Paper list

Theory · statistics

Shows title, authors, abstract, and links. Abstract language follows current locale with fallback.

Topic profile

Precomputed snapshot — no live database aggregation

Open full trend page

Papers by year

By venue

Results 7

Decomposition Polyhedra of Piecewise Linear Functions

Marie-Charlotte Brandenburg, Moritz Leo Grillo, Christoph Hertrich

In this paper we contribute to the frequently studied question of how to decompose a continuous piecewise linear (CPWL) function into a difference of two convex CPWL functions. Every CPWL function has infinitely many such decompositions, but for applications in optimization and neural network theory, it is crucial to find decompositions with as few linear pieces as possible. This is a highly challenging problem, as we further demonstrate by disproving a recently proposed approach by Tran and Wang [Minimal representations of tropical rational functions. Algebraic Statistics, 15(1):27–59, 2024]. To make the problem more tractable, we propose to fix an underlying polyhedral complex determining the possible locus of nonlinearity. Under this assumption, we prove that the set of decompositions forms a polyhedron that arises as intersection of two translated cones. We prove that irreducible decompositions correspond to the bounded faces of this polyhedron and minimal solutions must be vertices. We then identify cases with a unique minimal decomposition, and illustrate how our insights have consequences in the theory of submodular functions. Finally, we improve upon previous constructions of neural networks for a given convex CPWL function and apply our framework to obtain results in the nonconvex case.

Improving Pretraining Data Using Perplexity Correlations

Tristan Thrush, Christopher Potts, Tatsunori Hashimoto

Quality pretraining data is often seen as the key to high-performance language models. However, progress in understanding pretraining data has been slow due to the costly pretraining runs required for data selection experiments. We present a framework that avoids these costs and selects high-quality pretraining data without any LLM training of our own. Our work is based on a simple observation: LLM losses on many pretraining texts are correlated with downstream benchmark performance, and selecting high-correlation documents is an effective pretraining data selection method. We build a new statistical framework for data selection centered around estimates of perplexity-benchmark correlations and perform data selection using a sample of 90 LLMs taken from the Open LLM Leaderboard on texts from tens of thousands of web domains. In controlled pretraining experiments at the 160M parameter scale on 8 benchmarks, our approach outperforms DSIR on every benchmark, while matching the best data selector found in DataComp-LM, a hand-engineered bigram classifier. We have now also updated this paper to include results from preregistered experiments with new pretraining data on an aggregation of 22 benchmarks up to the 1.4B scale, showing increasing improvements of our method over others with more scale. A pip package with full documentation can be found here: https://github.com/TristanThrush/perplexity-correlations.

From Risk to Uncertainty: Generating Predictive Uncertainty Measures via Bayesian Estimation

Nikita Kotelevskii, Vladimir Kondratyev, Martin Takáč, Eric Moulines, Maxim Panov

There are various measures of predictive uncertainty in the literature, but their relationships to each other remain unclear. This paper uses a decomposition of statistical pointwise risk into components associated with different sources of predictive uncertainty: namely, aleatoric uncertainty (inherent data variability) and epistemic uncertainty (model-related uncertainty). Together with Bayesian methods applied as approximations, we build a framework that allows one to generate different predictive uncertainty measures. We validate measures, derived from our framework on image datasets by evaluating its performance in detecting out-of-distribution and misclassified instances using the AUROC metric. The experimental results confirm that the measures derived from our framework are useful for the considered downstream tasks.

Oracle efficient truncated statistics

Konstantinos Karatapanis, Vasilis Kontonis, Christos Tzamos

We study the problem of learning from truncated samples: instead of observing samples from some underlying population $p^\ast$, we observe only the examples that fall in some survival set $S \subset \mathbb{R}^d$ whose probability mass (measured with respect to $p^\ast$) is at least $\alpha$. Assuming membership oracle access to the truncation set $S$, prior works obtained algorithms for the case where $p^\ast$ is Gaussian or more generally an exponential family with strongly convex likelihood --- albeit with a super-polynomial dependency on the (inverse) survival mass $1/\alpha$ both in terms of runtime and in number of oracle calls to the set $S$. In this work we design a new learning method with runtime and query complexity polynomial in $1/\alpha$. Our result significantly improves over the prior works by focusing on efficiently solving the underlying optimization problem using a general purpose optimization algorithm with minimal assumptions.

