ICML 2026 Papers

International Conference on Machine Learning

Decision breakdown

6,341papers

Counted from the official paper list; may differ slightly from the number the conference announced.

  • Spotlight
    5368.5%
  • Poster
    5,80591.5%

Browse all papers

Mean-Shift PCA by Knockoff Mean

Mengda Li, Zeng Li, Jianfeng Yao

Expand abstract

Removing noise is difficult, but adding noise is easy. In this work, we show how to eliminate mean-shift noisy components from PCA by deliberately introducing knockoff mean-shift perturbation. Standard PCA is highly sensitive to shifts in the sample mean: a small fraction of samples from a shifted distribution can cause large deviations in the leading principal components. In high-dimensional regimes, existing Robust PCA approaches cannot handle the mean-shift contamination structure inherent in the mixture model. Using tools from Random Matrix Theory, we prove that the mean-shift spikes are spectrally separable from the stable eigenvalues of the original covariance. Furthermore, the original eigenspace remains asymptotically invariant to the contamination, independent of the mixture weight. Exploiting this spectral stability, we propose a simple, two-stage PCA algorithm by adding knockoff mean that identifies and removes the mean-shift component using only standard PCA operations.

Poster
A Refined Generalization Analysis for Extreme Multi-class Supervised Contrastive Representation Learning

Nong Minh Hieu, Antoine Ledent

Expand abstract

Contrastive Representation Learning (CRL) has achieved strong empirical success in multiple machine learning disciplines, yet its theoretical sample complexity remains poorly understood. Existing analyses usually assume that input tuples are identically and independently distributed, an assumption violated in most practical settings where contrastive tuples are constructed from a finite pool of labeled data, inducing dependencies among tuples. While one recent work analyzed this learning setting using U-Statistics to estimate the population risk, the techniques used therein require the risk of each class to concentrate uniformly, making excess risk bounds scale in the order of $\rho_{\min}^{-{1}/{2}}$ where $\rho_{\min}$ denotes the probability of the rarest class. Such a dependency can be overly pessimistic in the extreme multiclass settings where there are many tail classes which contribute minimally to the overall population risk. Our contributions are two-fold. Firstly, we improve upon the previous work and prove a bound with a sample complexity of the same order as the number of classes $R$, regardless of the distribution over classes. Furthermore, we formulate a different estimator that captures the concentration of the risk \textit{across classes}, enabling sharper bounds in extreme multi-class learning scenarios, especially where class distributions are long-tailed. Under mild assumptions on the class distributions, the resulting sample complexity is $\mathcal{{O}}(k)$ where $k$ is the number of samples per tuple.

Poster
Beyond First-order Asymptotics in Sequential Mean Testing

VIKAS DEEP, Shubhada Agrawal

Expand abstract

We revisit the problem of sequentially testing the mean of bounded distributions in a level-$\alpha$ power-one framework. We study a $\mathrm{KL_{inf}}$-based sequential test that is known to attain the information-theoretic lower bound on the expected stopping time with exact constants as $\alpha \to 0$. Going beyond first-order asymptotics, we establish a central limit theorem (CLT) for the stopping time of this test. Our analysis proceeds in two steps. First, we prove a novel CLT for the $\mathrm{KL_{inf}}$ statistic itself, characterizing its fluctuations around its deterministic limit. We then leverage this result to show that the stopping time, centered appropriately and scaled by $\sqrt{\log(1/\alpha)}$, converges in distribution to a Gaussian limit with an explicit variance. This yields a second-order characterization of an asymptotically optimal sequential test for bounded distributions. Finally, we present numerical experiments that corroborate our theoretical findings.

Spotlight
A Theory of Contrastive Learning with Natural Images

Antonio Torralba, Yair Weiss

Expand abstract

Why does contrastive learning with simple images and augmentations yield useful representations for downstream tasks? We address this question by analytically computing the optimal representation in terms of the contrastive loss for a range of basic augmentations and any image dataset with stationary statistics. We show that for certain augmentations the optimum can be attained by a CNN whose first layer filters are sinusoids, followed by a pointwise nonlinearity, global average pooling, and a final linear layer that performs partial whitening. We also show that the optimal weights in such CNNs for more complicated augmentations are still sinusoids. The frequencies of the sinusoids and their weights can be computed using a simple “waterfilling” algorithm given the dataset’s expected power spectrum. Experiments with different image datasets and augmentations show that such CNNs trained with SGD empirically learn sinusoids in their first layer and to perform partial whitening.

Poster
Outcome-Aware Spectral Feature Learning for Instrumental Variable Regression

Dimitri Meunier, Jakub Wornbard, Vladimir R Kostic, Antoine Moulin, Alek Fröhlich, Karim Lounici, Massimiliano Pontil, Arthur Gretton

Expand abstract

We address the problem of causal effect estimation in the presence of hidden confounders using nonparametric instrumental variable (IV) regression. An established approach is to use estimators based on learned \emph{spectral features}, that is, features spanning the top singular subspaces of the operator linking treatments to instruments. While powerful, such features are agnostic to the outcome variable. Consequently, the method can fail when the true causal function is poorly represented by these dominant singular functions. To mitigate, we introduce Augmented Spectral Feature Learning, a framework that makes the feature learning process outcome-aware. Our method learns features by minimizing a novel contrastive loss derived from an augmented operator that incorporates information from the outcome. By learning these task-specific features, our approach remains effective even under spectral misalignment. We provide a theoretical analysis of this framework and validate our approach on challenging benchmarks.

