COLT 2024 Papers

Conference on Learning Theory

Decision breakdown

170papers

Counted from the official paper list; may differ slightly from the number the conference announced.

  • Poster
    170100.0%

Top 10 topics (click to filter)

No topic data yet.

Trends for all 207 research topics

Browse all papers

Safe Linear Bandits over Unknown Polytopes

Aditya Gangrade, Tianrui Chen, Venkatesh Saligrama

Expand abstract

The safe linear bandit problem (SLB) is an online approach to linear programming with unknown objective and unknown \emph{roundwise} constraints, under stochastic bandit feedback of rewards and safety risks of actions. We study the tradeoffs between efficacy and smooth safety costs of SLBs over polytopes, and the role of aggressive {doubly-optimistic play} in avoiding the strong assumptions made by extant pessimistic-optimistic approaches. We first elucidate an inherent hardness in SLBs due the lack of knowledge of constraints: there exist ‘easy’ instances, for which suboptimal extreme points have large ‘gaps’, but on which SLB methods must still incur $\Omega(\sqrt{T})$ regret or safety violations, due to an inability to resolve unknown optima to arbitrary precision. We then analyse a natural doubly-optimistic strategy for the safe linear bandit problem, \textsc{doss}, which uses optimistic estimates of both reward and safety risks to select actions, and show that despite the lack of knowledge of constraints or feasible points, \textsc{doss} simultaneously obtains tight instance-dependent $O(\log^2 T)$ bounds on efficacy regret, and $\widetilde O(\sqrt{T})$ bounds on safety violations, thus attaining near Pareto-optimality. Further, when safety is demanded to a finite precision, violations improve to $O(\log^2 T).$ These results rely on a novel dual analysis of linear bandits: we argue that \textsc{doss} proceeds by activating noisy versions of at least $d$ constraints in each round, which allows us to separately analyse rounds where a ‘poor’ set of constraints is activated, and rounds where ‘good’ sets of constraints are activated. The costs in the former are controlled to $O(\log^2 T)$ by developing new dual notions of gaps, based on global sensitivity analyses of linear programs, that quantify the suboptimality of each such set of constraints. The latter costs are controlled to $O(1)$ by explicitly analysing the solutions of optimistic play.

Poster
Robust Distribution Learning with Local and Global Adversarial Corruptions (extended abstract)

Sloan Nietert, Ziv Goldfeld, Soroosh Shafiee

Expand abstract

We consider learning in an adversarial environment, where an $\varepsilon$-fraction of samples from a distribution $P$ are arbitrarily modified (\emph{global} corruptions) and the remaining perturbations have average magnitude bounded by $\rho$ (\emph{local} corruptions). Given access to $n$ such corrupted samples, we seek a computationally efficient estimator $\hat{P}_n$ that minimizes the Wasserstein distance $W_1(\hat{P}_n,P)$. In fact, we attack the fine-grained task of minimizing $W_1(\Pi_\sharp \hat{P}_n, \Pi_\sharp P)$ for all orthogonal projections $\Pi \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times d}$, with performance scaling with $\mathrm{rank}(\Pi) = k$. This allows us to account simultaneously for mean estimation ($k=1$), distribution estimation ($k=d$), as well as the settings interpolating between these two extremes. We characterize the optimal population-limit risk for this task and then develop an efficient finite-sample algorithm with error bounded by $\sqrt{\varepsilon k} + \rho + \tilde{O}(k\sqrt{d}n^{-1/k})$ when $P$ has bounded covariance. Our efficient procedure relies on a novel trace norm approximation of an ideal yet intractable 2-Wasserstein projection estimator. We apply this algorithm to robust stochastic optimization, and, in the process, uncover a new method for overcoming the curse of dimensionality in Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization.

