Differential Privacy

Distributed data analysis is a large and growing field driven by a massive proliferation of user devices, and by privacy concerns surrounding the centralised storage of data. We consider two \emph{adaptive} algorithms for estimating one quantile (e.g.~the median) when each user holds a single data point lying in a domain $[B]$ that can be queried once through a private mechanism; one under local differential privacy (LDP) and another for shuffle differential privacy (shuffle-DP). In the adaptive setting we present an $\varepsilon$-LDP algorithm which can estimate any quantile within error $\alpha$ only requiring $O(\frac{\log B}{\varepsilon^2\alpha^2})$ users, and an $(\varepsilon,\delta)$-shuffle DP algorithm requiring only $\widetilde{O}((\frac{1}{\varepsilon^2}+\frac{1}{\alpha^2})\log B)$ users. Prior (nonadaptive) algorithms require more users by several logarithmic factors in $B$. We further provide a matching lower bound for adaptive protocols, showing that our LDP algorithm is optimal in the low-$\varepsilon$ regime. Additionally, we establish lower bounds against non-adaptive protocols which paired with our understanding of the adaptive case, proves a fundamental separation between these models.

We study the $\ell_2$ mechanism for computing a $d$-dimensional statistic with bounded $\ell_2$ sensitivity under approximate differential privacy. Across a range of privacy parameters, we find that the $\ell_2$ mechanism obtains error approaching that of the Laplace mechanism as $d \to 1$ and approaching that of the Gaussian mechanism as $d \to \infty$; however, it dominates both in between.

Estimating causal effects from randomized experiments is only possible if participants are willing to disclose their potentially sensitive responses. Differential privacy, a widely used framework for ensuring an algorithm’s privacy guarantees, can encourage participants to share their responses without the risk of de-anonymization. However, many mechanisms achieve differential privacy by adding noise to the original dataset, which reduces the precision of causal effect estimation. This introduces a fundamental trade-off between privacy and variance when performing causal analyses on differentially private data. In this work, we propose a new differentially private mechanism, \textsc{Cluster-DP}, which leverages a given cluster structure in the data to improve the privacy-variance trade-off. While our results apply to any clustering, we demonstrate that selecting higher-quality clusters—according to a quality metric we introduce—can decrease the variance penalty without compromising privacy guarantees. Finally, we evaluate the theoretical and empirical performance of our \textsc{Cluster-DP} algorithm on both real and simulated data, comparing it to common baselines, including two special cases of our algorithm: its unclustered version and a uniform-prior version.

We propose a unified optimization framework for designing continuous and discrete noise distributions that ensure differential privacy (DP) by minimizing Rényi DP, a variant of DP, under a cost constraint. Rényi DP has the advantage that by considering different values of the Rényi parameter $\alpha$, we can tailor our optimization for any number of compositions. To solve the optimization problem, we reduce it to a finite-dimensional convex formulation and perform preconditioned gradient descent. The resulting noise distributions are then compared to their Gaussian and Laplace counterparts. Numerical results demonstrate that our optimized distributions are consistently better, with significant improvements in $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-DP guarantees in the moderate composition regimes, compared to Gaussian and Laplace distributions with the same variance.

We study private prediction where differential privacy is achieved by adding noise to the outputs of a non-private model. Existing methods rely on noise proportional to the global sensitivity of the model, often resulting in sub-optimal privacy-utility trade-offs compared to private training. We introduce a novel approach for computing dataset-specific upper bounds on prediction sensitivity by leveraging convex relaxation and bound propagation techniques. By combining these bounds with the smooth sensitivity mechanism, we significantly improve the privacy analysis of private prediction compared to global sensitivity-based approaches. Experimental results across real-world datasets in medical image classification and natural language processing demonstrate that our sensitivity bounds are can be orders of magnitude tighter than global sensitivity. Our approach provides a strong basis for the development of novel privacy preserving technologies.

Machine Unlearning (MU) aims at removing the influence of specific data points from a trained model, striving to achieve this at a fraction of the cost of full model retraining. In this paper, we analyze the efficiency of unlearning methods and establish the first upper and lower bounds on minimax computation times for this problem, characterizing the performance of the most efficient algorithm against the most difficult objective function. Specifically, for strongly convex objective functions and under the assumption that the forget data is inaccessible to the unlearning method, we provide a phase diagram for the *unlearning complexity ratio*---a novel metric that compares the computational cost of the best unlearning method to full model retraining. The phase diagram reveals three distinct regimes: one where unlearning at a reduced cost is infeasible, another where unlearning is trivial because adding noise suffices, and a third where unlearning achieves significant computational advantages over retraining. These findings highlight the critical role of factors such as data dimensionality, the number of samples to forget, and privacy constraints in determining the practical feasibility of unlearning.

