On the Interplay of Pre-Training, Mid-Training, and RL on Reasoning Language Models

Abstract

Recent reinforcement learning (RL) techniques have yielded impressive reasoning improvements in language models, yet it remains unclear whether RL truly extends a model's reasoning ability beyond pre-training. A central challenge is the lack of control in modern training pipelines, where opaque pre-training data, underexplored mid-training, and complex RL interactions obscure causal effects. To resolve this ambiguity, we develop a controlled experimental framework that isolates the causal contributions of pre-training, mid-training, and RL-based post-training. Our approach employs synthetic reasoning tasks with explicit atomic operations, parseable step-by-step reasoning traces, and systematic manipulation of training distributions. We evaluate along: *extrapolative generalization* to more complex compositions and *contextual generalization* across surface contexts. Using this framework, we reconcile competing views on RL’s effectiveness: 1) RL produces true capability gains (pass@128) only when pre-training leaves sufficient headroom and RL data target the model’s *edge of competence*, tasks that are difficult but not yet out of reach. 2) Contextual generalization requires minimal yet sufficient pre-training exposure, after which RL reliably transfers. 3) Mid-training significantly enhances performance under fixed compute compared with RL alone, demonstrating its central but underexplored role. 4) Process-level rewards reduce reward hacking and improve reasoning fidelity. Together, these results clarify the interplay between pre-training, mid-training, and RL, offering a foundation for improving reasoning language models training strategies. Codes and data are avaialble at [Github](https://github.com/Interplay-LM-Reasoning/Interplay-LM-Reasoning) and [HuggingFace](https://huggingface.co/Interplay-LM-Reasoning)