Poster
Risk-Sensitive Online Algorithms (Extended Abstract)

Nicolas Christianson, Bo Sun, Steven Low, Adam Wierman

Expand abstract

We study the design of risk-sensitive online algorithms, in which risk measures are used in the competitive analysis of randomized online algorithms. We introduce the CVaR$_\delta$-competitive ratio ($\delta$-CR) using the conditional value-at-risk of an algorithm’s cost, which measures the expectation of the $(1-\delta)$-fraction of worst outcomes against the offline optimal cost, and use this measure to study three online optimization problems: continuous-time ski rental, discrete-time ski rental, and one-max search. The structure of the optimal $\delta$-CR and algorithm varies significantly between problems: we prove that the optimal $\delta$-CR for continuous-time ski rental is $2-2^{-\Theta(\frac{1}{1-\delta})}$, obtained by an algorithm described by a delay differential equation. In contrast, in discrete-time ski rental with buying cost $B$, there is an abrupt phase transition at $\delta = 1 - \Theta(\frac{1}{\log B})$, after which the classic deterministic strategy is optimal. Similarly, one-max search exhibits a phase transition at $\delta = \frac{1}{2}$, after which the classic deterministic strategy is optimal; we also obtain an algorithm that is asymptotically optimal as $\delta \todown 0$ that arises as the solution to a delay differential equation.

Poster
Regularization and Optimal Multiclass Learning

Julian Asilis, Siddartha Devic, Shaddin Dughmi, Vatsal Sharan, Shang-Hua Teng

Expand abstract

The quintessential learning algorithm of empirical risk minimization (ERM) is known to fail in various settings for which uniform convergence does not characterize learning. Relatedly, the practice of machine learning is rife with considerably richer algorithmic techniques, perhaps the most notable of which is regularization. Nevertheless, no such technique or principle has broken away from the pack to characterize optimal learning in these more general settings. The purpose of this work is to precisely characterize the role of regularization in perhaps the simplest setting for which ERM fails: multiclass learning with arbitrary label sets. Using one-inclusion graphs (OIGs), we exhibit optimal learning algorithms that dovetail with tried-and-true algorithmic principles: Occam’s Razor as embodied by structural risk minimization (SRM), the principle of maximum entropy, and Bayesian inference. We also extract from OIGs a combinatorial sequence we term the Hall complexity, which is the first to characterize a problem’s transductive error rate exactly. Lastly, we introduce a generalization of OIGs and the transductive learning setting to the agnostic case, where we show that optimal orientations of Hamming graphs – judged using nodes’ outdegrees minus a system of node-dependent credits – characterize optimal learners exactly. We demonstrate that an agnostic version of the Hall complexity again characterizes error rates exactly, and exhibit an optimal learner using maximum entropy programs.

Poster
Refined Sample Complexity for Markov Games with Independent Linear Function Approximation (Extended Abstract)

Yan Dai, Qiwen Cui, Simon S. Du

Expand abstract

Markov Games (MG) is an important model for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL). It was long believed that the “curse of multi-agents” (i.e., the algorithmic performance drops exponentially with the number of agents) is unavoidable until several recent works (Daskalakis et al., 2023; Cui et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023). While these works resolved the curse of multi-agents, when the state spaces are prohibitively large and (linear) function approximations are deployed, they either had a slower convergence rate of $O(T^{-1/4})$ or brought a polynomial dependency on the number of actions $A_{\max}$ – which is avoidable in single-agent cases even when the loss functions can arbitrarily vary with time. This paper first refines the AVLPR framework by Wang et al. (2023), with an insight of designing \textit{data-dependent} (i.e., stochastic) pessimistic estimation of the sub-optimality gap, allowing a broader choice of plug-in algorithms. When specialized to MGs with independent linear function approximations, we propose novel \textit{action-dependent bonuses} to cover occasionally extreme estimation errors. With the help of state-of-the-art techniques from the single-agent RL literature, we give the first algorithm that tackles the curse of multi-agents, attains the optimal $O(T^{-1/2})$ convergence rate, and avoids $\text{poly}(A_{\max})$ dependency simultaneously.