The Breakdown of Gaussian Universality in Classification of High-dimensional Linear Factor Mixtures

Xiaoyi MAI, Zhenyu Liao

The assumption of Gaussian or Gaussian mixture data has been extensively exploited in a long series of precise performance analyses of machine learning (ML) methods, on large datasets having comparably numerous samples and features. To relax this restrictive assumption, subsequent efforts have been devoted to establish "Gaussian equivalent principles" by studying scenarios of Gaussian universality where the asymptotic performance of ML methods on non-Gaussian data remains unchanged when replaced with Gaussian data having the *same mean and covariance*. Beyond the realm of Gaussian universality, there are few exact results on how the data distribution affects the learning performance. In this article, we provide a precise high-dimensional characterization of empirical risk minimization, for classification under a general mixture data setting of *linear factor models* that extends Gaussian mixtures. The Gaussian universality is shown to break down under this setting, in the sense that the asymptotic learning performance depends on the data distribution *beyond* the class means and covariances. To clarify the limitations of Gaussian universality in the classification of mixture data and to understand the impact of its breakdown, we specify conditions for Gaussian universality and discuss their implications for the choice of loss function.

Bayesian Treatment of the Spectrum of the Empirical Kernel in (Sub)Linear-Width Neural Networks

Ouns El Harzli, Bernardo Cuenca Grau

We study Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) in the theoretical limits of infinitely increasing number of training examples, network width and input space dimension. Our findings establish new bridges between kernel-theoretic approaches and techniques derived from statistical mechanics through the correspondence between Mercer's eigenvalues and limiting spectral distributions of covariance matrices studied in random matrix theory. Our theoretical contributions first consist in novel integral formulas that accurately describe the predictors of BNNs in the asymptotic linear-width and sublinear-width regimes. Moreover, we extend the recently developed renormalisation theory of deep linear neural networks, enabling a rigorous explanation of the mounting empirical evidence that hints at the theory's applicability to nonlinear BNNs with ReLU activations in the linear-width regime. From a practical standpoint, our results introduce a novel technique for estimating the predictor statistics of a trained BNN that is applicable to the sublinear-width regime where the predictions of the renormalisation theory are inaccurate.

When does compositional structure yield compositional generalization? A kernel theory.

Samuel Lippl, Kim Stachenfeld

Compositional generalization (the ability to respond correctly to novel combinations of familiar components) is thought to be a cornerstone of intelligent behavior. Compositionally structured (e.g. disentangled) representations support this ability; however, the conditions under which they are sufficient for the emergence of compositional generalization remain unclear. To address this gap, we present a theory of compositional generalization in kernel models with fixed, compositionally structured representations. This provides a tractable framework for characterizing the impact of training data statistics on generalization. We find that these models are limited to functions that assign values to each combination of components seen during training, and then sum up these values ("conjunction-wise additivity"). This imposes fundamental restrictions on the set of tasks compositionally structured kernel models can learn, in particular preventing them from transitively generalizing equivalence relations. Even for compositional tasks that they can learn in principle, we identify novel failure modes in compositional generalization (memorization leak and shortcut bias) that arise from biases in the training data. Finally, we empirically validate our theory, showing that it captures the behavior of deep neural networks (convolutional networks, residual networks, and Vision Transformers) trained on a set of compositional tasks with similarly structured data. Ultimately, this work examines how statistical structure in the training data can affect compositional generalization, with implications for how to identify and remedy failure modes in deep learning models.

Theory · statistics · ICLR 2025 | paperlist.ai