The prevalent distributed machine learning paradigm faces two critical challenges: communication efficiency and data privacy. SIGNSGD provides a simple-to-implement approach with improved communication efficiency by requiring workers to share only the signs of the gradients. However, it fails to converge in the presence of data heterogeneity, and a simple fix is to add Gaussian noise before taking the signs, which leads to the Noisy SIGNSGD algorithm that enjoys competitive performance while significantly reducing the communication overhead. Existing results suggest that Noisy SIGNSGD with additive Gaussian noise has the same privacy guarantee as classic DP-SGD due to the post-processing property of differential privacy, and logistic noise may be a good alternative to Gaussian noise when combined with the sign-based compressor. Nonetheless, discarding the magnitudes in Noisy SIGNSGD leads to information loss, which may intuitively amplify privacy. In this paper, we make this intuition rigorous and quantify the privacy amplification of the sign-based compressor. Particularly, we analytically show that Gaussian noise leads to a smaller estimation error than logistic noise when combined with the sign-based compressor and may be more suitable for distributed learning with heterogeneous data. Then, we further establish the convergence of Noisy SIGNSGD. Finally, extensive experiments are conducted to validate the theoretical results.

We propose Plausible Token Amplification (PTA) to improve the accuracy of Differentially Private In-Context Learning (DP-ICL) using DP synthetic demonstrations. While Tang et al. empirically improved the accuracy of DP-ICL by limiting vocabulary space during DP synthetic demonstration generation, its theoretical basis remains unexplored. By interpreting ICL as implicit Bayesian inference on a concept underlying demonstrations, we not only provide theoretical evidence supporting Tang et al.'s empirical method but also introduce PTA, a refined method for modifying next-token probability distribution. Through the modification, PTA highlights tokens that distinctly represent the ground-truth concept underlying the original demonstrations. As a result, generated DP synthetic demonstrations guide the Large Language Model to successfully infer the ground-truth concept, which improves the accuracy of DP-ICL. Experimental evaluations on both synthetic and real-world text-classification datasets validated the effectiveness of PTA.

Cardinality sketches are compact data structures that efficiently estimate the number of distinct elements across multiple queries while minimizing storage, communication, and computational costs. However, recent research has shown that these sketches can fail under {\em adaptively chosen queries}, breaking down after approximately $\tilde{O}(k^2)$ queries, where $k$ is the sketch size. In this work, we overcome this \emph{quadratic barrier} by designing robust estimators with fine-grained guarantees. Specifically, our constructions can handle an {\em exponential number of adaptive queries}, provided that each element participates in at most $\tilde{O}(k^2)$ queries. This effectively shifts the quadratic barrier from the total number of queries to the number of queries {\em sharing the same element}, which can be significantly smaller. Beyond cardinality sketches, our approach expands the toolkit for robust algorithm design.

Estimating optimal transport maps between two distributions from respective samples is an important element for many machine learning methods. To do so, rather than extending discrete transport maps, it has been shown that estimating the Brenier potential of the transport problem and obtaining a transport map through its gradient is near minimax optimal for smooth problems. In this paper, we investigate the private estimation of such potentials and transport maps with respect to the distribution samples. We propose a differentially private transport map estimator with $L^2$ error at most $n^{-1} \vee n^{-\frac{2 \alpha}{2 \alpha - 2 + d}} \vee (n\epsilon)^{-\frac{2 \alpha}{2 \alpha + d}} $ up do polylog terms where $n$ is the sample size, $\epsilon$ is the desired level of privacy, $\alpha$ is the smoothness of the true transport map, and $d$ is the dimension of the feature space. We also provide a lower bound for the problem.

We propose the notion of empirical privacy variance and study it in the context of differentially private fine-tuning of language models. Specifically, we show that models calibrated to the same $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-DP guarantee using DP-SGD with different hyperparameter configurations can exhibit significant variations in empirical privacy, which we quantify through the lens of memorization. We investigate the generality of this phenomenon across multiple dimensions and discuss why it is surprising and relevant. Through regression analysis, we examine how individual and composite hyperparameters influence empirical privacy. The results reveal a no-free-lunch trade-off: existing practices of hyperparameter tuning in DP-SGD, which focus on optimizing utility under a fixed privacy budget, often come at the expense of empirical privacy. To address this, we propose refined heuristics for hyperparameter selection that explicitly account for empirical privacy, showing that they are both precise and practically useful. Finally, we take preliminary steps to understand empirical privacy variance. We propose two hypotheses, identify limitations in existing techniques like privacy auditing, and outline open questions for future research.

