ICML 2026 Papers

Mixture-of-Experts (MoEs) have become a central component of many state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary large language models. Despite their widespread adoption, it remains unclear how close existing MoE architectures are to optimal for inference cost, as measured by accuracy per floating-point operation and per parameter. In this work, we revisit MoE design from a hardware-software co-design perspective, grounded in empirical and theoretical considerations. We characterize key performance bottlenecks across diverse deployment regimes, spanning offline high-throughput execution and online, latency-critical inference. Guided by these insights, we introduce **LatentMoE**, a new model architecture resulting from systematic design exploration and optimized for maximal accuracy per unit of compute. Empirical design space exploration at scales of up to 95B parameters and over a 1T-token training horizon, together with supporting theoretical analysis, shows that LatentMoE consistently outperforms standard MoE architectures in terms of accuracy per FLOP and per parameter. Given its strong performance, the LatentMoE architecture has been adopted by the flagship Nemotron-3 Super and Ultra models and scaled to substantially larger regimes, including longer token horizons and larger model sizes, as reported in (NVIDIA et al., 2025, arXiv:2512.20856).

Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly advanced, with Gemini-3-Pro setting a new performance milestone. In this work, we explore collective intelligence as an alternative to monolithic scaling, and demonstrate that open-source LLMs' collaboration can surpass Gemini-3-Pro. We first revisit LLM routing and aggregation at scale and identify three key bottlenecks: (1) current train-free routers are limited by a query-based paradigm focusing solely on textual similarity; (2) recent aggregation methods remain largely static, failing to select appropriate aggregators for different tasks; (3) the complementarity of routing and aggregation remains underutilized. To address these problems, we introduce JiSi, a novel framework designed to release the full potential of LLMs' collaboration through three innovations: (1) Query-Response Mixed Routing capturing both semantic information and problem difficulty; (2) Support-Set-based Aggregator Selection jointly evaluating the aggregation and domain capacity of aggregators; (3) Adaptive Routing-Aggregation Switch dynamically leveraging the advantages of routing and aggregation. Comprehensive experiments on nine benchmarks demonstrate that JiSi can surpass Gemini-3-Pro with only 47% costs by orchestrating ten open-source LLMs, while outperforming mainstream baselines. It suggests that collective intelligence represents a novel path towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).

Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a widely adopted technique for improving large language models (LLMs) on complex tasks. Despite this progress, existing RL methods still face challenges in training agents with longer-horizon interactions. One major bottleneck is distinguishing the contribution of different actions in long-horizon interaction, leading to high optimization variance. To address this, we introduce a novel policy gradient method, Hindsight Policy Optimization (HPO), that projects both the current policy distribution and the hindsight distribution into an intent space and extracts low-variance learning signals from the Wasserstein distance between them. We theoretically and empirically show that aggregating semantically similar states and actions in the intent space yields a bounded-variance estimator and improves policy performance stably. Our code is available online.

Standard factuality evaluations of LLMs treat all errors alike, obscuring whether failures arise from missing knowledge (empty shelves) or from limited access to encoded facts (lost keys). We propose a behavioral framework that profiles factual knowledge at the level of facts rather than questions, characterizing each fact by whether it is encoded, and then by how accessible it is: cannot be recalled, can be directly recalled, or can only be recalled with inference-time computation (thinking). To support such profiling, we introduce WikiProfile, a new benchmark constructed via an automated pipeline with a prompted LLM grounded in web search. Across 4 million responses from 13 LLMs, we find that encoding is nearly saturated in frontier models on our benchmark, with GPT-5 and Gemini-3 encoding 95--98\% of facts. However, recall remains a major bottleneck: many errors previously attributed to missing knowledge instead stem from failures to access it. These failures are systematic and disproportionately affect long-tail facts and reverse questions. Finally, we show that thinking improves recall and can recover a substantial fraction of failures, indicating that future gains may rely less on scaling and more on methods that improve how models utilize what they already encode.

Reinforcement learning (RL) has demonstrated potential for enhancing reasoning in large language models (LLMs). However, effective RL training, which requires medium-difficulty training samples, faces two fundamental challenges: Effective Data Scarcity and Dynamic Difficulty Shifts, where medium-difficulty samples are scarce and become trivial as models improve. Existing methods mitigate this scarcity to some extent by generating training samples. However, these approaches suffer from anchor-free generation, ignoring co-evolution, and difficulty mismatch. To address these issues, we propose D²Evo, a Dual Difficulty-aware self-Evolution RL framework. In each iteration, our method mines medium-difficulty anchors based on the current Solver's capability, trains the Questioner to generate diverse questions at appropriate difficulty levels, and jointly optimizes both components to enable progressive reasoning gains. Extensive experiments demonstrate that D²Evo outperforms existing methods on mathematical reasoning benchmarks with fewer than 2K real mathematical samples, and exhibits strong generalization on general reasoning benchmarks.

