CVPR 2026 Papers

Multimodal large reasoning models (MLRMs) often suffer from hallucinations that stem not only from insufficient visual grounding but also from imbalanced allocation between perception and reasoning processes. Building upon recent interpretability findings suggesting a staged division of attention across layers, we analyze how this functional misalignment leads to two complementary failure modes: perceptual bias in shallow layers and reasoning drift in deeper layers. To alleviate these issues, we propose Functional Head Identification and Class-Conditioned Rescaling, a lightweight, training-free plugin that identifies perception- and reasoning-oriented heads and adaptively rebalances their layerwise contributions. Our method improves reasoning consistency and visual faithfulness without retraining or any architectural modification. Evaluations across three representative MLRMs and five multimodal reasoning benchmarks show an average 4.2 percentage-point gain, with less than 1% additional computation and only 9% baseline latency. Beyond empirical improvements, our study provides an interpretable perspective on regulating cross-layer functional dynamics to enhance the reliability of multimodal reasoning.

Computer-Aided Design (CAD) is essential in industrial design, but the complexity of traditional CAD modeling and workflows presents significant challenges for automating the generation of high-precision, editable CAD models. Existing methods, such as 3D reconstruction from sketches, often produce non-editable, approximate models that fall short of meeting the stringent requirements for precision and editability in industrial design. Moreover, the reliance on text or image-based inputs often requires significant manual annotation, limiting their scalability and applicability in industrial settings. To overcome these challenges, we propose the Heterogeneous Collaborative Multi-Expert Reinforcement Learning (CME-CAD) paradigm, a novel training paradigm for CAD code generation. Our approach integrates the complementary strengths of these models, facilitating collaborative learning and improving the model's ability to generate accurate, constraint-compatible, and fully editable CAD models. We introduce a two-stage training process: Multi-Expert Fine-Tuning (MEFT), and Multi-Expert Reinforcement Learning (MERL). Additionally, we present CADExpert, an open-source benchmark consisting of 17,299 instances, including orthographic projections with precise dimension annotations, expert-generated Chain-of-Thought (CoT) processes, executable CADQuery code, and rendered 3D models. The CADExpert dataset is publicly available at https://modelscope.cn/datasets/zhuofanChen/CADExpert.

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are emerging as an important technology in autonomous driving, recognized for their sophisticated reasoning and interpretability. However, traditional VLA models often rely on image-to-text with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, which converts sequential visual scenes into textual symbols, thereby under-utilizing spatial context in visual information. Existing autonomous driving systems using VLA models predict only a single sequence of waypoints as a trajectory considering a given command and multiple aspects. However, we suggest evaluating each sequence of waypoints to reveal the importance of the corresponding aspect. We introduce HybridDriveVLA, a VLA model that integrates visual Chain-of-Thought (V-Cot) reasoning and a proposed Tree-of-Thought (ToT)-inspired waypoint evaluation (ToT-evaluation). V-Cot reasoning anticipates future scenes, which serve as goals for ToT-evaluation. The ToT-evaluation generates and scores waypoints based each on safety, progress, and comfort aspects. The highest cumulated score of the waypoints based on the three aspects is optimal. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to propose a unified method integrating both a CoT and a ToT approach in a VLA model. Experimental results demonstrated that HybridDriveVLA achieved strong performance on comfort, progress, and safety metrics with and average collision rate of 0.17% on the nuScenes benchmark, outperforming traditional VLA models.