We design new differentially private algorithms for the problems of adversarial bandits and bandits with expert advice. For adversarial bandits, we give a simple and efficient conversion of any non-private bandit algorithm to a private bandit algorithm. Instantiating our conversion with existing non-private bandit algorithms gives a regret upper bound of $O\left(\frac{\sqrt{KT}}{\sqrt{\epsilon}}\right)$, improving upon the existing upper bound $O\left(\frac{\sqrt{KT \log(KT)}}{\epsilon}\right)$ for all $\epsilon \leq 1$. In particular, our algorithms allow for sublinear expected regret even when $\epsilon \leq \frac{1}{\sqrt{T}}$, establishing the first known separation between central and local differential privacy for this problem. For bandits with expert advice, we give the first differentially private algorithms, with expected regret $O\left(\frac{\sqrt{NT}}{\sqrt{\epsilon}}\right), O\left(\frac{\sqrt{KT\log(N)}\log(KT)}{\epsilon}\right)$, and $\tilde{O}\left(\frac{N^{1/6}K^{1/2}T^{2/3}\log(NT)}{\epsilon ^{1/3}} + \frac{N^{1/2}\log(NT)}{\epsilon}\right)$, where $K$ and $N$ are the number of actions and experts respectively. These rates allow us to get sublinear regret for different combinations of small and large $K, N$ and $\epsilon.$

Koufogiannis et al. (2016) showed a $\textit{gradual release}$ result for Laplace noise-based differentially private mechanisms: given an $\varepsilon$-DP release, a new release with privacy parameter $\varepsilon' > \varepsilon$ can be computed such that the combined privacy loss of both releases is at most $\varepsilon'$ and the distribution of the latter is the same as a single release with parameter $\varepsilon'$. They also showed gradual release techniques for Gaussian noise, later also explored by Whitehouse et al. (2022). In this paper, we consider a more general $\textit{multiple release}$ setting in which analysts hold private releases with different privacy parameters corresponding to different access/trust levels. These releases are determined one by one, with privacy parameters in arbitrary order. A multiple release is $\textit{lossless}$ if having access to a subset $S$ of the releases has the same privacy guarantee as the least private release in $S$, and each release has the same distribution as a single release with the same privacy parameter. Our main result is that lossless multiple release is possible for a large class of additive noise mechanisms. For the Gaussian mechanism we give a simple method for lossless multiple release with a short, self-contained analysis that does not require knowledge of the mathematics of Brownian motion. We also present lossless multiple release for the Laplace and Poisson mechanisms. Finally, we consider how to efficiently do gradual release of sparse histograms, and present a mechanism with running time independent of the number of dimensions.

This paper aims to provide differential privacy (DP) guarantees for Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms. In a first part, we establish DP guarantees on samples output by MCMC algorithms as well as Monte Carlo estimators associated with these methods under assumptions on the convergence properties of the underlying Markov chain. In particular, our results highlight the critical condition of ensuring the target distribution is differentially private itself. In a second part, we specialise our analysis to the unadjusted Langevin algorithm and stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics and establish guarantees on their (Rényi) DP. To this end, we develop a novel methodology based on Girsanov's theorem combined with a perturbation trick to obtain bounds for an unbounded domain and in a non-convex setting. We establish: (i) uniform in $n$ privacy guarantees when the state of the chain after $n$ iterations is released, (ii) bounds on the privacy of the entire chain trajectory. These findings provide concrete guidelines for privacy-preserving MCMC.

Recently differential privacy has been used for a number of streaming, data structure, and dynamic graph problems as a means of hiding the internal randomness of the data structure, so that multiple possibly adaptive queries can be made without sacrificing the correctness of the responses. Although these works use differential privacy to show that for some problems it is possible to tolerate $T$ queries using $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ copies of a data structure, such results only apply to {\it numerical estimation problems}, and only return the {\it cost} of an optimization problem rather than the solution itself. In this paper we investigate the use of differential privacy for adaptive queries to {\it search} problems, which are significantly more challenging since the responses to queries can reveal much more about the internal randomness than a single numerical query. We focus on two classical search problems: nearest neighbor queries and regression with arbitrary turnstile updates. We identify key parameters to these problems, such as the number of $c$-approximate near neighbors and the matrix condition number, and use different differential privacy techniques to design algorithms returning the solution point or solution vector with memory and time depending on these parameters. We give algorithms for each of these problems that achieve similar tradeoffs.