The Rapid Response (RR) framework (Peng et al., 2024), deployed in production systems including Anthropic’s ASL-3 safeguards (Anthropic, 2025), dynamically adapts jailbreak detection classifiers by generating synthetic training data from emerging attacks. We reveal that prompt injection can infiltrate this pipeline to deliver poisoned samples into the classifier’s training set, enabling two attack objectives: (I) targeted poisoning attacks that create false positives on harmless samples by categorizing them as a jailbreak, with a specific desired feature (e.g., certain formatting, subject, or keyword), (II) concept-based backdoor attacks that induce false negatives on jailbreak inputs, generalizing even to jailbreaks from attack strategies the defender explicitly trained against, when the backdoor trigger is present. Importantly, our threat model restricts adversaries to modify- ing only jailbreak samples (not benign data or labels), a constraint unexplored by prior work that makes the second objective particularly challeng- ing. We address this with Omission Attack, which exploits a new phenomenon: when training on concept-absent unsafe samples, the classifier mis- associates that concept’s presence with the safe label. Both attacks flip nearly all target labels with only 1% poisoning rate. Code: https://github.com/DH-davidhuang/rapid-poison

Self-correction in language models remains elusive. In this work, we explore whether language models can explicitly localize errors in incorrect reasoning, as a path toward building AI systems that can effectively correct themselves. We introduce a prompting method that structures reasoning as discrete, semantically coherent thought steps, and show that models can localize errors more reliably within this structure than in conventional, unstructured chain-of-thought reasoning. Motivated by how the human brain monitors errors at discrete decision points and resamples alternatives, we introduce Iterative Correction Sampling of Thoughts (Thought-ICS), a self-correction framework. Thought-ICS iteratively prompts the model to generate reasoning one discrete and complete thought at a time—where each thought represents a deliberate decision by the model—creating natural boundaries for precise error localization. Upon verification, the model localizes the first erroneous step, and the system backtracks to generate alternative reasoning from the last correct point. When asked to correct reasoning verified as incorrect by an oracle, Thought-ICS achieves 20-40% self-correction lift. In a completely autonomous setting without external verification, it outperforms contemporary self-correction baselines.

Current Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) exhibit remarkable general capabilities but significantly underperform in spatial reasoning tasks. Existing approaches treat this gap as a knowledge deficit, relying on supervised fine-tuning (SFT) to ingest labeled data from external vision sources or synthetic engines. In contrast, we argue that for many tasks, spatial capabilities are already present in pre-trained LRMs but require alignment through principles of internal logical coherence. In this work, we propose a self-supervised reinforcement learning (RL) framework that targets the internal Chain-of-Thought (CoT) process without requiring ground-truth annotations. By formalizing the notion of consistency verifiers—reward functions that check for geometric and semantic consistency under transformations like flipping or swapping the order of objects in the question—and optimizing them via our new OT-GRPO strategy, a minimal-consistency matching variant of group relative policy optimization, we demonstrate that models can self-correct their spatial logic. Our results show that this label-free consistency training approaches the accuracy of models trained with ground-truth supervision and achieves similar generalization across diverse tasks and domains.

Temporal Grounding (TG) aims to localize video segments corresponding to a textual query. Prior research predominantly focuses on single-segment retrieval. Real-world scenarios, however, often require localizing multiple disjoint segments for a single query—a setting we term **One-to-Many Temporal Grounding (OMTG)**. Previous state-of-the-art MLLMs, optimized for one-to-one settings, struggle in this context, often yielding near-zero scores due to a lack of event cardinality perception. To bridge this gap, we present a systematic solution with three key contributions. First, we establish the first comprehensive OMTG benchmark, introducing Count Accuracy (C-Acc) and Effective Temporal F1 (EtF1) as evaluation metrics. Second, we curate a high-quality OMTG dataset comprising 56k samples through a sophisticated construction pipeline. Third, we develop novel temporal and caption reward functions specifically designed for OMTG. In particular, the caption reward leverages Chain-of-Thought reasoning over dense video captions to explicitly guide policy optimization toward both preciseness and completeness. Extensive experiments show our model achieves a new state-of-the-art EtF1 of 43.65\% on OMTG Bench, outperforming Gemini 2.5 Pro and Seed-1.8 by 15.85\% and 15.61\%, respectively.

