ICML 2026 Papers

Fake Image Detection (FID), aiming at unified detection across four image forensic subdomains, is critical in real-world forensic scenarios. Compared with ensemble approaches, monolithic FID models are theoretically more promising, but to date, consistently yield inferior performance in practice. In this work, we identify the intrinsic distinctness of artifacts across subdomains—a critical barrier we term the "Ji-Zhe phenomenon". Driven by this phenomenon, we diagnose the cause of this underperformance for the first time: the collapse of the artifact feature space. The core challenge for developing a practical monolithic FID model thus boils down to the "unified-yet-discriminative" reconstruction of the artifact feature space. To address this paradoxical challenge, we hypothesize that high-level semantics can serve as a structural prior for the reconstruction, and further propose Semantic-Induced Constrained Adaptation (SICA), the first monolithic FID paradigm. Extensive experiments on our $ \textit{OpenMMSec} $ dataset demonstrate that SICA outperforms 15 state-of-the-art methods and reconstructs the target unified-yet-discriminative artifact feature space in a near-orthogonal manner, thus firmly validating our hypothesis. The code and dataset will be made publicly available.

Embedding methods are among the most efficient approaches for learning to reason about relational knowledge. In this paper, we focus on the framework of region-based embeddings, where relations are encoded as geometric regions. The spatial arrangement of these regions allows such models to capture symbolic rules, enabling them to simulate some forms of symbolic reasoning. A crucial consideration is how the regions are parameterized, as this affects which rule bases can be captured. Most methods use convex regions which are defined in terms of coordinate-wise comparisons. This makes them highly efficient, but the implications of this choice have thus far remained unclear. We present a series of results that shed light on this issue, showing that convex coordinate-wise models indeed have important limitations, while at the same time showing that there is still room for pushing the expressivity of existing coordinate-wise models.

Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) are promising alternatives to autoregressive large language models (AR-LLMs), as they potentially allow higher inference throughput. Reinforcement learning (RL) is crucial to enabling dLLMs to achieve performance comparable to that of AR-LLMs on important tasks, such as reasoning. However, RL algorithms well-suited to dLLMs' unique characteristics have yet to be developed. This paper proposes \textbf{Distribution Matching Policy Optimization (DMPO)}, a principled and theoretically grounded RL fine-tuning method specifically designed to enhance the reasoning capabilities of dLLMs by matching the dLLM policy distribution to the optimal, reward-tilted one through cross-entropy optimization. We identify a key implementation challenge with small training batch sizes and propose several effective solutions based on a novel weight baseline subtraction technique. DMPO exhibits superior performance on multiple reasoning benchmarks without supervised fine-tuning, achieving up to a $39.63$ percentage-point improvement in accuracy over prior non-DMPO RL baselines and $67.97$ percentage points over the base model, underscoring the effectiveness of the distribution-matching framework. Our code is available at https://github.com/yuchen-zhu-zyc/DMPO.

Recent work has sought to understand Large Language Models (LLMs) reasoning, yet a principled, model-intrinsic signal that captures its *layer-wise reasoning dynamics* remains underexplored. We bridge this gap by demonstrating that **the $\ell_2$ norm of hidden states serves as an endogenous signal of the model's reasoning intensity**. Using Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) as a diagnostic probe, we observe that LLMs' internal reasoning is marked by a sharp increase in reasoning feature activations concentrated in late layers. Motivated by this pattern, we establish a formal link between reasoning intensity and the model's latent geometry and theoretically prove that the $\ell_2$ norm of hidden states bounds the activation strength of SAE reasoning features. Empirical correlation analysis and causal interventions further prove $\ell_2$ norm as a faithful indicator, where heightened norms consistently correspond to critical reasoning steps. We then introduce three test-time scaling techniques guided by $\ell_2$ norms: Adaptive Layer-wise Reasoning Recursion, (ii) Endogenous Reasoning State Steering, and (iii) $\ell_2$-guided Response Selection, which requires no additional training or data and is compatible with advanced inference engines. Experiments across model architectures and benchmarks show that $\ell_2$-norm-based techniques significantly improve reasoning performance, offering a principled yet simple lens to perceive and control LLM latent reasoning dynamics. Our codes are available at https://github.com/zjy1298/The-Tell-Tale-Norm.

Latent reasoning has emerged as a powerful alternative to text-based Chain-of-Thought (CoT), offering significant gains in computational efficiency by compressing verbose reasoning into compact embeddings. However, compressing reasoning into the latent space renders the thinking opaque, hindering its interpretability. Current methods present a stark trade-off: they either function as unexplainable “black boxes” (e.g., Coconut), where the latent reasoning is not human-readable, or rely on separate post-hoc decoders for explainability (e.g., Heima), introducing architectural overhead and decoupling the explanation from the actual reasoning process. In this work, we present a unified framework for Self-Explainable Latent Reasoning (SELR) that trains a single model to perform efficient and inherently explainable latent reasoning. Our core contribution is a novel multi-task training objective that optimizes for two goals simultaneously: (1) an Answer Loss that optimizes the latent reasoning trajectory to produce accurate final answers, and (2) a CoT Loss that explicitly trains the same model to decode its own latent representations back into human-understandable reasoning steps. This design ensures that generated latent representations are both task-effective and semantically interpretable, eliminating the need for external decoders. We validate the effectiveness of SELR on both Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs), demonstrating that SELR achieves superior token efficiency and accuracy compared to baselines, while uniquely providing self-contained explainability without auxiliary models.

