ConCISE: Confidence-guided Compression in Step-by-step Efficient Reasoning
Authors: Ziqing Qiao, Yongheng Deng, Jiali Zeng, Dong Wang, Lai Wei, Guanbo Wang, Fandong Meng, Jie Zhou, Ju Ren, Yaoxue Zhang
Abstract
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) perform strongly in complex reasoning tasks via Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, but often suffer from verbose outputs, increasing computational overhead. Existing fine-tuning-based compression methods either operate post-hoc pruning, risking disruption to reasoning coherence, or rely on sampling-based selection, which fails to remove redundant content thoroughly. To address these limitations, this work begins by framing two key patterns of redundant reflection in LRMs—\textit{Confidence Deficit}, wherein the model reflects on correct intermediate steps, and \textit{Termination Delay}, where reflection continues after a verified, confident answer—through a confidence-guided perspective. Based on this, we introduce \textbf{ConCISE} (\textbf{Con}fidence-guided \textbf{C}ompression \textbf{I}n \textbf{S}tep-by-step \textbf{E}fficient Reasoning), a framework designed to generate concise reasoning chains, integrating \textit{Confidence Injection} to boost reasoning confidence, and \textit{Early Stopping} to terminate reasoning when confidence is sufficient. Extensive experiments demonstrate that compared to baseline methods, fine-tuning LRMs on \textbf{ConCISE}-generated data yields a better balance between compression and task performance, reducing length by up to ~50% under SimPO, while maintaining high task accuracy.