This paper investigates a pivotal yet debated component of reinforcement learning (RL) for training large language models (LLMs): controlling entropy (increasing or decreasing it) during RL fine-tuning. The existing literature presents a dichotomy: some studies posit that increasing entropy facilitates exploration, whereas others argue that decreasing entropy enhances performance. To reconcile these conflicting observations, we provide a theoretical framework showing that the effect of entropy is governed by \emph{Entropy Discrepancy}, the distributional divergence between positive and negative samples. Guided by this insight, we derive a principled dynamic scheduling method that adaptively modulates the entropy coefficient, effectively switching between entropy maximization and minimization as training evolves. Extensive experiments confirm the correlation between Entropy Discrepancy and the efficacy of entropy control. Furthermore, our adaptive method yields substantial improvements, boosting Pass@K by 6.7\% on AIME24 and 17.52\% on puzzle tasks compared to vanilla RL, while consistently outperforming recent state-of-the-art reasoning methods.

Reinforcement Learning (RL) for Large Language Models (LLMs) often suffers from training collapse in long-horizon tasks due to exploding gradient variance. To mitigate this, a baseline is commonly introduced for advantage computation; however, traditional value models remain difficult to optimize, and standard group-based baselines overlook sequence heterogeneity. Although classic optimal baseline theory can achieve global variance reduction, it neglects token heterogeneity and requires prohibitive gradient-based computation. In this work, we derive the Optimal Token Baseline (OTB) from first principles, proving that gradient updates should be weighted inversely to their cumulative gradient norm. To ensure efficiency, we propose the Logit-Gradient Proxy that approximates the gradient norm using only forward-pass probabilities. Our method achieves training stability and matches the performance of large group sizes ($N=32$) with only $N=4$, reducing token consumption by over 65\% across single-turn and tool-integrated reasoning tasks.

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models enable sparse expert activation, meaning that only a subset of the model’s parameters is used during each inference. However, to translate this sparsity into practical performance, an expert caching mechanism is required. Previous works have proposed hardware-centric caching policies, but how these various caching policies interact with each other and different hardware specification remains poorly understood. To address this gap, we develop \textbf{SpecMD}, a standardized framework for benchmarking ad-hoc cache policies on various hardware configurations. Using SpecMD, we perform an exhaustive benchmarking of several MoE caching strategies, reproducing and extending prior approaches in controlled settings with realistic constraints. Our experiments reveal that MoE expert access is not consistent with temporal locality assumptions (e.g LRU, LFU). Motivated by this observation, we propose \textbf{Least-Stale}, a novel eviction policy that exploits MoE's predictable expert access patterns to reduce collision misses by up to $85\times$ over LRU. With such gains, we achieve over $88\%$ hit rates with up to $34.7\%$ Time-to-first-token (TTFT) reduction on OLMoE at only $5\%$ or $0.6GB$ of VRAM cache capacity.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate executable outputs, JSON objects, and API calls, where a single syntax error can make the output unusable. Constrained decoding enforces validity token-by-token via masking and renormalization, but it can distort generation when the model assigns low probability mass to valid continuations, pushing decoding toward locally valid yet semantically incorrect trajectories. We propose \emph{Draft-Conditioned Constrained Decoding (DCCD)}, a simple two-step, training-free inference procedure that decouples semantic planning from structural enforcement: an unconstrained draft is generated first, and constrained decoding is then applied, conditioned on this draft, to guarantee validity. We analyze DCCD through a KL-projection view, showing that draft conditioning increases feasible mass and reduces the cumulative “projection tax” induced by hard constraints, with an optional best-of-$K$ draft selection. Across structured reasoning benchmarks, DCCD improves strict structured accuracy by up to +24 percentage points over standard constrained decoding (e.g., 15.2\% to 39.0\% on GSM8K with a 1B model), and enables smaller model pairs to match or exceed much larger constrained baselines, yielding substantial gains in parameter efficiency.

For tool-augmented language models, comparing natural-language reasoning with code-execution pipelines is difficult because the comparison changes both the intermediate representation and the execution mechanism. We separate these factors with an intermediate intervention: the model expresses its reasoning as executable code, and the language model simulates that code in context to produce an answer. On a 40-task verifiable algorithmic benchmark, deterministic code execution outperforms natural-language reasoning by +31.6pp. We observe that the intermediate intervention is not meaningfully different from natural-language reasoning (+0.15pp). These results suggest that, in our evaluated setting, changing the intermediate representation alone does not explain the tool-use advantage, providing evidence for the performance gains requiring reliable external execution. We formalize this intuition with a simple statistical decision-theoretic model that characterizes when execution dominates end-to-end risk in our disentangled trace-generation/execution regime. We validate our theory using a reconstruction intervention that leverages a proxy language model to infer natural-language reasoning traces from code representations, recovering performance comparable to the original natural-language reasoning pipeline. All experiments are at https://github.com/TerryTong-Git/ToolProj.