Poster
Reconstructing the Geometry of Random Geometric Graphs (Extended Abstract)

Han Huang, Pakawut Jiradilok, Elchanan Mossel

Expand abstract

Random geometric graphs are random graph models defined on metric spaces. Such a model is defined by first sampling points from a metric space and then connecting each pair of sampled points with probability that depends on their distance, independently among pairs. In this work we show how to efficiently reconstruct the geometry of the underlying space from the sampled graph under the {\em manifold} assumption, i.e., assuming that the underlying space is a low dimensional manifold and that the connection probability is a strictly decreasing function of the Euclidean distance between the points in a given embedding of the manifold in $\mathbb{R}^N$. Our work complements a large body of work on manifold learning, where the goal is to recover a manifold from sampled points sampled in the manifold along with their (approximate) distance

Poster
Pruning is Optimal for Learning Sparse Features in High-Dimensions

Nuri Mert Vural, Murat A Erdogdu

Expand abstract

While it is commonly observed in practice that pruning networks to a certain level of sparsity can improve the quality of the features, a theoretical explanation of this phenomenon remains elusive. In this work, we investigate this by demonstrating that a broad class of statistical models can be optimally learned using pruned neural networks trained with gradient descent, in high-dimensions. We consider learning both single-index and multi-index models of the form $y = \sigma^*(\boldsymbol{V}^{\top} \boldsymbol{x}) + \epsilon$, where $\sigma^*$ is a degree-$p$ polynomial, and $\boldsymbol{V} \in \mathbbm{R}^{d \times r}$ with $r \ll d$, is the matrix containing relevant model directions. We assume that $\boldsymbol{V}$ satisfies a certain $\ell_q$-sparsity condition for matrices and show that pruning neural networks proportional to the sparsity level of $\boldsymbol{V}$ improves their sample complexity compared to unpruned networks. Furthermore, we establish Correlational Statistical Query (CSQ) lower bounds in this setting, which take the sparsity level of $\boldsymbol{V}$ into account. We show that if the sparsity level of $\boldsymbol{V}$ exceeds a certain threshold, training pruned networks with a gradient descent algorithm achieves the sample complexity suggested by the CSQ lower bound. In the same scenario, however, our results imply that basis-independent methods such as models trained via standard gradient descent initialized with rotationally invariant random weights can provably achieve only suboptimal sample complexity.

Poster
Provable Advantage in Quantum PAC Learning

Wilfred Salmon, Sergii Strelchuk, Tom Gur

Expand abstract

We revisit the problem of characterising the complexity of Quantum PAC learning, as introduced by Bshouty and Jackson [SIAM J. Comput. 1998, 28, 1136–1153]. Several quantum advantages have been demonstrated in this setting, however, none are generic: they apply to particular concept classes and typically only work when the distribution that generates the data is known. In the general case, it was recently shown by Arunachalam and de Wolf [JMLR, 19 (2018) 1-36] that quantum PAC learners can only achieve constant factor advantages over classical PAC learners. We show that with a natural extension of the definition of quantum PAC learning used by Arunachalam and de Wolf, we can achieve a generic advantage in quantum learning. To be precise, for any concept class $\mathcal{C}$ of VC dimension $d$, we show there is an $(\epsilon, \delta)$-quantum PAC learner with sample complexity \[{O}\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\epsilon}}\left[d+ \log(\frac{1}{\delta})\right]\log^9(1/\epsilon)\right). \]{Up} to polylogarithmic factors, this is a square root improvement over the classical learning sample complexity. We show the tightness of our result by proving an $\Omega(d/\sqrt{\epsilon})$ lower bound that matches our upper bound up to polylogarithmic factors.

Poster
Projection by Convolution: Optimal Sample Complexity for Reinforcement Learning in Continuous-Space MDPs

Davide Maran, Alberto Maria Metelli, Matteo Papini, Marcello Restelli

Expand abstract

We consider the problem of learning an $\varepsilon$-optimal policy in a general class of continuous-space Markov decision processes (MDPs) having smooth Bellman operators. Given access to a generative model, we achieve rate-optimal sample complexity by performing a simple, \emph{perturbed} version of least-squares value iteration with orthogonal trigonometric polynomials as features. Key to our solution is a novel projection technique based on ideas from harmonic analysis. Our $\widetilde{O}(\epsilon^{-2-d/(\nu+1)})$ sample complexity, where $d$ is the dimension of the state-action space and $\nu$ the order of smoothness, recovers the state-of-the-art result of discretization approaches for the special case of Lipschitz MDPs $(\nu=0)$. At the same time, for $\nu\to\infty$, it recovers and greatly generalizes the $O(\epsilon^{-2})$ rate of low-rank MDPs, which are more amenable to regression approaches. In this sense, our result bridges the gap between two popular but conflicting perspectives on continuous-space MDPs.

