Synthetic Data

Blind Image Quality Assessment (BIQA) has advanced significantly through deep learning, but the scarcity of large-scale labeled datasets remains a challenge. While synthetic data offers a promising solution, models trained on existing synthetic datasets often show limited generalization ability. In this work, we make a key observation that representations learned from synthetic datasets often exhibit a discrete and clustered pattern that hinders regression performance: features of high-quality images cluster around reference images, while those of low-quality images cluster based on distortion types. Our analysis reveals that this issue stems from the distribution of synthetic data rather than model architecture. Consequently, we introduce a novel framework SynDR-IQA, which reshapes synthetic data distribution to enhance BIQA generalization. Based on theoretical derivations of sample diversity and redundancy's impact on generalization error, SynDR-IQA employs two strategies: distribution-aware diverse content upsampling, which enhances visual diversity while preserving content distribution, and density-aware redundant cluster downsampling, which balances samples by reducing the density of densely clustered areas. Extensive experiments across three cross-dataset settings (synthetic-to-authentic, synthetic-to-algorithmic, and synthetic-to-synthetic) demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. The code is available at https://github.com/Li-aobo/SynDR-IQA.

Private Evolution (PE) is a promising training-free method for differentially private (DP) synthetic data generation. While it achieves strong performance in some domains (e.g., images and text), its behavior in others (e.g., tabular data) is less consistent. To date, the only theoretical analysis of the convergence of PE depends on unrealistic assumptions about both the algorithm’s behavior and the structure of the sensitive dataset. In this work, we develop a new theoretical framework to understand PE’s practical behavior and identify sufficient conditions for its convergence. For $d$-dimensional sensitive datasets with $n$ data points from a convex and compact domain, we prove that under the right hyperparameter settings and given access to the Gaussian variation API proposed in \cite{PE23}, PE produces an $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-DP synthetic dataset with expected 1-Wasserstein distance $\tilde{O}(d(n\varepsilon)^{-1/d})$ from the original; this establishes worst-case convergence of the algorithm as $n \to \infty$. Our analysis extends to general Banach spaces as well. We also connect PE to the Private Signed Measure Mechanism, a method for DP synthetic data generation that has thus far not seen much practical adoption. We demonstrate the practical relevance of our theoretical findings in experiments.

Despite their remarkable performance on various tasks, Large Language Models (LLMs) still struggle with logical reasoning, particularly in complex and multi-step reasoning processes. Among various efforts to enhance LLMs' reasoning capabilities, synthesizing large-scale, high-quality logical reasoning datasets has emerged as a promising direction. However, existing methods often rely on predefined templates for logical reasoning data generation, limiting their adaptability to real-world scenarios. To address the limitation, we propose **LogicTree**, a novel framework for efficiently synthesizing multi-step logical reasoning dataset that excels in both complexity and instantiation. By iteratively searching for applicable logic rules based on structural pattern matching to perform backward deduction, **LogicTree** constructs multi-step logic trees that capture complex reasoning patterns. Furthermore, we employ a two-stage LLM-based approach to instantiate various real-world scenarios for each logic tree, generating consistent real-world reasoning processes that carry contextual significance. This helps LLMs develop generalizable logical reasoning abilities across diverse scenarios rather than merely memorizing templates. Experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that our approach achieves an average improvement of 9.4\% in accuracy on complex logical reasoning tasks.

Large generative models are increasingly trained on synthetic data from earlier generations, raising concerns about *model collapse*, a progressive performance decline consistently observed in empirical studies. However, theoretical understanding of recursive training dynamics and their failure modes remains limited. In this work, we theoretically show that recursive training inherently leads to exponential error growth unless mitigated by sufficient real data. Addressing the growing scarcity of real data, we introduce a self-verification mechanism enabling models to filter their outputs based on internal confidence scores without external validation. Through rigorous analysis, we derive finite-sample error bounds demonstrating that self-verification alone can prevent collapse, even in fully synthetic training regimes. Our theoretical framework extends to large language models (LLMs), characterizing the conditions under which recursive training can maintain stability without performance degradation.

