COLT 2022 Papers

Conference on Learning Theory

Decision breakdown

163papers

Counted from the official paper list; may differ slightly from the number the conference announced.

  • Poster
    163100.0%

Top 10 topics (click to filter)

No topic data yet.

Trends for all 207 research topics

Browse all papers

A Sharp Memory-Regret Trade-off for Multi-Pass Streaming Bandits

Arpit Agarwal, Sanjeev Khanna, Prathamesh Patil

Expand abstract

The stochastic $K$-armed bandit problem has been studied extensively due to its applications in various domains ranging from online advertising to clinical trials. In practice however, the number of arms can be very large resulting in large memory requirements for simultaneously processing them. In this paper we consider a streaming setting where the arms are presented in a stream and the algorithm uses limited memory to process these arms. Here, the goal is not only to minimize regret, but also to do so in minimal memory. Previous algorithms for this problem operate in one of the two settings: they either use $\Omega(\log \log T)$ passes over the stream \citep{rathod2021reducing, ChaudhuriKa20, Liau+18}, or just a single pass \citep{Maiti+21}. In this paper we study the trade-off between memory and regret when $B$ passes over the stream are allowed, for any $B \geq 1$, and establish \emph{tight} regret upper and lower bounds for any $B$-pass algorithm. Our results uncover a surprising \emph{sharp transition phenomenon}: $O(1)$ memory is sufficient to achieve $\widetilde\Theta\paren{T^{\half + \frac{1}{2^{B+2}-2}}}$ regret in $B$ passes, and increasing the memory to any quantity that is $o(K)$ has almost no impact on further reducing this regret, unless we use $\Omega(K)$ memory. Our main technical contribution is our lower bound which requires the use of \emph{information-theoretic techniques} as well as ideas from \emph{round elimination} to show that the \emph{residual problem} remains challenging over subsequent passes.

Poster
A Private and Computationally-Efficient Estimator for Unbounded Gaussians

Gautam Kamath, Argyris Mouzakis, Vikrant Singhal, Thomas Steinke, Jonathan Ullman

Expand abstract

We give the first polynomial-time, polynomial-sample, differentially private estimator for the mean and covariance of an arbitrary Gaussian distribution $N(\mu,\Sigma)$ in $\R^d$. All previous estimators are either nonconstructive, with unbounded running time, or require the user to specify a priori bounds on the parameters $\mu$ and $\Sigma$. The primary new technical tool in our algorithm is a new differentially private preconditioner that takes samples from an arbitrary Gaussian $N(0,\Sigma)$ and returns a matrix $A$ such that $A \Sigma A^T$ has constant condition number

Poster
(Nearly) Optimal Private Linear Regression for Sub-Gaussian Data via Adaptive Clipping

Prateek Varshney, Abhradeep Thakurta, Prateek Jain

Expand abstract

We study the problem of differentially private linear regression where each of the data point is sampled from a fixed sub-Gaussian style distribution. We propose and analyze a one-pass mini-batch stochastic gradient descent method (DP-AMBSSGD) where points in each iteration are sampled without replacement. Noise is added for DP but the noise standard deviation is estimated online. Compared to existing $(\epsilon, \delta)$-DP techniques which have sub-optimal error bounds, DP-AMBSSGD is able to provide nearly optimal error bounds in terms of key parameters like dimensionality $d$, number of points $N$, and the standard deviation \sigma of the noise in observations. For example, when the $d$-dimensional covariates are sampled i.i.d. from the normal distribution, then the excess error of DP-AMBSSGD due to privacy is $\sigma^2 d/N(1+d/(\epsilon^2 N))$, i.e., the error is meaningful when number of samples N\geq d \log d which is the standard operative regime for linear regression. In contrast, error bounds for existing efficient methods in this setting are: $d^3/(\epsilon^2 N^2)$, even for $\sigma=0$. That is, for constant $\epsilon$, the existing techniques require $N=d^{1.5}$ to provide a non-trivial result.

Poster