Poster
Principal eigenstate classical shadows

Daniel Grier, Hakop Pashayan, Luke Schaeffer

Expand abstract

Given many copies of an unknown quantum state $\rho$, we consider the task of learning a classical description of its principal eigenstate. Namely, assuming that $\rho$ has an eigenstate $|\phi⟩$ with (unknown) eigenvalue $\lambda > 1/2$, the goal is to learn a (classical shadows style) classical description of $|\phi⟩$ which can later be used to estimate expectation values $⟨\phi |O | \phi ⟩$ for any $O$ in some class of observables. We consider the sample-complexity setting in which generating a copy of $\rho$ is expensive, but joint measurements on many copies of the state are possible. We present a protocol for this task scaling with the principal eigenvalue $\lambda$ and show that it is optimal within a space of natural approaches, e.g., applying quantum state purification followed by a single-copy classical shadows scheme. Furthermore, when $\lambda$ is sufficiently close to $1$, the performance of our algorithm is optimal—matching the sample complexity for pure state classical shadows.

Poster
Prediction from compression for models with infinite memory, with applications to hidden Markov and renewal processes

Yanjun Han, Tianze Jiang, Yihong Wu

Expand abstract

Consider the problem of predicting the next symbol given a sample path of length $n$, whose joint distribution belongs to a distribution class that may have long-term memory. The goal is to compete with the conditional predictor that knows the true model. For both hidden Markov models (HMMs) and renewal processes, we determine the optimal prediction risk in Kullback-Leibler divergence up to universal constant factors. Extending existing results in finite-order Markov models (Han et al. (2023)) and drawing ideas from universal compression, the proposed estimator has a prediction risk bounded by redundancy of the distribution class and a memory term that accounts for the long-range dependency of the model. Notably, for HMMs with bounded state and observation spaces, a polynomial-time estimator based on dynamic programming is shown to achieve the optimal prediction risk $\Theta(\frac{\log n}{n})$; prior to this work, the only known result of this type is $O(\frac{1}{\log n})$ obtained using Markov approximation (Sharan et al. (2018)). Matching minimax lower bounds are obtained by making connections to redundancy and mutual information via a reduction argument.

Poster
Physics-informed machine learning as a kernel method

Nathan Doumèche, Francis Bach, Gerard Biau, Claire Boyer

Expand abstract

Physics-informed machine learning combines the expressiveness of data-based approaches with the interpretability of physical models. In this context, we consider a general regression problem where the empirical risk is regularized by a partial differential equation that quantifies the physical inconsistency. We prove that for linear differential priors, the problem can be formulated as a kernel regression task. Taking advantage of kernel theory, we derive convergence rates for the minimizer $\hat f_n$ of the regularized risk and show that $\hat f_n$ converges at least at the Sobolev minimax rate. However, faster rates can be achieved, depending on the physical error. This principle is illustrated with a one-dimensional example, supporting the claim that regularizing the empirical risk with physical information can be beneficial to the statistical performance of estimators.

Poster
Oracle-Efficient Hybrid Online Learning with Unknown Distribution

Changlong Wu, Jin Sima, Wojciech Szpankowski

Expand abstract

We study the problem of oracle-efficient hybrid online learning when the features are generated by an unknown i.i.d. process and the labels are generated adversarially. Assuming access to an (offline) ERM oracle, we show that there exists a computationally efficient online predictor that achieves a regret upper bounded by $\tilde{O}(T^{\frac{3}{4}})$ for a finite-VC class, and upper bounded by $\tilde{O}(T^{\frac{p+1}{p+2}})$ for a class with $\alpha$ fat-shattering dimension $\alpha^{-p}$. This provides the first known oracle-efficient sublinear regret bounds for hybrid online learning with an unknown feature generation process. In particular, it confirms a conjecture of Lazaric and Munos (2012). We then extend our result to the scenario of shifting distributions with $K$ changes, yielding a regret of order $\tilde{O}(T^{\frac{4}{5}}K^{\frac{1}{5}})$. Finally, we establish a regret of $\tilde{O}((K^{\frac{2}{3}}(\log|\mathcal{H}|)^{\frac{1}{3}}+K)\cdot T^{\frac{4}{5}})$ for the contextual $K$-armed bandits with a finite policy set $\mathcal{H}$, i.i.d. generated contexts from an unknown distribution, and adversarially generated costs.