Poster
Linear Regression with Unknown Truncation Beyond Gaussian Features

Alexandros Kouridakis, Anay Mehrotra, Alkis Kalavasis, Constantine Caramanis

Expand abstract

In truncated linear regression, samples $(x,y)$ are shown only when the outcome $y$ falls inside a certain survival set $S^\star$ and the goal is to estimate the unknown $d$-dimensional regressor $w^\star$. This problem has a long history of study in Statistics and Machine Learning going back to the works of (Galton, 1897; Tobin, 1958) and more recently in, e.g., (Daskalakis et al., 2019; 2021; Lee et al., 2023; 2024). Despite this long history, however, most prior works are limited to the special case where $S^\star$ is precisely known. The more practically relevant case, where $S^\star$ is unknown and must be learned from data, remains open: indeed, here the only available algorithms require strong assumptions on the distribution of the feature vectors (e.g., Gaussianity) and, even then, have a $d^{\mathrm{poly} (1/\varepsilon)}$ run time for achieving $\varepsilon$ accuracy. In this work, we give the first algorithm for truncated linear regression with unknown survival set that runs in $\mathrm{poly} (d/\varepsilon)$ time, by only requiring that the feature vectors are sub-Gaussian. Our algorithm relies on a novel subroutine for efficiently learning unions of a bounded number of intervals using access to positive examples (without any negative examples) under a certain smoothness condition. This learning guarantee adds to the line of works on positive-only PAC learning and may be of independent interest.

Poster
Learning $U$-Statistics with Active Inference

Xiaoning Wang, Yuyang Huo, Liuhua Peng, Changliang Zou

Expand abstract

$U$-statistics play a central role in statistical inference. In many modern applications, however, acquiring the labels required for $U$-statistics is costly. Motivated by recent advances in active inference, we develop an active inference framework for $U$-statistics that selectively queries informative labels to improve estimation efficiency under a fixed labeling budget, while preserving valid statistical inference. Our approach is built on the augmented inverse probability weighting $U$-statistic, which is proposed to incorporate the sampling rule and machine learning predictions. We characterize the optimal sampling rule that minimizes its variance and design practical sampling strategies. We further extend the framework to $U$-statistic-based empirical risk minimization. Experiments on real datasets demonstrate substantial gains in estimation efficiency over baseline methods, while maintaining target coverage.

Poster
Approximating f -Divergences with Rank Statistics

Viktor Stein, José Manuel de Frutos

Expand abstract

We introduce a rank-statistic approximation of $f$-divergences that avoids explicit density-ratio estimation by working directly with the distribution of ranks. For a resolution parameter $K$, we map the mismatch between two univariate distributions $\mu$ and $\nu$ to a rank histogram on $\{ 0, \ldots, K\}$ and measure its deviation from uniformity via a discrete $f$-divergence, yielding a rank-statistic divergence estimator. We prove that the resulting estimator of the divergence is monotone in $K$, is always a lower bound of the true $f$-divergence, and we establish quantitative convergence rates for $K\to\infty$ under mild regularity of the quantile-domain density ratio. To handle high-dimensional data, we define the sliced rank-statistic $f$-divergence by averaging the univariate construction over random projections, and we provide convergence results for the sliced limit as well. We also derive finite-sample deviation bounds along with asymptotic normality results for the estimator. Finally, we empirically validate the approach by benchmarking against neural baselines and illustrating its use as a learning objective in generative modeling experiments.

Poster
Adaptive Multiscale Binary Expansion Tests for Independence

Yang Yang, Duo Zheng, Sandeep Jain, Kai Zhang, Ping-Shou Zhong

Expand abstract

This paper introduces a new family of adaptive, distribution-free independence tests for multivariate random vectors based on binary expansion coefficients, supported by a tractable asymptotic theory. Our first key contribution establishes a general equivalence between independence testing and testing cross-covariances among exponentially many binary expansion interaction coefficients, applicable to broad sample spaces and not limited to kernel-induced representations. While this exponential interaction structure makes naive construction and computation infeasible, we overcome this challenge by reformulating the proposed tests as a class of U-statistics and deriving an explicit kernel representation that enables scalable and efficient computation. Exploiting the multiscale nature of binary expansions, the proposed framework automatically adapts to unknown dependence structures by selectively truncating higher-order interactions, yielding both strong power and clear interpretability. To further enhance power and computational efficiency, we introduce an adaptive weighted aggregation procedure, termed wa-dCoBET, which combines a baseline Covariance Binary Expansion Test (CoBET) with a distance-measure–based CoBET. Extensive simulations and a real-data application demonstrate that wa-dCoBET consistently matches or outperforms HSIC and distance covariance, particularly in higher-dimensional and non-monotone settings, while maintaining accurate type I error control.

Poster
The Catastrophic Failure of *the* k-Means Algorithm in High Dimensions, and How Hartigan's Algorithm Avoids It

Roy R Lederman, David Silva-Sánchez, Ziling Chen, Gilles Mordant, Amnon Balanov, Tamir Bendory

Expand abstract

Lloyd's k-means algorithm is one of the most widely used clustering methods. We prove that in high-dimensional, high-noise settings, the algorithm exhibits catastrophic failure: with high probability, essentially every partition of the data is a fixed point. Consequently, Lloyd's algorithm simply returns its initial partition — even when the underlying clusters are trivially recoverable by other methods. In contrast, we prove that Hartigan's k-means algorithm does not exhibit this pathology. Our results show the stark difference between these algorithms and offer a theoretical explanation for the empirical difficulties often observed with k-means in high dimensions.

Poster