Data diversity is crucial for training a strong language model. Yet metrics of diversity often diverge from this goal, measuring variations in heuristic features—like n-grams or embeddings—that are detached from how the model actually performs on a target task. This motivates us to ask: *Can we redefine data diversity—beyond measuring variations in heuristic features—in a way that better predicts model generalization?* Through large-scale empirical analyses spanning over 300 training runs, carefully controlled for data scale and quality, we show that data diversity can be a strong predictor of generalization in LLM reasoning—as measured by average model performance on unseen out-of-distribution benchmarks. We introduce **G-Vendi**, a metric that quantifies diversity via the entropy of model-induced loss gradients. G-Vendi scales to million-sample datasets and yet consistently outperforms heuristic alternatives, achieving strong correlation ($\text{Spearman's } \rho \approx 0.9$) with out-of-distribution (OOD) performance across both natural language inference (NLI) and math reasoning tasks. Building on this insight, we present **Prismatic Synthesis**, a framework for generating diverse synthetic data by targeting underrepresented regions in gradient space. Experimental results show that Prismatic Synthesis consistently improves model performance as we scale synthetic data—not just on in-distribution test but across unseen, out-of-distribution benchmarks—significantly outperforming state-of-the-art models in both domains. For example, PrismMath-7B, our model distilled from a 32B LLM without human verification, outperforms R1-Distill-Qwen-7B—trained on proprietary data generated by 671B R1—on 6 out of 7 challenging math benchmarks.

The increasing reliance on large-scale datasets in machine learning poses significant privacy and ethical challenges, particularly in sensitive domains such as face recognition. Synthetic data generation offers a promising alternative; however, most existing methods depend heavily on external datasets or pre-trained models, increasing complexity and resource demands. In this paper, we introduce **AugGen**, a self-contained synthetic augmentation technique. AugGen strategically samples from a class-conditional generative model trained exclusively on the target FR dataset, eliminating the need for external resources. Evaluated across 8 FR benchmarks, including IJB-C and IJB-B, our method achieves **1–12% performance improvements**, outperforming models trained solely on real data and surpassing state-of-the-art synthetic data generation approaches, while using less real data. Notably, these gains often exceed those from architectural modifications, underscoring the value of synthetic augmentation in data-limited scenarios. Our findings demonstrate that carefully integrated synthetic data can both mitigate privacy constraints and substantially enhance discriminative performance in face recognition. Code and datasets will be made publicly available upon publication.

Molecular synthetic space projecting is a critical technique in de novo molecular design, which aims to rectify molecules without synthesizability guarantee by converting them into synthetic postfix notations. However, the vast synthesizable chemical space and the discrete data modalities involved pose significant challenges to postfix notation conversion benchmarking. In this paper, we exploit conditional probability transitions in discrete state space and introduce MoleBridge, a deep generative model built on the Markov bridge approach for designing postfix notations of molecular synthesis pathways. MoleBridge consists of two iterative optimizations: i) Autoregressive extending of notation tokens from molecular graphs, and ii) generation of discrete reaction postfix notations through Markov bridge, where noisy token blocks are progressively denoised over multi-step iterations. For the challenging second iteration, which demands sensitivity to incorrect generative probability paths within intricate chemical spaces, we employ a thinking and denoising separation approach to denoise. Empirically, we find that MoleBridge is capable of accurately predicting synthesis pathways while exhibiting excellent performance in a variety of application scenarios.

State Space Models (SSMs) have emerged as promising alternatives to attention mechanisms, with the Mamba architecture demonstrating impressive performance and linear complexity for processing long sequences. However, the fundamental differences between Mamba and Transformer architectures remain incompletely understood. In this work, we use carefully designed synthetic tasks to reveal Mamba's inherent limitations. Through experiments, we identify that Mamba's nonlinear convolution introduces an asymmetry bias that significantly impairs its ability to recognize symmetrical patterns and relationships. Using composite function and inverse sequence matching tasks, we demonstrate that Mamba strongly favors compositional solutions over symmetrical ones and struggles with tasks requiring the matching of reversed sequences. We show these limitations stem not from the SSM module itself but from the nonlinear convolution preceding it, which fuses token information asymmetrically. These insights provide a new understanding of Mamba's constraints and suggest concrete architectural improvements for future sequence models.