ICML 2026 Papers

Vision-language-action models exhibit an inherent trade-off in action chunk length (``horizon''): longer horizons improve global foresight but degrade fine-grained local control, while shorter ones yield the opposite. To mitigate the trade-off, we propose a $\textbf{mixture of horizons (MoH)}$ strategy. In brief, MoH rearranges the action chunk into several segments with different horizons, processes them in parallel with a shared action transformer, and fuses outputs with a light linear gate. It offers three appealing benefits. i) Long-term foresight and short-term precision are jointly exploited within a single model. ii) MoH is plug-and-play for full-attention action modules with minimal training or inference overhead. iii) MoH enables dynamic inference with adaptive horizons, which selects stable actions through cross-horizon consensus, achieving 2.5$\times$ higher throughput than baselines while preserving superior performance. Extensive experiments over flow-based and one-step regression policies demonstrate that MoH yields consistent and significant gains on both simulations and real-world tasks.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable success across a broad range of vision tasks. However, constrained by the capacity of their internal world knowledge, prior work has proposed augmenting MLLMs by ``reasoning-then-tool-call'' for visual and textual search engines to obtain substantial gains on tasks requiring extensive factual information. However, these approaches typically define multimodal search in a naive setting, assuming that a single full-level or entity-level image query and few text query suffices to retrieve the key evidence needed to answer the question, which is unrealistic in real-world scenarios with substantial visual noise. Moreover, they are often limited in the reasoning depth and search breadth, making it difficult to solve complex questions that require aggregating evidence from diverse visual and textual sources. Building on this, we propose Vision-DeepResearch, which proposes one new multimodal deep-research paradigm, i.e., performs multi-turn, multi-entity and multi-scale visual and textual search to robustly hit real-world search engines under heavy noise. Our Vision-DeepResearch supports dozens of reasoning steps and hundreds of engine interactions, while internalizing deep-research capabilities into the MLLM via cold-start supervision and RL training, resulting in a strong end-to-end multimodal deep-research MLLM. It substantially outperforming existing multimodal deep-research MLLMs, and workflows built on strong closed-source foundation model such as GPT-5, Gemini-2.5-pro and Claude-4-Sonnet.

Understanding physical transformations is fundamental for reasoning in dynamic environments. While Vision Language Models (VLMs) show promise in embodied applications, whether they genuinely understand physical transformations remains unclear. We introduce ***ConservationBench*** evaluating ***conservation***—whether physical quantities remain invariant under transformations. Spanning four properties with paired conserving/non-conserving scenarios, we generate 23,040 questions across 112 VLMs. Results reveal systematic failure: performance remains near chance with improvements on conservation tasks accompanied by drops on controls. Control experiments show strong textual priors favoring invariance, yet models perform worse with visual content. Neither temporal resolution, prompting, nor curated sampling helps. These findings show that current VLMs fail to maintain transformation-invariant representations of physical properties across dynamic scenes.

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) extend large language models with visual understanding, but remain vulnerable to hallucination, where outputs are fluent yet inconsistent with images. Recent studies link this issue to language bias—the tendency of LVLMs to over-rely on text while neglecting visual inputs. Yet most analyses remain empirical without uncovering its underlying cause. In this paper, we provide a systematic study of language bias and identify its root in modality misalignment during training. Our analysis shows that both Visual Instruction Tuning (VIT) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) often prioritize textual improvements, which may cause LVLMs to overly lean toward language modeling rather than balanced multimodal understanding. To address this, we propose two simple yet effective methods: Language Bias Regularization (LBR), which mitigates language bias through regularization during instruction tuning, and Language Bias Penalty (LBP), which penalizes language bias in the DPO training process. Extensive experiments across diverse models and benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. LBR consistently improves performance on over ten general benchmarks, while LBP significantly reduces hallucination and improves trustworthiness. Together, these methods not only mitigate language bias but also advance the overall alignment of LVLMs, all without introducing any additional data or auxiliary models. Our code is publicly available at [https://github.com/lab-klc/HAVAE](https://github.com/lab-klc/HAVAE).

Vision–Language–Action (VLA) models enable general-purpose robotic control via large-scale multimodal pretraining, yet their effectiveness under few-shot imitation learning remains limited. We conduct a systematic stress test of state-of-the-art VLA models and show that performance degrades sharply as demonstrations are reduced, revealing a key weakness of existing adaptation strategies. To address this, we introduce FOCA, a future-oriented conditioning framework for data-efficient VLA adaptation. FOCA combines explicit prediction of task-grounded future interaction embeddings with implicit alignment to future goal observations, enabling long-horizon reasoning in latent space without pixel-level prediction. This formulation naturally supports action-free co-training with synthetic videos from video world models and can be interpreted as learning a future-conditioned value-like representation. Extensive experiments demonstrate FOCA achieves 95.7\% success with 20 demonstrations on LIBERO, improves 7–12\% on RoboCasa, and delivers up to 26\% absolute gains on real robots, establishing a new state of the art in few-shot VLA adaptation.