The rapid rise of vlogs as a personalized storytelling medium has created a demand for automated systems to evaluate and refine vlog editing plans. However, vlog assessment is highly subjective and remains challenging due to a lack of standardized criteria, dataset and benchmark, and effective reward models. To address these challenges, we define a comprehensive vlog evaluation framework guided by professional vlog creators and product managers, establishing a taxonomy of six key dimensions, *i.e.*, *Creativity*, *Consistency*, *Concept Design*, *Cinematography*, *Narration*, and *Pacing*. Subsequently, we curate a large-scale dataset of 100k vlog edits and a dedicated benchmark, **VRMBench**, to evaluate the vlog rewarding capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). Finally, we present **VlogReward**, a robust vlog reward model that can provide both fine-grained multi-dimensional scores and actionable feedback for iterative refinement. Technically, we enhance the Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) framework by introducing an adjustable inter-group comparison reward, which mitigates the "direction blindness" issue of standard GRPO and enables the model to better distinguish varied-quality edits. VlogReward achieves state-of-the-art results that significantly outperform existing MLLMs, including GPT-5 and Gemini-3-Pro. We hope that our study can help vlog creators and foster automated vlog evaluation and refinement systems.

Wasserstein metrics are increasingly adopted as similarity scores for images. We consider the sensitivity of Wasserstein metrics with respect to pixel-wise additive noise when the images are treated as discrete measures on the pixel grid. We derive finite-sample expectation bounds for a Gaussian noise model. Among other results, we prove that the error in the signed 2-Wasserstein distance scales with the square root of the noise standard deviation. This is favorable compared to the Euclidean metric that scales linearly, and thus provides a theoretical basis for the benefits of optimal transport distances in noisy settings. We present experiments that support our theoretical findings and point to a peculiar phenomenon where increasing the level of noise can decrease the Wasserstein distance. A case study on cryo-electron microscopy images demonstrates that the Wasserstein metric can capture the geometry of the data manifold in high noise settings even when the Euclidean metric fails.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are fundamentally limited by representation collapse, a bottleneck that severely degrades long-context performance. We identify that existing approaches risk drifting into one of two pathological extremes: homogenization collapse (e.g., attention sinks causing rank deficiency) and isolation collapse (e.g., local attention causing context disconnection). Through spectral analysis of attention dynamics, we derive an intrinsic trade-off between mixing efficiency (spectral gap) and information capacity (effective rank) that standard mechanisms struggle to balance. To resolve this dilemma, we propose the Topologically Regularized Side-Path (TRSP), a non-invasive architectural intervention that achieves spectral balance. TRSP employs a parameter-free Triangular Box mechanism, scaled by a lightweight, length-aware gate, to regularize the token interaction topology. By integrating proximal coupling to preserve effective rank and distal propagation to support non-degenerate mixing, TRSP promotes a geometrically healthier transition operator without altering core attention. Experiments show significant improvements across general capabilities and long-context benchmarks. Notably, on NoLiMa at $8\times$ the training length, TRSP retains $83\%$ accuracy and surpasses the Differential Transformer and Gated Attention by approximately 30 and 50 percentage points, respectively. Code available at: https://github.com/Eziotao-tyd/TRSP.

Schema graphs are an upstream bottleneck of schema-grounded information extraction and knowledge graph construction, yet most extraction systems assume the schema is already available. We introduce SCOPE (Schema Construction and Ontology-induction Pipeline Evaluation), a train-text-only benchmark for corpus-to-schema induction and optional schema fusion from raw text, built from 24 public information extraction sources (15 RE and 9 EE) normalized into evaluation-only gold schema graphs; its core event-extraction target covers event types and within-event argument roles, with inter-event links reported separately. We present SCION (Schema Construction and Induction with Ontology Normalization), an auditable reference pipeline rather than a new extraction architecture; it constructs candidate spaces from train text and restricts naming, merging, filtering, validation, and conservative fusion to candidate-linked evidence under strict JSON contracts. On the SCOPE core suite, SCION-lite attains the highest F1 among released source-schema references, Text2Onto-style, LLM-only, and matched extract-then-aggregate baselines under Literal, Fuzzy, Continuous, and Graph schema-graph metrics, while the compact open-model SCION-RL variant reduces reliance on proprietary LLM schema engineers. These results are reported against normalized typed-edge targets rather than as claims that induced schemas surpass human ontology design; the release includes evidence-linked outputs, parse/fallback logs, candidate retention/merging logs, run manifests, code, and benchmark packages at [https://github.com/wandugu/paper_scion](https://github.com/wandugu/paper_scion).

Multimodal large language models introduce attack surfaces absent in unimodal systems: adversaries can distribute malicious intent across modalities to evade unimodal safeguards. This motivates using cross-modal consistency as a detection signal rather than inspecting each modality in isolation. Our key observation is that benign inputs induce compatible predictive behavior from text-only and vision-only reasoning that stabilizes when fused, whereas adversarial manipulation disrupts this consistency, causing abnormal multimodal behavior. Existing defenses that examine raw inputs or outputs overlook this internal fusion process, rendering them brittle and computationally expensive. We propose FlowGuard, a lightweight inference-time framework that detects harmful inputs by monitoring internal multimodal consistency. Unlike approaches that rely on scalar confidence metrics, FlowGuard derives FlowVectors inspired by Partial Information Decomposition that quantify cross-modal redundancy, synergy, and modality-specific dominance, capturing whether multimodal fusion aligns with unimodal semantic evidencebetween unimodal and fused multimodal output distributions. In a one-class classification problem trained solely on benign data, FlowGuard reduces Attack Success Rates from $>90\%$ to $<15\%$ on unseen attacks, with $<3\%$ utility loss and up to a $6\times$ latency reduction. Our results demonstrate that monitoring cross-modal consistency offers an efficient and effective defense for multimodal reasoning.