Poster
Optimistic Rates for Learning from Label Proportions

Gene Li, Lin Chen, Adel Javanmard, Vahab Mirrokni

Expand abstract

We consider a weakly supervised learning problem called Learning from Label Proportions (LLP), where examples are grouped into "bags" and only the average label within each bag is revealed to the learner. We study various learning rules for LLP that achieve PAC learning guarantees for classification loss. We establish that the classical Empirical Proportional Risk Minimization (EPRM) learning rule (Yu et al., 2014) achieves fast rates under realizability, but EPRM and similar proportion matching learning rules can fail in the agnostic setting. We also show that (1) a debiased proportional square loss, as well as (2) a recently proposed EasyLLP learning rule (Busa-Fekete et al., 2023) both achieve "optimistic rates" (Panchenko, 2002); in both the realizable and agnostic settings, their sample complexity is optimal (up to log factors) in terms of $\epsilon, \delta$, and VC dimension.

Poster
Optimistic Information Directed Sampling

Gergely Neu, Matteo Papini, Ludovic Schwartz

Expand abstract

We study the problem of online learning in contextual bandit problems where the loss function is assumed to belong to a known parametric function class. We propose a new analytic framework for this setting that bridges the Bayesian theory of information-directed sampling due to Russo and Van Roy (2018) and the worst-case theory of Foster et al. (2021) based on the decision-estimation coefficient. Drawing from both lines of work, we propose a algorithmic template called Optimistic Information-Directed Sampling and show that it can achieve instance-dependent regret guarantees similar to the ones achievable by the classic Bayesian IDS method, but with the major advantage of not requiring any Bayesian assumptions. The key technical innovation of our analysis is introducing an optimistic surrogate model for the regret and using it to define a frequentist version of the Information Ratio of Russo and Van Roy (2018), and a less conservative version of the Decision Estimation Coefficient of Foster et al. (2021).

Poster
Optimal score estimation via empirical Bayes smoothing

Andre Wibisono, Yihong Wu, Kaylee Yingxi Yang

Expand abstract

We study the problem of estimating the score function of an unknown probability distribution $\rho^*$ from $n$ independent and identically distributed observations in $d$ dimensions. Assuming that $\rho^*$ is subgaussian and has a Lipschitz-continuous score function $s^*$, we establish the optimal rate of $\tilde \Theta(n^{-\frac{2}{d+4}})$ for this estimation problem under the loss function $\|\hat s - s^*\|^2_{L^2(\rho^*)}$ that is commonly used in the score matching literature, highlighting the curse of dimensionality where sample complexity for accurate score estimation grows exponentially with the dimension $d$. Leveraging key insights in empirical Bayes theory as well as a new convergence rate of smoothed empirical distribution in Hellinger distance, we show that a regularized score estimator based on a Gaussian kernel attains this rate, shown optimal by a matching minimax lower bound. We also discuss extensions to estimating $\beta$-Hölder continuous scores with $\beta \leq 1$, as well as the implication of our theory on the sample complexity of score-based generative models.