Reinforcement learning has become a cornerstone for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models, where group-based approaches such as GRPO have emerged as efficient paradigms that optimize policies by leveraging intra-group performance differences. However, these methods typically rely on absolute numerical rewards, introducing intrinsic limitations. In verifiable tasks, identical group evaluations often result in sparse supervision, while in open-ended scenarios, the score range instability of reward models undermines advantage estimation based on group means. To address these limitations, we propose **Reinforcement Learning with Relative Rewards (RLRR)**, a framework that shifts reward shaping from absolute scoring to relative ranking. Complementing this framework, we introduce the **Ranking Reward Model**, a listwise preference model tailored for group-based optimization to directly generate relative rankings. By transforming raw evaluations into robust relative signals, RLRR effectively mitigates signal sparsity and reward instability. Experimental results demonstrate that RLRR yields consistent performance improvements over standard group-based baselines across reasoning benchmarks and open-ended generation tasks.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated strong perception and reasoning capabilities. However, most existing models focus on isolated objects and neglect structured relationships for efficient target navigation, limiting their performance on visually intensive tasks. To address this challenge, we introduce Scene Graph Thinking (SaGe), a novel paradigm that enables fine-grained and structured visual reasoning through explicit scene-graph representations. Specifically, we first introduce an automated data engine that converts flat image–text corpora into structured scene graphs, where hierarchical entities constitute the nodes and diverse visual relations define the edges. Building upon this, we construct 120K high-quality training data by sampling reasoning traces from scene graphs. Then two-stage graph-aligned post-training paradigms are introduced, where supervised fine-tuning internalizes MLLMs with structured reasoning, and subsequent reinforcement fine-tuning proposes node-as-proxy graph rewards to consolidate efficient graph exploration. With curated data and graph-aligned training, our approach achieves significant improvements across eight multimodal benchmarks, demonstrating strong effectiveness on fine-grained perception and reasoning tasks.

Traditional hallucination detection fails on "Stubborn Hallucinations" — errors where LLMs are confidently wrong. We propose a geometric solution: Embedding-Perturbed Gradient Sensitivity (EPGS). We hypothesize that while robust facts reside in flat minima, stubborn hallucinations sit in sharp minima, supported by brittle memorization. EPGS detects this sharpness by perturbing input embeddings with Gaussian noise and measuring the resulting spike in gradient magnitude. This acts as an efficient proxy for the Hessian spectrum, differentiating stable knowledge from unstable memorization. Our experiments show that EPGS significantly outperforms entropy-based and representation-based baselines, providing a robust signal for detecting high-confidence factual errors.

Diffusion language models (DLMs) have emerged as a promising alternative to autoregressive (AR) generation, yet their reliance on Transformer backbones limits inference efficiency due to quadratic attention or KV-cache overhead. We introduce DiffuMamba, a masked diffusion language model built on a bidirectional Mamba backbone that combines the diffusion objective with linear-time sequence modeling, and DiffuMamba-H, a hybrid variant with interleaved attention. Across scales up to 1.3B parameters, our models match Transformer-based diffusion in downstream performance while achieving up to 8.2× and 4.3× higher inference throughput, respectively, on long sequences. We further present a systematic analysis of inference efficiency across modern DLM variants, combining asymptotic complexity with empirical measurements. Notably, cache-efficient block diffusion with Mamba mixers emerges as the only strategy that scales linearly with sequence length and achieves the strongest performance across all baselines, suggesting a promising direction for future diffusion-based generation systems.

In modern AI research, baseline and dataset selection is a high-stakes decision in experimental design. It operationalizes a research idea into a concrete evaluation protocol and largely determines the validity and comparability of empirical conclusions. However, making appropriate choices is increasingly difficult as baselines and datasets proliferate, while suitability is inherently context-dependent and rarely captured by baseline and dataset metadata. To address these challenges, we present \textbf{AgentExpt}, a comprehensive framework for baseline and dataset recommendation. We first curate a large-scale, high-quality knowledge base that links 108{,}825 accepted papers to their used baselines and datasets. Based on this resource, we design a \textit{collective perception-enhanced retriever} that represents each baseline or dataset by integrating first-person self-descriptions with third-person citation contexts, thereby effectively positioning them within the scholarly network. We further design a \textit{reasoning-augmented reranker} that encodes baseline-dataset interaction chains as a reasoning prior to fine-tune an LLM, producing refined rankings with interpretable justifications. Experiments show that our framework outperforms the strongest baseline, with average gains of +5.85\% in Recall@20 and +7.90\% in HitRate@10, and ablation studies confirm the effectiveness of our designed components. Overall, AgentExpt advances the efficient and reliable automation of experimental design. Our code is available at \url{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Agentexpt-DD3E}.