We study model personalization under user-level differential privacy (DP) in the shared representation framework. In this problem, there are $n$ users whose data is statistically heterogeneous, and their optimal parameters share an unknown embedding $U^* \in\mathbb{R}^{d\times k}$ that maps the user parameters in $\mathbb{R}^d$ to low-dimensional representations in $\mathbb{R}^k$, where $k\ll d$. Our goal is to privately recover the shared embedding and the local low-dimensional representations with small excess risk in the federated setting. We propose a private, efficient federated learning algorithm to learn the shared embedding based on the FedRep algorithm in (Collins et al., 2021). Unlike (Collins et al., 2021), our algorithm satisfies differential privacy, and our results hold for the case of noisy labels. In contrast to prior work on private model personalization (Jain et al., 2021), our utility guarantees hold under a larger class of users' distributions (sub-Gaussian instead of Gaussian distributions). Additionally, in natural parameter regimes, we improve the privacy error term in (Jain et al., 2021) by a factor of $\widetilde{O}(dk)$. Next, we consider the binary classification setting. We present an information-theoretic construction to privately learn the shared embedding and derive a margin-based accuracy guarantee that is independent of $d$. Our method utilizes the Johnson-Lindenstrauss transform to reduce the effective dimensions of the shared embedding and the users' data. This result shows that dimension-independent risk bounds are possible in this setting under a margin loss.

Despite the potential of differentially private data visualization to harmonize data analysis and privacy, research in this area remains underdeveloped. Boxplots are a widely popular visualization used for summarizing a dataset and for comparison of multiple datasets. Consequentially, we introduce a differentially private boxplot. We evaluate its effectiveness for displaying location, scale, skewness and tails of a given empirical distribution. In our theoretical exposition, we show that the location and scale of the boxplot are estimated with optimal sample complexity, and the skewness and tails are estimated consistently, which is not always the case for a boxplot naively constructed from a single existing differentially private quantile algorithm. As a byproduct of this exposition, we introduce several new results concerning private quantile estimation. In simulations, we show that this boxplot performs similarly to a non-private boxplot, and it outperforms the naive boxplot. Additionally, we conduct a real data analysis of Airbnb listings, which shows that comparable analysis can be achieved through differentially private boxplot visualization.

Traditional conformal prediction faces significant challenges with the rise of streaming data and increasing concerns over privacy. In this paper, we introduce a novel online differentially private conformal prediction framework, designed to construct dynamic, model-free private prediction sets. Unlike existing approaches that either disregard privacy or require full access to the entire dataset, our proposed method ensures individual privacy with a one-pass algorithm, ideal for real-time, privacy-preserving decision-making. Theoretically, we establish guarantees for long-run coverage at the nominal confidence level. Moreover, we extend our method to conformal quantile regression, which is fully adaptive to heteroscedasticity. We validate the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed method through comprehensive simulations and real-world studies on the ELEC2 and PAMAP2 datasets.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained significant popularity due to their remarkable capabilities in text understanding and generation. However, despite their widespread deployment in inference services such as ChatGPT, concerns about the potential leakage of sensitive user data have arisen. Existing solutions primarily rely on privacy-enhancing technologies to mitigate such risks, facing the trade-off among efficiency, privacy, and utility. To narrow this gap, we propose Cape, a context-aware prompt perturbation mechanism based on differential privacy, to enable efficient inference with an improved privacy-utility trade-off. Concretely, we introduce a hybrid utility function that better captures the token similarity. Additionally, we propose a bucketized sampling mechanism to handle large sampling space, which might lead to long-tail phenomenons. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets, along with ablation studies, demonstrate that Cape achieves a better privacy-utility trade-off compared to prior state-of-the-art works.

Many forms of sensitive data, such as web traffic, mobility data, or hospital occupancy, are inherently sequential. The standard method for training machine learning models while ensuring privacy for units of sensitive information, such as individual hospital visits, is differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD). However, we observe in this work that the formal guarantees of DP-SGD are incompatible with time series specific tasks like forecasting, since they rely on the *privacy amplification* attained by training on small, unstructured batches sampled from an unstructured dataset. In contrast, batches for forecasting are generated by (1) sampling sequentially structured time series from a dataset, (2) sampling contiguous subsequences from these series, and (3) partitioning them into context and ground-truth forecast windows. We theoretically analyze the privacy amplification attained by this *structured subsampling* to enable the training of forecasting models with sound and tight event- and user-level privacy guarantees. Towards more private models, we additionally prove how data augmentation amplifies privacy in self-supervised training of sequence models. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates that amplification by structured subsampling enables the training of forecasting models with strong formal privacy guarantees.