Poster
Optimal Multi-Distribution Learning

Zihan Zhang, Wenhao Zhan, Yuxin Chen, Simon S. Du, Jason D. Lee

Expand abstract

Multi-distribution learning (MDL), which seeks to learn a shared model that minimizes the worst-case risk across $k$ distinct data distributions, has emerged as a unified framework in response to the evolving demand for robustness, fairness, multi-group collaboration, etc. Achieving data-efficient MDL necessitates adaptive sampling, also called on-demand sampling, throughout the learning process. However, there exist substantial gaps between the state-of-the-art upper and lower bounds on the optimal sample complexity. Focusing on a hypothesis class of Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension $d$, we propose a novel algorithm that yields an $\varepsilon$-optimal randomized hypothesis with a sample complexity on the order of $\frac{d+k}{\varepsilon^2}$ (modulo some logarithmic factor), matching the best-known lower bound. Our algorithmic ideas and theory have been further extended to accommodate Rademacher classes. The proposed algorithms are oracle-efficient, which access the hypothesis class solely through an empirical risk minimization oracle. Additionally, we establish the necessity of randomization, unveiling a large sample size barrier when only deterministic hypotheses are permitted. These findings successfully resolve three open problems presented in COLT 2023 (i.e., Problems 1, 3 and 4 of Awasthi et al. 2023).

Poster
Open problem: Direct Sums in Learning Theory

Steve Hanneke, Shay Moran, Waknine Tom

Expand abstract

In computer science, the term ’direct sum’ refers to fundamental questions about the scaling of computational or information complexity with respect to multiple task instances. Consider an algorithmic task \({T} \){and} a computational resource \({C} \). For instance, \({T} \){might} be the task of computing a polynomial, with \({C} \){representing} the number of arithmetic operations required, or \({T} \){could} be a learning task with its sample complexity as \({C} \). The direct sum inquiry focuses on the cost of solving \({k} \){separate} instances of \({T} \), particularly how this aggregate cost compares to the resources needed for a single instance. Typically, the cost for multiple instances is at most \({k} \){times} the cost of one, since each can be handled independently. However, there are intriguing scenarios where the total cost for \({k} \){instances} is less than this linear relationship. Such questions naturally extend to the machine-learning setting in which one may be interested in solving several learning problems at once. This notion of direct sums of learning problems gives rise to various natural questions and interesting problems

Poster
Open problem: Convergence of single-timescale mean-field Langevin descent-ascent for two-player zero-sum games

Guillaume Wang, Lénaïc Chizat

Expand abstract

Let a smooth function $f: T^d \times T^d \to \mathbb{R}$ over the $d$-torus and $\beta>0$. Consider the min-max objective functional $F_\beta(\mu, \nu) = \iint f d\mu d\nu + \beta^{-1} H(\mu) - \beta^{-1} H(\nu)$ over $\mathcal{P}(T^d) \times \mathcal{P}(T^d)$, where $H$ denotes the negative differential entropy. Its unique saddle point defines the entropy-regularized mixed Nash equilibrium of a two-player zero-sum game, and its Wasserstein gradient descent-ascent flow $(\mu_t, \nu_t)$ corresponds to the mean-field limit of a Langevin descent-ascent dynamics. Do $\mu_t$ and $\nu_t$ converge (weakly, say) as $t \to \infty$, for any $f$ and $\beta$? This rather natural qualitative question is still open, and it is not clear whether it can be addressed using the tools currently available for the analysis of dynamics in Wasserstein space. Even though the simple trick of using a different timescale for the ascent versus the descent is known to guarantee convergence, we propose this question as a toy setting to further our understanding of the Wasserstein geometry for optimization.

Poster
Open Problem: What is the Complexity of Joint Differential Privacy in Linear Contextual Bandits?

Achraf Azize, Debabrota Basu

Expand abstract

Contextual bandits serve as a theoretical framework to design recommender systems, which often rely on user-sensitive data, making privacy a critical concern. However, a significant gap remains between the known upper and lower bounds on the regret achievable in linear contextual bandits under Joint Differential Privacy (JDP), which is a popular privacy definition used in this setting. In particular, the best regret upper bound is known to be $O\left(d \sqrt{T} \log(T) + \textcolor{blue}{d^{3/4} \sqrt{T \log(1/\delta)} / \sqrt{\epsilon}} \right)$, while the lower bound is $\Omega \left(\sqrt{d T \log(K)} + \textcolor{blue}{d/(\epsilon + \delta)}\right)$. We discuss the recent progress on this problem, both from the algorithm design and lower bound techniques, and posit the open questions.

Poster