. We investigate whether semantic classes of nouns and adjectives differ in how much they reduce uncertainty in classifier choice, and find that it is not fully idiosyncratic; while there are no obvious trends for the majority of semantic classes, shape nouns reduce uncertainty in classifier choice the most.

Keep browsing

More papers from top AI conferences

30+ top conferences, by conference, year, and topic.